🚨 BREAKING: There’s reports of Biden having a medical emergency

[TimHauck 2,866]

29 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

There’s reports of Biden having a medical emergency, but no one I’ve talked to who I trust has been able to verify it. Working on it and I’ll share anything I hear!
 

Please explain how this is a lie?

Whoever “reported” he had a medical emergency lied (this would include the OP who did not include what was after the comma in the thread title).  HTH

[Voltaire 5,316]

52 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

You and I have posted here for a long time. I respect you. I recently, kind of comically, asked if you were in a car crash cause of the number of ridiculous posts you have made. Read the 1st and last sentence in your post, and reconcile.

Brandon Tatum is a well-respected talented independent commentator on the right with an online following. He shows up at events, gets facetime on the news, and has some ties to the GOP establishment and maybe a few officeholders who like his podcast. So he hobnobs a bit. But he's small potatoes, he started as and still may be a one-man operation with zero budget. If he has anybody working for him, its not much more than a video editor and/or someone taking orders for the t-shirts and stuff he sells.

There are no reporters in the field. He sits in his house, watches the news, puts on one of the t-shirts he's selling to earn a buck, and talks about it in front of the camera. If something were to happen to Biden, there's nobody in the Biden camp that is going to call him. He's not on any Democrat's leak radar. There's just no way that he could get a scoop there.

It occurs to me that you are more likely to break a story on Biden, because its not outside the real of possibility that you might have a buddy working in the White House who saw something. Tatum doesn't know anybody working there. What few are aware of him at all probably don't listen to him or like him.

What you're seeing here is a guy who finds interesting stuff and talks about it. You're not seeing a guy who breaks news stories.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

you're a democrat, thats your party

I'd take RFK any day over Biden

 

Worms in his brain (  ) vs mush for brains? 

Tough call.

My answer is neither.

And lunatic convicted felon and proven sexual assailant that previously tried to overthrow the government is not a choice either  

[IGotWorms 4,058]

53 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Brandon Tatum is a well-respected

[Herbivore 1,134]

1 hour ago, Voltaire said:

Brandon Tatum is a well-respected talented independent commentator on the right with an online following. He shows up at events, gets facetime on the news, and has some ties to the GOP establishment and maybe a few officeholders who like his podcast. So he hobnobs a bit. But he's small potatoes, he started as and still may be a one-man operation with zero budget. If he has anybody working for him, its not much more than a video editor and/or someone taking orders for the t-shirts and stuff he sells.

There are no reporters in the field. He sits in his house, watches the news, puts on one of the t-shirts he's selling to earn a buck, and talks about it in front of the camera. If something were to happen to Biden, there's nobody in the Biden camp that is going to call him. He's not on any Democrat's leak radar. There's just no way that he could get a scoop there.

It occurs to me that you are more likely to break a story on Biden, because its not outside the real of possibility that you might have a buddy working in the White House who saw something. Tatum doesn't know anybody working there. What few are aware of him at all probably don't listen to him or like him.

What you're seeing here is a guy who finds interesting stuff and talks about it. You're not seeing a guy who breaks news stories.

wouldn't what he is doing imply he should not be respected

[Cdub100 3,906]

Wait, all of a sudden liberals don't believe sources?

They will eat up any negative Trump report, but when it comes to Biden they take a grain of salt.

[Voltaire 5,316]

30 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

wouldn't what he is doing imply he should not be respected

He might not be your cup of tea, but I like him. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

37 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

wouldn't what he is doing imply he should not be respected

Says the Biden voter who voted for a racist Pedo?

You have ZERO respectability. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

 

 

[MDC 7,408]

Ever notice how the Geeks who are most distrustful of the MSM are also the easiest marks for fake news?  

[IGotWorms 4,058]

57 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

Wait, all of a sudden liberals don't believe sources?

Some random weirdo on Twitter or TikTok?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,420]

The white house denied it. Take it to the bank. 

[Cdub100 3,906]

10 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Some random weirdo on Twitter or TikTok?

Liberals, "A source familiar with the way Trump thinks"

That's not an exaggeration like Tim or gutterdumbass uses. The media has printed stories just like this about trump and used  "A source familiar with the way Trump thinks" as their source.

Not saying one is better than the other just pointing out the hypocrisy. 

[IGotWorms 4,058]

16 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

Liberals, "A source familiar with the way Trump thinks"

That's not an exaggeration like Tim or gutterdumbass uses. The media has printed stories just like this about trump and used  "A source familiar with the way Trump thinks" as their source.

Not saying one is better than the other just pointing out the hypocrisy. 

I’m not a fan of anonymously sourced stuff either. With that said, in theory, a real news outlet is supposed to have editorial controls to ensure the source is real and credible. Yes I know it does not always work that way, unfortunately. But at least they are supposed to do that, whereas there are no expectations and zero accountability for the rando on Twitter or TikTok.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,099]

3 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

I’m not a fan of anonymously sourced stuff either. With that said, in theory, a real news outlet is supposed to have editorial controls to ensure the source is real and credible. Yes I know it does not always work that way, unfortunately. But at least they are supposed to do that, whereas there are no expectations and zero accountability for the rando on Twitter or TikTok.

How convenient you say that now.  Where were you for the last decade? 

[Voltaire 5,316]

48 minutes ago, MDC said:

Ever notice how the Geeks who are most distrustful of the MSM are also the easiest marks for fake news?  

We have to use our better judgement and do our own verifying and it can become exhausting for ordinary people.

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

50 minutes ago, MDC said:

Ever notice how the Geeks who are most distrustful of the MSM are also the easiest marks for fake news?  

It's like saying Fishtown is a nice place to raise a Family. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,348]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

Ever notice how the Geeks who are most distrustful of the MSM are also the easiest marks for fake news?  

ever notice how the geeks who love the MSM lick up ever lie and conspiracy as fact?

[Cdub100 3,906]

56 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

I’m not a fan of anonymously sourced stuff either. With that said, in theory, a real news outlet is supposed to have editorial controls to ensure the source is real and credible. Yes I know it does not always work that way, unfortunately. But at least they are supposed to do that, whereas there are no expectations and zero accountability for the rando on Twitter or TikTok.

if this was the 80s and maybe even 90s I would agree with you but as our media has been sucked up and now controlled by 4-5 major corporations the standards are no longer there. 

They are now mouth pieces for the party. 

It's sad but in my eyes the "media" is no better than rando Twitter/ticktock. And imo are worse because people still believe they are neutral.

[IGotWorms 4,058]

28 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

if this was the 80s and maybe even 90s I would agree with you but as our media has been sucked up and now controlled by 4-5 major corporations the standards are no longer there. 

They are now mouth pieces for the party. 

It's sad but in my eyes the "media" is no better than rando Twitter/ticktock. And imo are worse because people still believe they are neutral.

I don’t disagree with your assessment of the media today but of course it is still more reliable than some random weirdo on twitter or ticktock. This is not even debatable 

[TimHauck 2,866]

1 hour ago, Cdub100 said:

Liberals, "A source familiar with the way Trump thinks"

That's not an exaggeration like Tim or gutterdumbass uses. The media has printed stories just like this about trump and used  "A source familiar with the way Trump thinks" as their source.

Not saying one is better than the other just pointing out the hypocrisy. 

This is rich coming from the guy that started a thread saying Biden was going to drop out where the source was Bill O’Reilly made it up.

[Cdub100 3,906]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

This is rich coming from the guy that started a thread saying Biden was going to drop out where the source was Bill O’Reilly made it up.

Sure seems there's a lot of smoke to that fire. So I'm not sure what your point is.

[Cdub100 3,906]

1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

I don’t disagree with your assessment of the media today but of course it is still more reliable than some random weirdo on twitter or ticktock. This is not even debatable 

Their "reliability" which is falling year over year is what makes them more dangerous. Eventually, they will be viewed by most people as I view them. Assuming nothing changes.

[Voltaire 5,316]

5 hours ago, Herbivore said:

wouldn't what he is doing imply he should not be respected

maybe he's trolling and this is an inside joke I don't get. 

I just subscribe to his youtube channel and don't go there for breaking news.

[TimHauck 2,866]

1 hour ago, Cdub100 said:

Their "reliability" which is falling year over year is what makes them more dangerous. Eventually, they will be viewed by most people as I view them. Assuming nothing changes.

A TV host just making it up doesn’t count as a “report” though