Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
League Champion

Pam Bondi says Epstein files to be released today with flight logs and names

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, KSB2424 said:

That is good due diligence to respect victims privacy.  However you do that before the charade of the other day.  

This was handled poorly.  

How was it handled poorly?  Serious question - I'd like to understand where you're coming from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Hmmm……interesting 

 

some of that was pretty interesting. the melania stuff was kind of odd. why would trump wish gizlaine well if his wife came from that world and she was supposedly championing against it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Epstein trafficking victim who was offered up to Prince Andrew in hospital, claims she only has days to live after being hit by a bus.   Police have different story.   Hospital says she's being discharged within a few days.    

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/new-details-emerge-as-prince-andrew-accuser-virginia-roberts-giuffre-has-days-to-live/news-story/d5624e9824072b58f1aa458c6323eb24

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its been over a month since the Epstein file release non-event. At that time were told that a slew of previously unknown data had come into the national DoJ from their New York office. So... uh... regarding that new data...

It may be like the Kennedy assassination stuff... somebody quietly went in and scrubbed/removed all the most relevant and juicy info like they did Epstein himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/23/2025 at 3:48 PM, The Psychic Observer said:

Update?

Looks like somewhere along the line, someone with inside access made sure this got scrubbed, like the Kennedy assassination stuff, and the true identity of the owner of Hunter Biden's cocaine baggy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/23/2025 at 4:48 PM, The Psychic Observer said:

Update?

There were no 8 year olds there so Joe Biden is out of the picture. His daughter can confirm his preferences. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, jbycho said:

There were no 8 year olds there so Joe Biden is out of the picture. His daughter can confirm his preferences. 

There's only one president who has ever been sued by someone claiming they were assaulted by him as a minor. And it was not Joe Biden.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

There's only one president who has ever been sued by someone claiming they were assaulted by him as a minor. And it was not Joe Biden.

Imagine having a conversation with this jerk off in real life? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Imagine having a conversation with this jerk off in real life? 

That was Epstein's M.O., you're right, but again, that was Trump's friend, not Biden's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/1/2025 at 4:46 PM, Voltaire said:

Its been over a month since the Epstein file release non-event. At that time were told that a slew of previously unknown data had come into the national DoJ from their New York office. So... uh... regarding that new data...

It may be like the Kennedy assassination stuff... somebody quietly went in and scrubbed/removed all the most relevant and juicy info like they did Epstein himself.

IIRC data was also seized during the raid and arrest in Palm Beach FL. That data disappeared. The US Attorney then was Alex Acosta, who of course Trump named as his Labor Secretary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

IIRC data was also seized during the raid and arrest in Palm Beach FL. That data disappeared. The US Attorney then was Alex Acosta, who of course Trump named as his Labor Secretary.

So glad you FBG’s rejects came over. We never heard this stuff before. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

There's only one president who has ever been sued by someone claiming they were assaulted by him as a minor. And it was not Joe Biden.

What does that have to do with anything? Joe's daughter put in words how she tried to hide taking showers from him because he would always get into the shower naked with her. 

What do lawsuits have to do with realities? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jbycho said:

What does that have to do with anything? Joe's daughter put in words how she tried to hide taking showers from him because he would always get into the shower naked with her. 

What do lawsuits have to do with realities? 

They have a lot to do with reality, they're sworn statements. The persons who stole Ashley Biden's diary were indicted and it was so unbelievable that even the worst of the worst right wing blogs didn't want to touch it. If everyone from Breitbart to Rebel News and even Garrett Ziegler won't touch it that says a lot.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

They have a lot to do with reality, they're sworn statements. The persons who stole Ashley Biden's diary were indicted and it was so unbelievable that even the worst of the worst right wing blogs didn't want to touch it. If everyone from Breitbart to Rebel News and even Garrett Ziegler won't touch it that says a lot.

Ok. What happened to Jessie Smollett? 

Just because his daughter doesn't sue, doesn't mean shlt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jbycho said:

Ok. What happened to Jessie Smollett? 

The guy is a fraud. He never should have been let out of jail IMO (well until his sentence ran out).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

The guy is a fraud. He never should have been let out of jail IMO (well until his sentence ran out).

Liberal let him out. That is what you vote for. 

Biden is a pedo, and that is also what you vote for. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jbycho said:

Liberal let him out. That is what you vote for. 

I'm only going to agree with you about every single thing about Smollett. And Harris had a lot of problems as a candidate but her rush to support him without knowing the facts is a pretty good example of her flaws. - Eh I tend to vote for conservative judges. My problem with judge races (at least here) is no one shows up to vote for them, liberal and conservative the voters don't care.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jbycho said:

 Biden is a pedo, and that is also what you vote for. 

