Illegal immigrant charged in cheerleader's murder 'knew what he was doing' despite latest claim

[jbycho 755]

This didn't happen. We need to let in more. 

 

 

Rafael Govea Romero, of Mexico, is charged with capital murder in Lizbeth Medina's December 2023 homicide in Texas

The mother of slain 16-year-old Lizbeth Medina, who was allegedly murdered by an illegal immigrant from Mexico in December 2023, says the suspect's request for an insanity evaluation only "adds to the pain."

Rafael Govea Romero, 25, is charged with capital murder after Lizbeth was found dead with stab wounds on Dec. 5, 2023, in the bathroom of the Edna, Texas, apartment she shared with her mother.

"I broke down. I completely broke down," Jacqueline Medina, Lizbeth's mother, told Fox News Digital of her reaction to seeing his request for an insanity test, as local newspaper The Victoria Advocate first reported.

"For me, there's enough evidence that is obviously determining the fact… he knew what he was doing," Medina said. "One of the police officers said he seemed to be professional."

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/illegal-immigrant-charged-cheerleaders-murder-knew-what-he-doing-despite-latest-claim-mom-says

[weepaws 3,318]

Why was she with this 25 year old? 

[Maximum Overkill 2,400]

1 minute ago, weepaws said:

Why was she with this 25 year old? 

He's a Liberal, he groomed her 

[jbycho 755]

12 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Why was she with this 25 year old? 

He was telling her about God. 

[weepaws 3,318]

11 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

He's a Liberal, he groomed her 

Shame on her parents.  

 

[weepaws 3,318]

1 minute ago, jbycho said:

He was telling her about God. 

Hebrews 4:12.  For the Word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two edge sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.   Indeed 

Amen Thanks 

[weepaws 3,318]

3 minutes ago, jbycho said:

He was telling her about God. 

So you have experience of luring 16 year olds in that manner? Shame.  

[jbycho 755]

1 minute ago, weepaws said:

So you have experience of luring 16 year olds in that manner? Shame.  

18+ year old girls. Yes. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,527]

good hes insane, put him in an electric chair and tell him hes on a roller coaster

 

[jbycho 755]

55 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

good hes insane, put him in an electric chair and tell him hes on a roller coaster

 

It will take 30 years for some reason. 

[squistion 2,481]

16 minutes ago, jbycho said:

It will take 30 years for some reason. 

It does not generally take 30 years. As of 2020 there was an average of 18.9 years from sentencing until execution.

And SCOTUS is the reason. There is an extensive and lengthy appeals process set by the courts that must be followed (as much as some folks would like to fast track it). 

[jbycho 755]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

It does not generally take 30 years. As of 2020 there was an average of 18.9 years from sentencing until execution.

And SCOTUS is the reason. There is an extensive and lengthy appeals process set by the courts that must be followed (as much as some folks would like to fast track it). 

If there is no doubt, I don't care about mental health. Kill the killer. Now. 

[HellToupee 2,165]

Just now, jbycho said:

If there is no doubt, I don't care about mental health. Kill the killer. Now. 

19 years is much too long

[squistion 2,481]

Just now, jbycho said:

If there is no doubt, I don't care about mental health. Kill the killer. Now. 

Sorry, but SCOTUS says there is this pesky thing in the Constitution called "due process" that must be given to anyone who has been sentenced to death.

[Baker Boy 1,710]

12 minutes ago, squistion said:

Sorry, but SCOTUS says there is this pesky thing in the Constitution called "due process" that must be given to anyone who has been sentenced to death.

 

20 minutes ago, squistion said:

It does not generally take 30 years. As of 2020 there was an average of 18.9 years from sentencing until execution.

And SCOTUS is the reason. There is an extensive and lengthy appeals process set by the courts that must be followed (as much as some folks would like to fast track it). 

How is this the SCOTUS fault? Did they misinterpret the constitution?

[squistion 2,481]

42 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

How is this the SCOTUS fault? Did they misinterpret the constitution?

The Constitution requires that a defendant be given due process under the law. Given the irreversible nature of this punishment; SCOTUS is trying to prevent the government from taking a life without following all of the strict procedural safeguards, so that an innocent person does not receive the death penalty. 

Fun Fact: According to most studies, a life sentence without parole is generally considered to be significantly cheaper than executing a defendant, as the legal process involved in a death penalty case is much more complex and expensive, leading to higher overall costs for the state.

[Nomad99 802]

Here's another fun fact......if we make the change so that the constitution only applies to LEGAL CITIZENS OF THE USA.......it's the cost of a bullet after sentencing.

[Strike 5,980]

2 hours ago, squistion said:

The Constitution requires that a defendant be given due process under the law. Given the irreversible nature of this punishment; SCOTUS is trying to prevent the government from taking a life without following all of the strict procedural safeguards, so that an innocent person does not receive the death penalty. 

Fun Fact: According to most studies, a life sentence without parole is generally considered to be significantly cheaper than executing a defendant, as the legal process involved in a death penalty case is much more complex and expensive, leading to higher overall costs for the state.

If you are a focking idiot do not reply to this post.

[easilyscan 1,004]

As they say in Minnesota, all are welcome here. Diversity is our strength.

[jbycho 755]

4 hours ago, squistion said:

The Constitution requires that a defendant be given due process under the law. Given the irreversible nature of this punishment; SCOTUS is trying to prevent the government from taking a life without following all of the strict procedural safeguards, so that an innocent person does not receive the death penalty. 

Fun Fact: According to most studies, a life sentence without parole is generally considered to be significantly cheaper than executing a defendant, as the legal process involved in a death penalty case is much more complex and expensive, leading to higher overall costs for the state.

Wow. What a dumbass this guy is. 

[seafoam1 3,401]

4 hours ago, Strike said:

If you are a focking idiot do not reply to this post.

It's hard to believe that dude is still trying on this site. 

[Maximum Overkill 2,400]

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1864040499805364699

 

 

[lickin_starfish 2,001]

https://media.scored.co/scale/ZJG4qe067pf5cJaE.jpeg