nobody

Jags and Bryan Thomas would be a good fit.

Eagles got a good one. Mitchell is bad ass.

Antonio Pierce though. Quinyon Mitchell

Raiders can take Spencer Rattler now.

Man, the NFL is really milking this. Goofy story Pick 3 minutes of coverage 4 minutes of commercials 1 minute of coverage go to step 1.

Let's see if all the people saying the Jets will take Bowers are correct. Amarius Mims is my thinking. He's Jets-y pick.

I grew up in Louisiana, and the wimmenz down there are mostly overweight.

Is this going to be the most boring draft of all time? 43 minutes to draft and the only trades are for backup qbs.

That's what they did with the covid jab mandates. "Oh well, we did our best." Well if your best is trash, maybe sit back and leave decisions to the people who were telling you in real time that shìt is going sideways.

They had Ladd playing the X a lot because almost their entire receiving core are smurfs, so he was a fish out of water. They had him as an outside when he's really a slot receiver that can play outside sometimes.

I remember arguing with people that the jab wasn't stopping the spread well before the whole, "we never said getting the jab would stop you from getting it" absolute BS even came out. I knew because towns with 90% vax rates were still getting infections. In fact the same gaslighters that we're trying to tell me "no one ever said you wouldn't get it if you got vaxed" were the same people telling me that I'm killing grannies because only unvaxxed are spreading it.

Dumb. As soon as the infection rate R0 drops below 1, the infection will die off. You don't need anywhere close to mass vaccination for that to happen. That's how all of us with common sense knew all you jab pushers were full of shìt. You can't have 35% of your population vaccinated, another 35% having recent previous infection and still see the infection numbers we were seeing. That was obvious to people with common sense all the while you covidians tried to tell us it was a "pandemic of the unvaccinated."

You are the one saying that 95% effective doesn't mean 95% of people won't get it. I'm just saying that doesn't equate to everyone gets it. And the classic gaslighter defense. Tell the person you're gaslighting that they're gaslighting you. You're a terrible person. We all know what we were told. You're the one saying we were told something different.

So now you're just making up things I didn't say. What a surprise.

Your making the distinction between 95% of people vs 95% effective by acting like 95% effective should actually mean what? Everyone still gets it? Keep that gaslighting going like people weren't told what they were told.