Christian Nationalism

[Jose M 125]

1 minute ago, BeachGuy23 said:

That settles it.

The serial gay porn "research" has made you even dumber.

Love this for you boyo. 

I could explain it for you again.  And so could RLLD.  But we can't force you understand it.  It could be that you're really just that stoopid.

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It’s good for the producers of the goods. Not so much for the buyers. Next thing you’ll be telling me is the immigrants are bringing down wages and that helps with inflation. But we keep hearing wages are going up. So any of you idiots that want to trot that bullshitt out better tell us how both are possible. TIA. 

I won’t try to tell you anything. It’s useless. But I would suggest an Econ101 class might help you out. 

[TimHauck 2,870]

53 minutes ago, Jose M said:

No he didn't.

Uh…

6 hours ago, RLLD said:

1.  Do you think the current economy in 2024 is worse for the lower classes than 2008? Yes I do....

Gonna admit you were wrong Horsecrap?

[TimHauck 2,870]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Huh?  You said 2024 is worse than 2008 for the lower classes.  But have yet to provide any evidence backing that up

 

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

I never said any such thing

Uh…

6 hours ago, RLLD said:

1.  Do you think the current economy in 2024 is worse for the lower classes than 2008? Yes I do....

 

[RLLD 4,230]

10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

 

Uh…

 

You asked the question....I answered.......you brought 2008 into it....not me.....

[RLLD 4,230]

13 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Uh…

Gonna admit you were wrong Horsecrap?

I think you are having a lapse in logic...you cannot bring something into a conversation and then pretend someone else did...

[TimHauck 2,870]

10 minutes ago, RLLD said:

You asked the question....I answered.......you brought 2008 into it....not me.....

1.  You still said it.

2.  I only “brought 2008 into it”, because you said, and this is a direct quote: “This is the worst economy the lower classes have seen in their lifetime”

 

If they were alive in 2008 then that statement is incorrect.

[RLLD 4,230]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

1.  You still said it.

2.  I only “brought 2008 into it”, because you said, and this is a direct quote: “This is the worst economy the lower classes have seen in their lifetime”

 

If they were alive in 2008 then that statement is incorrect.

Ohhh, and here I thought you bringing it up meant it was you asking and me replying.....was the expectation that I would ignore it?

I am starting to wonder if you are being an honest player in this.  Pretending I brought it in and trying to defend that.....when it was clearly you....is wierd

[RLLD 4,230]

 

[TimHauck 2,870]

7 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Ohhh, and here I thought you bringing it up meant it was you asking and me replying.....was the expectation that I would ignore it?

I am starting to wonder if you are being an honest player in this.  Pretending I brought it in and trying to defend that.....when it was clearly you....is wierd

Not sure why this is so hard for you to follow, this isn’t rocket surgery.

You said (direct quote): “This is the worst economy the lower classes have seen in their lifetime”

That is when I “brought 2008 into it.”  Because 2008 was in all current adults’ lifetime.  

Get it?

But yeah, I did not actually expect you to answer the question with a yes or no answer.  I figured you’d go into your usual 10 paragraph ramble of using a lot of words to say nothing.

[RLLD 4,230]

10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Not sure why this is so hard for you to follow, this isn’t rocket surgery.

You said (direct quote): “This is the worst economy the lower classes have seen in their lifetime”

That is when I “brought 2008 into it.”  Because 2008 was in all current adults’ lifetime.  

Get it?

But yeah, I did not actually expect you to answer the question with a yes or no answer.  I figured you’d go into your usual 10 paragraph ramble of using a lot of words to say nothing.

Incorrect.....I stated lifetime.

YOU then asked about 2008, so I responded to that question. so what you stated ut you claimed it is worse than 2008 for the lower class and have yet to provide any evidence to back it up.

This was a misrepresentation. Since "I" said nothing of the sort, but instead was responding to your question....

And I have provided multiple links supporting, which you conveniently ignore, moreover, i have provide FAR MORE than yourself....

You are a dishonest participant I think,

[TimHauck 2,870]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Incorrect.....I stated lifetime.

YOU then asked about 2008, so I responded to that question. so what you stated ut you claimed it is worse than 2008 for the lower class and have yet to provide any evidence to back it up.

This was a misrepresentation. Since "I" said nothing of the sort, but instead was responding to your question....

And I have provided multiple links supporting, which you conveniently ignore, moreover, i have provide FAR MORE than yourself....

You are a dishonest participant I think,

Holy fock dude, I mentioned 2008 BECAUSE you said lifetime.  2008 was in the lifetime of all present day adults.

[RLLD 4,230]

6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Holy fock dude, I mentioned 2008 BECAUSE you said lifetime.  2008 was in the lifetime of all present day adults.

Why you did it does not matter to me, some folks in the labor market today and actively being harmed by Biden may have been in the market in 2008. 

Whether that is true or not matters little since the people are being harmed today, though it would seem like they at least feel like they are being more harmed...then again 2008 was a more equal distribution of pain because of the way the government screwed that one up

Still, for the lower strata this is the worst economic situation of their lifetime

[Hardcore troubadour 15,427]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

I won’t try to tell you anything. It’s useless. But I would suggest an Econ101 class might help you out. 

Yeah ok.  You rent stores that your daddy handed to you and pay as little as possible for labor.  You should teach a class. 

[TimHauck 2,870]

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Still, for the lower strata this is the worst economic situation of their lifetime

Maybe for some specific people, but overall, no it is not, not even close.

[RLLD 4,230]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Maybe for some specific people, but overall, no it is not, not even close.

There are perhaps some exceptions, but for most of them this is a disaster.

[TimHauck 2,870]

48 minutes ago, RLLD said:

 

 

[RLLD 4,230]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

 

Excellent.....please send this to CNN, MSNBC....hell to anyone who will push it out....

I absolutely want this to be the Democrat story line. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,427]

Come on, all you economic geniuses. Please tell me how bringing in millions of renters doesn’t lead to an increase in rent. Educate me. 

[Gepetto 1,368]

2 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

So is it good or bad for our economy when more of our products are consumed? 

The economy is not a person. Illegals cause increased demand for goods = higher prices = inflation = harder for regular citizens to afford to live and instead of saving and gaining wealth, get ever increasing debt. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,427]

1 minute ago, Gepetto said:

The economy is not a person. Illegals cause increased demand for goods = higher prices = inflation = harder for regular citizens to afford to live and instead of saving and gaining wealth, get ever increasing debt. 

The reality of Supply and demand has been suspended for the time being. 

[TimHauck 2,870]

4 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

The economy is not a person. Illegals cause increased demand for goods = higher prices = inflation = harder for regular citizens to afford to live and instead of saving and gaining wealth, get ever increasing debt. 

They do also bring down costs by doing jobs that most Americans don’t want to do.  Probably about a wash overall.

[RLLD 4,230]

 

Stephen A makes my argument for me....

"At some point in time you have to take into account what the voters thinking about....."

[Jose M 125]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Not sure why this is so hard for you to follow, this isn’t rocket surgery.

You said (direct quote): “This is the worst economy the lower classes have seen in their lifetime”

That is when I “brought 2008 into it.”  Because 2008 was in all current adults’ lifetime.  

Get it?

But yeah, I did not actually expect you to answer the question with a yes or no answer.  I figured you’d go into your usual 10 paragraph ramble of using a lot of words to say nothing.

If it's over 10 words long you have trouble stringing the meaning together.  Weird how everyone but you knows exactly what RLLD meant.  Time to take the L.

[Jose M 125]

Why is it so hard for you to follow along with what I think you said?!?!?!

[TimHauck 2,870]

38 minutes ago, Jose M said:

Why is it so hard for you to follow along with what I think you said?!?!?!

Once again, just gonna leave this here.

5 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Huh?  You said 2024 is worse than 2008 for the lower classes.  But have yet to provide any evidence backing that up

 

5 hours ago, Jose M said:

No he didn't.

