Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
easilyscan

Bill Clinton: SOTU Address 1995

Recommended Posts

Prof that it’s never going to happen, that video sounds like trump, another lie.  This government wants to destroy this country, why would they protect it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill was MAGA.  There’s no mistaking that our institutions have aided in moving our societal norms well to the left.  You gotta give the lefties props for playing the long game.  Good thread

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Squistion will claim this video was doctored and Slick Willie never made these comments.

Tim will jizz himself to claim the democrats were correct then and now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, he was correct.   The problem was not Bill, its the stupid children who were educated by a corrupt system after his administration....who now embrace lies over reality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

greatest president of my lifetime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/30/2024 at 8:13 PM, weepaws said:

Prof that it’s never going to happen, that video sounds like trump, another lie.  This government wants to destroy this country, why would they protect it.  

you keep saying this and I am 💯 with you. preech

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/3/2024 at 9:02 AM, edjr said:

greatest president of my lifetime.

I'd say it was the combo of Clinton and Newt Gingrich which got a bunch of stuff done across the aisle in Congress.  :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I'd say it was the combo of Clinton and Newt Gingrich which got a bunch of stuff done across the aisle in Congress.  :thumbsup: 

You can have another centrist in there again. All you have to do is vote for her. 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

You can have another centrist in there again. All you have to do is vote for her. 

Write in Tulsi Gabbard?  Kamala had the most progressive/Left voting record in the Senate, surely you know this.  :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Write in Tulsi Gabbard?  Kamala had the most progressive/Left voting record in the Senate, surely you know this.  :dunno: 

Thats grading on a curve, and including social issues which really don’t matter. Kamala is a pro-business centrist. Tulsi is a radical populist moron, hardly centrist. 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Real timschochet said:

You can have another centrist in there again. All you have to do is vote for her. 

I voted for Clinton twice, would vote for him again today assuming he would govern as he did then.  Loved the way he and Gingrich worked together, whether a forced marriage or not.  Do you feel Kamala Harris would have supported Operation Gatekeeper?  See her working with Mike Johnson to help balance the budget?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Mark Davis said:

I voted for Clinton twice, would vote for him again today assuming he would govern as he did then.  Loved the way he and Gingrich worked together, whether a forced marriage or not.  Do you feel Kamala Harris would have supported Operation Gatekeeper?  See her working with Mike Johnson to help balance the budget?

1. Yes of course. (I wouldn’t have, but my views on this issue are far more extreme than Kamala’s). 

2. Yes but I’m skeptical that Johnson would work with her. The budget can’t be balanced without significantly raising taxes AND cutting spending including spending on wasteful military projects, not just stuff that liberals like. Johnson hasn’t displayed any willingness to consider either approach. 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Real timschochet said:

1. Yes of course. (I wouldn’t have, but my views on this issue are far more extreme than Kamala’s). 

2. Yes but I’m skeptical that Johnson would work with her. The budget can’t be balanced without significantly raising taxes AND cutting spending including spending on wasteful military projects, not just stuff that liberals like. Johnson hasn’t displayed any willingness to consider either approach. 
 

I just don't see it based on her actions and her comments that the border was secure during the Biden Administration.  To me it showed a willing deception to the status that she knew to be true at the time, that the border was a huge issue.  In the interview with Bret Baier, she referenced the first bill they tried to pass when controlling both chambers and the White House.  That bill included a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants without securing the border.  I'm sure you will disagree with the summary and we are far apart on this, but there were Democrats who opposed it for those very reasons.  I'm happy that now she sees it as an issue, but the reality is that it was an issue much earlier.  I'm not one who calls her dumb or stupid, but by that same token I feel she fully knew the situation at the border was dire and basically took the administration stance of lying to the public about it being secure.  So I do view her way to the left of the Clinton Administration when it comes to the border.

You may well be right on Johnson, and more so that Johnson is held hostage by his caucus in a way Gingrich wasn't.  Your second point is largely true, and neither party is going to address it.  If we are going to run deficits, I'd rather do it with relatively lower spending and relatively lower taxes, even if I think spending is too high.  The reason for that is it gives us more runway or altitude to raise revenues in the future to offset that lesser spending.  It's also hard to reel in spending once we add a new program.  At least if you're working with somewhat smaller numbers, even if the deficit was the same, you have more room to fix the issue.  Sadly, I don't see anyone fixing the issue so it's just like trying to keep altitude on a plane without engines praying at some point they restart because you're crashing, it's just a matter of how much time you are leaving to try and find a solution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Thats grading on a curve, and including social issues which really don’t matter. Kamala is a pro-business centrist. Tulsi is a radical populist moron, hardly centrist. 

Jeezus you get more dense every time you speak. I thought tulsi was a Russian spy. 
 

kamala is further left than Marx 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Jeezus you get more dense every time you speak. I thought tulsi was a Russian spy. 
 

kamala is further left than Marx 

Groucho was pretty right wing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×