IGotWorms 3,441 Posted February 29 12 minutes ago, The Psychic Observer said: Because they are deciding if he should be above the law or not. If we all agree that he should not, then the court has nothing to decide. Why is it even a question? Supreme Court should not have accepted certiorari. They did it just to help him delay Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zsasz 219 Posted February 29 On 2/7/2024 at 6:45 AM, Maximum Overkill said: 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,961 Posted February 29 16 minutes ago, The Psychic Observer said: Because they are deciding if he should be above the law or not. If we all agree that he should not, then the court has nothing to decide. Why is it even a question? Ask the prosecutor. He’s the one that sent it to scotus. There seems to be a question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,961 Posted February 29 4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: Supreme Court should not have accepted certiorari. They did it just to help him delay It was Smith that sent it there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 1,593 Posted February 29 Lets all find out who made visits to Pedo Island. Libs: Trump was seen at a party with Epstein once, not on Pedo Island! Libs are so stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,441 Posted February 29 1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said: It was Smith that sent it there. Pretty misleading claim there. It was months ago that Smith asked the Supreme Court to leapfrog the court of appeals and decide the issue immediately. You know, to save time. But they declined that request. So here we are months later and now it’s in front of the Supreme Court because Trump lost in the court of appeals and appealed from there. Supreme Court knows there’s no way this case gets tried before the election now. And that was by design 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,961 Posted February 29 2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: Pretty misleading claim there. It was months ago that Smith asked the Supreme Court to leapfrog the court of appeals and decide the issue immediately. You know, to save time. Bur they declined that request. So here we are months later and now it’s in front of the Supreme Court because Trump lost in the court of appeals and appealed from there. Supreme Court knows there’s no way this case gets tried before the election now. And that was by design So letting a case play out in the lower courts is now some sign of chicanery? Ok. What if e wry prosecutor just wanted to skip over that part of the process? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,441 Posted February 29 1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said: So letting a case play out in the lower courts is now some sign of chicanery? Ok. What if e wry prosecutor just wanted to skip over that part of the process? Caught in a lie and now you pivot. I ain’t playing your bullsh1t games today 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,961 Posted February 29 17 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: Caught in a lie and now you pivot. I ain’t playing your bullsh1t games today What’s the lie? Holy shitt. You’re our very own Olberman. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 1,302 Posted May 12 On 2/29/2024 at 2:02 PM, IGotWorms said: Pretty misleading claim there. It was months ago that Smith asked the Supreme Court to leapfrog the court of appeals and decide the issue immediately. You know, to save time. But they declined that request. So here we are months later and now it’s in front of the Supreme Court because Trump lost in the court of appeals and appealed from there. Supreme Court knows there’s no way this case gets tried before the election now. And that was by design Or they adhered to their standard practice of not taking matters up which are not yet ripe. As a lawyer you would understand the ripeness doctrine, no? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,961 Posted May 12 20 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said: Or they adhered to their standard practice of not taking matters up which are not yet ripe. As a lawyer you would understand the ripeness doctrine, no? Works is a loyal cultist liberal first, lawyer second Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 921 Posted May 13 Everytime this gets bumped I think there is news on the Epstein list. The Diddy List will be released long before Epstein. Gay rapers going to have to take one for the team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,204 Posted May 13 27 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Everytime this gets bumped I think there is news on the Epstein list. The Diddy List will be released long before Epstein. Gay rapers going to have to take one for the team. That list will never be shown, too many high profile names on both sides of the ledger. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 921 Posted May 13 9 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said: That list will never be shown, too many high profile names on both sides of the ledger. I doubt we see either one. Diddy might have fewer political powerbrokers and he seemed more reckless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GutterBoy 2,449 Posted 5 hours ago Trump's in the Epstein files. Already saying it's phony. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
