Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/13/2023 in all areas

  1. 3 points
    I would think the economy and defense alone should be enough for 90% of people to vote Trump over Biden. Don't you want cheaper prices for stuff again? you psychos
  2. 2 points
  3. 2 points
    I am fine for paying them, but not for not killing. I am fine for paying them for killing folks on the payment eligible list. I would approve of double payments if they kill themselves.
  4. 2 points
  5. 2 points
    The threat is neutralized and everyone is safe. Great work!
  6. 2 points
  7. 2 points
  8. 2 points
    Yeah, me too. So why should Illegals get FREE healthcare when Grandma can't afford her blood pressure meds? Isn't it absolutely ridiculous to take care of ILLEGAL aliens before taking care of our own citizens who were born here and paid a lifetime of taxes?
  9. 1 point
    875, 050 Now. Semper Fi.
  10. 1 point
  11. 1 point
    Some of them think Covid ended when Biden (illegitimately) came into office.
  12. 1 point
    Wow. I didn’t know it was that low during Trump. Cruz owned that chump.
  13. 1 point
    He'll be fine, they can probably put his head back together
  14. 1 point
    My answer on why it helps us is even if you want to discount the market forces to price that extra production would bring, and I wouldn't be willing to concede that, in simple terms it's also employing Americans. Those happen to be pretty high paying jobs as well. I'm fine with discussing nuclear, but we would have to ramp up to it. If you want to advocate for those discussions, I'm 100% on board there. But if you're designing a parachute you don't jump out of the plane and try and figure it out on the way down. You do all the work and preparation before you jump out. We haven't done that work and preparation. We both know that we don't currently have the capacity in nuclear or other "clean" energy sources to meet our needs. I'm assuming you concede we need fossil fuels for at least the intermediate future, why would we not want those jobs and production here as opposed to supporting folks like the Saudis, Venezuela, Iran, pretty much the list of the world's worst regimes. Since one of the non factors or even possibly a negative on your side is that corporations will make money from it being here domestically, would you rather one of the OPEC nations or Venezuela have it? Someone is going to make money and have those jobs. I don't understand the left's position on why allowing that to go to such regimes is a good thing.
  15. 1 point
    Fremont street. Downtown Vegas. Martinis flowing
  16. 1 point
    How about any palpable explanation as to why Hunter and other family members were getting paid? What expertise where they bringing to any table, what possible service could they, with their education, training, and experience be providing which is in the most imaginative sense commensurate with the remuneration? Help me imagine. You don't have to prove anything, but help me picture the scenario under which they got paid.
  17. 1 point
    He provides expert advice on how to be a deadbeat dad?
  18. 1 point
    That's awesome. Never saw it before.
  19. 1 point
    Purdy had a 65.6 Total QBR in his 8 starts. He didn't play enough to qualify, but if he did that would've been good for 5th, behind only Mahomes, Allen, Tua, and Hurts. If he's healthy it's his job, and his coach already said he should be good for training camp. Ya'll are tripping...
  20. 1 point
    Call me crazy if you want, but I always thought of O'Hara as a straight up MILF back in the day. She's almost 30 years older than me and when Beetlejuice came out, I was only 8 years old. I saw a number of years later when I was just starting HS so, around 14. In '88, when it came out, she was in her mid 30's and I thought she was way hotter than Ryder at the time. There were definitely some deposits made into the spank bank thinking about her back in the day. Straight up hottie.
  21. 1 point
  22. 1 point
  23. 1 point
    Section 35.15 New york Penal Code 1. A person may, subject to the provisions of subdivision two, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary to defend himself, herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force by such other person, unless: (a) The latter's conduct was provoked by the actor with intent to cause physical injury to another person;  or (b) The actor was the initial aggressor;  except that in such case the use of physical force is nevertheless justifiable if the actor has withdrawn from the encounter and effectively communicated such withdrawal to such other person but the latter persists in continuing the incident by the use or threatened imminent use of unlawful physical force;  or (c) The physical force involved is the product of a combat by agreement not specifically authorized by law. 2. A person may not use deadly physical force upon another person under circumstances specified in subdivision one unless: (a) The actor reasonably believes that such other person is using or about to use deadly physical force.  Even in such case, however, the actor may not use deadly physical force if he or she knows that with complete personal safety, to oneself and others he or she may avoid the necessity of so doing by retreating;  except that the actor is under no duty to retreat if he or she is: (i) in his or her dwelling and not the initial aggressor;  or (ii) a police officer or peace officer or a person assisting a police officer or a peace officer at the latter's direction, acting pursuant to section 35.30;  or (b) He or she reasonably believes that such other person is committing or attempting to commit a kidnapping, forcible rape, forcible criminal sexual act or robbery;  or (c) He or she reasonably believes that such other person is committing or attempting to commit a burglary, and the circumstances are such that the use of deadly physical force is authorized by subdivision three of section 35.20.
  24. 1 point
    In his defense they’re being bombarded with false talking points from supposedly legitimate sources that in reality just propaganda machines
  25. 1 point
    There is not one shred of proof that this person either trans or a Democrat. None.


×