Comey to be Indicted

[seafoam1 3,315]

25 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

You don’t have to worry about it: you can continue your successful quest to be, by a large margin, the dumbest poster in this forum, and there will be no consequences. 

Everyone on this site knows you are wrong every time you post something. 100%. So I take this as a compliment coming from you. 

[The Real timschochet 7,203]

Just want to remind people that Biden’s Justice Department indicted Hunter Biden. 

That is what an independent Justice Department looked like. When we had one. 

[BrahmaBulls 879]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Just want to remind people that Biden’s Justice Department indicted Hunter Biden. 

That is what an independent Justice Department looked like. When we had one. 

So the corrupt President could just pardon him anyway.  Spare us your BS, dummy.

[edjr 6,783]

Why is it spelled Indickted and not Indighted?

[jonnyutah 482]

2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Further proof of what giant pieces of sh1t Maga is.  Crying abour Roger Stone, saying the "assault" wasn't necessary.  You're right, it wasn't necessary.  But do you really need to "get even" now?  Really need to get revenge and enjoy this retribution?  Those of you answering yes will probably be sitting in church this weekend worshipping Jesus.  Pieces of sh1t.

What kind of sorry ass loser admits this and then has the nerve to whine about retribution? 

Kindly gfy. 

Actually no. Put honey on your hands, then dip them in glass. Then gfy. 

[seafoam1 3,315]

11 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Just want to remind people that Biden’s Justice Department indicted Hunter Biden. 

That is what an independent Justice Department looked like. When we had one. 

Yeah, justice at work, amIright? You loser. 

President Joe Biden’s decision to go back on his word and issue a categorical pardon for his son, Hunter, just weeks before his scheduled sentencing on gun and tax convictions was a surprise that wasn’t all that surprising.

[HellToupee 2,058]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

https://x.com/atrupar/status/1971276026694004831

Eric Swalwell has already issued a warning to proseutors  that I posted earlier in this thread/

Swalwell on Comey: "What I would just say to any prosecutor at the DOJ is that it's not going away. As a member of the Judiciary Committee, I promise you when Democrats are in the majority we will look at all of this and there will be accountability and bar licenses will be at stake."

What he did is illegal . You can’t do this , he has to be really dumb 

[The Real timschochet 7,203]

16 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

So the corrupt President could just pardon him anyway.  Spare us your BS, dummy.

He pardoned Hunter, and others, because he knew that Trump would pull the exact kind of sh!t he’s pulling right now. Should have pardoned Comey too. 
 

How can you not be embarrassed by what is happening? Is there no bottom for Trump supporters? 

[BrahmaBulls 879]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

He pardoned Hunter, and others, because he knew that Trump would pull the exact kind of sh!t he’s pulling right now. Should have pardoned Comey too. 
 

How can you not be embarrassed by what is happening? Is there no bottom for Trump supporters? 

It's (D)ifferent.  Always is.  Facts are your shady leader pardoned his own kid for his crimes while you're out here crying like the b1tch you are over Trump.  

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

She committed an actual crime, and nothing was done at his direction. Yup, he screwed her. 

You might want to think about the Epstein files here. And I don’t mean OMB, look at an awful man he is. I mean DOJ procedure has always said that if someone isn’t charged Thats it, thats the end of the story. You don’t both not indict then publicly indict but not charge. Well except here, Comey did that. And yes I do think what she did is or was or should be a crime, but I understand why they didn’t charge it. We have a massive national security problem with data in the highest levels & it’s only gotten mega-times worse under Trump1 & now especially Trump2. But that’s another conversation. No, FBI Directors shouldn’t run investigations themselves & they definitely shouldn’t make pronouncements themselves. 
 

[Ron_Artest 1,955]

1 hour ago, KSB2424 said:

This isn’t even close to “getting even”.  Personally I think Trump is being pretty chill.  Considering they tried to smear, bankrupt, prosecute, jail and assassinate him.  

Comey did all that?  Wow impressive 

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

21 minutes ago, edjr said:

Why is it spelled Indickted and not Indighted?

It’s Latin. Indict, dictate, predict, contradict, addict, etc.

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

10 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

What he did is illegal . You can’t do this , he has to be really dumb 

Totally neutral question here, just asking for info - what is the actual leak that is being referred to here? Was it the October surprise NYT story where they said Hillary was still under investigation or something else? TIA.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

Didn’t Bidens DOJ offer Hunter an unprecedented plea deal and had to be forced to follow the law by a judge? You’re flailing again Real Tim. Your memory may suck or you just choose to be dishonest. Pick one. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

The judge assigned the case was hired y and worked for Comey. No shame in these bastards. It’s their super power. 

[HellToupee 2,058]

8 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The judge assigned the case was hired y and worked for Comey. No shame in these bastards. It’s their super power. 

Let him cool off at Guantánamo 

[Fnord 2,430]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

Is there no bottom for Trump supporters? 

There is. It is huge, and attached to their Father. And if they stop kissing it for a moment, they lose their sense of self worth.

[Mike Honcho 5,381]

So to sum up this story.

McCabe stated he leaked without Comey's permission to the press, and went to  Comey after, and Comey expressed approval of the leak(Comey denies he approved it).  Years later, Cruz asks Comey if he authorized the leak, he says "No", and now he's being charged perjury and obstuction of justice.  Sounds like an open and shut case. 

 

 

[seafoam1 3,315]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

Is there no bottom for Trump supporters? 

Yeah, it's called turning into a liberal democrat..

So basically, turning into you would be the bottom. Which would include becoming mentally retarded.  

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

52 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

So to sum up this story.

McCabe stated he leaked without Comey's permission to the press, and went to  Comey after, and Comey expressed approval of the leak(Comey denies he approved it).  Years later, Cruz asks Comey if he authorized the leak, he says "No", and now he's being charged perjury and obstuction of justice.  Sounds like an open and shut case. 

Actually I think Cruz’s question to Comey was if he wanted to change his statement and he said no. *That is the testimony they’re charging him on not the original statement.

Also apparently Cruz’s original statement had to do with the ‘anonymous’ nature of the original report, & anonymous sourcing is a very specific thing with its own guidelines at FBI, so the way Cruz asked it was about whether Comey had authorized the way the reporter had couched the sourcing, which he couldn’t have possibly had any control over. It sounds like Cruz botched the question itself.

The grand jury refused to indict on one of the three charges as well, & my guess is that third charge may be needed for the other two charges.

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Didn’t Bidens DOJ offer Hunter an unprecedented plea deal and had to be forced to follow the law by a judge?

It is sort of ridiculous. The plea deal included exactly what Biden was found guilty on. (& he did a plea deal on the tax charges anyway). That’s the point of plea deals, to save everyone the cost & time & trouble & risk of litigating. But if they had done a plea deal Biden would be paying back the American people & would’ve been reporting in for probation. But this way the People (us) get no accountability from the lawbreaker.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

14 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

It is sort of ridiculous. The plea deal included exactly what Biden was found guilty on. (& he did a plea deal on the tax charges anyway). That’s the point of plea deals, to save everyone the cost & time & trouble & risk of litigating. But if they had done a plea deal Biden would be paying back the American people & would’ve been reporting in for probation. But this way the People (us) get no accountability from the lawbreaker.

You forget about the gun charge. Or did you? 

[Strike 5,895]

2 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Just want to remind people that Biden’s Justice Department indicted Hunter Biden. 

That is what an independent Justice Department looked like. When we had one. 

Bullsh*t.  They tried to let him off and got caught by a judge who REFUSED to sign off on it.  GTFOH with your revisionist history.

[Strike 5,895]

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You forget about the gun charge. Or did you? 

The "plea deal" also had a back door clause in it that would have prevented Biden from being prosecuted for ANYTHING, even things not covered in the plea deal.  It was so unprecedented the judge asked the government to show where that type of deal had EVER been made, EVER.  Then she refused to sign off on it.  What a load of crap these libs are pulling.  But it's every time.  It's their playbook to try to rewrite history.

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

10 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You forget about the gun charge. Or did you? 

No I do, the gun charge was part of the 1st plea deal. It would’ve been deferred but he also was required to do monitoring. So they ended up doing a trial for the gun charge, and we don’t know what the judge would’ve done on the sentence.

The 2nd charge on taxes he pleaded guilty to anyway. - What didn’t happen, & which triggered the collapse of the plea deal, was HB getting charged on something else. Weiss never did charge him on that stuff. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

The "plea deal" also had a back door clause in it that would have prevented Biden from being prosecuted for ANYTHING, even things not covered in the plea deal.  It was so unprecedented the judge asked the government to show where that type of deal had EVER been made, EVER.  Then she refused to sign off on it.  What a load of crap these libs are pulling.  But it's every time.  It's their playbook to try to rewrite history.

Every fockin time. It’s like they took a class. 

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

5 minutes ago, Strike said:

The "plea deal" also had a back door clause in it that would have prevented Biden from being prosecuted for ANYTHING, even things not covered in the plea deal.  It was so unprecedented the judge asked the government to show where that type of deal had EVER been made, EVER.  Then she refused to sign off on it.  What a load of crap these libs are pulling.  But it's every time.  It's their playbook to try to rewrite history.

And what happened. Weiss never charged HB on ‘the other stuff.’

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

The after action Report by FBI agents after Jan 6. WOW! Confirms everything we have been saying. Christopher Wray is another worm that needs to be in shackles. How come they hid this from the public? 

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Christopher Wray

Weiss, Durham, Huber, Barr, now Wray & Siebert. Golly all these bad guys…. appointed by _______.

[seafoam1 3,315]

Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Weiss, Durham, Huber, Barr, now Wray Siebert. Golly all these bad guys…. appointed by

Comey going down. 

[Strike 5,895]

2 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

And what happened. Weiss never charged HB on ‘the other stuff.’

Look pal, you keep pretending you want to be a reasonable poster here.  But you're not if you try to rewrite history.   I'm not playing that game.  

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

Comey going down. 

Yes! Yes!! Next Bolton (also appointed by Trump!)!

[seafoam1 3,315]

1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Yes! Yes!! Next Bolton (also appointed by Trump!)!

Comey to be Indicted 

 

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

Look pal, you keep pretending you want to be a reasonable poster here.  But you're not if you try to rewrite history.   I'm not playing that game.  

My friend, they never charged him with anything but: 1. A gun charge (lying on a form about his drug use while buying a gun), & 2. Tax evasion (which he did a plea deal on).

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

4 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Weiss, Durham, Huber, Barr, now Wray & Siebert. Golly all these bad guys…. appointed by _______.

That’s your defense? You should e-mail their lawyers with that one.  You have a brilliant legal mind. 

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

Comey to be Indicted

Amigo, it already happened. Cheers.

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

That’s your defense? You should e-mail their lawyers with that one.  You have a brilliant legal mind. 

It’s not a defense, it’s just a source of amusement.

[seafoam1 3,315]

1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Amigo, it already happened. Cheers.

And this is awesome. 

 

 

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

And this is awesome. 

Not kidding, it might be for Comey. IIRC McCabe, Strzok & Page all got money in civil lawsuits after Trump1. If Comey gets to the other side of this he might make bank as well.

[seafoam1 3,315]

5 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Not kidding, it might be for Comey. IIRC McCabe, Strzok & Page all got money in civil lawsuits after Trump1. If Comey gets to the other side of this he might make bank as well.

The douche already was worth over $15M 10 years ago. He doesn't need money. That would never be a real victory for him. 

Especially when he goes to prison.