Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
HellToupee

Karoline Leavitt Eviscerates Enemy of the State Reporter

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:
  • During the debate on the 14th Amendment, Senator Howard provided this clarification when discussing the clause regarding citizenship for those "born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." 
     
  • Interpretation:
    Howard's view was that "subject to the jurisdiction" essentially excluded children born to individuals who were not fully subject to U.S. laws, like foreign diplomats or individuals on foreign soil. 
     

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

You really think that they intended on people to be here not permanently to have kids that were American citizens?

if you are not here legally or on vacation you are not part of the jurisdiction

we all know what it says 

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mike Hunt said:

The tape does not lie, video montages  of groping and racists comments.

Yet Biden gets a pass on all this..... 🤔

I might suggest Biden gets a pass because he leaned into the preferred dogma of legacy media. So his misdeeds are forgiven.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Thanks.  From your link:

Glad we could clear that up.  :thumbsup: 

You guys will swallow anything. Ah yes, she’s not responsible. :doh: IT WAS HER CAMPAIGN, if she didn’t know what $$$ was coming in and going out, she’s an idiot. Grifters gonna grift and you guys are easy marks. 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Girlfriend said:

You guys will swallow anything. Ah yes, she’s not responsible. :doh: IT WAS HER CAMPAIGN, if she didn’t know what $$$ was coming in and going out, she’s an idiot. Grifters gonna grift and you guys are easy marks. 🤣

Did you conclude this from your objective article from a place called END CITIZENS UNITED?  No chance they have an agenda.  

But even with the agenda, they had the integrity to report that she is not personally involved.

So... one of us is drawing conclusions based on feelz and not facts.  Hint: it isn't me.

BTW, did you find this article on some center-right corner of the internet that isn't news, since you don't read news?  :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Did you conclude this from your objective article from a place called END CITIZENS UNITED?  No chance they have an agenda.  

But even with the agenda, they had the integrity to report that she is not personally involved.

So... one of us is drawing conclusions based on feelz and not facts.  Hint: it isn't me.

BTW, did you find this article on some center-right corner of the internet that isn't news, since you don't read news?  :dunno: 

She;s not personally involved in her own campaign finances. 🤣 

https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/H2NH01270/?cycle=2022&election_full=false

The debt is under her filing. How is she not responsible? 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, The Girlfriend said:

She;s not personally involved in her own campaign finances. 🤣 

https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/H2NH01270/?cycle=2022&election_full=false

The debt is under her filing. How is she not responsible? 🤣

I provided the quotes from your own link that you didn't read.  You didn't answer where you found that BTW, since you claim to not be a Leftie nor read the news.

Regardless, how does a filing by her campaign dispute the quotes I provided from your link that you didn't read?

5 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Jerrry isn't capable of thinking for herself 🤣🤣🤣

Girlfriend, I'll tell you again, you don't want to associate with this tard.  But maybe you aren't as smart as I thought you were.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I provided the quotes from your own link that you didn't read.  You didn't answer where you found that BTW, since you claim to not be a Leftie nor read the news.

Regardless, how does a filing by her campaign dispute the quotes I provided from your link that you didn't read?

Still thinks she not responsible even though it’s right there on HER FEC filing. You interested in buying a bridge, Jerry?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, The Girlfriend said:

Still thinks she not responsible even though it’s right there on HER FEC filing. You interested in buying a bridge, Jerry?

Non responsive.  Carry on.  :cheers: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, The Girlfriend said:

⬆️💯

Your just posting pablum.  

Explain to us how, given the quotes from your link that you didn't read, this is indicative of "grift".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Your just posting pablum.  

Explain to us how, given the quotes from your link that you didn't read, this is indicative of "grift".

Believes Republican strategist Erin Perrine and not her FEC Filings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, The Girlfriend said:

Believes Republican strategist Erin Perrine and not her FEC Filings.

The FEC filing for her campaign confirms that she is personally a grifter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

And now she has just sent out a memo denying that the rescind was actually a rescind. 
 

You can’t make this up. 

You can't make up how triggered and suffering you are. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, The Girlfriend said:

:doh:

He's a shill for Trump.  Probably wearing the gold sneakers right now. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, The Girlfriend said:

:doh:

Do you do your own taxes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Do you do your own taxes?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

It's right on the tax form, you sign saying you're responsible!

HOLE EEE SH1T 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TrailGuy said:

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

It's right on the tax form, you sign saying you're responsible!

HOLE EEE SH1T 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Did you bang your head extra hard this morning?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Did you bang your head extra hard this morning?

⬆️ Thinks you're not responsible for your own taxes 🤣🤣🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TrailGuy said:

⬆️ Thinks you're not responsible for your own taxes 🤣🤣🤣

I'll try to dumb it down for you one more time.  How does signing the FEC form confirm that she personally is a grifter?

Honestly, my heart sinks a little when you jump into a thread like this.  I lose brain cells in every response to you.  :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jerryskids said:

I'll try to dumb it down for you one more time.  How does signing the FEC form confirm that she personally is a grifter?

:doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Girlfriend said:

URL not found.  However, reading the text here, I'm well aware that the taxpayer is ultimately responsible in most cases for such things.  I'd ask again how that confirms that she, and not the preparer or others in the organization, was the "grifter".  But you seem incapable of intelligent conversation; certainly on this topic, which I've asked numerous times.

Here, I'll post in a manner you seem to understand.

🤣

1 hour ago, TrailGuy said:

Can you imagine talking to a person like this in real life? 🤣🤣🤣

Imagine pretending to be a finance exec and not understanding how these things work.

Maybe you can take a trip to Dubai or Patagonia for a conference to learn up on basic finance, if you can work it into your global travel schedule. 

🤣🤣🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

URL not found.  However, reading the text here, I'm well aware that the taxpayer is ultimately responsible in most cases for such things.  I'd ask again how that confirms that she, and not the preparer or others in the organization, was the "grifter".  But you seem incapable of intelligent conversation; certainly on this topic, which I've asked numerous times.

Here, I'll post in a manner you seem to understand.

🤣

Imagine pretending to be a finance exec and not understanding how these things work.

Maybe you can take a trip to Dubai or Patagonia for a conference to learn up on basic finance, if you can work it into your global travel schedule. 

🤣🤣🤣

Oh I know how things work and I can tell you that when a candidate running for office fails to report contributions and spends them, they know what they are doing.

And when they are only forced to amend filings to report these contributions as a result of an error, they know what they are doing and that is clearly trying to grift off the contributions.

You can deny this all you want but I live in the real world and I know how it works.

:first:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Oh I know how things work and I can tell you that when a candidate running for office fails to report contributions and spends them, they know what they are doing.

And when they are only forced to amend filings to report these contributions as a result of an error, they know what they are doing and that is clearly trying to grift off the contributions.

You can deny this all you want but I live in the real world and I know how it works.

:first:

 

I thought you were a high-level finance VP of a healthcare-adjacent company, how would you know this?  Being healthcare-adjacent, did you contribute to Bernie or Warren?  :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Karoline put on a masterclass on how to run a news briefing today

She’s just embarrassing herself again. Had she got no dignity? Why doesn’t she say “I can’t lie for this schmuck any longer; I’m stepping down.” That’s what any decent person would do at this point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

She’s just embarrassing herself again. Had she got no dignity? Why doesn’t she say “I can’t lie for this schmuck any longer; I’m stepping down.” That’s what any decent person would do at this point. 

Inflation is transitory 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

She’s just embarrassing herself again. Had she got no dignity? Why doesn’t she say “I can’t lie for this schmuck any longer; I’m stepping down.” That’s what any decent person would do at this point. 

⬆️ Translation - thats what this lipstick dress wearing weakling would do.  Afraid of women, not a real man.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

She’s just embarrassing herself again. Had she got no dignity? Why doesn’t she say “I can’t lie for this schmuck any longer; I’m stepping down.” That’s what any decent person would do at this point. 

It must suck for someone like you to have to watch someone prepared, intelligent, and articulate who doesn't dodge questions up there instead of a DEI hire like KJP.  Gonna be a long four years.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Strike said:

It must suck for someone like you to have to watch someone prepared, intelligent, and articulate who doesn't dodge questions up there instead of a DEI hire like KJP.  Gonna be a long four years.......

I can’t tell you if it would suck or not since she’s none of those things. And yeah it will be a long 4 years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Strike said:

It must suck for someone like you to have to watch someone prepared, intelligent, and articulate who doesn't dodge questions up there instead of a DEI hire like KJP.  Gonna be a long four years.......

WTF boyo.  KJP was prepared intelligent and articulate.  Oh, she was black.  so DEI! 

Garbage person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×