Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
RaiderHaters Revenge

Libs...First Amendment!!!! derp derp

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Duh, it's wrong when both sides do it... it's just only wrong for both sides AFTER an accusation that a Republican does it... oh, and only the Republican is a fascist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Republican Vs Democratic, the enemy is feeding everyone a much of 💩.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Republican Vs Democratic, the enemy is feeding everyone a much of 💩.  

Scoffers will come in the last days. 

Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, League Champion said:

Scoffers will come in the last days. 

Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves

Exactly, trump is fake, we agree on that.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where have all the shitlibs gone? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

They are waiting for msdnc to cover this 

Just goes to show how FOS they are. Plenty of non libs, including you, said they weren’t happy with the fcc/ Kimmel situation, which wound up with him facing a small suspension from a show no one watches.  But actual censorship by the left on the biggest platforms in the world doesn’t seem to bother them.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Just goes to show how FOS they are. Plenty of non libs, including you, said they weren’t happy with the fcc/ Kimmel situation, which wound up with him facing a small suspension from a show no one watches.  But actual censorship by the left on the biggest platforms in the world doesn’t seem to bother them.  

yep but yet I still get called alt right maga or whatever

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Where have all the shitlibs gone? 

They are making their pink return of Kimmel hats. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

They are making their pink return of Kimmel hats. 

He’s on in an hour! They are all at their watch parties. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No examples of videos or even who they’re saying was banned is kinda weak IMO.  I don’t know about you but I saw plenty of misinfo on YouTube that wasn’t censored.  In fact many fans of the misinfo spreaders would often try to get people they disagreed with banned, like happened with Susan Oliver who would often point out the lies of John Campbell, who made millions on YouTube spreading lies.

Feels like they’re trying to blame what they did on their own on Biden to get in the good graces of the current admin.  Because if they were censoring folks, they were probably doing it in 2020 too.

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

No examples of videos or even who they’re saying was banned is kinda weak IMO.  I don’t know about you but I saw plenty of misinfo on YouTube that wasn’t censored.  In fact many fans of the misinfo spreaders would often try to get people they disagreed with banned, like happened with Susan Oliver who would often point out the lies of John Campbell, who made millions on YouTube spreading lies.

Feels like they’re trying to blame what they did on their own on Biden to get in the good graces of the current admin.  Because if they were censoring folks, they were probably doing it in 2020 too.

 

This post is absolutely shocking. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

No examples of videos or even who they’re saying was banned is kinda weak IMO.  I don’t know about you but I saw plenty of misinfo on YouTube that wasn’t censored.  In fact many fans of the misinfo spreaders would often try to get people they disagreed with banned, like happened with Susan Oliver who would often point out the lies of John Campbell, who made millions on YouTube spreading lies.

Feels like they’re trying to blame what they did on their own on Biden to get in the good graces of the current admin.  Because if they were censoring folks, they were probably doing it in 2020 too.

 

The tenet Russia hoax was one of them. That entire thing was dropped 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

The tenet Russia hoax was one of them. That entire thing was dropped 

Link to it being dropped?  I just see that the only people charged were the Russian nationals, but being in Russia the gov (especially the current one) probably isn’t trying hard to find them.

Not sure what that has to do with the government censoring YouTube creators though; YouTube didn’t do anything about it until after the indictment came out, and Tenet dissolved as a company.  The indictment said from the beginning that the creators were victims, nothing bad happened to them other than being made fun of for not realizing they were taking Russian money. Heck the podcast of one of them is where the FCC’s Brendan Carr made his threats against ABC!

@jonnyutah is fair to mock if people think it’s “(d)ifferent” becsuse of the content involved.  But where it is truly different is in the actions of the government.  YouTube claims there was “pressure,” but also says they continued to do their own moderating.   It’s not a violation of the first amendment to ask a company to review something to take down, then do nothing if they say no.  That’s basically what we saw with the Twitter files.   Yet here we had the FCC openly saying “we can do this the easy way or the hard way.”   If they don’t do anything further about this then you can say it’s somewhat comparable, but Trump truth’d that he was going to “go after” ABC…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And then we have the president threatening litigation if they don't remove the comic they don't like.

Yeah it's the same. 🤡

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would they censor under pressure from Biden about the election results? Elections have always been disputed. What was so different about that one? 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Link to it being dropped?  I just see that the only people charged were the Russian nationals, but being in Russia the gov (especially the current one) probably isn’t trying hard to find them.

