Fumbleweed 545 Posted June 14, 2010 Dis. Cuss. Discuss. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,215 Posted June 14, 2010 So far round 2 is unfolding exactly as I thought it would.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Clash of the Titans 1 Posted June 14, 2010 dont you work for the government ray....PLEASE GET ON BP TO GET THE OIL OUT OF THE GULF!! thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fumbleweed 545 Posted June 14, 2010 NAn, When you check in, if a player you wish to have at 1.12 or 2.01 is still available, feel free to let me know and I'll make the change to your picks. Mike will make your two picks for you, obviously, but you can switch one of his picks with an available player if you wish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fumbleweed 545 Posted June 14, 2010 Looks like NAn has arrived in the nick of time... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fumbleweed 545 Posted June 14, 2010 Wow...Shonn Greene was going to be my pick at 2.02...surprised he was on somebody else's radar that early. I'll take Williams, though, and not be too upset. Stewart is a vulture deluxe, but DeAngelo is still one of the best backs in the league and I like his potential to be a top ten back better than the remaining choices at the position. I'm happy with Brees and Williams to kick off my draft... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NAn 39 Posted June 14, 2010 Sorry again guys, appt I had went much longer than I thought... This is about where Greene has gone per ADP and think he's great value here...picked at the turn as 9-10th rb but could see finishing 6-7. Actually think top10 is a lock considering his situation. I considered going RB with the Moss pick, but what it came down to is I think Ilike the options for a #2rb over a #1wr on the 3/4 turn. Moss had 83/1264/13 in an 'off' year. With his qb 2 yrs removed from ACL and see offense improving overall in passing game b/c of it, see Moss benefitting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NAn 39 Posted June 14, 2010 DWill is who I considered at 2.01 and think him as a #2 would still have been solid, potentially scary if he was back to 08 form. Dont' actually see that but see team running more again (#2 in atts last year), him getting more carries (if for no other reason than from 3 games he missed), and more scoring opportunities just b/c kill a drive with a pick Delhomme is gone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,215 Posted June 14, 2010 I was pretty pleased to find Wayne at 2.04, he should have a solid year in 2010, and thus far his ADP has him at 1.10, so for the current measure of his value I came away pretty good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fumbleweed 545 Posted June 14, 2010 I was pretty pleased to find Wayne at 2.04, he should have a solid year in 2010, and thus far his ADP has him at 1.10, so for the current measure of his value I came away pretty good. Absolutely. Great spot to be in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ICEMAN 44 Posted June 14, 2010 All of the guys that I was hoping would fall to me had been selected (which is par for the course with this June Mock!), so I took my #1 rated QB. I really was hoping/fearing that Moss would fall to me (i'm a Pats fan, hence the trepidation). I think that he is going to explode this year, provided he can stay healthy. He fired his agent and is in a contract year, the last one he will most likely ever have. He knows that he has to put up some big numbers if he wants that last contract to have some big numbers on it. I think that Greene and Wayne went about where they should. Usually in the real drafts that I am in people are sleeping on Wayne, so he invariably falls to me. He should put up solid numbers again this year. ICEMAN Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JScott 20 Posted June 14, 2010 Never expected that Rodgers would have fallen to me in the 2nd, thus not part of my draft plan. I was looking at another position and the player I was targetting was/is available but I just felt Rodgers was too good of a value to let slip. I'll have to adjust the draft strategy now, but it will be interestingt to see what I would have had compared to what I will end up with now... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,148 Posted June 14, 2010 Yo, gotta run to a softball game. I will email Fumble my two person list in just a minute. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted June 15, 2010 NO COMMENT!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,215 Posted June 15, 2010 Manning went at about the right spot, IMHO. Rodgers, for reasons as yet undefined, is consistently disappearing in round 1 in current mocks.....before both Bree's and Manning....which I don't "get", or agree with. Rodgers is solidly the #3 QB IMHO, but could certainly be challenged by a strong showing by Brady in the pre-season that allows owners to regain faith in him as a top 3 QB. Williams is at about the right spot, could also be a mid-second round pick as well, anywhere from 2.01 to 2.06 is reasonable. But you also need to accept that you will need something else for your playoff run, his production will fall off precipitously by seasons end. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NAn 39 Posted June 15, 2010 More thoughts on Greene? at this draft spot in general? This is guy I'm starting to fall in love with as season approaches so always like to hear other thoughts to temper my own. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JScott 20 Posted June 15, 2010 Rodgers, for reasons as yet undefined, is consistently disappearing in round 1 in current mocks.....before both Bree's and Manning....which I don't "get", or agree with. Rodgers is solidly the #3 QB IMHO, but could certainly be challenged by a strong showing by Brady in the pre-season that allows owners to regain faith in him as a top 3 QB. Then you're sleeping on Rodgers. In this scoring format I believe he was the #2 QB in '08 and #1 last season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,215 Posted June 15, 2010 Then you're sleeping on Rodgers. In this scoring format I believe he was the #2 QB in '08 and #1 last season. Perhaps, but in recent year I have been advised to "wake up" or "stop snoozing" only to be consistently correct in my assessments, including top scorer in this event from last year; I tend to have some success with player assessments. And I truly believe that Rodgers is the #3 QB this coming year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JScott 20 Posted June 15, 2010 More thoughts on Greene? at this draft spot in general? This is guy I'm starting to fall in love with as season approaches so always like to hear other thoughts to temper my own. I like Greene alot this season. But love him next season, after LT finally burns out. I think Rex is old school enough to go with one all around RB. I'm not sure of Greene's receiving ability (doesn't matter in this format) but I see him as a young version of Turner with more speed and ability. I think late first is about right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JScott 20 Posted June 15, 2010 Perhaps, but in recent year I have been advised to "wake up" or "stop snoozing" only to be consistently correct in my assessments, including top scorer in this event from last year; I tend to have some success with player assessments. And I truly believe that Rodgers is the #3 QB this coming year. I felt the same after his '08 season. Wanted to see him do it again, so to speak. He did and then some. I'm a big believer in QBs that sit for a few seasons, learning. They just seem to hit the ground running so much better than a 3rd year QB who's been playing since season 1. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,215 Posted June 15, 2010 More thoughts on Greene? at this draft spot in general? This is guy I'm starting to fall in love with as season approaches so always like to hear other thoughts to temper my own. I think Greene was taken at pretty much the right spot (his ADP is 2.01), and you have to love his potential for the coming year. There are a ton of positives, and the only question is the impact of LT, everything else is perfect for him.....a young QB that will still be under the protection of a system intended to hide his mistakes, a staunch defense where he will be expected to run his arse off to ensure the D gets rest and they control the clock......I love Greene, truly.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted June 15, 2010 -I love Shonn and project him as the #4 rb this year. I had him as a corner pick and knew NAn would grab him. He normally grabbed 2 backs in the jetdoc mock on the corner. -I have Rodgers and Brees almost dead even and both ahead of Manning, but Manning isn't gonna hurt weekly at Qb in this format or on anny team. What you get with your next two or 3 picks will decide that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,215 Posted June 15, 2010 I felt the same after his '08 season. Wanted to see him do it again, so to speak. He did and then some. I'm a big believer in QBs that sit for a few seasons, learning. They just seem to hit the ground running so much better than a 3rd year QB who's been playing since season 1. I am delighted to have him in two keeper, and one dynasty.....in 2008 he was nearly my biggest point producer.....I am a fan Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted June 15, 2010 Never expected that Rodgers would have fallen to me in the 2nd, thus not part of my draft plan. I was looking at another position and the player I was targetting was/is available but I just felt Rodgers was too good of a value to let slip. I'll have to adjust the draft strategy now, but it will be interestingt to see what I would have had compared to what I will end up with now... Last year in this draft i picked at 8 or 9 and grabbed Fitz with my first pick and Brees in the 2nd. What saved my ass was I snagged Rice as my #2 bacl later. I know what you mean about having to change plans. Brees was just too appealing and it worked well for me last year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
robb 81 Posted June 15, 2010 So.......guess i was somewhat surprised that no one questioned my taking two wide receivers in rounds rounds 1 & 2. A different strategy, but one I choose after looking at the remaining RBs at my 2.03 selection. Just like taking a QB in round 2, it will force me to readust how I pick now through round 6 or 7. I also looked at 6 points per TD and thought these 2 can score TDs almost at will. We shall see. Thanks again for including me in this years draft! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,215 Posted June 15, 2010 So.......guess i was somewhat surprised that no one questioned my taking two wide receivers in rounds rounds 1 & 2. A different strategy, but one I choose after looking at the remaining RBs at my 2.03 selection. Just like taking a QB in round 2, it will force me to readust how I pick now through round 6 or 7. I also looked at 6 points per TD and thought these 2 can score TDs almost at will. We shall see. Thanks again for including me in this years draft! Not at all.....the "Stud WR" theory has been around for years, and there are plenty of people who subscribe to the WR-WR approach, though most of them are in a PPR format. Still, going WR-WR has become entirely palatable in recent years......I think its a peripheral result of the growing RBBC situations across the league.