Strike

Bump for MDC

https://1ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2024%2F04%2F23%2Fopinion%2Fbragg-trump-trial.html

Why did Columbia announce remote learning for the rest of the term and why did the President of Columbia say the following regarding the remote learning?:

Oh, well if some sound engineer none of us have ever heard of, in an article where the only other example they cite is One Direction, says it it must be true. WTF is wrong with you?

You were right about the Beastie Boys, but you're wrong here. I have no idea what Taylor Swift does in concert because I have no desire to see her in concert. But the BANDS that I DO go see sure as hell don't pipe anything in. What type of performers do YOU go see in concert?

Don't know if that's gonna be any good but I'm gonna see it that's for sure.

Come on man. "The Trevor Project" is one of the most respected, non partisan think tanks in the world with world renowned scientists doing SERIOUS research!!!

You just love making stuff up. Love me or hate me, very few people on this forum will dispute that I form my opinions based on data and I back that sh*t up, just as I did today. I have since the day I joined almost 20 years ago. Then we have you who I have shown to be factually wrong on at least 10 occasions since you started posting here in earnest, which is what 6 months? Remember when you thought Trump's civil case in NY was about Taxes, and accused me of clinging to irrelevant details when I told you you were wrong, and then you had to eat crow? Who had the opinion without the facts in that case? And rinse and repeat over and over again.

Come on man. We Chiefs fans have to stick together!!!!

I've told you all a bunch of times. Tim forms an opinion and then looks for supporting evidence, regardless of how specious that evidence is. If I were to support an argument for banning abortion with links to a pro-life site he'd discount it immediately, but he posts links to a site just as questionable to support the opinion he's formed regarding gender affirming care, all the while calling a report commissioned by the NHS in England disputed and controversial, which is ridiculous. The NHS said the following about the Cass report: https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/nhs-englands-response-to-the-final-report-of-the-independent-review-of-gender-identity-services-for-children-and-young-people/

England's NHS is neither disputed nor controversial. Most countries have followed the lead of countries pulling back on medical gender affirming care until more research is done. There is no disputing some of the negative effects of some of these treatments and the positive outcomes ARE disputed. The recommendations in the Cass report don't even preclude medical treatment of gender dysphoria, which you'd know if you bothered to read it. The U.S. is the outlier. Hitching your wagon the stance of people in the U.S. is gonna bite you in the butt.

As far as I can tell only one person is pushing the mantra that you can't say we, and it's the OP.

Nice! I'm at the opposite end of the spectrum, having what may be the smallest Maine Coon in existence. She weights like 6 pounds.

Ooh, you got me!!!!

You have a cat? Well, now we know Sux is in. How wide is the cat's b*tthole?