paulinstl 296 Posted August 28, 2014 Tom Fitton is my source. You even called him my source earlier when you tried to discredit him with your anonymous Wiki source. Tom Fitton is my source. You even called him my source earlier when you tried to discredit him with your anonymous Wiki source. Yours hid behind anonymity. Once again, I will ask the name of Fiton's anonymous source that he based his claim on. You can't have it both ways. He is not a source, the "government lawyer" was. You can't discredit the article I posted citing no named source and not hold your article to the same standard. I have no idea why I'm bothering, you spent months telling me Bush never claimed Iraq was an imminent threat because he never used the word imminent. :doh: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted August 28, 2014 let me guess the response. RMFF!!! And then some emoticons??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 28, 2014 Once again, I will ask the name of Fiton's anonymous source that he based his claim on. You can't have it both ways. He is not a source, the "government lawyer" was. You can't discredit the article I posted citing no named source and not hold your article to the same standard. I have no idea why I'm bothering, you spent months telling me Bush never claimed Iraq was an imminent threat because he never used the word imminent. :doh: You said he was my source earlier, now you are saying he isn't my source. Seems to me you are trying to have it both ways. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 28, 2014 let me guess the response. RMFF!!! And then some emoticons??? I save that for two "special" posters. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paulinstl 296 Posted August 28, 2014 You said he was my source earlier, now you are saying he isn't my source. Seems to me you are trying to have it both ways. Here is my quote that you are referring to, Any time you guys want to cite a source other than Tom Fitton, whose source is listed as "a government lawyer", I'll read what you have. Until then, not so much. It's pretty clear there were two different thoughts. Fiton was the source of the report used in the article. He claims his info came from "a government lawyer". Who is the source Fiton got his info from. Holy Jeebus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 28, 2014 "Source other than Tom Fitten". Look, Judicial Watch has a track record of uncovering lies by the IRS related to this issue. The Obama administration has a history of lying about this issue. I will go with the Judicial Watch guy, who is on record, over your anonymous hack from the Obama administration. I understand that is all you have, so you are playing semantics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 28, 2014 Wasting your time man...wasting your time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 28, 2014 Wasting your time man...wasting your time. I know I am, but Paul needs an education. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paulinstl 296 Posted August 28, 2014 "Source other than Tom Fitten". Look, Judicial Watch has a track record of uncovering lies by the IRS related to this issue. The Obama administration has a history of lying about this issue. I will go with the Judicial Watch guy, who is on record, over your anonymous hack from the Obama administration. I understand that is all you have, so you are playing semantics. Do you really want me to take the time pulling numerous articles reporting all the sh1t Judicial Watch has gotten wrong, only to have you respond with a typical barrage of BS? Not gonna do it, Bro. I will walk away from this one and allow you the last word. Have a good night. I'm gonna have a few ice cold Buds. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 28, 2014 Do you really want me to take the time pulling numerous articles reporting all the sh1t Judicial Watch has gotten wrong, only to have you respond with a typical barrage of BS? Not gonna do it, Bro. I will walk away from this one and allow you the last word. Have a good night. I'm gonna have a few ice cold Buds. Do you want me to pull out all the articles reporting all the sh1t the Obama administration has gotten wrong? I will be happy to play that game and we can compare whose source is more reliable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted August 28, 2014 Some people are just all in. There is no story they won't buy solely depending on what their political leanings are. Common sense be damned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 28, 2014 Some people are just all in. There is no story they won't buy solely depending on what their political leanings are. Common sense be damned. You do realize that on this board...those who lean more right and are vocal about it are the guiltiest of what you are claiming here right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 28, 2014 Some people are just all in. There is no story they won't buy solely depending on what their political leanings are. Common sense be damned. Paul still thinks this was nothing more than a couple of rogue agents in Cincy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,294 Posted August 28, 2014 Some people are just all in. There is no story they won't buy solely depending on what their political leanings are. Common sense be damned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frank M 181 Posted August 29, 2014 Some people are just all in. There is no story they won't buy solely depending on what their political leanings are. Common sense be damned. Irony. Complete and utter irony. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted August 29, 2014 Irony. Complete and utter irony. You, Sho, & Honcho responded. Case closed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 29, 2014 You, Sho, & Honcho responded. Case closed. It sure is closed (just not in the direction you were going for chief). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 29, 2014 You, Sho, & Honcho responded. Case closed. The trifecta of dumb. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,294 Posted August 29, 2014 The trifecta of dumb. What is the name of you & your aliases? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,317 Posted August 30, 2014 You do realize that on this board...those who lean more right and are vocal about it are the guiltiest of what you are claiming here right? The evidence suggests that the boy may have really seen a wolf this time. It looks to me like we have a real scandal here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 30, 2014 The evidence suggests that the boy may have really seen a wolf this time. It looks to me like we have a real scandal here. Scandal? With the IRS? Sure...like crack said, will anything really come of it other than a whole lot of righties salivating and wanting blood? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,317 Posted August 30, 2014 Scandal? With the IRS? Sure...like crack said, will anything really come of it other than a whole lot of righties salivating and wanting blood? Maybe. Reality gave us a link a page or two ago that the Lerner emails may actually be recoverable after all, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,294 Posted August 30, 2014 Maybe. Reality gave us a link a page or two ago that the Lerner emails may actually be recoverable after all, Actually it looks like Judicial Watch was caught lying again. As I reported earlier, multiple times, the IRS and it's backup system was a known vulnerability for years, because of the 6th month tape recycle---this isn't a revelation. Reality has proven time & time again to believe in this IRS fairy tale as told by the spin masters from the right. There's more evidence of big foot than there is of any conspiracy by the IRS and the adminstration. “This is a jaw-dropping revelation. The Obama administration had been lying to the American people about Lois Lerner’s missing emails,” Fitton said in a statement, adding that the group would bring the government’s statements up with Judge Emmet Sullivan, who is presiding over the group’s lawsuit. But an administration official with knowledge of Friday’s conversation said Judicial Watch’s statement, which runs counter to months of statements from a variety of administration and IRS higher-ups, was off-base. The administration official said Justice Department lawyers had dropped no bombshells last week, and Judicial Watch was mischaracterizing what the government had said. The official said DOJ lawyers were only referring to tapes backing up IRS emails that were routinely recycled twice a year before 2013, when the investigation into the Tea Party controversy began. The IRS has acknowledged those procedures were in place since it told lawmakers in June that Lerner’s computer crashed in 2011, leaving the agency unable to recover many of her emails over a two-year span. John Koskinen, the IRS commissioner, has testified before Congress several times over the last two months that the tapes backing up Lerner’s emails were recycled. “There is no newly divulged back-up system that was not previously known about,” the official said. “Government lawyers were simply referring to the back-up system at the IRS that Commissioner Koskinen had already disclosed.” Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,317 Posted August 30, 2014 Actually it looks like Judicial Watch was caught lying again. As I reported earlier, multiple times, the IRS and it's backup system was a known vulnerability for years, because of the 6th month tape recycle---this isn't a revelation. Reality has proven time & time again to believe in this IRS fairy tale as told by the spin masters from the right. There's more evidence of big foot than there is of any conspiracy by the IRS and the adminstration. OK then. Back to square one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted August 30, 2014 Nothing's gonna happen. To bad really. Could've used that money to help fix infrastructure or toward the war on terrorism or fund another few rounds of golf, maybe even another trip to europe for a Obummer family vacation. Oh well. #moneywellspent Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted August 30, 2014 Nothing's gonna happen. To bad really. Could've used that money to help fix infrastructure or toward the war on terrorism or fund another few rounds of golf, maybe even another trip to europe for a Obummer family vacation. Oh well. #moneywellspent Or send the DOJ out on more racist race baiting fake outrage drives Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted August 30, 2014 Or send the DOJ out on more racist race baiting fake outrage drives Crap. Yep. I forgot that one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 30, 2014 Reality has proven time & time again to believe in this IRS fairy tale as told by the spin masters from the right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 30, 2014 Honcho has proven time and time again to not believe in reality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,294 Posted August 30, 2014 Honcho has proven time and time again to not believe in reality. I'm sure your "reality" will be proven soon with the indictments for perjury, destruction of evidence and a score of other high crimes . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,490 Posted August 30, 2014 I'm sure your "reality" will be proven soon with the indictments for perjury, destruction of evidence and a score of other high crimes . Waterloo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted August 30, 2014 I have complete faith that eric holders justice dept will get to the bottom of this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,294 Posted August 30, 2014 I have complete faith that eric holders justice dept will get to the bottom of this. Well, in 23 pages you have yet to present any evidence, but at least you have emoticons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites