Massachusetts braces for 'most extreme cold on earth' and whopping 12 inches of snow. DAMN you global warming!!

[Frozenbeernuts 2,410]

CO2, one of the liberal boogeymen. Read and listen to Greg Braden. We are contributing, but it is a very small %.

In fact, for all the pollution we are responsible for, CO2 is probably the least harmful. CO2 leads to a greener earth.

Liberals. What can I say. They are just clueless about reality. They can't know what they are incapable of understanding.

[MDC 7,979]

1 hour ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

CO2, one of the liberal boogeymen. Read and listen to Greg Braden. We are contributing, but it is a very small %.

In fact, for all the pollution we are responsible for, CO2 is probably the least harmful. CO2 leads to a greener earth.

Liberals. What can I say. They are just clueless about reality. They can't know what they are incapable of understanding.

I just looked this guy up. Seems like he has a BS in earth sciences from the 1970s.  

[Frozenbeernuts 2,410]

Just now, MDC said:

I just looked this guy up. Looks like he has a BS in earth sciences from the 1970s.  

Yes, he is a geologist. The study of earth.

[MDC 7,979]

1 minute ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Yes, he is a geologist. The study of earth.

I have a BA in Literature which makes me a Nobel Laureate!  

[Frozenbeernuts 2,410]

Just now, MDC said:

I have a BA in Literature which makes me a Nobel Laureate!  

Whatever you say. Thank you for highlighting the limits of what liberals believe is possible

[MDC 7,979]

2 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Whatever you say. Thank you for highlighting the limits of what liberals believe is possible

It’s possible that a BS in Earth Sciences knows more than the scientific establishment, including people far more qualified than him. But the only reason to believe that guy over everyone else is if you really really really really want to.  

[Frozenbeernuts 2,410]

15 minutes ago, MDC said:

It’s possible that a BS in Earth Sciences knows more than the scientific establishment, including people far more qualified than him. But the only reason to believe that guy over everyone else is if you really really really really want to.  

I'm sure your method of assuming is very accurate. It has served liberals so well over the years. So well in fact that we were able to elect the one guy liberals hate more than anyone. Keep assuming things. I'm sure it will stop back firing eventually.

[MDC 7,979]

1 hour ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

I'm sure your method of assuming is very accurate. It has served liberals so well over the years. So well in fact that we were able to elect the one guy liberals hate more than anyone. Keep assuming things. I'm sure it will stop back firing eventually.

My assumption that one dude with a BS in Earth Sciences is less credible than thousands of people with advanced degrees in climate science is why Trump won?

This must be the same logic that got a felching heroine addict appointed as head of HHS.  

[Drizzay 751]

Didn't know there was a degree for Climate Science.  Most "Climate Scientists" have degrees in something other than atmospheric science or metorology.

[weepaws 3,376]

1 hour ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

I'm sure your method of assuming is very accurate. It has served liberals so well over the years. So well in fact that we were able to elect the one guy liberals hate more than anyone. Keep assuming things. I'm sure it will stop back firing eventually.

Darn it man, you logging off or lying about doing so? 

[Mike Honcho 5,493]

6 hours ago, supermike80 said:

I still struggle with this thinking-- That there is no other source for the warming of the Earth than us.  The earth that has gone through multiple climate changes in it's history.  We literally just emerged from an ice age 15,000 years ago.  Which means zip to humans who only live 80, but in the history of the Earth, 15K means jack squat.

I'm sure you will next show me how much the earth has warmed in the last 100 years or whatever, and correlate that directly to fossil fuel use.  Yeah, that certainly has merit, but is that the only possible reason?   I am just not convinced.

And to your point, there is no real need to get worked up about climate change.  We will never ever stop it, no matter what we do, so it is better to adapt to it and learn how to protect ourselves from it.

But I'm still not 100% in on it being only humans fault.

 

 

6 hours ago, supermike80 said:

Well, the problem with the scientific community you blindly follow is they are wrong..a lot.  They only know what they know and guess at a lot of the rest.   I'm not saying they are absolutely wrong, but just cause they are from the "scientific community" doesn't immediately make them 100% right about everything. 

We as a society have followed scientists through human history, only to find out later they were wrong.  

I'm more careful and somewhat skeptical of the scientists out there.   

Gotta love this - Look the earth has gone through multiple periods of warming and cooling...and you know this because of---yeah Science.  But science is wrong a lot. 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,410]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

My assumption that one dude with a BS in Earth Sciences is less credible than thousands of people with advanced degrees in climate science is why Trump won?

This must be the same logic that got a felching heroine addicted appointed as head of HHS.  

Oh a baby brain thinks he has a gotcha. This should be good.

I understand that liberals don't care who funds a study. All that matters is that they fund studies so that a majority say one thing. That's all a liberal needs to believe something.

Then the baby brains ignore the climate hysteria that has been going on for decades, which has been wrong of course. Scientists claiming the ice caps will melt and coast lines will disappear. That should have happened multiple times by now according to scientists.

People with enough money can make you people believe anything.

[edjr 6,957]

The Earth has a Fever - now give me millions to fly around in my private jet

[MDC 7,979]

41 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Oh a baby brain thinks he has a gotcha. This should be good.

I understand that liberals don't care who funds a study. All that matters is that they fund studies so that a majority say one thing. That's all a liberal needs to believe something.

Then the baby brains ignore the climate hysteria that has been going on for decades, which has been wrong of course. Scientists claiming the ice caps will melt and coast lines will disappear. That should have happened multiple times by now according to scientists.

People with enough money can make you people believe anything.

The ice caps have been shrinking for years. There are pictures and everything. 

Lemme guess: fraud / fake newz?  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,946]

Science is a liar.  Sometimes. 

[Ron_Artest 2,350]

54 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

 

People with enough money can make you people believe anything.

A billionaire has you believing he's a mythical creature called Q

[Frozenbeernuts 2,410]

15 minutes ago, MDC said:

The ice caps have been shrinking for years. There are pictures and everything. 

Lemme guess: fraud / fake newz?  

And the coast line? It was supposed to noticeably disappear a few decades ago.

There are some serious pollution issues in the world. You were directed to focus on the one that actually could be considered a benefit.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,410]

12 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Science is a liar.  Sometimes. 

Exactly. Liberals don't understand that sometimes these studies are funded by people with agendas. It's why they get fooled so easily. Get enough scientists to claim something and liberals will think it gospel.

[MDC 7,979]

2 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

And the coast line? It was supposed to noticeably disappear a few decades ago.

There are some serious pollution issues in the world. You were directed to focus on the one that actually could be considered a benefit.

Yes. Google “coastal erosion.” There are pictures of that too.  

I’m not focused on any of it. But you’re a Grade A rube if you think manmade emissions aren’t contributing to it.  

[Maximum Overkill 2,554]

That sucks, 65 degrees here tomorrow. We're in a cold front 

[Frozenbeernuts 2,410]

3 minutes ago, MDC said:

Yes. Google “coastal erosion.” There are pictures of that too.  

I’m not focused on any of it. But you’re a Grade A rube if you think manmade emissions aren’t contributing to it.  

I said they were, a very small amount.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,410]

3 hours ago, weepaws said:

Darn it man, you logging off or lying about doing so? 

I'm logging off for the day. You can stop whining about it now. At least until tomorrow.

[squistion 2,611]

10 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

I'm logging off for the day. You can stop whining about it now. At least until tomorrow.

Thank heaven for small favors.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,946]

Just now, squistion said:

Nobody likes you. Not even the libtards.  

[Maximum Overkill 2,554]

1 minute ago, squistion said:

Bye bye Pusssy! 

[supermike80 2,107]

12 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

Gotta love this - Look the earth has gone through multiple periods of warming and cooling...and you know this because of---yeah Science.  But science is wrong a lot. 

Ok so if I understand.   Science has been able to determine the earth has gone through cooling and warming periods, so because of that they must be right about everything?  Yeah that makes sense

[Mike Honcho 5,493]

46 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Ok so if I understand.   Science has been able to determine the earth has gone through cooling and warming periods, so because of that they must be right about everything?  Yeah that makes sense

I just find it curious that the very science you are saying is wrong is the same science you are using to give us your other facts(millions of years of warming and cooling).

19 hours ago, supermike80 said:

I still struggle with this thinking-- That there is no other source for the warming of the Earth than us.  The earth that has gone through multiple climate changes in it's history.  We literally just emerged from an ice age 15,000 years ago.  Which means zip to humans who only live 80, but in the history of the Earth, 15K means jack squat.

I'm sure you will next show me how much the earth has warmed in the last 100 years or whatever, and correlate that directly to fossil fuel use.  Yeah, that certainly has merit, but is that the only possible reason?   I am just not convinced.

And to your point, there is no real need to get worked up about climate change.  We will never ever stop it, no matter what we do, so it is better to adapt to it and learn how to protect ourselves from it.

But I'm still not 100% in on it being only humans fault.

 

I really should have stopped here though, because nobody is making that claim and you are either completely misstating man-made global warming or completely don't understand it. Regardless, if you don't understand the basic science and theory, I'm not going to explain it to you.

[supermike80 2,107]

Just now, Mike Honcho said:

I just find it curious that the very science you are saying is wrong is the same science you are using to give us your other facts(millions of years of warming and cooling).

I really should have stopped here though, because nobody is making that claim and you are either completely misstating man-made global warming or completely don't understand it. Regardless, if you don't understand the basic science and theory, I'm not going to explain it to you.

That's a great way to debate.   So you win by saying someone that disagrees with you just doesn't understand it.   No thought whatsoever to the other side eh?

Fine.  You have your opinion.   I respect it.  Sorry you can't discuss it however.

[edjr 6,957]

Guess what? Weather people wrong again. It is cold in snowing in some parts of taxachusetts, but not where I live (on da ocean)

[Mike Honcho 5,493]

53 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

That's a great way to debate.   So you win by saying someone that disagrees with you just doesn't understand it.   No thought whatsoever to the other side eh?

Fine.  You have your opinion.   I respect it.  Sorry you can't discuss it however.

You don't understand it---you completely mis-characterized what it was...so no, I'm not going to debate you.  Just like I wouldn't discuss with a child advance math when they clearly don't understand it.  

[supermike80 2,107]

9 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

You don't understand it---you completely mis-characterized what it was...so no, I'm not going to debate you.  Just like I wouldn't discuss with a child advance math when they clearly don't understand it.  

Ohhh....So this is the "I have my opinion and since you don't agree, you're dumb" debate tactic.  Good one

[Fnord 2,603]

11 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Exactly. Liberals don't understand that sometimes these studies are funded by people with agendas. 

Those bastards with an agenda are fooling us! AAARRGGGHHHH!!!

DOD Bastards!

US Naval Institute bastards!

Army Corps of Engineers. Filthy sons of bltches!

More DOD! These bastards are probably behind the whole bamboozle!

God damn crazy military leftists with nefarious agendas!