Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
squistion

Trump: “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a f****** Mexican!”

Recommended Posts

I'm late to this thread so I apologize, but I think a reset might be in order:

The same hack faux journalist from the Atlantic, owned by Jobs' widow, who did the uncorroborated "suckers and losers" thing 4 years ago... has another anonymous/uncorroborated statement about Trump this October surprise-time, yet the victims family say it didn't happen and Trump has been supportive, and everyone around him says it didn't happen.

But the Left says it probably happened because... "suckers and losers" thing.

Pretty close?  :dunno:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

the victims family say it didn't happen

 

This is not quite true

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

This is not quite true

How so?

Also nice surgical editing of my post, center-right Trump voter guy.  :thumbsup:

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

How so?

Also nice surgical editing of my post, center-right Trump voter guy.  :thumbsup:

 

Well that was the only comment I was disputing.

Neither the family nor the lawyer have specifically answered whether Trump/the White House paid.  And the lawyer is quoted as saying he did not.  Maybe that’s a lie, if so I’d think we’d see a lawsuit from her.  The gofundme from the gullible righties would be enormous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jerryskids said:

I'm late to this thread so I apologize, but I think a reset might be in order:

The same hack faux journalist from the Atlantic, owned by Jobs' widow, who did the uncorroborated "suckers and losers" thing 4 years ago... has another anonymous/uncorroborated statement about Trump this October surprise-time, yet the victims family say it didn't happen and Trump has been supportive, and everyone around him says it didn't happen.

But the Left says it probably happened because... "suckers and losers" thing.

Pretty close?  :dunno:

 

Pretty effin close. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

11 hours ago, jerryskids said:

I'm late to this thread so I apologize, but I think a reset might be in order:

The same hack faux journalist from the Atlantic, owned by Jobs' widow, who did the uncorroborated "suckers and losers" thing 4 years ago... has another anonymous/uncorroborated statement about Trump this October surprise-time, yet the victims family say it didn't happen and Trump has been supportive, and everyone around him says it didn't happen.

But the Left says it probably happened because... "suckers and losers" thing.

Pretty close?  :dunno:

 

Imagine telling yourself that John Kelly, Mark Milley, James Mattis, Mark Esper, and Mike Pence are all lying to you, but a twice-impeached, rapist, business fraud, convicted felon who paints himself orange and rambles about sharks, batteries and golfer d1ck is telling you truth.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TrailGuy said:

 

Imagine telling yourself that John Kelly, Mark Milley, James Mattis, Mark Esper, and Mike Pence are all lying to you, but a twice-impeached, rapist, business fraud, convicted felon who paints himself orange and rambles about sharks, batteries and golfer d1ck is telling you truth.

Quote

yet the victims family say it didn't happen and Trump has been supportive, and everyone around him says it didn't happen.

There, I typed it slower for you.  :cheers: 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

There, I typed it slower for you.  :cheers: 

The family obviously wasn't there when he said it, and the only person that denies he said it is Kash Patel who is a Trump nut swinger vying for AG, so of course he's gonna deny it.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

There, I typed it slower for you.  :cheers: 

Your post made me think of this scene;

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

The family obviously wasn't there when he said it, and the only person that denies he said it is Kash Patel who is a Trump nut swinger vying for AG, so of course he's gonna deny it.

Yeah, Kelly has no beef.

It's October, time for a SURPRISE! for simple minded folks.  :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

The family obviously wasn't there when he said it, and the only person that denies he said it is Kash Patel who is a Trump nut swinger vying for AG, so of course he's gonna deny it.

Mark Meadows also denied Trump made that alleged comment.

He didn’t exactly deny not paying for the funeral though, and like the lawyer the statement about that was pretty vague.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Mark Meadows also denied Trump made that alleged comment.

He didn’t exactly deny not paying for the funeral though, and like the lawyer the statement about that was pretty vague.

 

Of right, and this is the same Mark Meadows that was held in contempt of congress for refusing to testify about Jan 6, right?  The same Mark Meadows that was indicted for trying to steal the election in  both Georgia and Arizona?  Same guy right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TrailGuy said:

Of right, and this is the same Mark Meadows that was held in contempt of congress for refusing to testify about Jan 6, right?  The same Mark Meadows that was indicted for trying to steal the election in  both Georgia and Arizona?  Same guy right?

Yes, just saying it wasn’t just Patel denying it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

Have we established yet how much it does cost to bury a "##### Mexican"

Not sure, but in Tiajuana you can eat barbequed iguana

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Strike said:

Your post made me think of this scene;

 

Mount Rushmore of funniest TV scenes ever along with the WKRP Turkeys.  Long list of nominees for the other two.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Not sure, but in Tiajuana you can eat barbequed iguana

I'd take requests on the telephone

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jonmx said:

Have we figured out what the cost is yet?  

Doesn't matter since Trump didn't pay it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Have we figured out what the cost is yet?  

Trump could just bury her on his golf course for about $100 like he did to his exwife/baby mama.  Then write it off. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Have we figured out what the cost is yet?  

7 million Reichsmarks.    HITLER! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TrailGuy said:

Of right, and this is the same Mark Meadows that was held in contempt of congress for refusing to testify about Jan 6, right?  The same Mark Meadows that was indicted for trying to steal the election in  both Georgia and Arizona?  Same guy right?

