Leftists committing terrorism and not a chirp from the libtards here

[Sean Mooney 1,923]

10 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

What terrible things were done?  Threats are bad but they are still only threats.  Destroying beer that was already purchased doesn't hurt anyone.

Did anyone try burning down the brewery, a distribution center or delivery truck?  That would be more comparable. 

People were harrassed and targeted for buying the beer in some locations. 

Moreso than that though there was a calculated monetary effort by an individual and two organizations to fundamentally attack the infrastructure of Bud Light (and other companies) for "woke" policies. It was designed to hurt the company which in turn hurt sales and the workforce. Now I know the bigger optics of fires are bad. I said as much that I am 100% not for lighting fires of vehicles or shooting guns at them in public. But I'm also against targeted manipulation of people against companies by rich people. 

 

both attacks are organized. One is more obvious to the senses and thus will always look worse. 

[Hawkeye21 2,373]

1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

People were harrassed and targeted for buying the beer in some locations. 

Moreso than that though there was a calculated monetary effort by an individual and two organizations to fundamentally attack the infrastructure of Bud Light (and other companies) for "woke" policies. It was designed to hurt the company which in turn hurt sales and the workforce. Now I know the bigger optics of fires are bad. I said as much that I am 100% not for lighting fires of vehicles or shooting guns at them in public. But I'm also against targeted manipulation of people against companies by rich people. 

 

both attacks are organized. One is more obvious to the senses and thus will always look worse. 

One was much worse than the other.  The BL crap was not that bad.

[thegeneral 2,863]

20 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

It’s burning charging stations, vandalizing parked cars and actively accosting drivers. They are actively trying to destroy a company the employs 70k Americans and most likely in almost every 401k

People burning stuff down or messing with cars is absurd. Arrest these fockers.

Protesting, not buying the cars is fair game.

[Sean Mooney 1,923]

1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

One was much worse than the other.  The BL crap was not that bad.

Both were protests that were influenced by outside forces. One was more behind the scenes targeted. One is far more out in the open. I get why people think the latter is more egregious and have said I don't agree with the way it is being handled. But I'm not going to agree with handwaving away the other as "Just not buying a product."

[Hawkeye21 2,373]

2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Both were protests that were influenced by outside forces. One was more behind the scenes targeted. One is far more out in the open. I get why people think the latter is more egregious and have said I don't agree with the way it is being handled. But I'm not going to agree with handwaving away the other as "Just not buying a product."

Just stop comparing them.

[RLLD 4,143]

49 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

link?

 

[Sean Mooney 1,923]

2 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Just stop comparing them.

Stop trying to argue it was just not buying a product. 

[thegeneral 2,863]

People thinking their cause allows them to Fock with other peoples things, or worse shoot someone like that Luigi asshat, can all go fock themselves. You aren’t special, your cause doesn’t provide you special access to do what you want.

[Hawkeye21 2,373]

1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

Stop trying to argue it was just not buying a product. 

When did I say that?

[MDC 7,075]

10 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

One was much worse than the other.  The BL crap was not that bad.

I agree that defacing a business / product you don’t own is worse than buying a bunch of beer and shooting it or wherever. On the other hand, people are protesting Tesla because the CEO is haphazardly laying off tens of thousands of people and bragging about it like a doosh. MAGAs were protesting BL because they made a six pack of tranny beer that no one would have known about it people like a few Geeks I won’t name didn’t spend hours scouring the web for trans related stuff.

Nobody has been physically harmed that I know of so I’ll call it a wash.  

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,232]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

I agree that defacing a business / product you don’t own is worse than buying a bunch of beer and shooting it or wherever. On the other hand, people are protesting Tesla because the CEO is haphazardly laying off tens of thousands of people and bragging about it like a doosh. MAGAs were protesting BL because they made a six pack of tranny beer that no one would have known about it people like a few Geeks I won’t name didn’t spend hours scouring the web for trans related stuff.

Nobody has been physically harmed that I know of so I’ll call it a wash.  

Posting addresses of people who own teslas with the threat they won’t be removed till they sell them is absolutely wild.  And not physical harm as of yet.  What happens when someone takes it there.  Or at least shows up to vandalize a car at someone’s house and gets shot.  I’m sure you’ll defend the criminal 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,232]

1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

You should be able to see then pretty clear there is no real semblance of a plan here on anything. We are talking billions of dollars that go through these places and that is not easily just moved from one place to another.