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NAn 39 Posted June 15, 2010 -I love Shonn and project him as the #4 rb this year. I had him as a corner pick and knew NAn would grab him. He normally grabbed 2 backs in the jetdoc mock on the corner. -I have Rodgers and Brees almost dead even and both ahead of Manning, but Manning isn't gonna hurt weekly at Qb in this format or on anny team. What you get with your next two or 3 picks will decide that. LOL, that is usually my MO when I have the ends, but usually that's b/c that's where I see the value. Totally agree about Rodgers/Brees and then Peyton...they likely will be close by year's end anyway seperated by only a couple pts per game. solid value for Peyton/Brees where they were taken and even better where Rodgers went. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted June 15, 2010 Come on Clash. You've been here for over 40 minutes. Pick and quit holding this thing up. The list for the next pick is in hand. (someones) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted June 15, 2010 I'm old. Fumble has the KSB's list, and White Wonder is absent. I will check in at 6:30 A.M.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JScott 20 Posted June 15, 2010 Never expected that Rodgers would have fallen to me in the 2nd, thus not part of my draft plan. I was looking at another position and the player I was targetting was/is available but I just felt Rodgers was too good of a value to let slip. I'll have to adjust the draft strategy now, but it will be interestingt to see what I would have had compared to what I will end up with now... Marshall is the player I had targeted in the 2nd. From all the mocks I had done at FFC (was laid up in bed for a few days after surgery) I felt the best draft plan from the mid round picks was RB-WR-WR-RB for the first four rounds. But as I said I felt Rodgers was too good to pass up. So instead of Turner-Marshall, I now have Turner-Rodgers. Not too bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JScott 20 Posted June 15, 2010 I'm old. Fumble has the KSB's list, and White Wonder is absent. I will check in at 6:30 A.M.. You can always send me a list if you want RC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NAn 39 Posted June 15, 2010 Not at all.....the "Stud WR" theory has been around for years, and there are plenty of people who subscribe to the WR-WR approach, though most of them are in a PPR format. Still, going WR-WR has become entirely palatable in recent years......I think its a peripheral result of the growing RBBC situations across the league.... Agreed. IMO there is a drop off in value for RBs after DWill so WR/WR makes sense. Though I don't necessarily see it as the 'stud wr' stragety as best value at your pick stragety. I'll add again, that I went with Moss over DWill b/c think they'll decent RB options on 3/4 comeback...same would apply for you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fumbleweed 545 Posted June 15, 2010 I'm old. Fumble has the KSB's list, and White Wonder is absent. I will check in at 6:30 A.M.. I don't have anything from KSB....a reminder: ALL pick lists sent to me should be sent to THIS e-mail address: kkhollis@sbcglobal.net Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted June 15, 2010 You can always send me a list if you want RC Really kind of hard to leave a list with 2 guys before me. Those two picks could easily force me to go another direction. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted June 15, 2010 Yo, gotta run to a softball game. I will email Fumble my two person list in just a minute. I wonder where this went??? I'll see you all in the morning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,148 Posted June 15, 2010 I don't have anything from KSB....a reminder: ALL pick lists sent to me should be sent to THIS e-mail address: kkhollis@sbcglobal.net Howdy boys. I sent it to the address that was in the Rules and Draft Order thread pinned at the top. If you know you won't be able to access the Mock board for any given period of time, Please send a list of players to choose from to and Fumbleweed (HollisK@poncacity.k12.ok.us) Oh well, sorry about that, I thought I covered myself. I can pick now. Give me a minute. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fumbleweed 545 Posted June 15, 2010 Yeah, that e-mail address is from several years ago. Not sure why Mike included it, but it all worked out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,148 Posted June 15, 2010 Some people think that because of the Cowboys draft Austin's production will suffer. I actually think the opposite. Single coverage for this dude is like taking candy from a baby. He was one of the top WR's last year and that was with only 9 games of production. Here is what last season over the course of 16 games comes out to: 101 receptions, 1,652 yards and 13 touchdowns Now, while I certainly don't project that level of production out of Miles, I do think he may be sorta close to that and end up a top 5 WR this year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fumbleweed 545 Posted June 15, 2010 Still, going WR-WR has become entirely palatable in recent years......I think its a peripheral result of the growing RBBC situations across the league.... This. RBBC is like a wave sweeping across the league. Four picks to go in Round Two and only ten RBs taken? That is unprecedented in this mock and a reflection of the times to be sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remote controller 143 Posted June 15, 2010 Some people think that because of the Cowboys draft Austin's production will suffer. I actually think the opposite. Single coverage for this dude is like taking candy from a baby. He was one of the top WR's last year and that was with only 9 games of production. Here is what last season over the course of 16 games comes out to: 101 receptions, 1,652 yards and 13 touchdowns Now, while I certainly don't project that level of production out of Miles, I do think he may be sorta close to that and end up a top 5 WR this year. The news yesterday that he would play crayton's slot position is what bothers me some. That will hurt his overall production. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites