The Real timschochet 6,750 Posted March 12 1 hour ago, supermike80 said: We know. But this is the democrats fault. 100%. Kamala was a horrible choice for president. Worst I have ever seen. I'm supremely confident if she had been elected, this country would have continued down a path to self destruction. I know you feel that's what we are getting now with Trump. And I get your position. But here is no way in hell I could have voted for her. Obviously we disagree strongly about Kamala. But it’s a moot point. We have Trump, he is our President. I really do want him to succeed because I don’t want this nation to suffer. The first step is that the people around him have to talk him out of these tariffs. Other than Navarro, I know they know better. Both Musk and Lutnick are guys with deep knowledge of trade, there is no way they can think this is a good thing. They have to sit Trump down and get some sense into him before it’s too late. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,488 Posted March 12 4 minutes ago, jerryskids said: How would you prove their citizenship? You know where I live right? Would you agree that Wang, Gujar, Shang and Hasan are asian surnames? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,790 Posted March 12 Just now, Ron_Artest said: You know where I live right? Would you agree that Wang, Gujar, Jun and Hasan are asian surnames? Your analogy was to Haitian migrants, who lived where it was common to eat dogs, then coming to America. I'm talking about similar. So I'm not talking about a third generation American citizen with an Asian surname, racist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,488 Posted March 12 7 minutes ago, jerryskids said: Your analogy was to Haitian migrants, who lived where it was common to eat dogs, then coming to America. I'm talking about similar. So I'm not talking about a third generation American citizen with an Asian surname, racist. Not my analogy, it was HT's. You also don't know what generation my neighbors are. I would highly doubt that people in my neighborhood eat pets, same way Haitians in Springfield don't eat pets either. Besides all you said is that we don't allow Asians to live here. Asians do live here. Unless you think those surnames are white. And that's twice you've called me racist for no reason. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,401 Posted March 12 If Haitians eat dogs or cats anywhere, that means it’s true that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, OH, are eating the pets. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,790 Posted March 12 4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Not my analogy, it was HT's. You also don't know what generation my neighbors are. I would highly doubt that people in my neighborhood eat pets, same way Haitians in Springfield don't eat pets either. Besides all you said is that we don't allow Asians to live here. Asians do live here. Unless you think those surnames are white. And that's twice you've called me racist for no reason. 54 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: And people in Asia eat dogs, but my asian neighbors are not looking to BBQ my dog either. You got played, you're a gullible low IQ person who can't admit they were wrong. It was your analogy, in response to HT's statement that people in Haiti eat cats. HTH. Also I called you racist because you are calling Americans with Asian surnames "Asians." I only noticed it because a few minutes ago I looked up two golfers of Indian ethnicity: Akshay Bhatia (born January 31, 2002)[2] is an American professional golfer. Sahith Reddy Theegala (born December 4, 1997)[3] is an American professional golfer who plays on the PGA Tour. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
patweisers44 845 Posted March 12 16 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: You know where I live right? Would you agree that Wang, Gujar, Shang and Hasan are asian surnames? Wang is definitely Jewish, according to Al Czervik in Caddyshack. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,488 Posted March 12 3 minutes ago, jerryskids said: It was your analogy, in response to HT's statement that people in Haiti eat cats. HTH. Also I called you racist because you are calling Americans with Asian surnames "Asians." I only noticed it because a few minutes ago I looked up two golfers of Indian ethnicity: Akshay Bhatia (born January 31, 2002)[2] is an American professional golfer. Sahith Reddy Theegala (born December 4, 1997)[3] is an American professional golfer who plays on the PGA Tour. The first time you called me racist was because I wouldn't let asian people live in my neighborhood. The second time was because I assumed a person with a last name of Wang is of Asian ethnicity. You stand by both those statements? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,902 Posted March 12 46 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: Obviously we disagree strongly about Kamala. But it’s a moot point. We have Trump, he is our President. I really do want him to succeed because I don’t want this nation to suffer. The first step is that the people around him have to talk him out of these tariffs. Other than Navarro, I know they know better. Both Musk and Lutnick are guys with deep knowledge of trade, there is no way they can think this is a good thing. They have to sit Trump down and get some sense into him before it’s too late. What is "too late" exactly? What are you fear mongering over? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,902 Posted March 12 2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said: We would be in a MUCH better position if Kamala won, IMO. We wouldn't have a trade war, the economy would still be growing, govt would not be slashed, BUT republicans WOULD control both house and senate and have the ability to do what they wanted legally, then it would be up to Harris to veto or agree. Govt the way it should work, instead of the chaotic dictatorship we have now. Of course if you believe that the govt needs to be torn down and the US needs to withdraw from its allies and the world, well then you're getting what you want. Yes we know how you feel. Understood Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,488 Posted March 12 Just now, supermike80 said: Yes we know how you feel. Understood Facts not Feelz It's a fact that the US would be much better off right now economically right now if we had Harris over Trump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,902 Posted March 12 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: Facts not Feelz It's a fact that the US would be much better off right now economically right now if we had Harris over Trump. It is impossible for you to know that since Kamala is not in office. So no, that's a feelings position Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,488 Posted March 12 Just now, supermike80 said: It is impossible for you to know that since Kalama is not in office. So no, that's a feelings position I'm 100% confident that Kamala would NOT have started a trade war, cut govt funding and laid off thousands, and that is the exact reason why the economy is tanking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,902 Posted March 12 Just now, Ron_Artest said: I'm 100% confident that Kamala would NOT have started a trade war, cut govt funding and laid off thousands, and that is the exact reason why the economy is tanking. That's fine that this is your opinion. I respect it. It's not fact, but it is how you feel. And I totally understand it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,750 Posted March 12 25 minutes ago, supermike80 said: What is "too late" exactly? What are you fear mongering over? This is what I mean by too late: the other countries retaliate, and then Trump retaliates, and that’s how trade wars get started. Once they start it’s very difficult to stop because all parties have a lot of national pride and resentment which makes it very difficult for a nation’s leaders to back off (we already are starting to see this happening with Canada.) This isn’t fearmongering. It’s what happened in history almost every time tariffs are attempted as means to achieve some other goal. You can read books on Smoot Harley, or President McKinley in the 1890s- the results are always the same. But it’s not too late yet. Trump can back off right now, and it will be no harm no foul. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,985 Posted March 12 1 hour ago, MDC said: If Haitians eat dogs or cats anywhere, that means it’s true that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, OH, are eating the pets. You forgot Rats Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,750 Posted March 12 25 minutes ago, supermike80 said: That's fine that this is your opinion. I respect it. It's not fact, but it is how you feel. And I totally understand it While you can argue over the rest of his points, it IS very likely that she would not have started a trade war. I don’t see how you can reasonably argue otherwise. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 754 Posted March 12 1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said: This is what I mean by too late: the other countries retaliate, and then Trump retaliates, and that’s how trade wars get started. Once they start it’s very difficult to stop because all parties have a lot of national pride and resentment which makes it very difficult for a nation’s leaders to back off (we already are starting to see this happening with Canada.) This isn’t fearmongering. It’s what happened in history almost every time tariffs are attempted as means to achieve some other goal. You can read books on Smoot Harley, or President McKinley in the 1890s- the results are always the same. But it’s not too late yet. Trump can back off right now, and it will be no harm no foul. More fear mongering from the radical left. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,985 Posted March 12 1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said: While you can argue over the rest of his points, it IS very likely that she would not have started a trade war. I don’t see how you can reasonably argue otherwise. DEI Kamala wouldn't know how to start a pillow fight Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,401 Posted March 12 We do have consensus that Haitians do indeed eat cats. And dogs. Thats all I’m saying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,750 Posted March 12 Just now, jbycho said: More fear mongering from the radical left. My response to this post is not meant for the guy who wrote it, because he is an idiot, but for anyone else reading it: the main opposition to tariffs are not coming from the “radical left” but from conservatives who traditionally believe in free enterprise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,449 Posted March 12 Market was due a correction for over 2 years. Stupids say it wouldn't have happened under the leadership of the great economist Kamala Harris. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 754 Posted March 12 1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said: My response to this post is not meant for the guy who wrote it, because he is an idiot, but for anyone else reading it: the main opposition to tariffs are not coming from the “radical left” but from conservatives who traditionally believe in free enterprise. More fear mongering from the radical left. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,985 Posted March 12 1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said: Besides all you said is that we don't allow Asians to live here. Asians do live here I like those Washy Washy massage parlors. Asians are vital IMO, and great at Math. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 754 Posted March 12 2 minutes ago, Horseman said: Market was due a correction for over 2 years. Stupids say it wouldn't have happened under the leadership of the great economist Kamala Harris. Liberals only know how to emote weird feelings. They know nothing about reality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,750 Posted March 12 2 minutes ago, Horseman said: Market was due a correction for over 2 years. Stupids say it wouldn't have happened under the leadership of the great economist Kamala Harris. You can pretend all you want that it has nothing to do with the tariffs but that doesn’t mean anyone else needs to pretend with you. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 754 Posted March 12 1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said: You can pretend all you want that it has nothing to do with the tariffs but that doesn’t mean anyone else needs to pretend with you. See? More emoting their fears.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,488 Posted March 12 3 minutes ago, Horseman said: Market was due a correction for over 2 years. Stupids say it wouldn't have happened under the leadership of the great economist Kamala Harris. So you can say we were staring at a correction? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,449 Posted March 12 1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said: You can pretend all you want that it has nothing to do with the tariffs but that doesn’t mean anyone else needs to pretend with you. You can use the catalyst to cry about the inevitable all you want. But it just makes you look stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,401 Posted March 12 And if you don’t have any Asians where you live then where you live isn’t that nice. We all know who they get away from as fast as they can. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,750 Posted March 12 1 minute ago, Horseman said: You can use the catalyst to cry about the inevitable all you want. But it just makes you look stupid. If something needs a catalyst to happen, then by definition it can’t be inevitable. HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,790 Posted March 12 1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said: The first time you called me racist was because I wouldn't let asian people live in my neighborhood. The second time was because I assumed a person with a last name of Wang is of Asian ethnicity. You stand by both those statements? No, I said your community wouldn't, not you. No, I didn't say that. I said what I said in my last post, I'm not going to repeat it. Otherwise, good job, good effort. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,401 Posted March 12 17 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said: You forgot Rats It’s all protein. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,985 Posted March 12 10 minutes ago, MDC said: It’s all protein. The Haitian Berry Pickers would catch and eat the field rats, that's true. Which there's nothing wrong with that, they're actually a clean eat. It's the Subway Rats that you stay away from. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,902 Posted March 12 56 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: While you can argue over the rest of his points, it IS very likely that she would not have started a trade war. I don’t see how you can reasonably argue otherwise. I mean 2 can play that game. I believe Kamala, if elected, would have kept sending billions to Ukraine and started world war three. You can't argue with this. I'm willing to pay a bit more for goods and services if I don't get annihilated by a nuclear bomb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beaker15 241 Posted March 12 LOL at all the morons saying the economy is tanking Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,902 Posted March 12 58 minutes ago, jbycho said: More fear mongering from the radical left. Yeah. I mean my god. The left really scares people Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,750 Posted March 12 11 minutes ago, supermike80 said: I mean 2 can play that game. I believe Kamala, if elected, would have kept sending billions to Ukraine and started world war three. You can't argue with this. I'm willing to pay a bit more for goods and services if I don't get annihilated by a nuclear bomb No I don’t think Kamala starting WWIII is a reasonable argument or in any way analogous to what Trump has done. She would have supported Ukraine and eventually Putin would have sought a peaceful end to the stalemate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,902 Posted March 12 4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: No I don’t think Kamala starting WWIII is a reasonable argument or in any way analogous to what Trump has done. She would have supported Ukraine and eventually Putin would have sought a peaceful end to the stalemate. You have no way of knowing this. So, you are guessing. As I was Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 754 Posted March 12 2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: No I don’t think Kamala starting WWIII is a reasonable argument or in any way analogous to what Trump has done. Sure, because Harris funding foreign wars wouldn't continue to promote war. You are such an idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites