This is clear Election interference. LET’S GO 🔥

[League Champion 1,896]

 

 

 

[F1erce 88]

I saw this earlier & wasn’t sure if it was illegal. Just seems to me like really focked up reporting & misinformation. But more than likely you’ll have worms, gutter, purdyidiotic, etc to come defending it

[weepaws 3,154]

Wouldn’t it be great if the American people interfered with the election, and said, he won’t vote for these two idiots. We want two real , and true candidates, oh yes it would be.  Oh greatttt.  Amen Thanks 

[HellToupee 1,585]

1 hour ago, weepaws said:

Wouldn’t it be great if the American people interfered with the election, and said, he won’t vote for these two idiots. We want two real , and true candidates, oh yes it would be.  Oh greatttt.  Amen Thanks 

East a d1ck

 

Matthew 69

[HotRod 69]

Time to expose the deep state

[Patented Phil 1,469]

The bias is so extreme that yes - it’s starting to potentially create some legal jeopardy.  If the situation were reversed, Trump would be brought up on charges for running afoul of campaign finance laws.  At this point a compelling case can be made that the MSM is an “in-kind contribution” to Kamala’s campaign.

[TimHauck 2,615]

11 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

The bias is so extreme that yes - it’s starting to potentially create some legal jeopardy.  If the situation were reversed, Trump would be brought up on charges for running afoul of campaign finance laws.  At this point a compelling case can be made that the MSM is an “in-kind contribution” to Kamala’s campaign.

What would the right do if a billionaire paid swing state residents $47 to sign a petition in support of pro-choice abortion laws?

[weepaws 3,154]

1 hour ago, HellToupee said:

East a d1ck

 

Matthew 69

You should know better than to mock God’s Holy Word, But again you do go to a fake Catholic Church, made man lol.  

[weepaws 3,154]

1 hour ago, Patented Phil said:

The bias is so extreme that yes - it’s starting to potentially create some legal jeopardy.  If the situation were reversed, Trump would be brought up on charges for running afoul of campaign finance laws.  At this point a compelling case can be made that the MSM is an “in-kind contribution” to Kamala’s campaign.

Amen. 

[nobody 2,562]

Now they really got her!!!

[avoiding injuries 1,510]

12 hours ago, F1erce said:

I saw this earlier & wasn’t sure if it was illegal. Just seems to me like really focked up reporting & misinformation. But more than likely you’ll have worms, gutter, purdyidiotic, etc to come defending it

Isn’t “misinformation” what John Kerry, Hillary, Walz and Harris been complaining about over the past week, and is the reason they’re using to try and change the first amendment?

It’s DaNgErOuS!!

[Tree of Knowledge 1,700]

8 hours ago, weepaws said:

You should know better than to mock God’s Holy Word, But again you do go to a fake Catholic Church, made man lol.  

Don’t make fun of Christians and the Catholic Church. You sound like a heretic   

 

 

[jonmx 2,424]

Does not even scratch the surface of the real election interference.  Our government is in bed with the media, big tech, and Hollywood.  Most every piece of information we get from 'reliable' sources has been put through the government propaganda filter. 

 The 60-Minutes interview edits is just example one of a billion.  If Trump was interviewed the edits would highlight every little stumble he made.  Highly selective truth is not the real truth.   You can make the ugliest creature in the world look like an angel with enough filtering.