And AI isn't the answer

Was the post office your govt sector work?

Yes and my father worked 50 years for the govt as well 

[Sean Mooney 1,923]

7 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

When did I say that?

You are agreeing with the person who said it. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,864]

Who was paying people to boycott bud light? Mooney just makes shitt up 

[Sean Mooney 1,923]

2 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Posting addresses of people who own teslas with the threat they won’t be removed till they sell them is absolutely wild.  And not physical harm as of yet.  What happens when someone takes it there.  Or at least shows up to vandalize a car at someone’s house and gets shot.  I’m sure you’ll defend the criminal 

Clearly posting addresses is not okay. Back when the Bud Light stuff was going on it wasn't okay either for people to get harrassed as they were leaving stores with Bud Light. Too many people are sucked into this political war nonsense and think we have to drive the other person into the ground. I don't care for Elon Musk, but I don't care if someone buys a Tesla. I've driven a Tesla- it's fine. There is no need to shoot it or throw Molotov cocktails at it

People shouldn't be harrassed for buying a beer from a company that supported a LGBTQ person. Drinking Bud Light is its own punishment. 

[squistion 1,927]

Just now, Sean Mooney said:

People shouldn't be harrassed for buying a beer from a company that supported a LGBTQ person. Drinking Bud Light is its own punishment. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,722]

Just now, squistion said:

   The guy calling for violence against Tesla owners 

[Ron_Artest 998]

48 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

It’s burning charging stations, vandalizing parked cars and actively accosting drivers. They are actively trying to destroy a company the employs 70k Americans and most likely in almost every 401k

So now you have a problem with people losing their jobs and 401ks going down in value?

[Sean Mooney 1,923]

Imagine if you were on something called the Internet:

 

Quote

 

Recent tax filings reveal that The Concord Fund – a key entity in Leo’s network – contributed $350,000 to Consumers Defense, the new lobbying arm of “anti-ESG” group Consumers’ Research. These organizations were at the forefront of the Bud Light boycott and subsequent attacks on transgender activist Dylan Mulvaney following the brand’s collaboration with her. This contribution follows a previous $6 million donation to Consumers’ Research from DonorsTrust – another pivotal group in Leo’s network – which enabled its revenue to surge from $835,000 to over $8 million in 2021.

Just two weeks after Mulvaney’s Bud Light ad debuted, Consumers’ Research launched its “Woke Alerts” campaign, explicitly targeting the beer brand and claiming to play an “integral role” in the ensuing backlash. The boycott led to death threats and harassment targeting Mulvaney, violent incidents against Bud Light consumers, and 350 Anheuser-Busch employee layoffs.

These findings, coupled with recent research exposing Leo’s connections to the anti-trans organization Do No Harm, paint a clearer picture of Leo’s expanded priorities beyond just the judiciary as he works to force a wildly unpopular and extreme agenda on Americans everywhere.

 

[Ron_Artest 998]

23 minutes ago, RLLD said:

 

None of those polls show most of America wants Democrats to cooperate with Republicans

[Maximum Overkill 1,722]

1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

None of those polls show most of America wants Democrats to cooperate with Republicans

Liberals are violent by nature. Do you deny this? 

[MDC 7,075]

16 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Posting addresses of people who own teslas with the threat they won’t be removed till they sell them is absolutely wild.  And not physical harm as of yet.  What happens when someone takes it there.  Or at least shows up to vandalize a car at someone’s house and gets shot.  I’m sure you’ll defend the criminal 

Yeah that’s crazy. Shame people are so wrapped up in politics today they make videos of themselves shooting Bud Lite or post the addresses of Tesla owners online. Let’s just hope no one gets hurt! 

[MDC 7,075]

8 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Imagine if you were on something called the Internet:

 

I’m sure @RaiderHaters Revenge was equally sad and mad about this.

[RLLD 4,143]

3 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

None of those polls show most of America wants Democrats to cooperate with Republicans

Are you sure?  I mean, Trump said clearly what he was running for President to do..... and he was elected.

He is clearly doing what he said he would do.....and people poll positively for it more than against it.

It sure seems as if the people want him to do what he i doing.....why would you then infer they want Democrats to oppose him given these two elements?

[Maximum Overkill 1,722]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

shooting Bud Lite or post the addresses of Tesla owners online. Let’s just hope no one gets hurt! 

What's worse? 

