weepaws 3,157 Posted November 23, 2024 Signal intention to defend planned parenthood. Indeed Psalm 55:16-19. As for me , I will call upon God, and the Lord shall save me. Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud, and He shall hear my voice. He has delivered my soul in peace from the battle that was against me, for there were many with me. God shall hear, and afflict them, even He that abide of old. Selah. Because they have no changes, therefore they fear not God. Indeed Amen Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,846 Posted November 23, 2024 defend? Or defund? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,157 Posted November 23, 2024 1 hour ago, weepaws said: Signal intention to defund planned parenthood. Indeed Psalm 55:16-19. As for me , I will call upon God, and the Lord shall save me. Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud, and He shall hear my voice. He has delivered my soul in peace from the battle that was against me, for there were many with me. God shall hear, and afflict them, even He that abide of old. Selah. Because they have no changes, therefore they fear not God. Indeed Amen Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,846 Posted November 23, 2024 1 hour ago, weepaws said: Signal intention to defend planned parenthood. Indeed Psalm 55:16-19. As for me , I will call upon God, and the Lord shall save me. Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud, and He shall hear my voice. He has delivered my soul in peace from the battle that was against me, for there were many with me. God shall hear, and afflict them, even He that abide of old. Selah. Because they have no changes, therefore they fear not God. Indeed Amen Thanks Literally in your initial post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,952 Posted November 23, 2024 Two foreigners have to unfock years of liberals screwing the whole thing up. Any port. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,157 Posted November 23, 2024 Don’t recall the last Republican President doing a total defunding of plan parenthood. He did some, but still left the door open for baby murders to take place, sad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,842 Posted November 24, 2024 People who work for me keep asking about what's going to happen .gov workers are worried. Not me I welcome it and I hope I'm enpowered to make firing decisions that have me handcuffed right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 388 Posted April 2 Of course Ramaswamy got pushed out almost immediately after Trump came into office. Now Musk shoved out as well. America wanted its reality TV show back, it got it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,242 Posted April 2 13 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Of course Ramaswamy got pushed out almost immediately after Trump came into office. Now Musk shoved out as well. America wanted its reality TV show back, it got it. you guys need to pick one thing and stick with it I thought Musk was the oligarch you wanted out of the govt he was brought in to do a job, and unlike all govt officials once his job is done hes no longer needed its really that simple, of course the idiotic news and left will try to turn it into something Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 388 Posted April 2 3 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: you guys need to pick one thing and stick with it I thought Musk was the oligarch you wanted out of the govt he was brought in to do a job, and unlike all govt officials once his job is done hes no longer needed its really that simple, of course the idiotic news and left will try to turn it into something Ha, hey I agree. I think it's great he's leaving. Completely unconstitutional and wreckless. My comment is really how Trump created an imaginary lawless agency and within 5 months the two people he appointed it to head it up are gone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,242 Posted April 2 1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Ha, hey I agree. I think it's great he's leaving. Completely unconstitutional and wreckless. My comment is really how Trump created an imaginary lawless agency and within 5 months the two people he appointed it to head it up are gone. its not unconstitutional hes working for the executive branch, the executive branch overseas tons of things hes probably sick of death threats from you lunatics Trump created an imaginary agency is hilarious, I am sure you ran here to post when obama did Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 388 Posted April 2 2 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: its not unconstitutional hes working for the executive branch, the executive branch overseas tons of things hes probably sick of death threats from you lunatics Trump created an imaginary agency is hilarious, I am sure you ran here to post when obama did But it styles itself as a department, which can only be created by Congress. And each agency has distinct firewalls. It's most likely because 1. ego, Musk overshadowing Trump, 2. The Wisconsin Effect, 3. Trump's own actual department heads revolting, and/or 4. the courts are finally drilling down on Musk's activities in the scores of lawsuits he has generated from his chaos. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,242 Posted April 2 1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: But it styles itself as a department, which can only be created by Congress. And each agency has distinct firewalls. It's most likely because 1. ego, Musk overshadowing Trump, 2. The Wisconsin Effect, 3. Trump's own actual department heads revolting, and/or 4. the courts are finally drilling down on Musk's activities in the scores of lawsuits he has generated from his chaos. the Wisconsin effect? a court that was 4/3 stayed 4/3 wow omg huge blue wave, I dont get why anyone gives a fock about wisconsin Musk isnt overshadowing Trump Which Trump department head is revolting, is that from MSNBC that got it from a source close to someone who knows what a person is thinking? Its unconstitutional what the courts are doing as far as illegals so I really don't care that a small time court thinks they should have more power than the executive branch Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,893 Posted April 2 3 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Of course Ramaswamy got pushed out almost immediately after Trump came into office. Now Musk shoved out as well. America wanted its reality TV show back, it got it. "Anonymous inside sources" aren't always trustworthy. https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1907519073287635313 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,369 Posted April 2 3 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Of course Ramaswamy got pushed out almost immediately after Trump came into office. Now Musk shoved out as well. America wanted its reality TV show back, it got it. Gullible idiot. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 388 Posted April 2 1 hour ago, Horseman said: Gullible idiot. The maga proclivity for: 1. insults, 2. vulgarity, &/or 3. memes always amuses me. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CaptainObvious1 327 Posted April 3 18 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: The maga proclivity for: 1. insults, 2. vulgarity, &/or 3. memes always amuses me. maga? We're all Americans Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 388 Posted April 3 Just now, CaptainObvious1 said: maga? We're all Americans I agree with you, we are. But I certainly don't think maga folks are defined by some ethnic or religious characteristic. It's ideology. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,157 Posted Friday at 07:43 AM Southern baptist convention membership declines. Matthew 24:10. And then many will be offended , will betray one another , and will hate one another. Indeed Amen Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,803 Posted Friday at 11:51 AM On 4/2/2025 at 5:49 PM, SaintsInDome2006 said: The maga proclivity for: 1. insults, 2. vulgarity, &/or 3. memes always amuses me. Yeah. You are knocking it out of the park with this take. Omar and the rest of these "unvulgar" liberals are really "MAGA". "Today I tried to ask @Ilhan a question on behalf of The @DailyCaller News Foundation and she told me to "F**k off" twice," Morell shared in an X post that also included video of the tense exchange. "Do you think more of your Democratic colleagues should be traveling to El Salvador to advocate on behalf of Abrego Garcia?" Morell asked as Omar and an entourage walked outside the Capitol in Washington, D.C. As she continued walking, Omar replied, "I think you should f--- off." Caught off guard, Morell asked, "I’m sorry, what?" The far-left lawmaker repeated herself, "You should f--- off." The journalist asked her to clarify once more. "Who should?" he asked. She shot back, "You." And some more "MAGA"... Democrats are embracing the f-bomb in congressional campaign messaging as they seek to tap into their party’s anger. In recent weeks, a number of newly launched Democratic hopefuls for key House and Senate seats have pledged to “unf‑‑‑ our country” or have urged their party to “drop the excuses and grow a f‑‑‑ing spine.” The ads are indicative of the rising temperature in American politics generally, but they also underscore the ways politicians are trying to resonate with base voters, many of whom have expressed frustration with Democratic leaders. “I think that in the case of the Democratic candidates … the swearing reflects their sense of crisis,” said Michael Adams, a lexicography expert and author of the book “In Praise of Profanity.” A spokesperson for the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) hit back, arguing that Democrats “seem obsessed with saying ‘f‑‑‑ing’ and ‘a‑‑’ as the strategy to win back the voters that rejected them in 2024.” They pointed The Hill to examples of sitting congressional Democrats leaning on the language lately. In New York, former journalist Mike Sacks earlier this month launched a Democratic challenge for Rep. Mike Lawler’s (R-N.Y.) Empire State seat, pledging to “unf‑‑‑ our country.” Challenging longtime Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) last month, progressive influencer Kat Abughazaleh told Democrats to “drop the excuses and grow a f‑‑‑ing spine.” “Lots of candidates use haughty, stilted language that sounds out of touch and even alienating. Kat sounds like a real person — and real people are f‑‑‑ing fed up with the status quo,” Abughazaleh’s campaign manager, Sam Weinberg, told The Hill. Now should I post the "non insults" the left throws at Trump and his voters? I'm sure you have never heard any liberal say anything about Nazis, Orange Cheetos Man, Authoritarian, Right Wing Cult Members, MAGA Retards... Do you really need me to go into this for you? I didn't think so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 388 Posted Friday at 01:59 PM 2 hours ago, seafoam1 said: Now should I post the "non insults" the left throws at Trump and his voters? I'm sure you have never heard any liberal say anything about Nazis, Orange Cheetos Man, Authoritarian, Right Wing Cult Members, MAGA Retards... Do you really need me to go into this for you? I didn't think so. This includes a “progressive influencer” & Rep. Omar - am I missing anyone from the above? As far as Omar is concerned, she’s frequently awful. I do think people & voters should reject that kind of behavior. However my point was about maga posters as responders. It’s often seen in discussions IMO & what gets me is that maga thinks of themselves as conservative or pro family values, but the insults & vulgarity are frequent from them online. But someone like Horsey is just a dude, same goes for the online personality whoever that is, someone like Omar is more significant. Voters should expect their elected officials to be good examples. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,803 Posted Friday at 03:05 PM 1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: This includes a “progressive influencer” & Rep. Omar - am I missing anyone from the above? As far as Omar is concerned, she’s frequently awful. I do think people & voters should reject that kind of behavior. However my point was about maga posters as responders. It’s often seen in discussions IMO & what gets me is that maga thinks of themselves as conservative or pro family values, but the insults & vulgarity are frequent from them online. But someone like Horsey is just a dude, same goes for the online personality whoever that is, someone like Omar is more significant. Voters should expect their elected officials to be good examples. You forgot this along with every liberal on this site: Yeah. You are knocking it out of the park with this take. Omar and the rest of these "unvulgar" liberals are really "MAGA". "Today I tried to ask @Ilhan a question on behalf of The @DailyCaller News Foundation and she told me to "F**k off" twice," Morell shared in an X post that also included video of the tense exchange. "Do you think more of your Democratic colleagues should be traveling to El Salvador to advocate on behalf of Abrego Garcia?" Morell asked as Omar and an entourage walked outside the Capitol in Washington, D.C. As she continued walking, Omar replied, "I think you should f--- off." Caught off guard, Morell asked, "I’m sorry, what?" The far-left lawmaker repeated herself, "You should f--- off." The journalist asked her to clarify once more. "Who should?" he asked. She shot back, "You." And some more "MAGA"... Democrats are embracing the f-bomb in congressional campaign messaging as they seek to tap into their party’s anger. In recent weeks, a number of newly launched Democratic hopefuls for key House and Senate seats have pledged to “unf‑‑‑ our country” or have urged their party to “drop the excuses and grow a f‑‑‑ing spine.” The ads are indicative of the rising temperature in American politics generally, but they also underscore the ways politicians are trying to resonate with base voters, many of whom have expressed frustration with Democratic leaders. “I think that in the case of the Democratic candidates … the swearing reflects their sense of crisis,” said Michael Adams, a lexicography expert and author of the book “In Praise of Profanity.” A spokesperson for the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) hit back, arguing that Democrats “seem obsessed with saying ‘f‑‑‑ing’ and ‘a‑‑’ as the strategy to win back the voters that rejected them in 2024.” They pointed The Hill to examples of sitting congressional Democrats leaning on the language lately. In New York, former journalist Mike Sacks earlier this month launched a Democratic challenge for Rep. Mike Lawler’s (R-N.Y.) Empire State seat, pledging to “unf‑‑‑ our country.” Challenging longtime Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) last month, progressive influencer Kat Abughazaleh told Democrats to “drop the excuses and grow a f‑‑‑ing spine.” “Lots of candidates use haughty, stilted language that sounds out of touch and even alienating. Kat sounds like a real person — and real people are f‑‑‑ing fed up with the status quo,” Abughazaleh’s campaign manager, Sam Weinberg, told The Hill. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,803 Posted Friday at 03:08 PM 1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: This includes a “progressive influencer” & Rep. Omar - am I missing anyone from the above? As far as Omar is concerned, she’s frequently awful. I do think people & voters should reject that kind of behavior. However my point was about maga posters as responders. It’s often seen in discussions IMO & what gets me is that maga thinks of themselves as conservative or pro family values, but the insults & vulgarity are frequent from them online. But someone like Horsey is just a dude, same goes for the online personality whoever that is, someone like Omar is more significant. Voters should expect their elected officials to be good examples. Do you need to be reminded of all the libtard posters as responders on this site and what they have been responding with? Or do you not read their posts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,952 Posted Friday at 03:15 PM Tampon Tom was picked to give the ticket some masculinity. Plus Josh Shapiro was too Jewish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 388 Posted Friday at 06:30 PM 3 hours ago, seafoam1 said: Do you need to be reminded of all the libtard posters as responders on this site and what they have been responding with? Or do you not read their posts? You may be right about that - do you get a high frequency of insults and vulgarity from liberal posters? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,803 Posted Saturday at 03:34 AM 9 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: You may be right about that - do you get a high frequency of insults and vulgarity from liberal posters? No. Do you need help searching for all the insults thrown around to everyone and simply in general from the liberals on this site? Or can you manage to find that yourself? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites