nobody

May be a joke

I have an idea. Why doesn't someone just ask Kimmel what he meant? Or do we feel like he would lie to save himself so no matter what he'll play the semantics game HauckTua is playing? I mean it was probably written by some writer anyway I'd imagine.

I guess. I mean it's two words. Was he speaking specifically about stupid Muslims? Or was he saying all Muslims are stupid? I mean I'm sure there a plenty of stupid muslims out there. Lord knows I know a ton of stupid Christians after all.

Sure. I didn't even know who Kirk was before all this. Why would I care how you interpret anything he says?

Not true. They suppressed Hunter laptop story too. And while I don't buy ivermectin is effective against covid, by like week 10 we knew it was old and fat people who were vulnerable to covid and they pushed a narrative that anyone who stepped outside was at risk and then they used it to push BS about how the vaccine would keep you from getting covid which was bs.

Come on. Everyone knows what he meant. Why wouldn't you say, "characterize as left wing," if that's what you meant. By saying that maga was "desperate" to characterize the shooter as "other than them," especially in that patronizing and condemning intonation, the implication is that the shooter was indeed one of them. Any non-robot would interpret it that way. But in the end, it doesn't matter. He could've came out and said, "why did maga kill Kirk?" Government is grossly overstepping by threatening FCC action over it.

Ehhhhhhhhh.... Not so fast. When you come down on the same side of every issue, you're on the team. But I have openings on the "both sides can fock themselves" team if you're interested. I'm going to need you to sh¡t on the wokies some, too, though.

If I was a wokie, I'd say the reason there hasn't been riots over Kirk as there were for George Floyd is that: The riots were the result of decades of perceived systemic oppression. Kirk supporters may have only been perceived to be oppressed in the last what? 5 years? The riots were a byproduct of protests against a system of power that wasn't represented by them. If Kirk supporters were to protest, who would they be protesting against? The leftist/anti-fascist folks don't have systemic power so rioting against system abuse would be rioting against themselves. On the MAGA side, I'd say the riots didn't happen because the right hasn't weaponized riots for political gain, yet, and don't have the infrastructure in place to organize the protests to act as a powder keg

Very much so. And we're cheering it on like the dumb focks we are.

This is pretty nutso. All the people around the world that would see the American way of life destroyed. All it takes is social media pitting us against each other and we take turns chipping away at freedom of speech out of spite. Do you guys understand that if folks aren't allowed to have dissenting opinions, the government has complete control over narratives and what the mob thinks?

The left had the FBI curating social media to shape narratives. It's a huge reason musk bought twitter. The right saw the power in influencing gullible lemmings, and how easy it is, and just started doing it better. But it was wrong then, and it is wrong now. And I spoke up then as well. But don't worry, your team will get their chance too and the death of free speech will be met with the sound of cheers by whichever team is doing it at the time. We suck.

I said peep about all of it, and this is a pyrrhic victory. The wokies will be back in power soon enough, and they'll retaliate, and you guys will all be crying. And it won't be whataboutism. Trump is setting precedent here.

He'll be back. He's probably sucking his way back as we speak.

That would make more sense. Kimmel is like gutterboy. He was cool being racist. He was told to be woke, so that's what he did, and now he'll lick whatever boots he has to to keep his job.

No. Are you?