***The Official Seattle Seahawks IN-Season Thread 2014-15***

[R8RMick 242]

 

Well, except for that 30-yard-run around the end, I thought the Packers did a pretty good job against the premiere rusher (and MVP candidate )in the league with the great offensive line that Dallas has, the way they pounded him and having to also worry about a dynamic receiver, an MVP candidate at QB, and a very good tight end...

Holding a potent offense like that to 315 yards was actually a pretty decent defensive effort...

 

Felt like you were going out of your way to dog us

 

You mistake intent, I'd actually like to see the Pack win the game as I hate the f*cking arrogant Seahawks. A turnover here, a big special teams play there, a steady run game with Lacy, a nice painkiller shot for Rodgers, anything is possible. At even strength I'd call a toss-up, maybe. With Rodgers limited they need help. I should say that I don't see a 14 point blowout here, but Phillybears take is hard to argue with.

[Hawkfin 32]

 

I've since admitted that I was wrong about Russell Wilson many times. As did plenty of personnel people in the NFL. I was not pleased he went in the third round as I didn't have him rated to go so early. And I used the tired argument that he was too short. I called him a glorified midget. That being said, I'm more on target than not on player evaluations in the early rounds. And I have 12 years of posts made here to back it up. I am now more leery of evaluating late round picks made by this front office as it turns out, they are using some kind voodoo I can't comprehend which leads to great players, after they coach them up of course. The coaches on this team continue to take in discarded players in this league and draft players, and make them better. Could Wilson have been a starting QB in this league on another team other than Seattle? Who knows. He might still be sitting on somebody's bench. Rodgers had to wait years for his turn. Steve Young too, behind Montana. Who knows. I'm very happy that he is on this team right now.

 

You say Green Bay is a completely different team than when Seattle met them early in the year. And the exact same thing was said about Carolina, how much they had improved and figured things out from an earlier meeting. And in the end, how did it turn out? Seattle won and never was I concerned that Carolina could win because I expected Seattle to pull away in the 2nd half, like they've been doing. Same script. Seattle is a much improved team since early in the season. Much improved. Our secondary depth was decimated at the beginning of year as we had to trade for a guy just to have a body to plug into the nickle corner. Harvin's departure changed the offense, which seems to have worked out. Wilson is spreading the ball around again rather than force feeding it to one guy for 3 yard screens. Believe me, I'd like to have a #1 WR right now, but it's been interesting that Seattle has gone 10-2 without Harvin. But gave up too much draft capital to acquire him. Seattle has played better ball down the stretch, not that Green Bay hasn't been on a roll as well. The Seahawks are a loose bunch based on all their behaviors this week and I expect a convincing win. Their record at home, their record in prime time games vs Green Bay's struggles on the road. It's not like they only lost early in the year on the road, as the Buffalo game shows. It's all very convincing to me. I didn't say that Green Bay has no shot. Of course they do. I said they were a very good team. This is the way I see the game unfolding.

Love the detailed posts Phillybear! I think you were right on point with everything. I loved the part about Maxwell and how he didn't even play last game. He might be a huge key for us. He's a great corner and allows us to go deeper at the position. We should run better too as Carolina was prepared well and playing good.

 

I think Phillybear layed down the facts. Period. I'm not sure how you can argue that great post? Sure, nobody knows the final results, but those were all facts laid out other then the final prediction score. And that looks about right too.

 

The dribble about GB being a different team seems less factual then anything he said. They hadn't played the likes of Seahawks after that game so of course they are going to get better after a huge loss. Rodgers and everybody else was perfectly healthy that first game. We beat up on Lacy. There Online was healthy. Just because they ran better later in the year, doesn't mean they became better? Seattle just won the SB, and a let down to GB could have occured easily. It didn't, we spanked them and shut them down while blowing them out.

Now we have a hobbled Rodgers, and Lacy gets benched more then he plays. I could see a Blowout again in all reality.

(And the same results would happen EVEN if Rodgers was healthy this game, so don't want to hear that garbage after the fact either)

 

But, his post was spot on and provided facts. Good job.

I agree that Philybeer missed the evaluation on Wilson. But, he admitted the mistake eventually. He's usually VERY good at evaluations though with a great track record. Not all of us agreed with him on that though. I was a HUGE Flynn supporter, but what Wilson did in the preseason changed my mind in an instant. I was also very high on the pick before preseason. I had Wilson rated ahead of Tannehill and #4 on my board with a huge "want" on him. Although I thought he was going later then the 3rd too, but loved the pick. So not all of us were wrong about Wilson. I loved him. I think Phillybear gets wrapped up a little bit to much with draft capitol vs good talent. If it's a great pick, then it really doesn't matter where we draft him. Although, I also agree it's smart to not take a guy to early if you can get him later. (I think Wilson was close though. Irvin was not. Well I guess I just didn't like Irvin much)

 

Anyway, my evaluation of Wilson was very high. He showed great tapes and play in college with very little INT's. Great accuracy. He's always been a passer first, and runner second while looking down field to pass with his head on a swivel. Smart guy and proven by how he learned two different systems. Also saw him the the Gruden camp and loved what he did there too. Not that I knew he would be this good, but that was a great pick in the draft. The Seahawks Blog (board room full of Seahawk fans) were also pretty high on Wilson.

 

Not sure how you can bash him for something so long ago and one bad evaluation on his part?

 

Also the Hawks have always had a ton of fans. We've always rocked the house way back in the Kingdom days. The fans have always been here and we are always loyal. Of course it's going to get bigger when we have more success though. The Mariners still get tons of fans even though they suck every year. I still see people wearing Mariner gear even though it would get much crazier if they became a champion or a playoff run.

We support our town and are always here!

 

When your in the middle of a playoff run though - Then it looks like there are new fans. But, IMO it's more about the support becomes greater because we love our team and to show our respects.

But to your point, bandwagon fans are everywhere and for every team/winner. That is true.

 

Good posts Phillybear - Love reading it.

I had the score: Hawks 17-7 at the half - Hawks winning 30-21 (But GB last TD coming in garbage time and maybe by Flynn)

[Groundhog 24]

I think this game comes down to whether Eddie Lacy can run the ball successfully or not. We know the Hawks have a good run D, yet the Panthers had success running it anyway. Ability to run the ball sets up short yardage 3rd down situations and Rodgers would be able to use short routes over the middle to Cobb, little screens to Kuhn, what have you, that don't require him to move a lot nor take a long time to develop.

 

But…if the Hawks can stop them in the running game, then you're looking at 3rd and long, longer routes, ability of the Hawks front 7 to pin their ears back and meet at the QB, who can't escape because his calf is tender like veal francese.

 

My guess…Hawks bottle up Lacy, Rodgers can't come to the rescue given his injuries, and Hawks win 31-13. I would feel better about this pick if Jordan Hill were playing, but it's still my pick.

[Hawkfin 32]

I think this game comes down to whether Eddie Lacy can run the ball successfully or not. We know the Hawks have a good run D, yet the Panthers had success running it anyway. Ability to run the ball sets up short yardage 3rd down situations and Rodgers would be able to use short routes over the middle to Cobb, little screens to Kuhn, what have you, that don't require him to move a lot nor take a long time to develop.

 

But…if the Hawks can stop them in the running game, then you're looking at 3rd and long, longer routes, ability of the Hawks front 7 to pin their ears back and meet at the QB, who can't escape because his calf is tender like veal francese.

 

My guess…Hawks bottle up Lacy, Rodgers can't come to the rescue given his injuries, and Hawks win 31-13. I would feel better about this pick if Jordan Hill were playing, but it's still my pick.

I agree..... We've struggled giving up long drives when it's 3rd and short. And after teams have gotten a nice chunk of yardage rushing.

But, most of those games were on the road. (Dallas being the exception and that was after we had a bunch of injuries. (Namely Wagner/Maxwell)

I think stopping Lacy and getting them in 3rd and 6+ is the key. (That didn't happen vs Carolina so we need to do better with this. Key for sure)

 

But, GB almost has to have a perfect pass game to still beat us that way. Hobled Rodgers I don't think can do it. This is going to be like a sitting duck P. Manning in the SB IMO.

Plus we might tear into GB Def on the flip side.

