Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mike Honcho

Trump’s pardon of convicted woman is the second time he’s erased her sentence in a criminal case

Recommended Posts

Quote

 

President Donald Trump is issuing a slew of pardons, a White House official said Friday, including granting clemency again to a woman who was convicted for a second time after he commuted her sentence in his first term.

Trump’s latest pardon of Adriana Camberos, along with her brother Andres, erases their 2024 convictions related to a scheme the Justice Department said involved deception in their resale of wholesale groceries and other goods. She had previously been convicted of an unrelated fraud, and Trump commuted her sentence in that case in 2021.

The White House official claimed the family had been “unfairly targeted” and subject to a political prosecution by the Biden administration given the earlier act of clemency, which erased a prison sentence for selling counterfeit bottles of 5-Hour Energy. Marcus S. Bourassa, Camberos’ attorney, told CNN, “Ms. Camberos was wrongfully convicted. She’s home now and very grateful to the President, the White House, and Alice Johnson for their support.”

Full Story

 

This has to be a first...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Third time is the charm. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the first I heard of it and only know the CNN side of the story from the link above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

This is the first I heard of it and only know the CNN side of the story from the link above.

How about foxnews?

Trump issues a flurry of pardons, including for a woman whose sentence he commuted in his first term | FOX 56 News https://share.google/wSKgUMwklzUqMfrbH

Fits the pattern.  Trump will pardon any fraudster who pays him.  That's the trump way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

How about foxnews?

Trump issues a flurry of pardons, including for a woman whose sentence he commuted in his first term | FOX 56 News https://share.google/wSKgUMwklzUqMfrbH

Fits the pattern.  Trump will pardon any fraudster who pays him.  That's the trump way.

That's not FoxNews. That's an AP story sourced from a FOX site, but AP does have more credibility than CNN.

Her attorney says she was wrongfully convicted, but defense attorneys get paid to say things like that, and I'm not going to draw conclusions from that either. It does imply that a case can be made in her defense. We'd have to look at both that defense and the prosecution's case to figure out what's going on.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

That's not FoxNews. That's an AP story sourced from a FOX site, but AP does have more credibility than CNN.

Her attorney says she was wrongfully convicted, but defense attorneys get paid to say things like that, and I'm not going to draw conclusions from that either. It does imply that a case can be made in her defense. We'd have to look at both that defense and the prosecution's case to figure out what's going on.

Keep cucking for your daddy, bootlicker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ron_Artest said:

Keep cucking for your daddy, bootlicker.

In this thread one person wants to hear both sides of the story and make an informed decision and the other person bases their opinion on a clearly biased news article that doesn't present either.

The one is known to take nuanced positiones based on the evidence. The other can be predicted with 100% reliability to take the most extreme positions on all matters of issues and does so with the animalist hateful vile dripping phlegm that fills the vacant space where most people's soul would occupy.

And which is the cuck?

The gutterboy has resided in the gutter from the very beginning of your warped twisted evil existence. At least your ridiculousness and low IQ self-owns in defense of the indefensible can be fun to read at time. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

In this thread one person wants to hear both sides of the story and make an informed decision and the other person bases their opinion on a clearly biased news article that doesn't present either.

The one is known to take nuanced positiones based on the evidence. The other can be predicted with 100% reliability to take the most extreme positions on all matters of issues and does so with the animalist hateful vile dripping phlegm that fills the vacant space where most people's soul would occupy.

And which is the cuck?

The gutterboy has resided in the gutter from the very beginning of your warped twisted evil existence. At least your ridiculousness and low IQ self-owns in defense of the indefensible can be fun to read at time. 

Alright you actually want to play this out.  Let's hear the other side.  Present to me why this fraudster deserves a second pardon.  Go ahead.  This should be good.

Or you can just keep quiet and consider yourself owned.  Choice is yours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ron_Artest said:

Alright you actually want to play this out.  Let's hear the other side.  Present to me why this fraudster deserves a second pardon.  Go ahead.  This should be good.

Or you can just keep quiet and consider yourself owned.  Choice is yours.

This guy never takes a break from his incessant whining. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Alright you actually want to play this out.  Let's hear the other side.  Present to me why this fraudster deserves a second pardon.  Go ahead.  This should be good.

Or you can just keep quiet and consider yourself owned.  Choice is yours.

I did give it a cursory look, but there's not much out there. I don't have time to look into everything. Granted, I do have a nice three day weekend, but its not something I'm terribly interested in and further, looking sh*t up for you has proven time and again to be a wasted effort as you are not a serious person nor have you been capable of holding a decent conversation in the last ten years. There goes an hour of my time looking up sh*t I don't care about for a request by you and you won't read it anyway.

Use to be I was half retired and had all kinds of free time, not so much anymore.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

I did give it a cursory look, but there's not much out there. I don't have time to look into everything. Granted, I do have a nice three day weekend, but its not something I'm terribly interested in and further, looking sh*t up for you has proven time and again to be a wasted effort as you are not a serious person nor have you been capable of holding a decent conversation in the last ten years. There goes an hour of my time looking up sh*t I don't care about for a request by you and you won't read it anyway.

Use to be I was half retired and had all kinds of free time, not so much anymore.

So you spent an hour looking up an explanation for why this was a valid pardon and couldn't find one.

I didn't spend an hour, maybe 3 minutes, but I couldn't find one either.

What we do know is that she paid trump prior to the pardon.

I'm gonna conclude that there is no other side to this.  It's a pay for pardon.  You were wrong, and trump is a crook.

Thanks for playing Voltaire.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, HellToupee said:

They were unfairly targeted as it says in your post

This is rich 😂

These ICE dudes are pulling people over and asking for papers because they are brown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, thegeneral said:

This is rich 😂

These ICE dudes are pulling people over and asking for papers because they are brown.

Trump!!! :cry:

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if the excuse for this one will be that he doesn’t know him like it was for the Binance guy. 😂

Who are we kidding no one will ask after a day. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He should have done like Biden did for all his friends and family and pardoned her for any crimes committed in a 20 year period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody doubt that Don will pardon his hood buddy convicted child sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell on his way out the door?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Strike said:

He should have done like Biden did for all his friends and family and pardoned her for any crimes committed in a 20 year period.

Would you happen to have evidence of Biden receiving multiple, staggering payoffs from those he has pardoned?

No, you don't. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×