nobody

They would've lost anyway. Pats stopped even trying to score because the broncos were no threat to score.

You got me. Stidham was awesome. You won the internet today.

Tough to win that challenge, but I don't think Maye got that first.

I'm waiting for some more videos to surface, but it looks to me like ICE agents really messed up here. Appears dude was disarmed before shots fired therefore not a threat given the 4 agents subduing him. Most plausible scenario: Accidental discharge triggered agents to shoot not realizing the dude was disarmed. But it's also very plausible some trigger happy douche decided he was a threat and opened fire. Neither are good. On the spectrum of potential scenarios, at minimum anyone who fired a shot needs badge removed. Government liable for civil damages. Shooters potentially eligible for criminal charges pending more evidence. What's shown, they can't do criminal charges to me. Best thing feds can do is say they focked up but I'm sure they have a bunch of lawyers telling them they can't say that.

Getting closer. But you're wokeness is causing you to be too extreme.

Was the tat good at least?

I don't think anyone here cares, and I think most of us already knew.

They didn't get rid of the evidence. First they said it was Russian disinformation, remember? You guys believed that of course. Then they said they couldn't authenticate it because files were copied and threw up their hands. Nothing else they can do. Who knew copy/paste was the ultimate protection against cyber investigations. Then the gop put on a big show like Congress always does. I mean do those dog and pony shows ever lead to anything other than a bunch of grandstanding sound bites?

Got to pretend you're doing something. First day interacting with any sort of leadership at any level of any organization?

Dude thinks the GOP wanted a spotlight on politicians taking under the table payments. Yeah the crack squad of FBI tech investigators couldn't authenticate anything because some files were copied. I'm sure that would stop them if you or I were under investigation. Man, hopefully if I ever need to go to trial for something, I get you guys on my jury. For people who like to rail against privilege, y'all really don't know how real privilege works. god bless.

Is this the third time I told you that it's useless because you will take nothing less than a signed confession backed up by video evidence or the fourth? And it's very clear your intent given you keep giving yourself the out by naming yourself the arbiter of what is reputable or not which you may not realize yet is what we are actually arguing about. I mean do you really want to get into a 4 page discussion lasting three days on if something should be reputable enough for you or not? Because I don't. I already know the outcome. Again, you will take nothing less than a signed notarized confession. I already know that. And yes I'm exaggerating for effect to demonstrate the futility of trying to explain to someone that when you find a trail of cookie crumbs leading from the kitchen to a kid's room and crumbs all in his room and on his face that you don't need to see him eating the cookie to know he did it.

You guys crack me up. You mean the DoJ didn't find anything wrong with their boss who's backed up by an entire system of power brokers that would all likely get pulled into the muck if a real investigation took place? Oh okay, then. Just look at what the dude wrote in the emails. It's blatantly obvious. Just like Trump burying Epstein. We all know Trump at best was turning a blind eye to Epstein. At worst he was a loyal participant in the crimes. And, yes, we will likely never see anyone held accountable for it. That doesn't mean we have to buy all the self-serving absolute BS that these guys spew. And quite frankly, you guys all look like bootlickers on both sides when you protect your guy and try to call out the other team's guy when it's just so so so obvious they're knee deep in some BS.

No trump should fry too. That's the part you guys don't get.

Why? You don't know what was on the laptop by now? I think you do, and, again, you choose to ignore it. Show me evidence! Here's evidence. No, not that evidence!

Like I said, is magas can't help it if you want to ignore shìt