 

I sense PAIN coming for Rodgers and company! I might even feel bad for Rodgers in this.

Loved how I heard Earl Thomas say: "Rodgers ain't hurt" - They are amped up and going to be bringing it on him.

 

GO HAWKS

 

[IMMensaMind 462]

Phillybear's comment to pooh-pooh Green Bay being a different team by comparing the claim to the same one made about Carolina - "how did that turn out" is about as good as you do there - and it isn't good enough.

 

Carolina became better on defense - and they were better: against SEA, it was a 7 point game deep into the 3rd quarter.

 

Now imagine for a moment that you supplant Green Bay in that exact circumstance. Now you have a guy that won't turn the ball over as Cam did - that won't miss wide aass open reads of players that would have gone 30 yards untouched, as Cam did - that won't allow SEA even half the time on the field that Cam did, due to offensive ineptitude...

 

...and you have a recipe for a hushed and frightened SEA crowd in that loud-arse stadium.

 

Because let's be real: comparing Green Bay fixing its early season issues to Carolina fixing its issues is like comparing how a Ford Taurus runs after a tuneup to the what a Ferrari sounds like after one.

 

Running game? Better. Top 5, in fact.

 

Run D? MUCH better - but I love people using early season stats to convince themselves that Green Bay is still around 23.

 

Pass protection? Quickly now near the top. Detroit's pass D is fearsome, and Rodgers dissected them.

 

Defensive pressure? HUGELY better. This is Peppers' time. This is why he joined Green Bay. You combine that with a couple of fresh faces @ linebacker - AJ Sparrow is hardly playing now - and you have the ability to collapse on Wilson in a way that was not even dreamed of in week 1, when Wilson (who I love) chewed them up. Matthews in the middle has galvanized this defense.

 

This is going to be a great game, and giving Green Bay 7 1/2 is about 4 1/2 too many. I can see...

 

Oh, I wont say it. I'll wait.

[Hawkfin 32]

Phillybear's comment to pooh-pooh Green Bay being a different team by comparing the claim to the same one made about Carolina - "how did that turn out" is about as good as you do there - and it isn't good enough.

 

Carolina became better on defense - and they were better: against SEA, it was a 7 point game deep into the 3rd quarter.

 

Now imagine for a moment that you supplant Green Bay in that exact circumstance. Now you have a guy that won't turn the ball over as Cam did - that won't miss wide aass open reads of players that would have gone 30 yards untouched, as Cam did - that won't allow SEA even half the time on the field that Cam did, due to offensive ineptitude...

 

...and you have a recipe for a hushed and frightened SEA crowd in that loud-arse stadium.

 

Because let's be real: comparing Green Bay fixing its early season issues to Carolina fixing its issues is like comparing how a Ford Taurus runs after a tuneup to the what a Ferrari sounds like after one.

 

Running game? Better. Top 5, in fact.

 

Run D? MUCH better - but I love people using early season stats to convince themselves that Green Bay is still around 23.

 

Pass protection? Quickly now near the top. Detroit's pass D is fearsome, and Rodgers dissected them.

 

Defensive pressure? HUGELY better. This is Peppers' time. This is why he joined Green Bay. You combine that with a couple of fresh faces @ linebacker - AJ Sparrow is hardly playing now - and you have the ability to collapse on Wilson in a way that was not even dreamed of in week 1, when Wilson (who I love) chewed them up. Matthews in the middle has galvanized this defense.

 

This is going to be a great game, and giving Green Bay 7 1/2 is about 4 1/2 too many. I can see...

 

Oh, I wont say it. I'll wait. :touchdown:

I don't think Philly was Pooh poohing on GB. He was simply showing the end of the year stats. Those end of the year stats are true regarless of how much you want to say they are better here or better there. Those were the facts and end of year final stats.

They also don't play Seattle 16 weeks out of 16 so really the stats are meaningless.

That being said, the stats favor Seahawks overall for his basis of his final projection.

 

But, I also want to clarify your error in our first matchup. GB was not within a TD in the 4th qrt. Actually it was 22-10 in the 3rd with Seahawks driving to the goal line. Then at the very start of the 4th Qrt Hawks scored again making it 29-10. I call that a blowout!

Sure, halftime was close. This is always the case with us. We keep it close at half and then open up a can of whoop ass in the 2nd.

 

Also, this is with a perfect and healthy Rodgers, Healthy Lacy untill we hurt him, and a healthy Oline, and Peppers who hasn't won cr ap in his own right.

 

But, none the less - Enjoy the game! Have fun. It could be close and nobody is a sure thing. GB does have lots of weapons.

But, I like our chances.

[IMMensaMind 462]

I don't think Philly was Pooh poohing on GB. He was simply showing the end of the year stats. Those end of the year stats are true regarless of how much you want to say they are better here or better there. Those were the facts and end of year final stats.

They also don't play Seattle 16 weeks out of 16 so really the stats are meaningless.

That being said, the stats favor Seahawks overall for his basis of his final projection.

But, I also want to clarify your error in our first matchup. GB was not within a TD in the 4th qrt. Actually it was 22-10 in the 3rd with Seahawks driving to the goal line. Then at the very start of the 4th Qrt Hawks scored again making it 29-10. I call that a blowout!

Sure, halftime was close. This is always the case with us. We keep it close at half and then open up a can of whoop ass in the 2nd.

Also, this is with a perfect and healthy Rodgers, Healthy Lacy untill we hurt him, and a healthy Oline, and Peppers who hasn't won cr ap in his own right.

But, none the less - Enjoy the game! Have fun. It could be close and nobody is a sure thing. GB does have lots of weapons.

But, I like our chances.

I'm not sure what you're referencing when you comment on an error. I only commented on CAR being down 7 deep in the 3rd quarter.

 

Cam was positively terrible on offense in that game, serving up an atrocious 90 yard INT and absolutely missing his reads and sailing throws. The final score was lopsided for those reasons; I don't see that happening this weekend.

 

Gonna be a great game; this is what being a NFL fan is all about!

[Hawkfin 32]

I'm not sure what you're referencing when you comment on an error. I only commented on CAR being down 7 deep in the 3rd quarter.

 

Cam was positively terrible on offense in that game, serving up an atrocious 90 yard INT and absolutely missing his reads and sailing throws. The final score was lopsided for those reasons; I don't see that happening this weekend.

 

Gonna be a great game; this is what being a NFL fan is all about!

I'm sorry. that was my error.

I thought I read GB only being down by 7 into the 4th qrt.

I appoligize for that misread!

 

I see your point about Carolina. Cam did look bad at times. I guess how much of that do you want to give credit to us?

Overall, I thought they played well to keep it close. I don't think it was our best day Def until the 4th qrt.

Comparing that game vs plug in GB is something entirely diffrent though. You can't take 3 qrt's, plug in GB, and make a case?

I don't think anyway.

 

But, it should be a good game. I agree. Have fun!

[Marshall 98]

While I appreciate phillybear's write-up, as a longtime 'Hawks fan (since Steve Largent days - no bandwagon here), reading his predicted score makes me nervous. I foresee more of a potential nail-biter in the works, with the 'Hawks eventually pulling off the victory. I know that I won't quit hollering, and won't be relaxing until/as that happens.

 

Mike Tanier wrote an excellent analysis of both sides of this matchup that you may find as informative (and entertaining) as I did. Scroll down to the second half of the article, if you're not interested in the Pats or the Colts:

 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2329652-nfl-conference-championship-game-picks-will-the-pats-and-seahawks-roll

[Hawkfin 32]

While I appreciate phillybear's write-up, as a longtime 'Hawks fan (since Steve Largent days - no bandwagon here), reading his predicted score makes me nervous. I foresee more of a potential nail-biter in the works, with the 'Hawks eventually pulling off the victory. I know that I won't quit hollering, and won't be relaxing until/as that happens.

 

Mike Tanier wrote an excellent analysis of both sides of this matchup that you may find as informative (and entertaining) as I did. Scroll down to the second half of the article, if you're not interested in the Pats or the Colts:

 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2329652-nfl-conference-championship-game-picks-will-the-pats-and-seahawks-roll

Yeah, that was a good read. Lots of truth in all that. Good article.

 

The plus part of everything for us though is this:

-SD had a perfect game plan and rivers was perfect. Woodhead was doing damage, and Rivers was always in 3rd and short. Gates played out of his mind. It was clear, Chanclor was hurt though. It was a road game and early in the year.

 

-Dallas beat up our line and ran on us hard. This is where Cam and Maxwell and Wagner all got hurt. It was Beasley that got torched. It took a 3rd and 20 to beat us still. We were messed up and even had to move Sherman around to fix our problems. Dallas was red hot.

 

-KC pounded us on the ground and used the Dallas plan. We had no answers at the time on run def. I think we had a poor game plan. Still had injuries of Wagner, etc.. Wilson had a bad day and KC has a good Def. Beasley again got torched with Maxwell, Lane, and Simon hurt/out.

 

-Rams were really lucky against us and have a really solid def. that always plays us tough - Took many fakes to beat us. Still had some problems stopping the run.

 

All injuries are clear. Beasley is NOT in the lineup. Run game appears to be fixed. We are on a Hot streak and we are at home, unlike 3 of those 4 loses.

You don't usually win them all anyway, and we have turned it up in the last 2 months. Rodgers is not mobil now and will have to sit there like P. Manning in the SB. Lacy is a slow RB where our speed and power should shut him down.

 

Should be good game!

Have fun - Go Hawks

[phillybear 366]

edit: I was going to do the "mush" thing, but I decided not to.

 

Moving on.

[phillybear 366]

 

Really? 123 is almost 150?

Or is it 22 yards (on 6 more carries!) more than Eddie Lacy had despite missing the second quarter with asthma attacks...

 

 

Why do we have to exaggerate and make stuff up so much?

 

We all saw the game.

 

145 total yards, at 5.2 yards per rush. That's not good.

 

Now, if what I read was correct, the 1st half of the season Green Bay had the worst rushing defense in the league. And now they sit at #23. Did they improve? Well, in the 2nd half, they faced the rushing offenses of

 

#27 Chicago

#9 Philadelphia

#14 Minnesota

#18 New England

#24 Atlanta

#25 Buffalo

#29 Tampa Bay

#28 Detroit

 

so, Green Bay played a bunch of weak rushing team to help improve their rushing defense stats. It stands to reason they are going to have some problems with their smallish defensive line stopping the Seattle rushing attack.

[Kopy 571]

I heard 30 to 50 mph wind gusts for game time. Sounds like a good time for Beast Mode.

[phillybear 366]

While 62% of the betting action is coming in on GreenBay, we are seeing reverse line movement as the line is now climbing to -8 and -8.5

 

The books are wanting more Green Bay action, which is abnormal considering the way people are placing their bets more on Green Bay. I like Seattle's chances even better now.

[phillybear 366]

I heard 30 to 50 mph wind gusts for game time. Sounds like a good time for Beast Mode.

 

And lots of rain. Today we see the emergence of Beast Mud.

[donhaas 18]

 

145 total yards, at 5.2 yards per rush. That's not good.

 

Now, if what I read was correct, the 1st half of the season Green Bay had the worst rushing defense in the league. And now they sit at #23. Did they improve? Well, in the 2nd half, they faced the rushing offenses of

 

#27 Chicago

#9 Philadelphia

#14 Minnesota

#18 New England

#24 Atlanta

#25 Buffalo

#29 Tampa Bay

#28 Detroit

 

so, Green Bay played a bunch of weak rushing team to help improve their rushing defense stats. It stands to reason they are going to have some problems with their smallish defensive line stopping the Seattle rushing attack.

 

 

Not sure how you read a box score but Murray had 123 yards (and a little 5-yard catch somewhere)... He averaged 4.9 per carry. Less than Lacy's 5.2. Dallas offense = 315 total yards.

 

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2015011100/2014/POST19/cowboys@packers#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000455375&tab=recap

 

 

You spend too much time looking up stats (and sometimes not getting them right)....

Just relax.... enjoy the game. The Packers are the same team from the first game and Rodgers is the same type of quarterback as these 9 World League quarterbacks Seattle just faced

 

You've already made it clear that there's absolutely no reason to worry, so why not r-e-l-a-x and kick back

[phillybear 366]

 

 

Not sure how you read a box score but Murray had 123 yards (and a little 5-yard catch somewhere)... He averaged 4.9 per carry. Less than Lacy's 5.2. Dallas offense = 315 total yards.

 

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2015011100/2014/POST19/cowboys@packers#menu=gameinfo%7CcontentId%3A0ap3000000455375&tab=recap

 

 

You spend too much time looking up stats (and sometimes not getting them right)....

Just relax.... enjoy the game. The Packers are the same team from the first game and Rodgers is the same type of quarterback as these 9 World League quarterbacks Seattle just faced

 

You've already made it clear that there's absolutely no reason to worry, so why not r-e-l-a-x and kick back

 

Dallas ran for 145 yards are 5.2 ypr. That is a fact. My stats are just fine. You could try looking at the entire box score. Geez, it's like you are trying to be purposefully obtuse.

[donhaas 18]

 

Dallas ran for 145 yards are 5.2 ypr. That is a fact. My stats are just fine. You could try looking at the entire box score. Geez, it's like you are trying to be purposefully obtuse.

 

Yeah... we were talking Murray

 

145 yards is fine.... more importantly, 315 is great

Less than the 162 and 401 when Seattle played them

 

R-E-L-A-X

[phillybear 366]

 

Yeah... we were talking Murray

 

145 yards is fine.... more importantly, 315 is great

Less than the 162 and 401 when Seattle played them

 

R-E-L-A-X

 

Which is fine that you may have discussed Murray. I quick look at the box score....eh, whatever. I've been specific all through out the thread. I suppose I will need to be extremely specific at all times.

 

Unless I am mistaken, Seattle had 11 starters out vs Dallas. So there's that. But no excuses. We lost to Dallas. So there's that.

 

Who can possibly relax on game day? Are you a chick or something? I'm ready to chew through a bowling ball.

[donhaas 18]

 

 

Who can possibly relax on game day? Are you a chick or something? I'm ready to chew through a bowling ball.

 

 

Are you playing today, tubby?

 

If not, then relax. You've already laid out how it's near impossible for Seattle to lose today.

Have a beer.... sit back... enjoy the pre-game and then the game

 

We'll catch up with you later!

[Groundhog 24]

If the wind gusts are indeed 30 mph to 50 mph, then both QBs are going to have a hard time throwing it. I say again: STOP EDDIE LACY!

[phillybear 366]

Inactive for the game is Justin Britt, our worst starting offensive lineman. OK at run blocking, putrid in pass blocking. Super sub Alvin Bailey will start for him. He's a very good pass blocker, arguably the best on the team, so-so at run blocking. Bailey is the guy that would take over for Okung if we cut him in the offseason. Bailey really should be starting at one of the spots, maybe next year gets a shot at Carpenter's spot.

 

Jeron Johnson, the backup to Kam Chancellor is out too. Not too thrilled with this one. I guess DeShawn Shead slides over to the backup to Chancellor now, which he did in last year's playoffs.

[Marshall 98]

SEA!

[donhaas 18]

Packers completely choked away that game several times..... I'm so embarrassed to be a Packer fan right now

 

 

 

Congratulations, boys! Good luck!

[uwmalcolm 74]

Packers completely choked away that game several times..... I'm so embarrassed to be a Packer fan right now

 

 

 

Congratulations, boys! Good luck!

Thanks donhass:) It was a crazy and lucky comeback. The fan bases each had one tortuous half to watch, then OT went our way.

[phillybear 366]

I am really wrecked. So....I have very little comments...Go 'Hawks

 

Seattle with an improbable win. I am jacking off every minute.

 

Also, how about my prediction of 2 Rodgers INTs. Hey, I might not have nailed all my picks, but still.....that's impressive.

[IMMensaMind 462]

Congrats Seahawks. You did what you had to in order to take advantage of a horrible coaching strategy on green bays part, and you pulled off a totally improbable win. Good luck against NE, though you don't need it.

[phillybear 366]

I'm pretty much ossified. Um....I can't begin to comprehend winning this game. Sheeeesh.

 

I'll check back in tomorrow, whden I cn make some sense of this miracle.

[uwmalcolm 74]

Posted this win probability chart in another thread but it's more appropriate here...http://ow.ly/i/8iSaG

[Marshall 98]

Posted this win probability chart in another thread but it's more appropriate here...http://ow.ly/i/8iSaG

 

That's a total trip. I miss Sando.

[uwmalcolm 74]

 

That's a total trip. I miss Sando.

The droppoff from him to Terry Blount is unfathomable. At least Sando is stepping up his game even more which is cool to see.

[Marshall 98]

The droppoff from him to Terry Blount is unfathomable. At least Sando is stepping up his game even more which is cool to see.

 

Terry Blount is unfathomable, in and of himself.

 

I really, really miss Sando because I don't get to read him anymore - since he became an elite Insider and whatnot.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Cant believe the Packers focked that ine up.

 

And Rodgers may seem pissed about being conservative, but he has pretty much free reign at the line...

 

Cant give up a fake fg, 2 point conversion, and onside kick. 3 things...improbanle but all went r8hht for Seattle in the end.

 

Worst loss ive ever witnessed as a fan.

[IMMensaMind 462]

Cant believe the Packers focked that ine up.

 

And Rodgers may seem pissed about being conservative, but he has pretty much free reign at the line...

 

Cant give up a fake fg, 2 point conversion, and onside kick. 3 things...improbanle but all went r8hht for Seattle in the end.

 

Worst loss ive ever witnessed as a fan.

Without question.

[Groundhog 24]

Congrats Seahawks. You did what you had to in order to take advantage of a horrible coaching strategy on green bays part, and you pulled off a totally improbable win. Good luck against NE, though you don't need it.

 

Wow. My Hawks should not have even been in a position to win this game, but I'll take it. Can't imagine what Pack fans must feel like right now. A little more aggressiveness early on probably would have rendered the end of game stuff moot. Congrats to the Pack on a good season and overcoming a lot of hurdles on the way here.

[IMMensaMind 462]

1) McCarthy unwilling to shove the ball in the endzone on 4th and my c0ck early in the game.

2) Capers being incredibly stupidly calling a prevent D - and rushing 3 - on 3rd and 19. Pull his focking toupee off and shove it down his throat on that dumbss play alone.

3) McCarthy being a puzzy and throwing Lacy into a line completely expected 2 yards and yak it up to eat 45 seconds of the clock.

4) Capers playing prevent D and allowing Lynch free reign down the field, and Wilson to run for the first time in the game.

5) Azzhole special teams idiocy allowing both Bostick stapler and AJ Sparrow on the field on the onside kick.

6) Add as you wish.

 

[donhaas 18]

1) McCarthy unwilling to shove the ball in the endzone on 4th and my c0ck early in the game.

2) Capers being incredibly stupidly calling a prevent D - and rushing 3 - on 3rd and 19. Pull his focking toupee off and shove it down his throat on that dumbss play alone.

3) McCarthy being a puzzy and throwing Lacy into a line completely expected 2 yards and yak it up to eat 45 seconds of the clock.

4) Capers playing prevent D and allowing Lynch free reign down the field, and Wilson to run for the first time in the game.

5) Azzhole special teams idiocy allowing both Bostick stapler and AJ Sparrow on the field on the onside kick.

6) Add as you wish.

 

 

 

Morgan Burnett immediately laying down on the ground with nothing but green field ahead of him????

 

 

So many multiple choke jobs in one game

[IMMensaMind 462]

Morgan Burnett immediately laying down on the ground with nothing but green field ahead of him????

 

 

So many multiple choke jobs in one game

Did he? I didn't catch that - though I knew he sat with little contact (better than coughing up the ball).

[donhaas 18]

Did he? I didn't catch that - though I knew he sat with little contact (better than coughing up the ball).

 

http://www.packers.com/media-center/videos/Wilson-intercepted-by-S-Morgan-Burnett/c2541d58-dda9-4855-908d-afd3174c3623

[IMMensaMind 462]

http://www.packers.com/media-center/videos/Wilson-intercepted-by-S-Morgan-Burnett/c2541d58-dda9-4855-908d-afd3174c3623

Wow.

 

I shouldn't have watched that. It makes me additionally dumbfounded on how we could POSSIBLY have lost that game. You SUCK, Capers and McCarthy!!!!!