HenryHill9323 65 Posted March 16, 2015 Link to all of the world's Muslims dancing? More retard logic by RP. Link to me saying all of the world's muslims were dancing, Dummy? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 16, 2015 Link to me saying all of the world's muslims were dancing, Dummy?Oh. Then what was your point? My analogy is still spot on. Do you ever tire of me stepping on your throat? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryHill9323 65 Posted March 16, 2015 Oh. Then what was your point? My analogy is still spot on. Do you ever tire of me stepping on your throat? Unlike mooslims, you won't find any gun owners dancing in the streets celebrating someone murdering someone with a gun. Dayum, you need everything in crayon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 16, 2015 Unlike mooslims, you won't find any gun owners dancing in the streets celebrating someone murdering someone with a gun. Dayum, you need everything in crayon. Once again, you want to judge all Muslims because of some wacky ones. No different than wacky gun owners. We can do this all day. Actually, you'd be willing. I'm not the 100 posts per day guy that you are. I have a life. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryHill9323 65 Posted March 16, 2015 Once again, you want to judge all Muslims because of some wacky ones. So, you think terrorists are just wacky? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 16, 2015 So, you think terrorists are just wacky? Same boat as idiots who shoot up schools. Wacked out. Illogical. Not representing everyone else. Stay down, Man. This is a slaughter. Ouch Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryHill9323 65 Posted March 16, 2015 Same boat as idiots who shoot up schools. Wow dude, the science really is settled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 16, 2015 Wow dude, the science really is settled. We're talking about labeling entire groups of people based on lunatics. Please try to keep up. For God's sake, this is ALL you do. You think you'd be a little better at it by now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryHill9323 65 Posted March 16, 2015 based on lunatics Oh those wacky ISIS guys. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,563 Posted March 16, 2015 It's shocking that they even had to release this statement. But when idiots like RP and Drobeski exist and want to characterize all 1.5 billion as terrorists, I guess they have to speak to lowest common denominator. It's really frightening that guys like them get to vote. TROLL !@# Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 16, 2015 TROLL !@#You forgot to BOLD RP and Drobeski's names. Oh yeah, they're conservatives, too. Nevermind, Grease Boy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,563 Posted March 16, 2015 You forgot to BOLD RP and Drobeski's names. Oh yeah, they're conservatives, too. Nevermind, Grease Boy. You started it, dumbo. Post #4. Try again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 16, 2015 You started it, dumbo. Post #4. Try again. Go put air in someone's tires, 99 Weeker. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,563 Posted March 16, 2015 Go put air in someone's tires, 99 Weeker. Thought so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bert 1,128 Posted March 16, 2015 That'd be a great analogy if our goal had been to secure Texas' assistance against the Branch Davidians Okay use any religious person that has killed people in the name of religion. That is not the point. The question is: How is calling ISIS "muslim/islamic terrorists" calling all muslims terrorists? Only the ignorant think all muslims are terrorists and only the ignorant think ISIS isn't an Islamic/muslim/religious terrorist organization. Even muslims know that ISIS is a bunch of religious nut jobs just like chrisitans know westboro baptists are a bunch of religious nut jobs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryHill9323 65 Posted March 16, 2015 You started it, dumbo. Post #4. Try again. Post 4 is late for Ducky. Musta been busy in front of the mirror. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 16, 2015 Okay use any religious person that has killed people in the name of religion. That is not the point. The question is: How is calling ISIS "muslim/islamic terrorists" calling all muslims terrorists? Only the ignorant think all muslims are terrorists and only the ignorant think ISIS isn't an Islamic/muslim/religious terrorist organization. Even muslims know that ISIS is a bunch of religious nut jobs just like chrisitans know westboro baptists are a bunch of religious nut jobs. yep Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,060 Posted March 16, 2015 Okay use any religious person that has killed people in the name of religion. That is not the point. The question is: How is calling ISIS "muslim/islamic terrorists" calling all muslims terrorists? Only the ignorant think all muslims are terrorists and only the ignorant think ISIS isn't an Islamic/muslim/religious terrorist organization. Even muslims know that ISIS is a bunch of religious nut jobs just like chrisitans know westboro baptists are a bunch of religious nut jobs. Well when you're trying to work with countries that are almost entirely muslim it's probably best to avoid playing into your opponent's claim that you're engaged in some sort of religious holy war. Rightly or wrongly, that is a perception that has traction in certain corners of the would and we would like to have some allies in those corners. Seems pretty simple, really Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 16, 2015 Well when you're trying to work with countries that are almost entirely muslim it's probably best to avoid playing into your opponent's claim that you're engaged in some sort of religious holy war. Rightly or wrongly, that is a perception that has traction in certain corners of the would and we would like to have some allies in those corners. Seems pretty simple, really those countries aren't afraid to call them Islamic terrorists dumbo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryHill9323 65 Posted March 16, 2015 those countries aren't afraid to call them Islamic terrorists dumbo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 16, 2015 Well when you're trying to work with countries that are almost entirely muslim it's probably best to avoid playing into your opponent's claim that you're engaged in some sort of religious holy war. Rightly or wrongly, that is a perception that has traction in certain corners of the would and we would like to have some allies in those corners. Seems pretty simple, really Guys with limited intelligence have no grasp of diplomacy. RP is barely smarter than a soap dish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bert 1,128 Posted March 16, 2015 Well when you're trying to work with countries that are almost entirely muslim it's probably best to avoid playing into your opponent's claim that you're engaged in some sort of religious holy war. Rightly or wrongly, that is a perception that has traction in certain corners of the would and we would like to have some allies in those corners. Seems pretty simple, really With extremists it doesn't matter. No matter what we do or say we will be engaged in a holy war. I don't think the average mulism is stupid enough to believe the holy war extremist rhetoric. Just a difference of opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,060 Posted March 16, 2015 Guys with limited intelligence have no grasp of diplomacy. RP is barely smarter than a soap dish. Yes that's why I'm surprised Bert can't see it. He at least holds himself out as being smarter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryHill9323 65 Posted March 16, 2015 Guys with limited intelligence have no grasp of diplomacy. RP is barely smarter than a soap dish. Seems to me Obama would call them what the mooslim countries are calling them. Ya know, for diplomacy reasons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bert 1,128 Posted March 16, 2015 Yes that's why I'm surprised Bert can't see it. He at least holds himself out as being smarter I see but it is very simplistic and targeted at a very small % of muslims. I do not believe the average muslim is as ignorant as us American's think they are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,060 Posted March 16, 2015 I see but it is very simplistic and targeted at a very small % of muslims. I do not believe the average muslim is as ignorant as us American's think they are. I imagine that it depends on the country. In a nation like Jordan I suspect there is probably a lot of suspicion of the United States. So if you want that country's cooperation you probably do have to be a tad careful in what you say. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,275 Posted March 16, 2015 I see but it is very simplistic and targeted at a very small % of muslims. I do not believe the average muslim is as ignorant as us American's think they are. We associate their inane dedication to the literal interpretation of the Quran as ignorance, when in fact they can be very crafty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bert 1,128 Posted March 16, 2015 I imagine that it depends on the country. In a nation like Jordan I suspect there is probably a lot of suspicion of the United States. So if you want that country's cooperation you probably do have to be a tad careful in what you say. Not really a big deal I suppose but it seems like a lot of effort for not a lot of result and also makes us look simplistic. Of course being that we are in the 4th term of GW Bush that ship has sailed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryHill9323 65 Posted March 16, 2015 I imagine that it depends on the country. In a nation like Jordan I suspect there is probably a lot of suspicion of the United States. So if you want that country's cooperation you probably do have to be a tad careful in what you say. If we didn't have the moron Lurch running the negotiations the simple way to handle this would be to say behind the scenes to these guys: "Hey, our internal politics calls for us to call this Islamic terrorism, but we both know you guys are all about peace, so ignore what we have to put out for domestic consumption and let's figure out how to deal with these "wacky" ISIS characters who are giving your peaceful religion a bad name". That's diplomacy. Unfortunately, mooslim apologists like you, PeenieDC, and Ducky can't think on that level. Too nuanced. What is worse is that Obama and Lurch can't either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted March 16, 2015 What cracks me up is how so many Foxtards are SOOOO outraged that Obummer won't call "them" Islamic Terrorists. Hmmm...Short memories. Apparently they don't remember when Bush Jr's team tried to rebrand the War on Terror? "'We actually misnamed the war on terror. It ought to be the struggle against ideological extremists who do not believe in free societies who happen to use terror as a weapon to try to shake the conscience of the free world." GWB They have stopped talking about a "war on terrorism." Thinking it too narrowly defined, Administration officials now speak of a "struggle against global extremism." Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld describes America's policies as a "global struggle against the enemies of freedom, the enemies of civilization." Donny Rumsfeld http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2005/07/whats-in-a-name-war-on-terror-out-struggle-against-extremism-in Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 16, 2015 Ooops. You're not allowed to say Bush. They want to pretend that never happened. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 16, 2015 We are still on this? Does calling them Islamic...when Islamic is right in the focking name ISIS or ISIL really mean anything? No...if any righty wants to talk about fake outrage...this is it. Its completely focking meaningless to add Islamic terrorist when describing things...it does nothing to help end what is going on...but that is what you all keep crying about. Holy fock. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,060 Posted March 16, 2015 What cracks me up is how so many Foxtards are SOOOO outraged that Obummer won't call "them" Islamic Terrorists. Hmmm...Short memories. Apparently they don't remember when Bush Jr's team tried to rebrand the War on Terror? http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2005/07/whats-in-a-name-war-on-terror-out-struggle-against-extremism-in Deflection Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 16, 2015 Deflection nailed it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 16, 2015 nailed it Not really...since its on topic of what to call them and points out the blatant hypocrisy of those on the right that didn't care then...but only care now because of Obama. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryHill9323 65 Posted March 16, 2015 Does calling them Islamic...when Islamic is right in the focking name ISIS or ISIL really mean anything? Egypt calls ISIS "Islamic". Mebbe you should ask them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 16, 2015 Egypt calls ISIS "Islamic". Mebbe you should ask them.never mind that obozo says they aren't Islamic Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 16, 2015 never mind that obozo says they aren't Islamic That you dont understand his angle with that or just repeat this thinking is clever is pretty funny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryHill9323 65 Posted March 16, 2015 That you dont understand his angle with that or just repeat this thinking is clever is pretty funny. Engrish......do you speak it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites