Ron_Artest 2,768 Posted 8 hours ago FBI agents search Washington Post reporter’s home - The Washington Post https://share.google/Vdfg7p0q9ZiV1SanM The FBI executed a search warrant Wednesday morning at a Washington Post reporter’s home as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of illegally retaining classified government materials. On Christmas Eve, the Washington Post published a story by Hannah Natanson, a reporter who works as part of a team covering the ways Donald Trump is upending the federal workforce. “I am The Post’s ‘federal government whisperer.’ It’s been brutal,” the headline went. She described having been an education reporter who wandered over to Reddit, where she put out a call for “anyone willing to chat.” She provided her contact information on Signal, an encrypted app that Post reporters are encouraged to use. “The next day, I woke at sunrise to dozens of messages—the ruling pattern of my mornings ever since,” she wrote. Before long, “I would gain a new beat, a new editor and 1,169 contacts on Signal, all current or former federal employees who decided to trust me with their stories.” On Wednesday morning, the FBI searched her home and seized her phone, a Garmin watch, and two laptops—one of them issued by the Post. Trump's assault on the press continues. He calls them the enemy of the people. This is how authoritarians stop people from speaking out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,685 Posted 8 hours ago Take it up with the judge… “The FBI executed a search warrant Wednesday morning” Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,590 Posted 8 hours ago Another liberal nut job whines early in the morning. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,974 Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, avoiding injuries said: Take it up with the judge… “The FBI executed a search warrant Wednesday morning” They seem to always forget that part… They act like Trump just says oh yeah, go raid her house. Now the next part will be it’ll be an unjust warrant, which will be absolutely hilarious. Given how Biden treated warrants and fake information to drum them up. It’s like they hang themselves with every time they whine about something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,306 Posted 6 hours ago I missed Rusty’s outrage when Biden’s jack boot thugs raided James O’Keefe. Does anyone have the link? TIA 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 2,058 Posted 6 hours ago No one is above the law. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,521 Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, avoiding injuries said: Take it up with the judge… “The FBI executed a search warrant Wednesday morning” So all judges are impartial now? Good to know. Better not see you whining about “activist judges!” Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,768 Posted 6 hours ago 9 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said: No one is above the law. Except Trump, of course, who continues to break the law by covering up the Epstein child trafficking ring Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,306 Posted 6 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Except Trump, of course, who continues to break the law by covering up the Epstein child trafficking ring Didn’t the Clintons, leaders of the Democrat Party for 35 years, just refuse to testify on Epstein? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrahmaBulls 1,019 Posted 6 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Except Trump, of course, who continues to break the law by covering up the Epstein child trafficking ring You're an idiot 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,241 Posted 6 hours ago Obama locked up the most reports since ww2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,145 Posted 5 hours ago If this is the story I read about, they didn't raid the reporter for any investigation related to the reporter. They're investigating a leak within the government. The reporter has not been accused of wrongdoing. IOW. nothingburger. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,768 Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Didn’t the Clintons, leaders of the Democrat Party for 35 years, just refuse to testify on Epstein? Indict them, I don't give a fock. Your daddy is covering it up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,768 Posted 5 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Strike said: If this is the story I read about, they didn't raid the reporter for any investigation related to the reporter. They're investigating a leak within the government. The reporter has not been accused of wrongdoing. IOW. nothingburger. How many insiders are gonna talk to reporters after this? Your talking points didn't discuss this I bet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kopy 598 Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Didn’t the Clintons, leaders of the Democrat Party for 35 years, just refuse to testify on Epstein? They should be get jail time. Fair is fair. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,145 Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: How many insiders are gonna talk to reporters after this? Your talking points didn't discuss this I bet. Are you suggesting there will never be a whistleblower again? Because I'll take that bet. How much? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,306 Posted 4 hours ago 30 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Indict them, I don't give a fock. Your daddy is covering it up. They lead YOUR party. How deep does it go? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kopy 598 Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Tree of Knowledge said: They lead YOUR party. How deep does it go? Yes sir. They only answer to one person. King Obama Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,768 Posted 52 minutes ago 4 hours ago, Strike said: Are you suggesting there will never be a whistleblower again? Because I'll take that bet. How much? Never? Of course not. But you have to admit the purpose of going after whistleblowers is to stop them from coming forward right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,768 Posted 52 minutes ago 3 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said: They lead YOUR party. How deep does it go? Ask trump. He's covering for them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,145 Posted 49 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Never? Of course not. But you have to admit the purpose of going after whistleblowers is to stop them from coming forward right? No, I don't admit that. Why would I? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,768 Posted 34 minutes ago 14 minutes ago, Strike said: No, I don't admit that. Why would I? Well it's the truth but I know you're not truthful so makes sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,145 Posted 32 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: Well it's the truth but I know you're not truthful so makes sense. This from the guy who just started caring about Epstein's victims Share this post Link to post Share on other sites