TBayXXXVII 2,500 Posted August 11, 2023 3 minutes ago, RLLD said: You might be right. I think the Democrats believe that indicting Trump is their best bet. So they are selling out on it as a strategy. Whether or not people see through it is the question. Oh, I think you're right on that front, but that's to disguise the fact that they're more corrupt... and the fools (look at the people on this board as examples), will listen. Any Republican should win in a landslide, but we know that won't happen. It won't happen because the American people aren't all that smart. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,172 Posted August 11, 2023 1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said: Oh, I think you're right on that front, but that's to disguise the fact that they're more corrupt... and the fools (look at the people on this board as examples), will listen. Any Republican should win in a landslide, but we know that won't happen. It won't happen because the American people aren't all that smart. Agree. We can already see there was collusion between big tech, the DOJ and Democrats..... The desperation of the acts of the Democrats is suggestive that there is likely more, and Trump would likely ferret it out. Where a normal politician would perhaps not expose them, but instead use it as leverage, Trump is not a normal politician....and I think the Democrats are rather fearful that no matter what they offer him, he will still expose them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 29 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said: LOL, not surprised. Good chat. Thanks for offering your perspective Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 51 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: 2020: Lock Trump up! 2023: How dare you go after Joe Biden for corruption!! Please do go after Joe Biden til you are blue in the face…Will the deep state allow it…deep derp!1!!1! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 31 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said: Oh, I think you're right on that front, but that's to disguise the fact that they're more corrupt... and the fools (look at the people on this board as examples), will listen. Any Republican should win in a landslide, but we know that won't happen. It won't happen because the American people aren't all that smart. Good grief get over yourself Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,858 Posted August 11, 2023 1 minute ago, thegeneral said: Good grief get over yourself And yet another hypocrite liberal sheep speaks up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 7 minutes ago, seafoam1 said: And yet another hypocrite liberal sheep speaks up. Good thing the Peefoams of the world know the truth!! JFC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,133 Posted August 11, 2023 Some funny stuff in here for sure. But I also see several that look less like hypocrisy and more like reassessing new data and coming to different conclusions than those once held. I get LC and the MAGAmooks misunderstanding this and labeling it as hypocrisy. We know that they are mostly incapable of changing their initial opinions about anything, regardless of evidence. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,956 Posted August 11, 2023 20 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Please do go after Joe Biden til you are blue in the face…Will the deep state allow it…deep derp!1!!1! You say that HERE, but you and your side actually say the opposite everywhere else. I get it, you have to try and give the appearance of impartiality in here but you're not fooling anyone. Major fail on your part. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: You say that HERE, but you and your side actually say the opposite everywhere else. I get it, you have to try and give the appearance of impartiality in here but you're not fooling anyone. Major fail on your part. Politicians are not big fans of holding their own accountable and encouraging all investigations into their members. You all act like this is some thing that one party owns. What color is the sky in your world? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 5 minutes ago, Fnord said: Some funny stuff in here for sure. But I also see several that look less like hypocrisy and more like reassessing new data and coming to different conclusions than those once held. I get LC and the MAGAmooks misunderstanding this and labeling it as hypocrisy. We know that they are mostly incapable of changing their initial opinions about anything, regardless of evidence. You must not have seen what Ellen Barkin said in Twitter!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,956 Posted August 11, 2023 4 minutes ago, thegeneral said: You must not have seen what Ellen Barkin said in Twitter!!! Distract and Deflect! Were those your marching orders today? We all know when you can't defend your side's behavior you resort to this type of nonsense. It's all a joke until it's a conservative or Republican and then yur in here losing your bacon. We're onto your game. Always have been. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 15 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Distract and Deflect! Were those your marching orders today? We all know when you can't defend your side's behavior you resort to this type of nonsense. It's all a joke until it's a conservative or Republican and then yur in here losing your bacon. We're onto your game. Always have been. This thread is about “hypocrisy” of liberals. Yes there are liberals that will say hypocritical things. BFD. Is this a huge revelation. I merely pointed out the leader of the GOP has hours videos of doing this shet What nonsense am I resorting to here? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,896 Posted August 11, 2023 10 minutes ago, thegeneral said: You must not have seen what Ellen Barkin said in Twitter!!! Wrong. The correct response is, "I agree, she's an idiot". You can't help yourself can you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 1 minute ago, League Champion said: Wrong. The correct response is, "I agree, she's an idiot". You can't help yourself can you? Ellen Barkin wouldn’t register on my meter TBH (except maybe some of her early work in film…hot) but yeah it’s not shocking she’d say something crazy on Twitter. Like 90% of Twitter if you are keeping score. Look if you want to have a spot to stroke each other about stupid Libs by all means. It’s fun I guess but it’s not like this is a one way street here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,858 Posted August 11, 2023 40 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Good thing the Peefoams of the world know the truth!! JFC Well, the generalpimpledoosh's of the world sure don't. You all are too busy dreamimg of getting peed on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,896 Posted August 11, 2023 16 minutes ago, thegeneral said: it’s not shocking Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,896 Posted August 11, 2023 SHE'S A GEM AIN'T SHE? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,896 Posted August 11, 2023 ANOTHER BRAIN SURGEON Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,896 Posted August 11, 2023 Remember when the LIBERALS fell for it??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,896 Posted August 11, 2023 Typical Liberal hypocrite. It could be anyone from this forum. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,896 Posted August 11, 2023 40 minutes ago, thegeneral said: not shocking Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,896 Posted August 11, 2023 DOES THE HYPOCRISY EVER END? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,500 Posted August 11, 2023 1 hour ago, thegeneral said: Good chat. Thanks for offering your perspective I just think it's clear as day that when Trump was running, he assumed that the FBI would do their job and come to the same conclusion that most of the country came to, and that was she was guilty and literally destroyed the evidence. Comey said as much, and then proceeded to not press charges. Anyone with a brain would have to sit back and reevaluate their position on the FBI after that. On top of that, it's been clear that ever since Trump won, the FBI was taking orders from the DNC to go after Trump. Dude, literally, the who Russia collusion crap was created by Clinton and passed on to the FBI... who lied, on purpose, to get an illegal FISA warrant. Only an idiot would not realize what's happened since 2015. That's why I said I wasn't surprised by your response. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 6 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said: I just think it's clear as day that when Trump was running, he assumed that the FBI would do their job and come to the same conclusion that most of the country came to, and that was she was guilty and literally destroyed the evidence. Comey said as much, and then proceeded to not press charges. Anyone with a brain would have to sit back and reevaluate their position on the FBI after that. On top of that, it's been clear that ever since Trump won, the FBI was taking orders from the DNC to go after Trump. Dude, literally, the who Russia collusion crap was created by Clinton and passed on to the FBI... who lied, on purpose, to get an illegal FISA warrant. Only an idiot would not realize what's happened since 2015. That's why I said I wasn't surprised by your response. You have misstated the FBI’s reasoning for why they did not ultimately press charges against Hillary. They deemed it did not meet the threshold to press charges, that she did not intentionally or knowingly obstruct the investigation. The bar is incredibly low for these people. Only a moron like Trump would talk about it so openly and tried to obstruct in such an easily demonstrable way…allegedly Furthermore, Trump’s own words on this matter prior to him being busted are textbook hypocrisy. You do not care because it’s team red tie, which is fine but spare us the tired high horse act. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RogerDodger 797 Posted August 11, 2023 Just now, thegeneral said: They deemed it did not meet the threshold to press charges, that she did not intentionally or knowingly obstruct the investigation. The bar is incredibly low for these people. Only a moron like Trump would talk about it so openly and tried to obstruct in such an easily demonstrable way…allegedly Destroying Devices and Evidence > Talking About It Don't be a moron. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,896 Posted August 11, 2023 1 minute ago, thegeneral said: They deemed it did not meet the threshold to press charges, that she did not intentionally or knowingly obstruct Smashing hard drives and destroying evidence is not deemed obstruction? Since when? It's all about who you know. She should be in jail for Benghazi alone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,500 Posted August 11, 2023 5 minutes ago, thegeneral said: You have misstated the FBI’s reasoning for why they did not ultimately press charges against Hillary. They deemed it did not meet the threshold to press charges, that she did not intentionally or knowingly obstruct the investigation. The bar is incredibly low for these people. Only a moron like Trump would talk about it so openly and tried to obstruct in such an easily demonstrable way…allegedly Furthermore, Trump’s own words on this matter prior to him being busted are textbook hypocrisy. You do not care because it’s team red tie, which is fine but spare us the tired high horse act. Is that what your liberal outlets told you? Figured as much. If I'm on a horse, it's because your head is up it's azz... just like everyone else on team blue. That's why it's called team blue by the way. Because your head is always up the parties azz, you can't breathe, hence, turning blue. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 2 minutes ago, RogerDodger said: Destroying Devices and Evidence > Talking About It Don't be a moron. Hillary’s claim is they destroyed stuff as part of a normal process, deleted emails as a normal protocol. It has to be provable they are intentionally misleading or obstructing. Increasingly low bar for Clinton or anyone to clear. If people want to argue about that being stupid or outrageous, fine have at it. Trump said he didn’t have anything, they said yeah you do, he was asked to give stuff back he said he didn’t have it, then gave some stuff back, they they said there’s more, Trump was subpoenaed, still didn’t give it all back, was caught with talking about it afterwards, was having his assistant move it all around, deleting vids of them doing it, etc. In any case this thread is about hypocrisy…the horror of that…the guy who will be the nom of the GOP is the poster boy for this. People don’t give a shet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 11 minutes ago, League Champion said: Smashing hard drives and destroying evidence is not deemed obstruction? Since when? It's all about who you know. She should be in jail for Benghazi alone. She testified in front of Congress for hours about Benghazi. Why did they not put her in jail afterwards? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,062 Posted August 11, 2023 13 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said: Is that what your liberal outlets told you? Figured as much. If I'm on a horse, it's because your head is up it's azz... just like everyone else on team blue. That's why it's called team blue by the way. Because your head is always up the parties azz, you can't breathe, hence, turning blue. So answer me this…should Trump be in trouble for obstructing the investigation into his handling of classified docs? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RogerDodger 797 Posted August 11, 2023 18 minutes ago, thegeneral said: In any case this thread is about hypocrisy… Yep. Hypocrisy - Clinton shouldn't have been charged, Trump should. Not Hypocrisy - Clinton wasn't charged so neither should Trump be. Pretty simple stuff here. Don't invent excuses to be a hypocrite. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,896 Posted August 11, 2023 28 minutes ago, thegeneral said: She testified in front of Congress for hours about Benghazi. Why did they not put her in jail afterwards? Roger is right though, you're obviously going way out of your way to defend them. It's ok to denounce both, be honest with yourself. Hillary and Biden have gotten preferential treatment. That's not a reach Share this post Link to post Share on other sites