nobody

Oh, that's all? @supermike80, call off the family meeting. That's a nothingburger.

What you posted from your idle jon stewart was just them saying, "yeah, having a gun in that spot didn't help matters." (I'm paraphrasing before you freak out) Somehow, you took that as, OMG, OMG OMG, @supermike80's daddy is taking away guns!!Q#@!31

I can't even follow this. You're telling me @supermike80's daddy said we can't have guns? @supermike80 should call a family meeting and get his pops under control.

Classic Gutter. Everyone else has to speak with absolute precision while he can speak in generalities and exaggerations. No one is going after 2A. If Trump were to go after 2A only the folks that love the taste of boot like everyone who flipped on the Epstein stuff would go along, but F those guys anyway.

Well according to you and jon stewart (who said it better than you ever could), @supermike80's daddy wants to take everyone's guns. So who's boots am I licking, by saying we ain't giving up 2A?

And you said the admin was repeating the anti-2A message. Then you said Jon stewart put together the comedy segment better than you ever could in which he says Republicans are giving away the 2nd amendment because Trump told them to. If you didn't mean that the admin wants to get rid of 2A, then maybe don't say the admin is repeating an anti-2A message and jizz yourself over a comedian saying it and then saying he's saying it better than you ever could.

Okay so no one is saying "guns are the problem." Being at a protest with a gun isn't the problem. Inserting yourself in the way of law enforcement while carrying will increase your odds of getting shot by law enforcement. That's common sense. If you hear people saying "the gun is the problem" and extrapolate that to mean anything other than, "carrying a gun and getting into an altercation with law enforcement can lead to deadly use of force," you are misunderstanding the message. If they tell you guns are the problem, they are being imprecise. I know that always trips you up. Jon stewart purposely misunderstands messages for a living so he can make jokes. I wouldn't use him for real opinions.

Comedians purposely avoid nuance for the joke gutter. That's why jon stewart himself said years ago not to take what he says seriously. No one is saying get rid of guns. They're saying use judgement when legally carrying by avoiding tussles with law enforcement. Even the most bootlicking bootlickers here aren't saying get rid of 2A and neither is the administration.

I was wondering where gutter got that talking point. Turns out a comedy show. Good grief.

Rankings must be... Josh Allen Justin Herbert Drake Maye (Super Bowl) Sheduer Lamar Jackson Trevor Lawrence Joe Burrow Daniel Jones (injured) Mahomes (injured) Bo Nix (injured) Stroud Aaron Rodgers Tua Cam Ward Geno Smith Justin Fields

It would to you and I. If they feel like there is some moral imperative to keep ICE from during their job, though, they probably would feel like it's their duty to physical interfere. Take abortion. If you feel like people are legit murdering babies, common sense goes out the window, and they think fire bombing some abortion clinic is justified. Now why people think enforcing borders is so egregious is beyond me, but no accounting for extreme moral outliers. Then there are other factors in my opinion: ICE tactics that are more jackhammer than scalpel which I'm sure is a direct influence from the Trump admin placing unreasonable arrest quotas forcing some rather blunt encounters to occur which is fanning the flames Egging on by state and local politicians and social media This seemingly desperate need to be recognized as woke so much that the most unstable of the bunch all seem to want to one up each other We're all arguing about what side is right and what side is wrong. From my perspective, everyone at every level seems to be contributing to the problem. My personal opinion: I think Trump and Noem don't know any better. They don't strike me as nuanced thinkers. Trump only thinks about what he wants in broad terms. He needs extremely competent people to execute his vision for him. I think the wokies are stirring the pot because they see civil unrest as a political weapon.

I don't see many people advocating giving up guns. In fact the only person I see saying anything about the 2nd amendment is you asserting that MAGA is now ready to bootlick their guns away. I don't think that's the case. I will say though that one good thing that came out of this is a whole swath of people seem to understand the value of the 2nd amendment all the sudden.

It takes 5 ICE agents to beat up one old lady, so the 5:1 math works.

Guys, don't forget to consider maybe both sides are douchebags. In my experience, for something to escalate, it usually takes two douchebags,

What I learned during covid when my fellow citizens cheered as the government tried to get me fired for not taking a vax I didn't need is that the government can claim anything they want is legal if enough people are cool with it. From that perspective, I sympathize with the protestors. Although, I don't think agitating agents and impeding their movement and operations is an effective or legal way to accomplish their goals. So my sympathy is used up pretty quick.