*** OFFICIAL Kamala Harris Unscripted Press Conference and/or Interview Thread***

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

1 minute ago, IndyColtsFan said:

Perhaps this will be a real knee-slapper after the 30th time your fountain-of-originality ass says it.

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!

If the shoe fits, you gotta' wear it and the shoe fits you perfectly. 

[IndyColtsFan 325]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

If the shoe fits, you gotta' wear it and the shoe fits you perfectly. 

HARDY HAR HAR HAR!!!!

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

Just now, IndyColtsFan said:

HARDY HAR HAR HAR!!!!

Boyosexual says what? 

[5-Points 3,387]

3 hours ago, squistion said:

https://x.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1823752396922581311

The only people in America upset about Harris doing campaign rallies in swing states instead of press conferences are the press and the Trump campaign.

We certainly don't expect you sheep to complain. 

Everybody else who expects POTUS candidates to sell themselves to the electorate are right to criticize her for her lack of courage to stand up and take questions from the press. 

[IndyColtsFan 325]

4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Boyosexual says what? 

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/JG9gNTy5miM

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

5 minutes ago, IndyColtsFan said:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/JG9gNTy5miM

Sorry, pal.  I don't click on links from known propagandists and cult members.   You'll have to see if maybe you can trick one of your boyosexual buddies on clicking it instead.

[squistion 1,946]

41 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

We certainly don't expect you sheep to complain. 

Everybody else who expects POTUS candidates to sell themselves to the electorate are right to criticize her for her lack of courage to stand up and take questions from the press

Which I am sure she will after the Democratic Convention. 

[jerryskids 6,558]

Rusty used to be in the press. Now he thinks it's great that Harris doesn't talk to the press, and that the press isn't pushing very hard.  

[MDC 7,124]

Trump never stops talking, and it’s all about what a disaster Biden/Harris are, how unfair the press is to him and 2020 muh fraud. You guys act like he’s out there with pie charts outlining his vision for the next 4 years.  

[Reality 3,093]

3 minutes ago, MDC said:

Trump never stops talking, and it’s all about what a disaster Biden/Harris are, how unfair the press is to him and 2020 muh fraud. You guys act like he’s out there with pie charts outlining his vision for the next 4 years.  

I know it's hard for you not to be a worthless troll but, this thread is about Harris. HTH

[Reality 3,093]

When you start losing dude's like this, it's not good.

How frightened are they?

 

[jerryskids 6,558]

24 minutes ago, Reality said:

When you start losing dude's like this, it's not good.

How frightened are they?

 

The one thing in our favor, and by "our" I mean people who want transparency, is that segments of the MSM might still be a little sore that they were gaslit and made to look like idiots for 4 years of defending Biden's mental state.  Muh deep fake videos%$@!

So now that the right is calling them out again, this time for being biotches to Harris, some of them may push back a little.  Like this guy.

[5-Points 3,387]

2 hours ago, squistion said:

Which I am sure she will after the Democratic Convention. 

Not good enough. 

[squistion 1,946]

Just now, 5-Points said:

Not good enough. 

It will be for most voters. Stay tuned.

[The Real timschochet 6,407]

1 minute ago, 5-Points said:

Not good enough. 

Not good enough for who? 
 

Personally I think she should give lots of press conferences and interviews. But if her team has calculated that she can win without doing so then more power to them. She’s running against a guy who has broken every rule of politics and said things that would destroy any other candidate. Only today he endorsed Mark Robinson, a Holocaust denier, advocate of murder who would deny women the right to vote. This sort of crap doesn’t seem to hurt Trump at all. So why shouldn’t Kamala try to get away with the relatively minor sin of giving as few interviews as possible? Maybe if you guys ran as her opposition a guy who wasn’t a totally incompetent a$$hole it might make a difference, but you didn’t…

[5-Points 3,387]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

It will be for most voters. Stay tuned.

Ok

[IndyColtsFan 325]

MAH UNSCRIPTED NEWS CONFERENCE!

[5-Points 3,387]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

Not good enough for who? 
 

Personally I think she should give lots of press conferences and interviews. But if her team has calculated that she can win without doing so then more power to them. She’s running against a guy who has broken every rule of politics and said things that would destroy any other candidate. Only today he endorsed Mark Robinson, a Holocaust denier, advocate of murder who would deny women the right to vote. This sort of crap doesn’t seem to hurt Trump at all. So why shouldn’t Kamala try to get away with the relatively minor sin of giving as few interviews as possible? Maybe if you guys ran as her opposition a guy who wasn’t a totally incompetent a$$hole it might make a difference, but you didn’t…

Her team has calculated that she can't win if the electorate hears her speak. 

I called it early. They will keep her from speaking unless it's pre-planned and on teleprompter. 

They will not allow her to speak freely. Because it will torpedo her campaign. 

[squistion 1,946]

Just now, 5-Points said:

Her team has calculated that she can't win if the electorate hears her speak. 

I called it early. They will keep her from speaking unless it's pre-planned and on teleprompter. 

They will not allow her to speak freely. Because it will torpedo her campaign. 

Which will be disproven at the Democratic Convention.

[IndyColtsFan 325]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

Which will be disproven at the Democratic Convention.

They'll just pivot from one base-assuring nothingburger to another while the rest of us watch Clownzo swirling the political drain.

Love it!

[jerryskids 6,558]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

Which will be disproven at the Democratic Convention.

Same kinda teleprompter reading that convinced you at the SOTU that Biden is completely competent? 

"I've BEEN a prosecutor... unfettered by what has been... coconut tree!"

[The Real timschochet 6,407]

1 minute ago, 5-Points said:

Her team has calculated that she can't win if the electorate hears her speak. 

I called it early. They will keep her from speaking unless it's pre-planned and on teleprompter. 

They will not allow her to speak freely. Because it will torpedo her campaign. 

No. You completely misunderstand what’s going on. As usual. 
 

You need to read up on the campaigns of Ronald Reagan in 1980 and Barack Obama in 2008, which were both quite similar to Kamala’s approach. The key to these three campaigns is made up of 3 parts: 

1. You spread optimism. 
2. You create a GENERAL image of goodwill without many specifics which allows voters to create their own image of you that they prefer. 
3. You create a sense of inevitability. 

Any thing that detracts from these three goals, which a personal interview or press conference would certainly do, becomes unnecessary. Thats what Reagan did, what Obama did, and what Harris is now doing. I’m not saying I particularly admire this strategy or that it’s good for the country. I would prefer if the old days of Abe Lincoln and Stephen Douglas seriously laying out their views before the nation would return. But they won’t. In our age of mass media what Kamala is doing is a proven winning strategy so long as you have the charisma to pull it off. She does. 

[5-Points 3,387]

4 minutes ago, squistion said:

Which will be disproven at the Democratic Convention.

No, it won't. 

If the dem base had any integrity, they would be demanding that she be forthcoming with her policies. 

But you have no integrity. You're content to let her hide as long as possible in the hopes that she can beat the bad orange man. 

It's really pathetic. 

[squistion 1,946]

Just now, 5-Points said:

No, it won't. 

If the dem base had any integrity, they would be demanding that she be forthcoming with her policies. 

But you have no integrity. You're content to let her hide as long as possible in the hopes that she can beat the bad orange man. 

It's really pathetic. 

Which she will be at The Democratic Convention and thereafter - stay tuned.

[zsasz 361]

WAHHH WAHHH A CANDIDATE I"M NOT GOING TO VOTE FOR ANYWAY WON'T TELL ME WHY I WON'T VOTE FOR HER!!!!!

 

[The Real timschochet 6,407]

7 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

No, it won't. 

If the dem base had any integrity, they would be demanding that she be forthcoming with her policies. 

But you have no integrity. You're content to let her hide as long as possible in the hopes that she can beat the bad orange man. 

It's really pathetic. 

How about this- she makes one statement: 

“As President, I won’t impose a 10-20% tariff on all imports that come into this country.” 
Please explain why this isn’t preferable, all by itself, to your guy. 

[5-Points 3,387]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

No. You completely misunderstand what’s going on. As usual. 
 

You need to read up on the campaigns of Ronald Reagan in 1980 and Barack Obama in 2008, which were both quite similar to Kamala’s approach. The key to these three campaigns is made up of 3 parts: 

1. You spread optimism. 
2. You create a GENERAL image of goodwill without many specifics which allows voters to create their own image of you that they prefer. 
3. You create a sense of inevitability. 

Any thing that detracts from these three goals, which a personal interview or press conference would certainly do, becomes unnecessary. Thats what Reagan did, what Obama did, and what Harris is now doing. I’m not saying I particularly admire this strategy or that it’s good for the country. I would prefer if the old days of Abe Lincoln and Stephen Douglas seriously laying out their views before the nation would return. But they won’t. In our age of mass media what Kamala is doing is a proven winning strategy so long as you have the charisma to pull it off. She does. 

I understand exactly what's going on. 

The dems staged a coup, to oust the guy you were convinced was capable of serving another term as potus, despite all of the evidence to the contrary. 

They have now convinced you that the most unlikeable politician in generations is all of a sudden the savior of America after years of telling you the exact opposite. 

And, once again, you line up at the trough to gobble up as much of the tripe as you can before they switch it out for haggis and tell you it's all going to be filet mingon if you just keep voting for them. 

[jerryskids 6,558]

7 minutes ago, zsasz said:

WAHHH WAHHH A CANDIDATE I"M NOT GOING TO VOTE FOR ANYWAY WON'T TELL ME WHY I WON'T VOTE FOR HER!!!!!

 

As a centrist, you seem surprisingly gleeful at being gaslit once again by the MSM on the Democrat candidate.  Do you think other centrists share this centrist view, of enjoying being a lemming to the media?  Seems kinda uncentrist to me.   

[MDC 7,124]

1 hour ago, Reality said:

I know it's hard for you not to be a worthless troll but, this thread is about Harris. HTH

Seems relevant, since the other candidate talks incessantly about himself. I prefer silence.

[jerryskids 6,558]

16 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

No. You completely misunderstand what’s going on. As usual. 
 

You need to read up on the campaigns of Ronald Reagan in 1980 and Barack Obama in 2008, which were both quite similar to Kamala’s approach. The key to these three campaigns is made up of 3 parts: 

1. You spread optimism. 
2. You create a GENERAL image of goodwill without many specifics which allows voters to create their own image of you that they prefer. 
3. You create a sense of inevitability. 

Any thing that detracts from these three goals, which a personal interview or press conference would certainly do, becomes unnecessary. Thats what Reagan did, what Obama did, and what Harris is now doing. I’m not saying I particularly admire this strategy or that it’s good for the country. I would prefer if the old days of Abe Lincoln and Stephen Douglas seriously laying out their views before the nation would return. But they won’t. In our age of mass media what Kamala is doing is a proven winning strategy so long as you have the charisma to pull it off. She does. 

Very good post until the last part.  She is historically unlikable.  The MSM is creating your #3 by enabling her to avoid questions, and creating the illusion that she is the amalgamation of all of the great orators of our time.  If she veers one foot from the teleprompter she sucks, bad.  That's why she isn't doing interviews or press conferences.

You've proven an utter inability to evaluate people (Biden), or evaluate the bias of the MSM (too many instances to count), so I know this post is wasted on you.  Someday maybe I'll learn. 

[The Real timschochet 6,407]

1 minute ago, 5-Points said:

I understand exactly what's going on. 

The dems staged a coup, to oust the guy you were convinced was capable of serving another term as potus, despite all of the evidence to the contrary. 

They have now convinced you that the most unlikeable politician in generations is all of a sudden the savior of America after years of telling you the exact opposite. 

And, once again, you line up at the trough to gobble up as much of the tripe as you can before they switch it out for haggis and tell you it's all going to be filet mingon if you just keep voting for them. 

It’s you who has been fooled into thinking she’s unlikable. Why? Because Fox News told you so? Because her approval ratings were low? Her approval ratings have been tied to Biden and inflation. Most of America knew nothing about her until a month ago. When they listen to her they really like her. I wrote she has charisma. 

Liberals refused to accept that Reagan had charisma. You may be too young to remember (I’m an old man so I do). They considered him an unlikable angry guy from California and a total idiot. They were frustrated that he never gave interviews except to very friendly sources and always spoke in platitudes. They called him the “Teflon” man and were incredibly frustrated by his ascent. Reagan was smarter than they were. 

[The Real timschochet 6,407]

2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Very good post until the last part.  She is historically unlikable.  The MSM is creating your #3 by enabling her to avoid questions, and creating the illusion that she is the amalgamation of all of the great orators of our time.  If she veers one foot from the teleprompter she sucks, bad.  That's why she isn't doing interviews or press conferences.

You've proven an utter inability to evaluate people (Biden), or evaluate the bias of the MSM (too many instances to count), so I know this post is wasted on you.  Someday maybe I'll learn. 

Again I think it’s you who is missing the mark here not me. Read my above post on Reagan. He really did come off as unlikable until 1980. And liberals never did like him even after that. I think you’ve fallen in the same trap here. 

[IndyColtsFan 325]

2 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Rusty used to be in the press. Now he thinks it's great that Harris doesn't talk to the press, and that the press isn't pushing very hard.  

I think it's great and amusing that MAGAturds obsess and make a fuss over whether Harris gives an unscripted news conference. I'm all for Clownzo doing unscripted news conferences, because a piece of his political viability dies every time he does.

By the way, "the press" refers to newspapers, because, you know, the thing newspapers get printed on is a press. 

The media - which also includes the broadcast, radio and online-only outlets - is a shell of itself and doesn't adhere to the gold standard of unbiased, balanced and factual that we followed to the letter oh so long ago.

So at this time I don't give a rat's ass whether she talks to it, particularly since her campaign is doing fabulous without it.

HAAAWWWWWWWW HHEEEEEEEEE HAAAAAWWWWWW HEEEEEEE HAWWWWWW!!!!

[IndyColtsFan 325]

21 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

As a centrist, you seem surprisingly gleeful at being gaslit once again by the MSM on the Democrat candidate.  Do you think other centrists share this centrist view, of enjoying being a lemming to the media?  Seems kinda uncentrist to me.   

And yet you expect Harris to have an unscripted news conference with this MSM you distrust and makes people their lemmings.

Pretty hypocritical there, boyo.

[jerryskids 6,558]

11 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Again I think it’s you who is missing the mark here not me. Read my above post on Reagan. He really did come off as unlikable until 1980. And liberals never did like him even after that. I think you’ve fallen in the same trap here. 

Except for that 1964 speech which launched him to two terms as governor of your state, then two terms as president.

In case you want to watch it.

 

2 minutes ago, IndyColtsFan said:

I think it's great and amusing that MAGAturds obsess and make a fuss over whether Harris gives an unscripted news conference. I'm all for Clownzo doing unscripted news conferences, because a piece of his political viability dies every time he does.

By the way, "the press" refers to newspapers, because, you know, the thing newspapers get printed on is a press. 

The media - which also includes the broadcast, radio and online-only outlets - is a shell of itself and doesn't adhere to the gold standard of unbiased, balanced and factual that we followed to the letter oh so long ago.

So at this time I don't give a rat's ass whether she talks to it, particularly since her campaign is doing fabulous without it.

HAAAWWWWWWWW HHEEEEEEEEE HAAAAAWWWWWW HEEEEEEE HAWWWWWW!!!!

It's weird that you think calling me an Eeyore for pointing out how you've abandoned your journalism principles is some kind of win for you.  But you do you.   

[MDC 7,124]

How can I know why I won’t ever vote for Harris if she doesn’t do interviews?  

[jerryskids 6,558]

1 minute ago, IndyColtsFan said:

And yet you expect Harris to have an unscripted news conference with this MSM you distrust and makes people their lemmings.

Pretty hypocritical there, boyo.

This makes no sense.  Trump just sat with a group of black women journalists who couldn't have been more biased.  Harris wouldn't join, even though they'd have bowed to her altar.  She knows she sucks at anything unscripted.

More importantly, my post was making fun of @zsasz, who calls himself a centrist but is every bit as blue pilled as you are.

Otherwise, good post, good effort.   

[IndyColtsFan 325]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

This makes no sense. Clownzo just sat with a group of black women journalists who couldn't have been more biased.  Harris wouldn't join, even though they'd have bowed to her altar.  She knows she sucks at anything unscripted.

More importantly, my post was making fun of @zsasz, who calls himself a centrist but is every bit as blue pilled as you are.

Otherwise, good post, good effort.   

Clownzo off of the bat was rude, defensive and made an ass of himself. 

Again, on what issues would I classify as a blue pill.

There are plenty of centrists, moderates and conservatives who can't stand Clownzo and see him as a danger to democracy. Clownzo dislike doesn't make one a liberal. Harris now leads in all battleground states except Nevada, and she's gaining ground in Florida and Texor.

Just look at the ol' polls!

[5-Points 3,387]

16 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

It’s you who has been fooled into thinking she’s unlikable. Why? Because Fox News told you so? Because her approval ratings were low? Her approval ratings have been tied to Biden and inflation. Most of America knew nothing about her until a month ago. When they listen to her they really like her. I wrote she has charisma. 

Liberals refused to accept that Reagan had charisma. You may be too young to remember (I’m an old man so I do). They considered him an unlikable angry guy from California and a total idiot. They were frustrated that he never gave interviews except to very friendly sources and always spoke in platitudes. They called him the “Teflon” man and were incredibly frustrated by his ascent. Reagan was smarter than they were. 

I've never liked her. Not when she was DA, not when she was AG and certainly not when she was Senator. 

The entire country felt the same about her when she ran in '16. Her term as VP has done nothing to change my mind about her.

She's quite possibly the worst person to ever be considered for the position. And that includes Al Gore. 

[seafoam1 2,799]

2 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

I've never liked her. Not when she was DA, not when she was AG and certainly not when she was Senator. 

The entire country felt the same about her when she ran in '16. Her term as VP has done nothing to change my mind about her.

She's quite possibly the worst person to ever be considered for the position. And that includes Al Gore. 

You are not allowed to dislike a candidate without tim telling you that it's Foxnews' fault. This is what the left has become.