Yes, multiple people who were there say it didn't happen.  You have a known hack from the Atlantic with an "anonymous source."

Just accept that you were duped by one of many October surprises$#@! from the Left/MSDNC to come.  I'd ask you to learn from this, but I don't have high hopes.  :(

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jonmx said:

Have we figured out what the cost is yet?  

More than the military was willing to pay, apparently 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TrailGuy said:

The family obviously wasn't there when he said it, and the only person that denies he said it is Kash Patel who is a Trump nut swinger vying for AG, so of course he's gonna deny it.

Who is the person that said he said it? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Who is the person that said he said it? 

You can' read the article?  Does this help?

In an Oval Office meeting on December 4, 2020, officials gathered to discuss a separate national-security issue. Toward the end of the discussion, Trump asked for an update on the McCarthy investigation. Christopher Miller, the acting secretary of defense (Trump had fired his predecessor, Mark Esper, three weeks earlier, writing in a tweet, “Mark Esper has been terminated”), was in attendance, along with Miller’s chief of staff, Kash Patel. At a certain point, according to two people present at the meeting, Trump asked, “Did they bill us for the funeral? What did it cost?”

According to attendees, and to contemporaneous notes of the meeting taken by a participant, an aide answered: Yes, we received a bill; the funeral cost $60,000.

Trump became angry. “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a Mexican!” He turned to his chief of staff, Mark Meadows, and issued an order: “Don’t pay it!” Later that day, he was still agitated. “Can you believe it?” he said, according to a witness. “ people, trying to rip me off.”

Khawam, the family attorney, told me she sent the bill to the White House, but no money was ever received by the family from Trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TrailGuy said:

You can' read the article?  Does this help?

In an Oval Office meeting on December 4, 2020, officials gathered to discuss a separate national-security issue. Toward the end of the discussion, Trump asked for an update on the McCarthy investigation. Christopher Miller, the acting secretary of defense (Trump had fired his predecessor, Mark Esper, three weeks earlier, writing in a tweet, “Mark Esper has been terminated”), was in attendance, along with Miller’s chief of staff, Kash Patel. At a certain point, according to two people present at the meeting, Trump asked, “Did they bill us for the funeral? What did it cost?”

According to attendees, and to contemporaneous notes of the meeting taken by a participant, an aide answered: Yes, we received a bill; the funeral cost $60,000.

Trump became angry. “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a Mexican!” He turned to his chief of staff, Mark Meadows, and issued an order: “Don’t pay it!” Later that day, he was still agitated. “Can you believe it?” he said, according to a witness. “ people, trying to rip me off.”

Khawam, the family attorney, told me she sent the bill to the White House, but no money was ever received by the family from Trump.

It was a simple question. Who said he said it?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

It was a simple question. Who said he said it?!

Come on man, two people that were there that no one knows the name of. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jonnyutah said:

It was a simple question. Who said he said it?!

That's too much text for you to read?  WTF Retard!

According to attendees, and to contemporaneous notes of the meeting taken by a participant

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

It was a simple question. Who said he said it?!

Quote

according to two people present at the meeting.

I know, this conversation is so old with the Donald, it's been going on since 2015. Let's avoid all the Fake News / Professional Journalism back & forth.

This is what I'm curious about:

A. If true Maga would care for and still adore the man that is Donald.

-OR-

B. It would totally matter but Maga can sleep safe in their knowledge The Leader is not like that sort of horrific person painted by this awful story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

That's too much text for you to read?  WTF Retard!

According to attendees, and to contemporaneous notes of the meeting taken by a participant

We call that deflection. 

The reality here is you have no clue. 

You cant provide a name. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

We call that deflection. 

The reality here is you have no clue. 

You cant provide a name. 

 

 

Do you know what an anonymous source means?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I know, this conversation is so old with the Donald, it's been going on since 2015. Let's avoid all the Fake News / Professional Journalism back & forth.

This is what I'm curious about:

A. If true Maga would care for and still adore the man that is Donald.

-OR-

B. It would totally matter but Maga can sleep safe in their knowledge The Leader is not like that sort of horrific person painted by this awful story.

"True Maga" doesnt care what the donald says at this point. They love him. 

But there is a large group of people that can see an increasingly devious and dishonest media is a horrible thing for this country.

25 years ago 60 minutes would have had their entire staff terminated or they would have likely resigned. Jeff Goldberg would have lost his job the last time he pulled this. 

We are living in a world where journalists now use the Colgate commercial technique as their gold standard. 

So people like "trail guy" impune every source that denies the story, but rely heavily on a source that he can't even provide a name for, and then aggressively tries to deflect from that. 

That's low IQ stuff. 

You might as well say nut uh and na na na boo boo. Same level. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Do you know what an anonymous source means?

These guys don't think Watergate happened either cause the source wasn't on the record. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Do you know what an anonymous source means?

Lol. Explain it to me Captain 70 smooth. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

These guys don't think Watergate happened either cause the source wasn't on the record. 

Watergate source being anonymous followed generally accepted journalistic principles for using such a source. 

Obviously the results of what went down back all of that up. 

Did that escape you? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Do you know what an anonymous source means?

Bless your heart.  :lol: 

Hey, did you hear that Kelly said that Trump likes Hitler?  October!  Surprise!  Simp!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×