If only there was an AG and a DOJ that Trump supporters could trust who would investigate such a thing. - IIRC they indicted Hunter Biden over a line in his own book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

If only there was an AG and a DOJ that Trump supporters could trust who would investigate such a thing. - IIRC they indicted Hunter Biden over a line in his own book.

Yep. Presidents never cover up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jbycho said:

Yep. Presidents never cover up. 

I'm in favor of investigating public officials of all stripes and sizes of office. IG's, DA's, USA's, FBI, DEA, ICE, the Post Office, let them investigate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I'm in favor of investigating public officials of all stripes and sizes of office. IG's, DA's, USA's, FBI, DEA, ICE, the Post Office, let them investigate.

Biden laptop? No thanks. AMIRIGHT? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jbycho said:

Biden laptop? No thanks. AMIRIGHT? 

Ha, I don't know what people want. The data is handed off to Trump's own attorney, who brings it to Trump's own AG, who hands it to the FBI run by Trump's own FBID, and the laptop data is used by Trump's own US Attorney to convict Hunter Biden twice before two Trump appointed judges. Is there something else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Ha, I don't know what people want. The data is handed off to Trump's own attorney, who brings it to Trump's own AG, who hands it to the FBI run by Trump's own FBID, and the laptop data is used by Trump's own US Attorney to convict Hunter Biden twice before two Trump appointed judges. Is there something else?

Yeah. Keep reading your liberal directives. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jbycho said:

Yeah. Keep reading your liberal directives

I'm asking you - maybe have Tyrus beat Hunter Biden over the head with the laptop in front of Maralago? Garrett Ziegler even published all the data on a searchable website. - What was not done with the laptop data you'd like to have done with it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Ha, I don't know what people want. The data is handed off to Trump's own attorney, who brings it to Trump's own AG, who hands it to the FBI run by Trump's own FBID, and the laptop data is used by Trump's own US Attorney to convict Hunter Biden twice before two Trump appointed judges. Is there something else?

The CIA calling it a Russian hack doesn’t concern you? And then the guy that put it together becomes sec of state? It’s all good. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

The CIA calling it a Russian hack doesn’t concern you? And then the guy that put it together becomes sec of state? It’s all good. 

Ok let's say that's true - all of it. We're good with Pam Bondi, Kash Patel and Dan freakin' Bongino investigating all that, right? Indict away, boys!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Ok let's say that's true - all of it. We're good with Pam Bondi, Kash Patel and Dan freakin' Bongino investigating all that, right? Indict away, boys!

You are struggling to divert. It's not working no matter how hard you try. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jbycho said:

You are struggling to divert. It's not working no matter how hard you try. 

You want me to address the issue of the letter itself?

Let's say this - if Marco Rubio lassoed 50 ex-IC officers/agents to publish a letter covering up some crime of Trump or Vance, then yeah I'm sure I would be demanding their indictment.

I personally do not think the Blinken letter was false, wrong or misleading. That's just me and I'm willing to defend that but I also think that if the DOJ brought a good case against it I'd consider myself shocked but thankful they brought it to light.

But you really, really have a hard line arguing that Bondi, Patel and Bongino (!) are protecting Blinken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

You want me to address the issue of the letter itself?

Let's say this - if Marco Rubio lassoed 50 ex-IC officers/agents to publish a letter covering up some crime of Trump or Vance, then yeah I'm sure I would be demanding their indictment.

I personally do not think the Blinken letter was false, wrong or misleading. That's just me and I'm willing to defend that but I also think that if the DOJ brought a good case against it I'd consider myself shocked but thankful they brought it to light.

But you really, really have a hard line arguing that Bondi, Patel and Bongino (!) are protecting Blinken.

Laptop. Not letter. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, jbycho said:

Laptop. Not letter. 

I must be missing something. What are you looking to have happen? Burisma investigated?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

You want me to address the issue of the letter itself?

Let's say this - if Marco Rubio lassoed 50 ex-IC officers/agents to publish a letter covering up some crime of Trump or Vance, then yeah I'm sure I would be demanding their indictment.

I personally do not think the Blinken letter was false, wrong or misleading. That's just me and I'm willing to defend that but I also think that if the DOJ brought a good case against it I'd consider myself shocked but thankful they brought it to light.

But you really, really have a hard line arguing that Bondi, Patel and Bongino (!) are protecting Blinken.

 One on the right is happy about Bondi and companies inaction. But you were ok with what happened. Says a lot about you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

 One on the right is happy about Bondi and companies inaction. But you were ok with what happened. Says a lot about you. 

I'm ok with it if nothing wrong happened. But if the DOJ issued an indictment showing some sort of subterfuge and deception that would change my mind. On the other hand there will be people who will never let go of the idea that wrongdoing occurred even if Bondi, Ratcliffe, Gabbard, Patel and Bongino never find any themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×