 

10 hours ago, RLLD said:

1.  Do you think the current economy in 2024 is worse for the lower classes than 2008? Yes I do....

2.  Do you think the overall economy is currently worse in 2024 than 2008?  No I do not

So @Jose M, I’ll take that as a no, you won’t admit you were wrong?  Maybe you’re a @Strike alias also…

[RLLD 4,230]

50 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Once again, just gonna leave this here.

 

 

So @Jose M, I’ll take that as a no, you won’t admit you were wrong?  Maybe you’re a @Strike alias also…

You are misrepresenting…..and I think you knownit

[TimHauck 2,870]

5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

You are misrepresenting…..and I think you knownit

No I’m not.  I asked you a yes or no question, you said yes, but for some reason @Jose M says you didn’t.

[Jose M 125]

Why is it so hard for you to follow along with what I think you said?!?!?!

[TimHauck 2,870]

9 minutes ago, Jose M said:

Why is it so hard for you to follow along with what I think you said?!?!?!

He said it.

[BeachGuy23 642]

36 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He said it.

Bro you're arguing with a dude with a 3rd grade level IQ at best.

He'll do this all night.  Horsegirl ain't got nothing better to do. 

[TimHauck 2,870]

42 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Bro you're arguing with a dude with a 3rd grade level IQ at best.

He'll do this all night.  Horsegirl ain't got nothing better to do. 

Geek Club is like an alternate universe.  Apparently if you answer a question that doesn’t count as you saying it.

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

11 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Geek Club is like an alternate universe.  Apparently if you answer a question that doesn’t count as you saying it.

I feel like this is basically true of the conservative movement in the last decade or so, in the age of Trump. Nicolle Wallace calls it “living on Earth 2”. They’re not in the same reality as the rest of us. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,101]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I feel like this is basically true of the conservative movement in the last decade or so, in the age of Trump. Nicolle Wallace calls it “living on Earth 2”. They’re not in the same reality as the rest of us. 

Huh?  you guys think men can be women becuase they say so, support pedopheilia, and insist on gender surgery and drugs for children.  And that's just the tip of the iceberg.  if anyone's on a different planet, it's you and your side.

you're living in an alternate reality.

And nicole wallace?    you could have just said Joy Behar and it would have been the same.

[BeachGuy23 642]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Huh?  you guys think men can be women becuase they say so, support pedopheilia, and insist on gender surgery and drugs for children.  And that's just the tip of the iceberg.  if anyone's on a different planet, it's you and your side.

you're living in an alternate reality.

And nicole wallace?    you could have just said Joy Behar and it would have been the same.

I don't believe any of the nonsense you just posted.

What do you say now boyo?

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

10 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Huh?  you guys think men can be women becuase they say so, support pedopheilia, and insist on gender surgery and drugs for children.  And that's just the tip of the iceberg.  if anyone's on a different planet, it's you and your side.

you're living in an alternate reality.

And nicole wallace?    you could have just said Joy Behar and it would have been the same.

It’s revealing that all 3 of your points are about transgenders. 99% of liberals don’t think about this issue at all unless confronted with it by angry conservatives. Without getting into detail about it most of us just want everyone to be loved and respected and not mistreated for who they are or who they want to be. Any and all policy concerns are rooted in that principle. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,101]

12 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

It’s revealing that all 3 of your points are about transgenders. 99% of liberals don’t think about this issue at all unless confronted with it by angry conservatives. Without getting into detail about it most of us just want everyone to be loved and respected and not mistreated for who they are or who they want to be. Any and all policy concerns are rooted in that principle. 

Again, you're not living in reality.  That's fact. 

You trying go acquire as many virtues as you can is also revealing - all talk, no walk.  You're delusional.

[zsasz 369]

On 4/4/2024 at 10:07 AM, BeachGuy23 said:

Just so we're clear.  You think the lower class would be BETTER off NOT having jobs?

Freaking shill...SMH

  The things MAGA cultists will try to convince others of so their orange skinned god doesn't look bad.  These guys are clowns and their elitism is showing.  

[TimHauck 2,870]

58 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Huh?  you guys think men can be women becuase they say so, support pedopheilia, and insist on gender surgery and drugs for children. 

Great, another tranny thread 

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]