Epstein Suicided, Who Are They Protecting?

[thegeneral 3,214]

9 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Can’t help yourself  

Lol

[thegeneral 3,214]

11 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Trump banned him from mar-a-Lago.  

Watch out for a lecture about the state of Modern MAGAism!

[BeachGuy23 642]

26 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Oh that.  Yeah, modern liberalism is a religion akin to Islam....behaves almost just like it.

They hyperbole is hysterical.

Meanwhile, conservatives want to turn back the clock to the 1950's and ban a woman's right to choose, ban non-straight relationships, ban books, meld the church and state, etc.  The conservatives on this board have got to have their heads in the sand.

[RLLD 4,230]

2 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

They hyperbole is hysterical.

Meanwhile, conservatives want to turn back the clock to the 1950's and ban a woman's right to choose, ban non-straight relationships, ban books, meld the church and state, etc.  The conservatives on this board have got to have their heads in the sand.

Not hyperbole.....Liberalism, the modern version, behaves exactly like a pre-reformation religion....

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, RLLD said:

Not hyperbole.....Liberalism, the modern version, behaves exactly like a pre-reformation religion....

I just gave specific examples of how conservatives wish to do exactly the same.

Liberalism supports science, freedom of choice, not bound by any dogma, or exactly the opposite of any religion.

You're 100% wrong on this one friend. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,545]

17 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Well this thread didn’t go well for the Trumpers  

Wrong.  Every "Trumper" is perfectly willing to send him up the river if all the Democrats are held equally accountable.  Interesting that your side is willing to protect Trump isn't it?  My guess is because their side is vastly involved.

[BeachGuy23 642]

1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Wrong.  Every "Trumper" is perfectly willing to send him up the river if all the Democrats are held equally accountable.  Interesting that your side is willing to protect Trump isn't it?  My guess is because their side is vastly involved.

Do you honestly think any libs on this board really want some democrat who abused underage girls to not be tried?

Like you seriously believe that?

[thegeneral 3,214]

2 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Wrong.  Every "Trumper" is perfectly willing to send him up the river if all the Democrats are held equally accountable.  Interesting that your side is willing to protect Trump isn't it?  My guess is because their side is vastly involved.

 @Tree of Knowledge to the white courtesy phone!

[thegeneral 3,214]

Just now, BeachGuy23 said:

Do you honestly think any libs on this board really want some democrat who abused underage girls to not be tried?

Like you seriously believe that?

Many are brainwashed I think by Twitter and the like. It’s really wild. 

[RLLD 4,230]

4 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

I just gave specific examples of how conservatives wish to do exactly the same.

Liberalism supports science, freedom of choice, not bound by any dogma, or exactly the opposite of any religion.

You're 100% wrong on this one friend. 

We can of course agree to disagree.  Liberalism supports science that feeds its social goals, not actual science. It supports freedom of choice if you are the right skin color or gender, or of the proper political tilt. Dogma is the essence of Liberalism. Any variance from its dogmatic principles results in excommunication (cancelling).  The intolerance and violence that pervades leftism is absolutely akin to pre-reformation.

The right has its own zealots....they just are not as militant as those on the left, today.

[TBayXXXVII 2,545]

Just now, BeachGuy23 said:

Do you honestly think any libs on this board really want some democrat who abused underage girls to not be tried?

Like you seriously believe that?

Yup.  I think every liberal who defends democrat policies deserve ANY respect or benefit of the doubt.  Every lib on this board has criticized Trump for things they CLAIM he did, while we have actual proof of Biden doing those things.  Yet, you guys only care that Trump did it.

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

We can of course agree to disagree.  Liberalism supports science that feeds its social goals, not actual science. It supports freedom of choice if you are the right skin color or gender, or of the proper political tilt. Dogma is the essence of Liberalism. Any variance from its dogmatic principles results in excommunication (cancelling).  The intolerance and violence that pervades leftism is absolutely akin to pre-reformation.

The right has its own zealots....they just are not as militant as those on the left, today.

Would you agree that the vast majority of scientist are liberals?  And what freedoms are you denied by being a white male?

Can't wait to read your response. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

7 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Wrong.  Every "Trumper" is perfectly willing to send him up the river if all the Democrats are held equally accountable.  Interesting that your side is willing to protect Trump isn't it?  My guess is because their side is vastly involved.

lol, the only person I see people protecting here is Trump (mostly HT)

[thegeneral 3,214]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

We can of course agree to disagree.  Liberalism supports science that feeds its social goals, not actual science. It supports freedom of choice if you are the right skin color or gender, or of the proper political tilt. Dogma is the essence of Liberalism. Any variance from its dogmatic principles results in excommunication (cancelling).  The intolerance and violence that pervades leftism is absolutely akin to pre-reformation.

The right has its own zealots....they just are not as militant as those on the left, today.

Go up to Idaho panhandle and report back.

The whole Jan 6th thing was a little militant as well

[Tree of Knowledge 1,858]

15 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

I just gave specific examples of how conservatives wish to do exactly the same.

Liberalism supports science, freedom of choice, not bound by any dogma, or exactly the opposite of any religion.

You're 100% wrong on this one friend. 

Okay.  Ask a liberal: “What is a woman.”

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Yup.  I think every liberal who defends democrat policies deserve ANY respect or benefit of the doubt.  Every lib on this board has criticized Trump for things they CLAIM he did, while we have actual proof of Biden doing those things.  Yet, you guys only care that Trump did it.

Can you provide an example of things there's proof of Biden doing that we accuse Trump of doing with no proof.

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, Tree of Knowledge said:

Okay.  Ask a liberal: “What is a woman.”

I'm a liberal so I'll answer.  A person born with XX chromosomes.

That was pretty easy TBH

[Tree of Knowledge 1,858]

6 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

 @Tree of Knowledge to the white courtesy phone!

If we have consistent rules, Trump does time but Hillary, Biden and their ilk get the firing squad?

[Tree of Knowledge 1,858]

1 minute ago, BeachGuy23 said:

I'm a liberal so I'll answer.  A person born with XX chromosomes.

That was pretty easy TBH

Would you be willing to put that on a sign and attend the Democrat Convention?

[thegeneral 3,214]

3 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

If we have consistent rules, Trump does time but Hillary, Biden and their ilk get the firing squad?

What’s this now?

[RLLD 4,230]

3 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Would you agree that the vast majority of scientist are liberals?  And what freedoms are you denied by being a white male?

Can't wait to read your response. 

I would not presume to label people like that.  And moreover, I would hope that scientists would never allow political thoughts to cloud science.  

Now setting aside your immediate labelling of me as a "white male", as well as the irrelevancy of that factor..... why not just speak to the statement which did not devolve the conversation down to a single category? 

You apparent line of thought.....aligning political factors to scientists is part of the troubling trend that reduces people to inteangible things instead of facts and actions.  Not surprising mind you, but unfortunate.

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Would you be willing to put that on a sign and attend the Democrat Convention?

Sure why not?  I wouldn't feel the need to as 99% of democrats understand it.  I think you're too busy listening to the very loud 1% and thinking they speak for all democrats.  They do not friend.  Any more then the deplorable horde who stained our House trying to prevent the peaceful transfer of power represent all republicans.

See how easy that is?

[RLLD 4,230]

6 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Go up to Idaho panhandle and report back.

The whole Jan 6th thing was a little militant as well

I propose that rather than look for some extreme examples, which I surmise we could do all day.....we instead focus on the facts and behaviors.  

January 5th for me was no different than the BLM riots, let them all rot in jail.  

[thegeneral 3,214]

Just now, RLLD said:

I propose that rather than look for some extreme examples, which I surmise we could do all day.....we instead focus on the facts and behaviors.  

January 5th for me was no different than the BLM riots, let them all rot in jail.  

Anyone who breaks the law should go to jail. We can agree there. I think 99% of people agree with this. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, RLLD said:

I would not presume to label people like that.  And moreover, I would hope that scientists would never allow political thoughts to cloud science.  