Not sure what that has to do with the government censoring YouTube creators though; YouTube didn’t do anything about it until after the indictment came out, and Tenet dissolved as a company.  The indictment said from the beginning that the creators were victims, nothing bad happened to them other than being made fun of for not realizing they were taking Russian money. Heck the podcast of one of them is where the FCC’s Brendan Carr made his threats against ABC!

@jonnyutah is fair to mock if people think it’s “(d)ifferent” becsuse of the content involved.  But where it is truly different is in the actions of the government.  YouTube claims there was “pressure,” but also says they continued to do their own moderating.   It’s not a violation of the first amendment to ask a company to review something to take down, then do nothing if they say no.  That’s basically what we saw with the Twitter files.   Yet here we had the FCC openly saying “we can do this the easy way or the hard way.”   If they don’t do anything further about this then you can say it’s somewhat comparable, but Trump truth’d that he was going to “go after” ABC…

This is the part they ignore to try and play gotcha. I mean if the Biden team said "You got to take this stuff down or we will take away X..." sure- that's pure government overreach and unacceptable. But they are within their means to say "Hey, take a look at this stuff." Trump's team would've been well within their rights to say to ABC, "Hey take a look at what Kimmel is saying...." But they didn't say that. Carr said "

Quote

 

“We can do this the easy way or the hard way” – and said he hoped ABC and its local affiliates were listening.

“These companies can find ways to change conduct to take action, frankly, on Kimmel,” Carr remarked. “Or, you know, there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”

 

There is a world of difference in that.

But I venture this is all because that Tim Pool chucklefuck got outed as a Russian paid idiot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

This is the part they ignore to try and play gotcha. I mean if the Biden team said "You got to take this stuff down or we will take away X..." sure- that's pure government overreach and unacceptable. But they are within their means to say "Hey, take a look at this stuff." Trump's team would've been well within their rights to say to ABC, "Hey take a look at what Kimmel is saying...." But they didn't say that. Carr said "

There is a world of difference in that.

But I venture this is all because that Tim Pool chucklefuck got outed as a Russian paid idiot. 

Carr should have censored Trump's speech to the U.N.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

so its ok when Biden does it, got it

 

you don't got it. you are trying to justify a poor position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Herbivore said:

you don't got it. you are trying to justify a poor position.

no my position is ALWAYS....GOVT GET THE FCUK OUT OF EVERYTHING

both sides

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

no my position is ALWAYS....GOVT GET THE FCUK OUT OF EVERYTHING

both sides

 

yeah I know your stance there. i get the idea, but don't think it is realistic. do you see no difference in your examples?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

yeah I know your stance there. i get the idea, but don't think it is realistic. do you see no difference in your examples?

Nope I see the govt overstepping in all scenarios.

i think the Biden admin getting doctors who are trained professionals videos removed from YouTube and not allowing the discussion to occur to be very harmful

im glad i had a doctor who did his own research and tried what was working in chile when i had covid rather than listening to fauci here  

i also know that the Kimmel decision was more influenced by lost revenue than anything else

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Nope I see the govt overstepping in all scenarios.

i think the Biden admin getting doctors who are trained professionals videos removed from YouTube and not allowing the discussion to occur to be very harmful

im glad i had a doctor who did his own research and tried what was working in chile when i had covid rather than listening to fauci here  

i also know that the Kimmel decision was more influenced by lost revenue than anything else

ok, I see some difference, but respect your position about overstepping.

I guess the revenue idea will reveal itself, but right now it seems abc wanted him back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Nope I see the govt overstepping in all scenarios.

i think the Biden admin getting doctors who are trained professionals videos removed from YouTube and not allowing the discussion to occur to be very harmful

im glad i had a doctor who did his own research and tried what was working in chile when i had covid rather than listening to fauci here  

i also know that the Kimmel decision was more influenced by lost revenue than anything else

Ivermectin doesn’t work for Covid 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Ivermectin doesn’t work for Covid 

who said it does?

tylenol doesn't work either but my doctor gave me that

maybe just maybe taking something allows your body to focus on healing other places

your body is constantly fighting parasites, that requires energy.  If Ivermectin in this example helps ease the battle on one front, your body can spend energy fighting other fronts

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×