Shooting a damn can or pulling a @The Real timschochet and condoning violence on Tesla owners and dealerships because you don't like Elon Musk? 

[The Real timschochet 6,328]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

 

He is clearly doing what he said he would do.....and people poll positively for it more than against it.

 

Have you read the polls lately? Because this simply isn’t true. 

[HellToupee 1,570]

1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

What's worse? 

Shooting a damn can or pulling a @The Real timschochet and condoning violence on Tesla owners and dealerships because you don't like Elon Musk? 

Is he taking a Polanski stance on this?

[Ron_Artest 998]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

Are you sure?  I mean, Trump said clearly what he was running for President to do..... and he was elected.

He is clearly doing what he said he would do.....and people poll positively for it more than against it.

It sure seems as if the people want him to do what he i doing.....why would you then infer they want Democrats to oppose him given these two elements?

More people voted against Trump than voted for him.

More people disapprove of what Trump is doing then approve.

Numbers get even worse on the economy.

So no, the polling does not show that people want Democrats to work with Republicans.  Sit down.

[The Real timschochet 6,328]

1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

What's worse? 

Shooting a damn can or pulling a @The Real timschochet and condoning violence on Tesla owners and dealerships because you don't like Elon Musk? 

I really should stop responding to you because almost everything you write is bullsh!t…but whatever. Please provide  link to me ever condoning violence on Tesla owners (or for that matter anyone else.) 

[Maximum Overkill 1,722]

Just now, HellToupee said:

Is he taking a Polanski stance on this?

Always 

[Sean Mooney 1,923]

5 minutes ago, MDC said:

I’m sure @RaiderHaters Revenge was equally sad and mad about this.

It wasn't Raiders I was responding to. We may rarely ever agree but he isn't a mental midget like the person who desperately tries to get my attention multiple times a day on here

[The Real timschochet 6,328]

Just now, Maximum Overkill said:

Always 

Link please 

[Ron_Artest 998]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

I really should stop responding to you because almost everything you write is bullsh!t…but whatever. Please provide  link to me ever condoning violence on Tesla owners (or for that matter anyone else.) 

Put him on ignore.  He's just a Russian troll.

[Sean Mooney 1,923]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I really should stop responding to you because almost everything you write is bullsh!t…but whatever. Please provide  link to me ever condoning violence on Tesla owners (or for that matter anyone else.) 

I'd just scroll past his stuff. It's good for your health.

Also he's a huge hypocrite because we uncovered he is okay with pedophiles as long as they are MAGA.

[RLLD 4,143]

Just now, Ron_Artest said:

More people voted against Trump than voted for him.

More people disapprove of what Trump is doing then approve.

Numbers get even worse on the economy.

So no, the polling does not show that people want Democrats to work with Republicans.  Sit down.

No, more people voted for Trump, that is how he was elected, and garnered the popular vote as well.  So that is false right on it face.

More people, according to CNN polling as well as others, support what he is doing than oppose it.  So you are not telling the truth.

The economy angle is something I have already stated you might want to be careful with here, those numbers are already improving, to keep pretending he will damage it might result in further loss of credibility for folks like you

SO yeah, everything  is pointing to the wider public supporting him, so again, if you want to keep opposing what the majority of people want, that is fine....but later when the mid terms come around, remember you were warned it might cause you further losses.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,864]

16 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Imagine if you were on something called the Internet:

 

No source. 2021, before the boycott, obscure group.  Nice job. Trying to portray that boycott as astro turf is hilarious. lol 

[RLLD 4,143]

5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Have you read the polls lately? Because this simply isn’t true. 

Not only have I read them, I posted them, and that the polls support my position.  I have not checked out MSDNC, they usually find a way to lie about such things, so if that is your source I might suggest you reconsider, here I have posted CNN....and I assume you will accept their work?

[The Real timschochet 6,328]

Just now, RLLD said:

More people, according to CNN polling as well as others, support what he is doing than oppose it. 

 

This is wrong. The latest CNN poll has Trump’s approval rating as underwater.

[Maximum Overkill 1,722]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

The latest CNN poll

 

[RLLD 4,143]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

This is wrong. The latest CNN poll has Trump’s approval rating as underwater.

No, I posted it, more people still support him.  Now, I expect that to change perhaps in the future, but right now they support him.  Instead of just opposing Trump, the Demorats should come forward with a competing vision and solutions.   But right now, the insistence on just opposing....not working.