Now setting aside your immediate labelling of me as a "white male", as well as the irrelevancy of that factor..... why not just speak to the statement which did not devolve the conversation down to a single category? 

You apparent line of thought.....aligning political factors to scientists is part of the troubling trend that reduces people to inteangible things instead of facts and actions.  Not surprising mind you, but unfortunate.

This is what you posted

 "It supports freedom of choice if you are the right skin color or gender, or of the proper political tilt."

So I ask again, what choice are you and other white conservatives, since you're obviously saying that whites aren't the correct skin color and conservatives aren't the right political dogma, denied freedom of choice about?

I look forward to hearing your answer. 

 

[Reality 3,121]

Trump is definitely being protected when it comes to Epstein.

[League Champion 1,911]

Just now, BeachGuy23 said:

 

So I ask again, what choice are you and other white conservatives, since you're obviously saying that whites aren't the correct skin color and conservatives aren't the right political dogma, denied freedom of choice about?

I look forward to hearing your answer

Do you know the only thing that frightens Liberals more than Trump? Black & minority Republicans. And it's happening BOYO!! It's happening right now!! How does that make you feel, angry, sad??? 

Liberals don't know how to act or what to do. But it doesn't matter, we're coming!!! The racist narrative has been obliterated. 

You know it's true. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

1 minute ago, League Champion said:

Do you know the only thing that frightens Liberals more than Trump? Black & minority Republicans. And it's happening BOYO!! It's happening right now!! How does that make you feel, angry, sad??? 

Liberals don't know how to act or what to do. But it doesn't matter, we're coming!!! The racist narrative has been obliterated. 

You know it's true. 

I love the fact that more minorities may vote republican.  Having a group vote as almost a monolith does a disservice to that group and likely means they don't get the attention they deserve from the party's leadership.  It also means that republicans are putting forth policies that appeal to more than christian white people.  That's great. 

[thegeneral 3,214]

5 minutes ago, Reality said:

Trump is definitely being protected when it comes to Epstein.

Prolly not. He just partied with him, knew he liked em young, and thought it was terrific back in the day! 

[RLLD 4,230]

8 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Anyone who breaks the law should go to jail. We can agree there. I think 99% of people agree with this. 

Maybe slightly less than 99% nowadays....

[League Champion 1,911]

3 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Having a group vote as almost a monolith

So you're saying that Minorities and Blacks CAN'T THINK FOR THEMSELVES? 

That's some racist shizz BOYO. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, League Champion said:

So you're saying that Minorities and Blacks CAN'T THINK FOR THEMSELVES? 

That's some racist shizz BOYO. 

Is that what I posted?  You seem pretty unglued right now friend.  Maybe log off and take a walk?

[RLLD 4,230]

9 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

This is what you posted

 "It supports freedom of choice if you are the right skin color or gender, or of the proper political tilt."

So I ask again, what choice are you and other white conservatives, since you're obviously saying that whites aren't the correct skin color and conservatives aren't the right political dogma, denied freedom of choice about?

I look forward to hearing your answer. 

 

No it does not, and I will not tolerate that game.  You inserted the term white male, please stop that nonsense. 

Now, we already know that skin color and gender are important delineators in terms of whether your opinion is valid or not.  When the President makes such assertions we need to take notice, we even have journalists suggesting your skin color matters when you have an opinion.  Its racist. It distinguishes Liberals.  You do not hear such trite nonsense from other areas.  They are not free to have an opnion, for their skin color means they should be silent. That is the implication. And where it arises that conservatives make assertions that people of color, any color, cannot have an opinion because of the matter of their skin......perhaps you and I can THEN object in unison.

Until then, I might stand in some opposition to any movement suggesting that skin color is a measure of the person, I leave that to you and yours. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, RLLD said:

No it does not, and I will not tolerate that game.  You inserted the term white male, please stop that nonsense. 

Now, we already know that skin color and gender are important delineators in terms of whether your opinion is valid or not.  When the President makes such assertions we need to take notice, we even have journalists suggesting your skin color matters when you have an opinion.  Its racist. It distinguishes Liberals.  You do not hear such trite nonsense from other areas.  They are not free to have an opnion, for their skin color means they should be silent. That is the implication. And where it arises that conservatives make assertions that people of color, any color, cannot have an opinion because of the matter of their skin......perhaps you and I can THEN object in unison.

Until then, I might stand in some opposition to any movement suggesting that skin color is a measure of the person, I leave that to you and yours. 

Friend, YOU asserted that being the wrong color and wrong party impacts your freedom of choice.

I'm just asking for an example of how your freedom of choice has been impacted by not being the correct color and not being the correct political dogma.

I get it if you realize how wrong you are and don't want to discuss it further.

[League Champion 1,911]

3 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Is that what I posted

Yes, that's EXACTLY what you posted 

[RLLD 4,230]

3 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Friend, YOU asserted that being the wrong color and wrong party impacts your freedom of choice.

I'm just asking for an example of how your freedom of choice has been impacted by not being the correct color and not being the correct political dogma.

I get it if you realize how wrong you are and don't want to discuss it further.

I did, I supported it, I simply denied you the silly game of pretending I said "white male".  I am sure you find that disconcerting.  I provided examples of what I meant, you can pretend I did not, that is for you.  But ones freedom in this nation is dependant on skin color, gendar and of late....religion as well....and all of the intolerance....and violence emanates from the left.....

You will not distract from the topic. Liberalism is a religion, based on intolerance, racism and hate.  It behaves not unlike radical Islam. The only time I have witnessed that hate being remotely challenged...internally by liberalism...is when their Palestinian contingent supported murder and rape of children in Israel....so there is some hope I guess. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

I did, I supported it, I simply denied you the silly game of pretending I said "white male".  I am sure you find that disconcerting.  I provided examples of what I meant, you can pretend I did not, that is for you.  But ones freedom in this nation is dependant on skin color, gendar and of late....religion as well....and all of the intolerance....and violence emanates from the left.....

You will not distract from the topic. Liberalism is a religion, based on intolerance, racism and hate.  It behaves not unlike radical Islam. The only time I have witnessed that hate being remotely challenged...internally by liberalism...is when their Palestinian contingent supported murder and rape of children in Israel....so there is some hope I guess. 

So you refuse to give an example of how your life has been less free or you've had less choice because you're not the correct color or political dogma?  Seems like it should be easy for you to give examples since you're so adamant that those the incorrect color and politics have their freedoms impacted.  You stated this my friend.  Your stream of consciousness statements are meaningless without data to back it up friend. 

[RLLD 4,230]

15 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

So you refuse to give an example of how your life has been less free or you've had less choice because you're not the correct color or political dogma?  Seems like it should be easy for you to give examples since you're so adamant that those the incorrect color and politics have their freedoms impacted.  You stated this my friend.  Your stream of consciousness statements are meaningless without data to back it up friend. 

Reducing this to me is beyond inane.   Any example I might submit is irrelevant.  The experiences of a single person do not translate to the wider nation.....I apologize, I did forget that you and your ilk prefer to categorize people by skin color.  I see what you are struggling.....

OK.....

Now it makes sense.  You are trying to distract from the facts of Liberalism by playing the race game, focusing on that and distilling it down to a person.

So then, any white male....using your words....who can then lay claim to some loss of freedom is a "proof" of something, is that what you are saying? I mean that does add up now that I think about it......Liberals always use one-offs as some proof of a systemic issue.....and its never a proof.

Yep.....we are at loggerheads here, you want to do something I am unwilling to do....be illogical.....no wonder we were all over the place

[League Champion 1,911]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

Reducing this to me is beyond inane. 

It's BOYO. He's a bleeding heart Liberal. This is their tactic, it's all they know. 

[RLLD 4,230]

Just now, League Champion said:

It's BOYO. He's a bleeding heart Liberal. This is their tactic, it's all they know. 

To be fair, I sometimes am not paying close enough attention, I get caught up in the conversation and assume it is transpiring in good faith. And only later do I realize it was never a real conversation.