Badmojo1006 0 Posted April 28, 2006 Couldn't happen to a nicer guy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted April 28, 2006 http://www.buzzflash.com/ PS: So much for republican family values! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Riddlen 1 Posted April 28, 2006 http://www.buzzflash.com/ PS: So much for republican family values! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted April 28, 2006 What's that supposed to mean? Your doping Goebells ain't guilty? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,825 Posted April 28, 2006 http://www.buzzflash.com/ PS: So much for republican family values! Do you find joy in a person having a drug problem? Seems very un-liberal to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted April 28, 2006 Do you find joy in a person having a drug problem? Seems very un-liberal to me. Would you find joy if Hitler had a drug problem? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Riddlen 1 Posted April 28, 2006 What's that supposed to mean? Your doping Goebells ain't guilty? no, I could give a sheet about rush, I have never listened to him. I just dont see what it has to do with repubs in general. some talking head Fs up? whoopdie do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheNewGirl 1,496 Posted April 28, 2006 Would you find joy if Hitler had a drug problem? No, considering he's DEAD. Jeebus. Use a better example next time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,825 Posted April 28, 2006 Would you find joy if Hitler had a drug problem? No. Also I don't understand the question. Please explain. TIA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted April 28, 2006 Look the other way nothing to see here, amirite? No. Also I don't understand the question. Please explain. TIA Its called 'karma' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gocolts 300 Posted April 28, 2006 I thought drugs are okay with liberals???? Drugs is one of the few issues I agree with some of the liberals on.We should decriminalize drugs. Don't miss this once in a lifetime chance to be on the same side as me RR. amirite??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,825 Posted April 28, 2006 Look the other way nothing to see here, amirite?Its called 'karma' I've heard of 'karma'. I don't see how that is relevant to comparing relative joy on Limbaugh vs. Hitler doing drugs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,565 Posted April 28, 2006 Looks like he bought his way out of it. Well done Rush http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=100...DcQ11Y&refer=us Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gocolts 300 Posted April 28, 2006 I've heard of 'karma'. I don't see how that is relevant to comparing relative joy on Limbaugh vs. Hitler doing drugs. Leave it to rude rick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted April 28, 2006 I get off on hearing this ######! PS: Thank the lord for inventing right wing hypocrites! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gocolts 300 Posted April 28, 2006 I get off on hearing this ######! PS: Thank the lord for inventing right wing hypocrites! Tell us something we don't know. Hypocrites.That's a good one.You relize you are the one being the hypocrite.Your a liberal.Most liberals are for drugs being legal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TyCobb 0 Posted April 28, 2006 Rush He appeared in court to plead not guilty and pay the legal fees. Hardly a formal arrest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torridjoe 48 Posted April 28, 2006 Rush He appeared in court to plead not guilty and pay the legal fees. Hardly a formal arrest. he didn't plead not guilty, he pled GUILTY. He agreed to continue treatment and pay 30,000. In exchange, the charge is held in abeyance for 18 months and then dropped if he stays clean. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted April 28, 2006 This is not about the joy of seeing a Republican go down or the joy of seeing a fellow human being going through hardship. It's about the happiness that the general public feels whenever a big-mouthed know it all is shown to be a bigger loser than most of the people he's preaching to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,565 Posted April 28, 2006 he didn't plead not guilty, he pled GUILTY. He agreed to continue treatment and pay 30,000. In exchange, the charge is held in abeyance for 18 months and then dropped if he stays clean. no he didn't He pled not guilty and reached a deal with prosecutors that will lead to the charges being dismissed if he follows his program. http://www.wtnh.com/Global/story.asp?S=4834674 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torridjoe 48 Posted April 28, 2006 no he didn't He pled not guilty and reached a deal with prosecutors that will lead to the charges being dismissed if he follows his program. http://www.wtnh.com/Global/story.asp?S=4834674 That's bizarre. You'd at least plead out no lo contendre in that kind of a situation. Nothing says "I'm guilty" like agreeing to pay 30 grand in fees. But I apologize for the error. I assumed that was just a typo. I've never heard of a deferred conviction like that, that wasn't accompanied by a guilty plea. Florida. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ArnieBragg 1 Posted April 28, 2006 Have you read some of the quotes this guy has said in the past re: what should happen to drug addicts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted April 29, 2006 That's bizarre. You'd at least plead out no lo contendre in that kind of a situation. Nothing says "I'm guilty" like agreeing to pay 30 grand in fees. But I apologize for the error. I assumed that was just a typo. I've never heard of a deferred conviction like that, that wasn't accompanied by a guilty plea. Florida. Unless you are not guilty, want the two and a half year fishing expedition to end, and are willing to throw about 30 minutes of your income at it to make it go away. Also, WTF do you mean by ""deferred conviction" when he hasn't even been indicted? Talk about jumping the gun. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DAVID RUFFIN 2 Posted April 29, 2006 BuzzFlash News It's okay to relish in the sheer joy of feeling divine justice in seeing Rush Limbaugh cop a plea for drug addiction and be arrested. Revel in it, because Repulicans always find a way to wiggle out of responsibility for these things. Rush will be back on the air, blaming his predilection for chowing down on pain killers on Hillary Clinton. Limbaugh is a pathological liar, who performs his populist propaganda radio gig in return for a fat check. He's not down; he's just temporarily derailed. But, he'll be fertilizing the masses with his manure next week, because Republicans, in the end, have an excuse for everything, even thousands upon thousands dead in Iraq. Only a liberal judge would let a junky get his charge dismissed after "rehab." Right, Rush? How Sweet It Is! "Rush Limbaugh was arrested Friday on prescription drug charges, law enforcement officials said." The Goebbels of the Airwaves Copped a Plea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,512 Posted April 29, 2006 THIS JUST IN: All the Kennedys are alcoholics Alcohol isn't a drug, though...Right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanXIII 8 Posted April 29, 2006 Unless you are not guilty, want the two and a half year fishing expedition to end, and are willing to throw about 30 minutes of your income at it to make it go away. Also, WTF do you mean by ""deferred conviction" when he hasn't even been indicted? Talk about jumping the gun. It's called "adjudication withheld." Also, you do realize that drug charges generally don't go before a grand jury, don't you? Of course, you guys voted in an alcoholic drunk driver TWICE so your frothing-at-the-mouth defense of a conservative drug addict is hardly surprising... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bno70_1 0 Posted April 29, 2006 Not defending Rush at all, but do you know how many people go in for surgery or hurt their back or something and then end up addicted to pain killers and the like? That's scary stuff. I never even fill the prescriptions when I have surgery etc. That stuff is dangerous. You would think Limbough's credibility is just about gone right about now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanXIII 8 Posted April 29, 2006 Not defending Rush at all, but do you know how many people go in for surgery or hurt their back or something and then end up addicted to pain killers and the like? That's scary stuff. I never even fill the prescriptions when I have surgery etc. That stuff is dangerous. You would think Limbough's credibility is just about gone right about now. Especially since he's on record saying that drug addicts belong in prison. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted April 29, 2006 Especially since he's on record saying that drug addicts belong in prison. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted April 29, 2006 CNN.com's poll says most Americans want El Fatso in the pokey Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,512 Posted April 29, 2006 CNN.com's poll says most Americans want El Fatso in the pokey A CNN poll? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Riddlen 1 Posted April 29, 2006 CNN.com's poll says most Americans want El Fatso in the pokey computers have the internet now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
doughboys_2002 11 Posted April 29, 2006 I kinda thought it was common knowledge that Hitler did have a huge drug problem. Would you find joy if Hitler had a drug problem? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest tiki_gods Posted April 29, 2006 A CNN poll? Breaking News: Jesse Jackson stages a protest because Rush is white and only prominate black men are allowed to have drug problems. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thetxstang 0 Posted April 30, 2006 This is not about the joy of seeing a Republican go down or the joy of seeing a fellow human being going through hardship. It's about the happiness that the general public feels whenever a big-mouthed know it all is shown to be a bigger loser than most of the people he's preaching to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bigtuna 0 Posted April 30, 2006 This is not about the joy of seeing a Republican go down or the joy of seeing a fellow human being going through hardship. It's about the happiness that the general public feels whenever a big-mouthed know it all is shown to be a bigger loser than most of the people he's preaching to. Best post so far. Simple, concise evaluation of the joy that most multi-toothed Americans feel when seeing this hypocrite get his proper due. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rude Rick 0 Posted April 30, 2006 Best post so far. Simple, concise evaluation of the joy that most multi-toothed Americans feel when seeing this hypocrite get his proper due. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites