Biden took $5mm bribe from Ukraine - Burisma - FBI

[RLLD 4,143]

1 minute ago, Wade Garrett said:

So the laptop of a crackhead that never mentions Biden nor has any direct evidence is now evidence?  And pray tell how do we know Biden is the big guy?  Because of one throw away sentence?

Just LOL

Glad to see the laptop is no longer "Russian Disinformation". On that one we are left with two possibilities, the DOJ is inept or the DOJ is corrupt, based on the way they rapidly moved to defend Biden from it.  You might want to continue to discredit the laptop, but given teh complex LLC setups it listed and which have been corroborated, you might want to reconsider. Now, if a Trump kid had a laptop like that......are you going to suggest you would defend Trump from its contents? I think not...... and nor shold you.

SO we have multiple sources of evidence now, all lining up to demonstrate Biden is a typical corrupt politician....that we do not assail this in chorus is telling.

Instead of defending a politician, any of them. you should be demanding investigations on them. all of them.....they all need to be watched.

 

[Wade Garrett 155]

Just now, RLLD said:

Glad to see the laptop is no longer "Russian Disinformation". On that one we are left with two possibilities, the DOJ is inept or the DOJ is corrupt, based on the way they rapidly moved to defend Biden from it.  You might want to continue to discredit the laptop, but given teh complex LLC setups it listed and which have been corroborated, you might want to reconsider. Now, if a Trump kid had a laptop like that......are you going to suggest you would defend Trump from its contents? I think not...... and nor shold you.

SO we have multiple sources of evidence now, all lining up to demonstrate Biden is a typical corrupt politician....that we do not assail this in chorus is telling.

Instead of defending a politician, any of them. you should be demanding investigations on them. all of them.....they all need to be watched.

 

What evidence does the laptop have that points to Biden?

Are you hanging your entire argument on a reference to the big guy?

Surely there's actual mention of Biden and his involvement in some crime.  Right?

[RogerDodger 797]

To be fair, MSM isn't reporting it so Wade Ravens Fan has no idea what you're talking about.

 

[Wade Garrett 155]

5 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

To be fair, MSM isn't reporting it so Wade Ravens Fan has no idea what you're talking about.

 

I'm not sure why you keep linking me to this Ravens Fan guy.  I really really hope he's not one of your gay lovers...that'd be super icky.

But you can aware me.  What direct links does the laptop have to Joe Biden?  The big guy comment?  Surly there's more than that.

[Strike 5,205]

7 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

It is disappointing the Republicans are not starting the impeachment process.  I hate they refuse to play dirty like the Democrats.  This is a lot worse than the Trump Ukraine phone call.  

Articles of impeachment were filed against Biden and Harris today. Not sure if they'll go anywhere but at least someone is trying.

[RogerDodger 797]

1 minute ago, Wade Garrett said:

I'm not sure why you keep linking me to this Ravens Fan guy.  I really really hope he's not one of your gay lovers...that'd be super icky.

But you can aware me.  What direct links does the laptop have to Joe Biden?  The big guy comment?  Surly there's more than that.

To remind you what a loser you are no matter who you pretend to be, James.  

[RogerDodger 797]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

Articles of impeachment were filed against Biden and Harris today. Not sure if they'll go anywhere but at least someone is trying.

[RogerDodger 797]

Impeachment sites the FD–1023 and the Burisma $5,000,000.  Includes Harris for not securing the boarder.  

[RLLD 4,143]

17 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

What evidence does the laptop have that points to Biden?

Are you hanging your entire argument on a reference to the big guy?

Surely there's actual mention of Biden and his involvement in some crime.  Right?

I have already stated, and in this instance the laptop was not fabricated by the Clinton campaign, so that is a bonus.  The DOj did not have to fake anything on this one, though they did try to discredit the entire thing.  

If we can go after Trump with the flimsy nonsense from the Clinton dossier, we can certainly go after Biden with the credible contents associated with the laptop, and the other evidence gathered that corroborates it.

I am rather dismayed that anyone would stand up for any politician, I mean, what the fock has happened to this society? 

[RLLD 4,143]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

Articles of impeachment were filed against Biden and Harris today. Not sure if they'll go anywhere but at least someone is trying.

I am less enthusiastic about this.  I do not want to continue the misuse of impeachment as a tool against political adversaries, and I am concerned it is happening again here.

I expect to see more evidence than we presently have to suggest impeachment is warranted.  This is overreach IMHO.  Unless......unless....... they do have evidence that they simply have not yet shared.

