Jump to content

nobody

Members
  • Content Count

    22,811
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

nobody last won the day on November 1 2025

nobody had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

2,961 Excellent

About nobody

  • Rank
    FF Geek
  • Birthday 05/15/1977

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    EEF2F7 even posts
  • Website URL
    http://www.goiterfetish.com
  • ICQ
    0
  • Yahoo
    F5F9FD odd posts

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

31,440 profile views
  1. Dang Rusty. You going to let Gutter say that about you?
  2. Yeah, but no one was being held accountable until the video went viral and there was a critical mass of public outcry.
  3. Your wokie in crime said he's responsible. He said walz is taking responsibility like the real leader he is. He's such a great leader.
  4. nobody

    Minnesota

    I guess in dogcows world, if a cop says move your car, you can run people over. (not that she almost ran the dude over because she was trying to obey that order) This is getting seafoam level stupid.
  5. nobody

    Minnesota

    At least she proved how racist she wasn't by getting herself killed hitting a law enforcement officer with her car trying to flee. Super not racist.
  6. nobody

    Minnesota

    She didn't act on the order to move. She didn't comply with the superseding order to get out of the car. In fact, she was clearly trying to flee No one was pointing a gun at her until she started veering the car toward an officer The officer being in the wrong place doesn't give her the right to hit him with her car as she flees Clean shoot
  7. nobody

    Minnesota

    He wouldn't have been dead if Chauvin didn't kneel on his neck. Therefore, Chauvin is guilty.
  8. nobody

    Minnesota

    The one guy said move. The second and most recent order was to get out of the car. She didn't act until the superseding order came and she perceived herself to be in danger of facing some sort of consequence for her action. Clean shoot.
  9. nobody

    Minnesota

    I will say, though, it was clear that she wasn't trying to hit the officer. She was clearly trying to escape and between her panic and her car's crappy turn radius couldn't get around the officer. But she should've stopped. Instead she didn't care that the officer was there and kept going. And how is he supposed to know she isn't trying to run him over? She did actually touch the officer with her car demonstrating he was in danger. In fact, it looks like she kind of hit his leg out from under him and he was athletic enough to just slide off the car. Even the fact that he was close enough to basically stick his gun on the window means he was close enough to be in danger. Clean shoot.
  10. nobody

    Minnesota

    Wrong as usual. She steered the car at the officer. That by law is enough of a justification for deadly force.
  11. nobody

    Minnesota

    Here's what I see from the two videos. Truck pulls up. Passenger officer who seems to have some chill gets out and says move the car. The driver gets out clearly pissed and makes a beeline to the wokie saying, "get out of the car. Get out of the focking care now," at which time he tries to open the door. When he tries to open the door, driver decides to take off. She backs up first and then turns toward the third officer Third officer who I can't tell where he came is in front of the car. Draws his gun the second the car shidts into drive from reverse. Car pushes him as he gets off his feet and slides off hood while shooting. First shot is through windshield. Second and third are clearly through driver side window. Justified shoot. She steered into the officer while trying to evade arrest. Agents could spend some of the flood of funding they're getting to get some de-escalation training. Prior context would've been helpful. Multiple people whipping out phones to video and gawk and yell like neanderthals implies the situation had relevant pretext.
  12. nobody

    Minnesota

    He's overseeing massive fraud? I heard that's what good leaders do.
  13. So Walz is responsible.
  14. I don't remember that at all. I've owned bitcoin longer than you have, and I've watched you evolve your understanding of it over the years as you fell ass backward into profit. Do you remember how you had it all wrong originally? Probably not. You're getting in the neighborhood of getting it though last time I saw you write out an opinion. Still a long way to go. You still think it's going to be world currency right?
  15. Sure I'll explain it. Fnord and this eagerowl guy are right. The motivation to not put in controls to control fraud and by extension to defend the fraud via deflection and denial as you and mdc have been doing is out of motivation to look not racist. The problem, like I've said in the past, is people like you and mdc and gutter actually are racist. You don't want to be, but you don't know how, so you confuse not being racist with just letting minorities do and say whatever they want for fear of being called racist. You're allowed to disagree with a black person. That's not racist. If a somali is committing fraud, you're allowed to say it. That's not racist.
×