Jump to content

Strike

Members
  • Content Count

    35,606
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    41

Strike last won the day on March 12

Strike had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

4,032 Excellent

About Strike

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

32,576 profile views
  1. Strike

    The state of the Presidential race

    Are you the one who argued with Jerry incessantly about the meaning of the phrase "existential threat?"
  2. Strike

    The state of the Presidential race

    Tim will start calling for impeachment on day one of Trump's term, as soon as Trump starts reversing a crapload of Biden's executive orders.
  3. Strike

    The state of the Presidential race

    Your own article says that prosecution misled the court and that the evidence was tampered with. Sorry you are incapable of reading. And that's why they postponed the trial.
  4. Strike

    The state of the Presidential race

    It's been posted. Not sure if I posted it or someone else but it's been posted, probably multiple times. How many aliases is this that you're on? How sad is it that you've been banned so many time but keep coming back.
  5. Cohen's "evidence" is his testimony. Why should anyone believe a proven, convicted liar? Cross examination should be good. Can't wait.
  6. Not at all. The question is how one would know if he is lying given how freely he does it.
  7. How do you know who I'm even talking about? I didn't name names.
  8. He's the star witness of this case. If you truly believe that you can't believe Trump should be convicted in this case.
  9. Squisition is a documented liar. I know what I read.
  10. Sure. I'll just call you "Squisition Cohen" from now on. Or would you rather "Squisition Pinnochio?"
  11. Strike

    The state of the Presidential race

    No I don't. What I want is you to start posting based on DATA, not your as Jerry would say, "Feelingz!!!!!" I get tired of having to prove you wrong on basic FACTS. As I always say, I have no problem debating people on differences of opinion. But that assumes we're using the same FACTS, not that one of us (me) is using FACTS and some of us (you) are making up "FACTS." It's not possible to have intelligent discourse under those conditions.
  12. Squisition. I'll take a check. Thanks.
  13. Prosecutor: Mr. proven liar/perjurer, did you lie here today? Perjurer: No I didn't!!!! Okay we believe you.
  14. Strike

    The state of the Presidential race

    ROFLMAO. Remember when you posted a single cherry picked poll to suggest Biden was going to win. And then I posted a link to 538 showing a bunch of polls where Trump was winning the majority? Then you said 538 was "behind" and the REAL momentum was with Biden. Remember that? It wasn't very long ago.
×