And also, why the fock is Harris included? 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I am less enthusiastic about this.  I do not want to continue the misuse of impeachment as a tool against political adversaries, and I am concerned it is happening again here.

I expect to see more evidence than we presently have to suggest impeachment is warranted.  This is overreach IMHO.  Unless......unless....... they do have evidence that they simply have not yet shared.

And also, why the fock is Harris included? 

weve been trying to go the high road for decades and were just getting rolled.  thats the entire point of electing trump, a champion who will fight.

[Wade Garrett 155]

5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I have already stated, and in this instance the laptop was not fabricated by the Clinton campaign, so that is a bonus.  The DOj did not have to fake anything on this one, though they did try to discredit the entire thing.  

If we can go after Trump with the flimsy nonsense from the Clinton dossier, we can certainly go after Biden with the credible contents associated with the laptop, and the other evidence gathered that corroborates it.

I am rather dismayed that anyone would stand up for any politician, I mean, what the fock has happened to this society? 

Can you give me an example of what you consider credible contents associated with the laptop?  What does the laptop say about Biden's role? 

[RLLD 4,143]

5 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

weve been trying to go the high road for decades and were just getting rolled.  thats the entire point of electing trump, a champion who will fight.

I understand, I rally do, and I get it......but.....when it comes to this, when it comes to impeachment....we should always take the high road, no matter what.....sorry

[RLLD 4,143]

8 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Can you give me an example of what you consider credible contents associated with the laptop?  What does the laptop say about Biden's role? 

I beleive Tony Bobulinski when he asserts that Joe is "the big guy", and it makes sense.  If you are looking at this logically it adds up, and it does so to a sufficient level to justify a hard core investigation.  We managed to do it to Trump, now I want to see more politicians held to account, if this were done we might be able to clense some of the corruption out of government. It would be good for all of us.  

[Strike 5,205]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I beleive Tony Bobulinski when he asserts that Joe is "the big guy", and it makes sense.  If you are looking at this logically it adds up, and it does so to a sufficient level to justify a hard core investigation.  We managed to do it to Trump, now I want to see more politicians held to account, if this were done we might be able to clense some of the corruption out of government. It would be good for all of us.  

They have other documentation that specifically refers to Joe as the Big Guy.  It's corroborated multiple ways.  It's not just Bobulinski's word.

https://nypost.com/2022/07/27/hunter-bidens-biz-partner-called-joe-biden-the-big-guy-in-panic-over-laptop/

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/joe-biden-referred-big-guy-dealings-with-ukraine-china-fbi-record

[thegeneral 2,913]

12 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

weve been trying to go the high road for decades and were just getting rolled.  thats the entire point of electing trump, a champion who will fight.

High road? GTFO

Your former president, the guy who doesn't understand or doesn’t care about basic laws, norms, etc got on the political scene by claiming Obama wasn’t born here and it resonated with all the racists. 
 

[RLLD 4,143]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

They have other documentation that specifically refers to Joe as the Big Guy.  It's corroborated multiple ways.  It's not just Bobulinski's word.

Agree. I presume that nothing presented will satisfy, no amount of evidence will result in any understanding or agreement.  People who align themselves with politics cannot allow their politics or politcians to be anything less than perfect. We see this happen to all people, regardless of party, whereby their sense of value and place is tied directly to politics and the poltiical players....and so they defend these clowns as if they were defending themselves.....its sorta sick.....

[Wade Garrett 155]

7 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I beleive Tony Bobulinski when he asserts that Joe is "the big guy", and it makes sense.  If you are looking at this logically it adds up, and it does so to a sufficient level to justify a hard core investigation.  We managed to do it to Trump, now I want to see more politicians held to account, if this were done we might be able to clense some of the corruption out of government. It would be good for all of us.  

So nothing on the laptop links Joe to anything by name?

You're willing to put forward a full investigation over some random big guy comment?

And before you compare it to Russia, remember that Trump's main goons met with supposed Russian agents to get dirt on HIllary.  Then he lied about it repeatedly.  Also remember that Bannon gave private polling info to a Russian spy.

But you're going to take a single reference to the big guy as solid enough evidence to investigate huh?  Can you share the documents that specifically state the Joe Biden is the big guy and the big guy is somehow involved in crimes. 
 

tia

 

[RLLD 4,143]

1 minute ago, Wade Garrett said:

So nothing on the laptop links Joe to anything by name?

