Jump to content

Strike

Members
  • Content Count

    41,349
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    60

Strike last won the day on September 10

Strike had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

5,941 Excellent

About Strike

  • Rank
    FF Geek

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

63,639 profile views
  1. Strike

    Fascist attacks on Individuals and Speech

    Maybe they wanted to not be dooshes and removed a threatening group/page. Your constant attempts to score gotchas are tiring and make you look like an 11 year old. An 11 year old with Autism.
  2. It's just another idiotic lib talking point. @The General just providing more evidence that he's not a serious poster.
  3. It's in this thread drive by poster. Address it or don't I don't really care.
  4. No, you haven't discussed it. But you do you, drive by poster.
  5. https://abcnews.go.com/US/arson-pennsylvania-gov-shapiro-mansion-plead-guilty/story?id=126504348
  6. Oh, I have been trust me. Thanks to me the ACLU is investigating non existent ICE vehicles in rural farming communities in 12 different states.
  7. You still haven't addressed my counter example. I wonder why? Not really. You're the typical lib. Want to whine about things but not really discuss them. I don't remember you actually discussing any topics here. You're the classic drive by poster.
  8. I don't consider jaywalking to be as serious an offense as I do illegal immigration so this is a poor comparison.
  9. Yes. I've posted it twice. The 2nd time I specifically called attention to it. Maybe your reading comprehension of my posts is about as good as your reading comprehension of the article that makes it clear he's not a U.S. Citizen, yet you seem to have thought he was. Or you just lied.
  10. Cool. So what's the problem?
  11. Yep. They're not serious posters.
  12. No. You lied. And you keep ignoring my counterexample. I wonder why? Not really.
  13. He's like @The Real timschochet. He thinks that if HE THINKS A LAW is bad it shouldn't be enforced and/or an individual should be able to just ignore it without repercussions.
  14. So you lied. And his legal residency requires him to carry his authorization to be here at all times. You ignored my example above. Do you think I should be required to carry my driver's license when I drive?
  15. When you have to lie to try to make an argument, you've already lost the argument.
×