Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
squistion

U.S. Military and boat strikes thread - Was The Follow-Up Boat Strike a War Crime?

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Trump didn’t know anything about the double-strike on a boat killing survivors.

Trump also didn’t know anything about the drug kingpin he pardoned.

Does he even know what day it is?

https://www.threads.com/@aaron.rupar/post/DRufxZNiS4n

Didn’t know Binance did business with terrorists and child pornographers either. But he pardoned the CEO and went into business with him. 🤡 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, MDC said:

Didn’t know Binance did business with terrorists and child pornographers either. But he pardoned the CEO and went into business with him. 🤡 

Poor mdpee. 🐷

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Now they're all blaming admiral Bradley for the war crime.  What a sh1t show 

Went from “didn’t happen” to “that guy over there did it” pretty f-ing fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dogcows said:

Went from “didn’t happen” to “that guy over there did it” pretty f-ing fast.

The commanding officer makes the call. They're the ones to answer for it. Trump nor Hegseth have any idea of these operations till they're over. That's real life 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

The commanding officer makes the call. They're the ones to answer for it. Trump nor Hegseth have any idea of these operations till they're over. That's real life 

 

You think these girlie men have a clue? They really think Hegseth is on a headset calling the plays like it’s  Call of Duty. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>>According to the Post, two unidentified sources said, prior to the September 2 attack that killed at least eleven people, that Secretary Pete Hegseth gave a spoken directive, which one source described as “the order was to kill everybody.”<>

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

You think these girlie men have a clue? They really think Hegseth is on a headset calling the plays like it’s  Call of Duty. 

They think Trump is watching on TV 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Omg! Hegseth said to kill them! He should have soad use the non lethal rocket and only wound them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Omg! Hegseth said to kill them! He should have soad use the non lethal rocket and only wound them. 

@SaintsInDome2006 thinks we should warn them so nobody gets hurt?? 

The whole point is to KILL them. Snowflakes are something special. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

@SaintsInDome2006 thinks we should warn them so nobody gets hurt?? 

The whole point is to KILL them. Snowflakes are something special. 

SecDef is ordering tactical strikes? This has all sorts of issues but that’s no way to run a navy.

Btw if the head of Southern Command (who just took over from the last commander who resigned) had to run it up the chain that says it all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ron_Artest said:

The whole point is to stop drugs from coming into the US.  The point is not to kill boaters in the Caribbean 

Boaters? I thought we were killing fishermen? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Boaters? I thought we were killing fishermen? 

We don't know who we're killing.  That's the problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

We don't know who we're killing.  That's the problem.

Just taking random shots? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Maximum Overkill said:

The commanding officer makes the call. They're the ones to answer for it. Trump nor Hegseth have any idea of these operations till they're over. That's real life 

 

Throwing your fellow service member under the bus for a fat senile old man and a Fox News host. What a patriot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Just taking random shots? 

You tell me.  Why are we murdering so called narco terrorists, whatever that is supposed to mean, but we don't know who they are.  2 incidents where they survived that we know of.  Once we ordered a second shot to kill, th second the survivors were picked up and returned home, no charges, no trial.  Why is that?

And don't tell me it's about drugs.  They're not bringing fentanyl into the US.  We are pardoning the top drug lords.  We're not trying to stop drugs.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Maximum Overkill said:

They think Trump is watching on TV 

Hegseth said he was watching on TV when it happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“I don’t think we’re necessarily going to ask for a declaration of war. I think we’re just gonna kill people that are bringing drugs into our country. We’re going to kill them. They’re going to be, like, dead,” Trump said

They admitted to everything until they realized these are war crimes.  Now they're blaming an admiral.  Disgusting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, the fact that 79% of the boats had drugs justifies the murder of the innocents in the other 21%?

That will be a small consolation to the familes of those killed in boats that carried no drugs. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, squistion said:

So, the fact that 79% of the boats had drugs justifies the murder of the innocents in the other 21%?

That will be a small consolation to the familes of those killed in boats that carried no drugs. 

 

Based on the letter Paul shared, the distinguished Senator from KY may need to double check his math.

212 vessels indterdicted: 41 had no drugs, =19.3% 

Of those 41, 24 had "committed no criminal offense." 24 of 212 = 11.3% of interdictments wherein the boats were completely clear of wrongdoing. So we are potentially killing people that not only aren't drug mules, but have committed no crimes whatsoever. That's stone cold murder. Trump's America. It's what HT voted for.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Based on the letter Paul shared, the distinguished Senator from KY may need to double check his math.

212 vessels indterdicted: 41 had no drugs, =19.3% 

Of those 41, 24 had "committed no criminal offense." 24 of 212 = 11.3% of interdictments wherein the boats were completely clear of wrongdoing. So we are potentially killing people that not only aren't drug mules, but have committed no crimes whatsoever. That's stone cold murder. Trump's America. It's what HT voted for.

It is disturbing that neither he nor some of the others here seem to have a problem with this and may justify it by saying, "If (roughly) 4 out 5 are carrying drugs, the 1 out of 5 innocents who are killed are collateral damage and the price of doing business (so to speak). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What were the boats being stopped for ? It’s kind of important. I’ll hang up and listen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Youre saying this situation with firing on survivors occurred more than once?

The whole point is to kill the crew, is it not?? 

Have you ever been in the military? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

>>According to the Post, two unidentified sources said, prior to the September 2 attack that killed at least eleven people, that Secretary Pete Hegseth gave a spoken directive, which one source described as “the order was to kill everybody.”<>

"two unidentified sources".  LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, shadrap said:

"two unidentified sources".  LOL

If the sources went on the record, they would be fired, no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Maximum Overkill said:

The whole point is to kill the crew, is it not?? 

Have you ever been in the military? 

That's illegal.  You've never been in the military 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Stop, he's not. I know you

You know he’s 13. You just like young white boys. :thumbsdown: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, shadrap said:

"two unidentified sources".  LOL

Step 1. It’s not happening.

1 hour ago, shadrap said:

good.

Step 3.  It’s happening and it’s a good thing 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, squistion said:

If the sources went on the record, they would be fired, no?

I think you have the situation confused with Governor Walz in Minnesota.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, MDC said:

You know he’s 13. You just like young white boys. :thumbsdown: 

Sure. Nice try, stop lying. You're Son is moved out

You're daughter is legal age and Fat. I'm not into that so don't worry. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×