You're willing to put forward a full investigation over some random big guy comment?

And before you compare it to Russia, remember that Trump's main goons met with supposed Russian agents to get dirt on HIllary.  Then he lied about it repeatedly.  Also remember that Bannon gave private polling info to a Russian spy.

But you're going to take a single reference to the big guy as solid enough evidence to investigate huh?  Can you share the documents that specifically state the Joe Biden is the big guy and the big guy is somehow involved in crimes. 
 

tia

 

You're willing to put forward a full investigation over some random big guy comment?

I most assuredly am. in order to stay pphilosophically honest I actually need to since I supported the investigation of Trump with the dossier.  To now decide to not support such a move would be wrong.

I leave it to you to pretend Biden is not involved, to wait for some magical instance where everything can be tied together without an actual investigation.

SO

How about this, the DOJ does the same thing to investigate Biden as they did to investigate Trump?  If they find nothing there, then we know for sure, we are all good. What is the harm? Why is the DOJ so resistant to look into this instance and this President, when they have more information and information that is being both confirmed and corroborated?

[dogcows 1,030]

4 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Agree. I presume that nothing presented will satisfy, no amount of evidence will result in any understanding or agreement.  People who align themselves with politics cannot allow their politics or politcians to be anything less than perfect. We see this happen to all people, regardless of party, whereby their sense of value and place is tied directly to politics and the poltiical players....and so they defend these clowns as if they were defending themselves.....its sorta sick.....

You haven’t presented any evidence though. A couple of guys claiming “Big Guy” means something is NOT evidence. You know that, right? It’s hearsay... at BEST. But we know that it’s not even that. It’s highly unreliable sources saying crazy stuff that for some reason you choose to believe.

Also, the right loves to paper over the fact that all this “big guy” nonsense is in relation to a deal that never actually happened.

You could read the actual facts here, but come on... we know you won’t. Just bask in your ignorance and your assuredness that Biden is a criminal, no evidence needed.

https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/oct/29/tony-bobulinski-hunter-biden-and-china-explainer/

[RLLD 4,143]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

You haven’t presented any evidence though. A couple of guys claiming “Big Guy” means something is NOT evidence. You know that, right? It’s hearsay... at BEST. But we know that it’s not even that. It’s highly unreliable sources saying crazy stuff that for some reason you choose to believe.

Also, the right loves to paper over the fact that all this “big guy” nonsense is in relation to a deal that never actually happened.

You could read the actual facts here, but come on... we know you won’t. Just bask in your ignorance and your assuredness that Biden is a criminal, no evidence needed.

https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/oct/29/tony-bobulinski-hunter-biden-and-china-explainer/

I have presented more evidence than what was available when the DOJ investigated Trump.

All I ask, is that the DOJ take action as they did with Trump, this is not some extravagant ask. I am struggling to understand why you would defend the powerful from investigation.

[Strike 5,205]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I have presented more evidence than what was available when the DOJ investigated Trump.

All I ask, is that the DOJ take action as they did with Trump, this is not some extravagant ask. I am struggling to understand why you would defend the powerful from investigation.

Seriously?  Have you EVER, even ONCE, seen a post from Dogsh*t that questioned his "team?"  Dude is a loyal soldier and will fall on the sword. 

[dogcows 1,030]

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I have presented more evidence than what was available when the DOJ investigated Trump.

No, you haven’t. However, Hunter Biden is, in fact, being investigated. So... what are you asking for exactly?

[TBayXXXVII 2,484]

On 6/9/2023 at 6:17 PM, Wade Garrett said:

Now cultist believe unnamed informants?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Oh the irony.

[RLLD 4,143]

Just now, dogcows said:

No, you haven’t. However, Hunter Biden is, in fact, being investigated. So... what are you asking for exactly?

Yes I have, and in fact what I have noted we have physical evidence for. So if we then refer to the standard as it was used for Trump, we have effectively more evidence.....

My ask is simple. Hold power accountable. I think they did a marvelous job as it pertains to Trump, give me more of that.

And when they are done with Biden, go get mcConnell, and then Pelosi, and then McCarthy.....get them all until we wring the corruption out of it.

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

21 minutes ago, Strike said:

Seriously?  Have you EVER, even ONCE, seen a post from Dogsh*t that questioned his "team?"  Dude is a loyal soldier and will fall on the sword. 

Yeah I’m done. We’re arguing with people who get their news from MSNBC and DailyKos. 

[dogcows 1,030]

13 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Yeah I’m done. We’re arguing with people who get their news from MSNBC and DailyKos. 

Don’t have cable and don’t know what the 2nd is. Maybe I should check it out. If it’s the opposite of what you think, it’s probably good…

Update: yeah looks like a fun site - https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/6/13/2175177/-Fox-News-announces-Melania-Trump-s-arrival-at-the-courthouse-and-it-isn-t-Melania

[Hardcore troubadour 14,944]

2 hours ago, dogcows said:

False. Just plain false. Like you, I’ve seen the evidence trotted out by GOP lawmakers and it’s evidence of nothing. But they know you hate Biden so you’ll believe whatever they say.

The GOP trotted out evidence?  Duh. It’s not the GOP’s evidence.  It’s the FBI’s.  Wow. 

[dogcows 1,030]

44 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Yes I have, and in fact what I have noted we have physical evidence for. So if we then refer to the standard as it was used for Trump, we have effectively more evidence.....

My ask is simple. Hold power accountable. I think they did a marvelous job as it pertains to Trump, give me more of that.

And when they are done with Biden, go get mcConnell, and then Pelosi, and then McCarthy.....get them all until we wring the corruption out of it.

The laptop is physical evidence of what though? That’s the entire point. Your pile of in a toilet is physical evidence of what you ate for lunch. But how is it relevant to anything else? Which is the point. Nothing from the laptop has shown any evidence of illegal activity by Joe Biden. 

How about instead of “going after power” - we only investigate people if there’s legitimate evidence? They’ve been digging for any hard evidence of Joe Biden being corrupt for years… and still have nothing. Way past time to move on. Right now their strategy is to sift through discarded old FBI files for unverified intel and pretend that it’s “new evidence.”

[RLLD 4,143]

1 hour ago, dogcows said:

The laptop is physical evidence of what though? That’s the entire point. Your pile of in a toilet is physical evidence of what you ate for lunch. But how is it relevant to anything else? Which is the point. Nothing from the laptop has shown any evidence of illegal activity by Joe Biden. 

How about instead of “going after power” - we only investigate people if there’s legitimate evidence? They’ve been digging for any hard evidence of Joe Biden being corrupt for years… and still have nothing. Way past time to move on. Right now their strategy is to sift through discarded old FBI files for unverified intel and pretend that it’s “new evidence.”

No thanks, I prefer the Trump model of go after them period, evidence be damned.

 

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,944]

7 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

 

[Reality 3,099]

Pretty incredible what the Biden's have gotten away with.

[Wade Garrett 155]

55 minutes ago, RLLD said:

No thanks, I prefer the Trump model of go after them period, evidence be damned.

 

Ok let's start.  Did Trump's goons meet with supposed russian agents for dirt on hillary.  Yes or no

Did Bannon working for Trump give private polling info to a russian spy.  Yes or no

Any of those are miles beyond a "big guy" reference that no one really knows on some crackheads laptop.

Facts not feelz boyo. 

[RogerDodger 797]

6 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Ok let's start.  Did Trump's goons meet with supposed russian agents for dirt on hillary.  Yes or no

Did Bannon working for Trump give private polling info to a russian spy.  Yes or no

Any of those are miles beyond a "big guy" reference that no one really knows on some crackheads laptop.

Facts not feelz boyo. 

If you're still referencing laptop emails you probably ought to educate yourself on the more recent evidence.  HTH

[Wade Garrett 155]

2 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

If you're still referencing laptop emails you probably ought to educate yourself on the more recent evidence.  HTH

We got bank records with Biden's name on them?  Maybe some taped phone calls?  A picture of him wearing "The Big Guy" shirt?

Whatcha got boyo?

[RogerDodger 797]

39 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

We got bank records with Biden's name on them?  Maybe some taped phone calls?  A picture of him wearing "The Big Guy" shirt?

Whatcha got boyo?

The first two yes. 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,944]

The FBI is obviously covering for Biden. 

[RLLD 4,143]

10 hours ago, Wade Garrett said:

Ok let's start.  Did Trump's goons meet with supposed russian agents for dirt on hillary.  Yes or no

Did Bannon working for Trump give private polling info to a russian spy.  Yes or no

Any of those are miles beyond a "big guy" reference that no one really knows on some crackheads laptop.

Facts not feelz boyo. 

You misunderstand, I have no issue with Trump beiung held to account, that is the desire. Now I want Biden also held to account.

[Reality 3,099]

Unreal, how deep does the corruption go?