Fumbleweed 484 Posted April 28, 2006 ................. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
t.j 35 Posted April 28, 2006 http://www.nfl.com/draft/drafttracker/team/NYG 1 25 2 56 3 87 4 124 5 158 7 232 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raider 84 29 Posted April 28, 2006 WR all the way!!!!!! Eli, Eli, Eli!!!!!!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Portis26 0 Posted April 29, 2006 at 25 - I think they take a RB - as the air apparent to Tiki... Williams or Moaroney are better value then any WR - Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barnaby Wilde 0 Posted April 29, 2006 at 25 - I think they take a RB - as the air apparent to Tiki... Williams or Moaroney are better value then any WR - air, or heir? Don't worry, they won't... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Portis26 0 Posted April 29, 2006 air, or heir? Don't worry, they won't... tomato tomato potato potato Thank God I'm not in English Lit Class; cause I would have gotten a red circle around that word... shame on me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barnaby Wilde 0 Posted April 29, 2006 tomatotomato potato potato Thank God I'm not in English Lit Class; cause I would have gotten a red circle around that word... shame on me. Lighten up Clinton...just poking a bit of fun your way. Geez, with no first round pick today, you are going to be bored, aren't ya? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
barber2300 0 Posted April 29, 2006 at 25 - I think they take a RB - as the air apparent to Tiki... Williams or Moaroney are better value then any WR - Unless Chad Jackson slips to us for some reason, I don't think we should go WR or running back (although I have a funny feeling we might take Moss). If we keep the pick, I think we should still go defense with it. I think we'll likely go LB still. Our depth chart still isn't too strong there. Another option is CB. There is also a chance we trade down for more picks also. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CA_7 0 Posted April 29, 2006 Giants: Tiki is all for picking an RB BY MIKE GARAFOLO ~ Star-Ledger Staff NEW YORK -- Tiki Barber is well aware of the business side of the NFL, the strategy behind the draft and his impending decline. That's why yesterday, when asked about the possibility of the Giants drafting running back Laurence Maroney to be his successor, the 31-year-old Barber immediately nodded and flashed that million-dollar smile. http://www.nj.com/giants/ledger/index.ssf?...0940.xml&coll=1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
56 0 Posted April 29, 2006 http://www.nfl.com/draft/drafttracker/team/NYG1 25 2 56 3 87 4 124 5 158 7 232 I am calling it right now, the Giants will hit a homerun in the 2nd with this pick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vor 0 Posted April 29, 2006 I am calling it right now, the Giants will hit a homerun in the 2nd with this pick. I'd rather they score a Touchdown with it.. seriously though, did you sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night or something.. wanna elaborate? -v Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barnaby Wilde 0 Posted April 29, 2006 1 pick to go...do they get Chad Jackson? Or still go defense? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vor 0 Posted April 29, 2006 From Espn.com: Steelers-Giants Steelers get: 25th pick in 2006 draft (selected WR Santonio Holmes). Giants get: 32nd pick in 1st round, 32nd in the 3rd round (96 overall) and 32nd in the 4th round (129th overall). Not a bad haul for moving down 7 spots.. the 2nd round pick would've been better. -v Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr.shitty 0 Posted April 29, 2006 now what ? Jackson will most likely still be there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bigblue 0 Posted April 29, 2006 Take Jackson. Go defense with the later picks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Walter34 3 Posted April 29, 2006 Dont they have two pro bowlers at end already? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr.shitty 0 Posted April 29, 2006 WTF !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barnaby Wilde 0 Posted April 29, 2006 WTF? Why would you take a DE when you have 2 pro bowlers and a guy like Tuck waiting in the wings? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dagger 0 Posted April 29, 2006 WTF? Why would you take a DE when you have 2 pro bowlers and a guy like Tuck waiting in the wings? He was their best player available? Strahan is going to be a cap casualty in 2007. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Smurphy118 0 Posted April 29, 2006 I had it all backwards i guess. Teams are supposed to draft at the position where they need the least help??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barnaby Wilde 0 Posted April 29, 2006 I would have rather seen them take Chad JAckson to be groomed to replace Amani Toomer than have Mathais drafted to replace Strahan. I dunno... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Weapon of Mass Destruction 0 Posted April 29, 2006 This made absolutely no sense. EA should get his nuts chopped off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mr.shitty 0 Posted April 29, 2006 im sending them my fantasy football drafting resume they could have got him at 56 (id still had been pissed though) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
barber2300 0 Posted April 29, 2006 Great trade, awful pick. Hopefully they make up for it with the next one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
monk 1 Posted April 29, 2006 I was unhappy at first because I feel like the Giants are 1 good Safty, DT or LB away from having an awesome defense. But from what I am reading ...This guy has good size, All-Pro talent and the opporunity to learn from Strahan and Osi. They should have solid DE for Years Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dagger 0 Posted April 29, 2006 The Giants did what other teams fail to do . . . take the best player available on their board. With injuries and the salary cap, a position that is a strength can quickly become a weakness. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barnaby Wilde 0 Posted April 29, 2006 Adding Moss was nice. He can play WR and return kicks. Good move EA. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
monk 1 Posted April 29, 2006 Adding Moss was nice. He can play WR and return kicks. Good move EA. Anyone know how he compares to Santana when he came out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
koya 0 Posted April 29, 2006 Good job so far - they traded down (enabling them to trade up for Moss) and got a player that might have been, by a good margin, the best player/talent on the board. While not a need, now that postion (one of the most important) won't be a need for years to come. Id have prefered to get someone to replace Pettigout, but maybe Justice had more issues than we are aware of. Moss will be GREAT in this offense. I dont like WRs picked high by and large, but he has exactly what an already good offense doesnt have at all. A VERY quick, VERY shifty receiver. I understand they will try to run screens to Moss with the other WRs (big guys) blocking, ala Steve Smith or Santana Moss. LOVE that. Plus, with the trees running seems and outs, there should be a lot of open space to get Moss some running room in general. Eli must be LOVING that pick - which makes it all the better in the grand scheme of things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Giants Fan 85 Posted April 30, 2006 I was a little upset that we didn't get Jackson, but I think EA is honest when he says Moss was the highest ranked WR they had on the board, and that's why they traded up in the 2nd round. Perhaps it's also why they made the trade with Pittsburgh ... to set up that move, if they felt he wouldn't fall. I think he might have ... but I like the call. 2 solid picks. I was hoping they would take a top notch WR today. Very happy, overall. Dunno if I'd call Toomer a "Tree" ... he was supposed to be a hands guy ... until he started dropping a lot of passes. But with Shockey and Tiki ... and Jacobs who has turned into a decent blocker, and Eli chuckin' ... I dunno how you can cover all that. Because Toomer does have good hands ... when he's open. Yeah ... it could all work together real nice .... if all goes as planned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Giants Fan 85 Posted April 30, 2006 And don't forget ... at one time the NYG defense was centered around Cornelius Griffin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HTH 82 Posted April 30, 2006 And don't forget ... at one time the NYG defense was centered around Cornelius Griffin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites