Hardcore troubadour 15,007 Posted May 29, 2017 Podesta is some sort of deviant for sure, and robbery being the motive in the Seth Rich case is is highly questionable. That's a lot more than can be said for what we've seen about Trump and the ruskies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 30, 2017 Uranium One (Wikileaks Podesta email confirmed) Then there is the glaring fact that the Clinton Foundation also scored $145 million in donations from nine shareholders in a Canadian uranium company called Uranium One that was sold to the Russian government in 2010. The deal required the approval of several federal government agencies, including Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The deal allowed Rosatom, the Russian State Nuclear Agency, to buy assets that amounted to 20 percent of American uranium. Rosatom, by the way controls the Russian nuclear arsenal. Hillary Clinton says she was not involved in the decision to approve the sale of Uranium One. As proof, the Clinton campaign in 2015 trotted out her former aide, Assistant Secretary of State Fernandez, to say publicly that we should take his word for it that she was not involved in approving that deal. But as we now know from the leaked Podesta emails, Fernandez was all too eager to help Podesta kill the story, while getting other favors from Podesta https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2053 Fernandez's email to Podesta quid pro quo. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//emailid/2059 Fernandez thanking Podesta for assistance getting on CAP (Center for American Progress) Board of trustees. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/03/03/peter-schweizer-trump-vs-clintons-russia-ties-guess-who-always-got-free-pass.html Trump has barely been a politician and he is already worse. And Hillary isn't relevant to what Trump may be guilty of....so, wrong thread unless yiu are just trying to deflect (which obviously, youbate). Also...the Uranium One thing always exposes you to be a focking uninformed moron (like Pozzagate and Seth Rich). HRC and Bill guilty of funneling hundreds of millions or by now over a BILLION from several foreign governments through the Clinton Foundation (hence the need for a private email server to avoid oversight). Trump worse? That's the hack in you speaking. So nothing to the Uranium One deal, huh? Explain away those Wikileak emails between Fernandez and Podesta. Quid pro quo in black and white. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted May 30, 2017 HRC and Bill guilty of funneling hundreds of millions or by now over a BILLION from several foreign governments through the Clinton Foundation (hence the need for a private email server to avoid oversight). Trump worse? That's the hack in you speaking. So nothing to the Uranium One deal, huh? Explain away those Wikileak emails between Fernandez and Podesta. Quid pro quo in black and white. So focking what? One is an old lady with cankles and a future descent into Parkinson's to look forward to. The other is the current commander in chief of our armed forces. The head of our government. Has permission to launch missiles. So which one being a corrupt piece of garbage (both are) is the more pressing problem at the moment do you think? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 30, 2017 HRC and Bill guilty of funneling hundreds of millions or by now over a BILLION from several foreign governments through the Clinton Foundation (hence the need for a private email server to avoid oversight). Trump worse? That's the hack in you speaking. So nothing to the Uranium One deal, huh? Explain away those Wikileak emails between Fernandez and Podesta. Quid pro quo in black and white. You don't read well do you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 30, 2017 So focking what? One is an old lady with cankles and a future descent into Parkinson's to look forward to. The other is the current commander in chief of our armed forces. The head of our government. Has permission to launch missiles. So which one being a corrupt piece of garbage (both are) is the more pressing problem at the moment do you think? Because this PROVEN corrupt b!tch might run again in 2020. While Trump Admin is under investigation, it's already been established HRC will sell off our country to any government provided the price is right. Let's not forget Democrats are currently being investigated for: Wasserman Schultz - Awan Brothers, spying on political opponents/allies via the unmasking efforts of Susan Rice/Brennan, possible leaks of classified information to media, etc...... Yeah, there's no concern over the sh!t the Dems are pulling/pulled (focking Bernie over) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 30, 2017 You don't read well do you? So I'll accept that as a concession on the Uranium One. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 30, 2017 So I'll accept that as a concession on the Uranium One. Not at all...the Iranium one has been destroyed over and over. Nothing I. The emails you posted implicated anything. And again...Hillary is focking irrelevant to the discussion of what Trump may be involved with. She is done. Nobody here is claiming she should be president. People thinking Trump is focked are even willing to live with Pence as President. This has nothing to do with Hillary. Get that yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted May 30, 2017 Because this PROVEN corrupt b!tch might run again in 2020. While Trump Admin is under investigation, it's already been established HRC will sell off our country to any government provided the price is right. Let's not forget Democrats are currently being investigated for: Wasserman Schultz - Awan Brothers, spying on political opponents/allies via the unmasking efforts of Susan Rice/Brennan, possible leaks of classified information to media, etc...... Yeah, there's no concern over the sh!t the Dems are pulling/pulled (focking Bernie over) Fine. Your boy is in charge of the FBI. Lock em all up. But see, the problem is, he may not want a real robust FBI, since he's corrupt as Fock himself. See the problem? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 30, 2017 Not at all...the Iranium one has been destroyed over and over. Nothing I. The emails you posted implicated anything. So the part where Fernandez (who provided Hillary with cover as the Assistant Secretary of State) tells Podesta he would love to help Candidate Clinton but needs help with a recommendation for a spot for the Board of Trustees isn't implicating? Dude, you claim not to care about Hillary but you are the biggest Hillary Hack on this bored. There's a paper trail there a focking blind man could follow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,007 Posted May 30, 2017 Fine. Your boy is in charge of the FBI. Lock em all up. But see, the problem is, he may not want a real robust FBI, since he's corrupt as Fock himself. See the problem? Ya know, Trump was as high profile as they come, and was a huge real estate developer in NY, not exactly a sqeaky clean business. NY has lots and lots of law enforcement that woukd have loved a scalp like his. And never a whiff about him in all the years he's been around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted May 30, 2017 Ya know, Trump was as high profile as they come, and was a huge real estate developer in NY, not exactly a sqeaky clean business. NY has lots and lots of law enforcement that woukd have loved a scalp like his. And never a whiff about him in all the years he's been around. Sure is a palpable reek now. And hell. The guy admitted to bribing politicians on tv. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,007 Posted May 30, 2017 Sure is a palpable reek now. And hell. The guy admitted to bribing politicians on tv. No he didn't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted May 30, 2017 No he didn't.Here's some videos of Trump speaking that hints towards the "yes he did" https://americanbridgepac.org/watch-trump-brag-about-bribing-politicians-again-and-again-and-again/ Oh wait. Was this a joke? Sarcasm? Alternative fact? I eagerly await the spin zone even though Bill O'Reilly isn't with Fox Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,007 Posted May 30, 2017 Here's some videos of Trump speaking that hints towards the "yes he did" https://americanbridgepac.org/watch-trump-brag-about-bribing-politicians-again-and-again-and-again/ Oh wait. Was this a joke? Sarcasm? Alternative fact? I eagerly await the spin zone even though Bill O'Reilly isn't with Fox You're Fockin kidding, right? Contribution=Bribe now? Not legally it doesn't. Try something else. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted May 30, 2017 You're Fockin kidding, right? Contribution=Bribe now? Not legally it doesn't. Try something else."When you give", he said last year, "they do whatever the hell you want them to do." Checkmate chump Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,007 Posted May 30, 2017 "When you give", he said last year, "they do whatever the hell you want them to do." Checkmate chump Ugh. Bribery is illegal. Contributions are not. Yer stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted May 30, 2017 Ugh. Bribery is illegal. Contributions are not. Yer stupid. You sound like the common Hillary supporter. Guess you really didn't switch sides did you. Poor schmuck Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 30, 2017 Anyone ever wonder if the DNC was truly hacked, why were only emails on Hillary and those around her were taken? Nothing from Obama, Bernie, Shumer, Pelosi, etc.........wouldn't an outside entity grab it all in hopes of tipping over the whole apple cart? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 30, 2017 So the part where Fernandez (who provided Hillary with cover as the Assistant Secretary of State) tells Podesta he would love to help Candidate Clinton but needs help with a recommendation for a spot for the Board of Trustees isn't implicating? Dude, you claim not to care about Hillary but you are the biggest Hillary Hack on this bored. There's a paper trail there a focking blind man could follow. No...a guy who has been helpful with a candidate asking for such thing is hardly a rare thing. That is a gigantic reach to what yiu are asserting with so many things. I mean really? That's your big proof? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 30, 2017 Could go anywhere...but based on Trump tweets and speeches he has insulted and losses of Germany, Mexico, South Korea, Canada, Australia and France. Yet never a bad word about Tussia and even praises them...praises Putin, Erdogon (whose thugs beat up protestors at the embassy here during his visit) and Duterte. And nothing but praise from his supporters. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 31, 2017 Andrew Weissmann may be joining Mueller in the investigation. Enron prosecutor...ex head of the Criminal Fraud division ...dealt with the Gambino crime family... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted May 31, 2017 Could go anywhere...but based on Trump tweets and speeches he has insulted and losses of Germany, Mexico, South Korea, Canada, Australia and France. Yet never a bad word about Tussia and even praises them...praises Putin, Erdogon (whose thugs beat up protestors at the embassy here during his visit) and Duterte. And nothing but praise from his supporters. simmer down fruitcake you can tell when you're in full tilt mode , you mumble and stumble like Barry did when trying to criticize Trump. Or is that the lifetime disability meds kicking in ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 31, 2017 simmer down fruitcake you can tell when you're in full tilt mode , you mumble and stumble like Barry did when trying to criticize Trump. Or is that the lifetime disability meds kicking in ?Literally nothing you said makes sense.I'm just fine chief...I don't get all pissed off on the internet. Disability mess? Nah...asthma and acid reflux aren't a disability. The only meds I take. It's not my fault your orange hero is pissing off our best allies while cozying up to Putin, Duterte and Erdogan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted May 31, 2017 I don't get all pissed off on the internet. Denial: It's not just a river in Egypt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,007 Posted May 31, 2017 Millhouse on the Simpsons has an asthma inhaler. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,691 Posted May 31, 2017 Seven months into the investigation and there still is no proof! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted May 31, 2017 Seven months into the investigation and there still is no proof! What are you afraid of? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 31, 2017 Seven months into the investigation and there still is no proof! How do you know? Sitting in with Mueller or McCabe? In any of the intel committees? BTW Comey is set to testify in an open meeting. Should be fun. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted May 31, 2017 What if it's found our he didn't? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted May 31, 2017 What if it's found our he didn't? Then so be it. That's what investigations are for. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,912 Posted May 31, 2017 Then so be it. That's what investigations are for. No no no no.... if you think that this investigation turns up nothing in there won't be repercussions you are kidding yourself. First off we're going to grill you goofballs daily over it but the American public isn't just going to go oh good there was an investigation there was nothing on we go. No no. You've hooked Your Wagon to this Theory and you'll pay for it if it's wrong. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 31, 2017 What if it's found our he didn't? If all investigations show he and his people did nothing...move in to defeating the GOP in the midterms.The amount that has already come out and who is involved in the investigations...I don't think that absolutely nothing will come of this. Ive said it often...I'm not sure it reached all the way to Trump...but some very close to him will go down. And in nearly any other admin with any other congress there would be Impeachment proceedings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 31, 2017 No no no no.... if you think that this investigation turns up nothing in there won't be repercussions you are kidding yourself. First off we're going to grill you goofballs daily over it but the American public isn't just going to go oh good there was an investigation there was nothing on we go. No no. You've hooked Your Wagon to this Theory and you'll pay for it if it's wrong. And if they do find things with Flynnamd Kushner and/or others? What wi you all say? Claim others are wrong if it doesn't get to Trump himself? And if it does? Claim it's some deep state conspiracy by the media and Obama and the DNC? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,912 Posted May 31, 2017 And if they do find things with Flynnamd Kushner and/or others? What wi you all say? Claim others are wrong if it doesn't get to Trump himself? And if it does? Claim it's some deep state conspiracy by the media and Obama and the DNC? No I will blast Trump for it if he had some role in it. But I think it needs to also be more than exposing things the Democrats were trying to hide. I would just think with as many Obama leftovers that can't go a day without leaking something and can't keep their mouth shut we would have something concrete by now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted May 31, 2017 No no no no.... if you think that this investigation turns up nothing in there won't be repercussions you are kidding yourself. First off we're going to grill you goofballs daily over it but the American public isn't just going to go oh good there was an investigation there was nothing on we go. No no. You've hooked Your Wagon to this Theory and you'll pay for it if it's wrong. Lol Go for it. I'll just be happy that all these "coincidences" were looked into. And not by Republican-led committees. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 31, 2017 No I will blast Trump for it if he had some role in it. But I think it needs to also be more than exposing things the Democrats were trying to hide. I would just think with as many Obama leftovers that can't go a day without leaking something and can't keep their mouth shut we would have something concrete by now. Why does it have to be more than that? BTW, the IC report in Russian measures was about more than just the hack of the DNC. If he was coordinating (or his campaign) with a hostile foreign government in taking such measures...that wouldn't be enough for you? Really? We have proof that it's Obama leftovers doing the leaking huh? What a lame excuse Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,912 Posted May 31, 2017 Why does it have to be more than that? BTW, the IC report in Russian measures was about more than just the hack of the DNC. If he was coordinating (or his campaign) with a hostile foreign government in taking such measures...that wouldn't be enough for you? Really? We have proof that it's Obama leftovers doing the leaking huh? What a lame excuse Yeah I just meant there needs to be some substance to it. Not that he just condoned it or look the other way or something. He would need to have had an active role. Proof of leaks? Yeah I'm sure it was Republicans doing it. Come on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 825 Posted May 31, 2017 Yeah I just meant there needs to be some substance to it. Not that he just condoned it or look the other way or something. He would need to have had an active role. Proof of leaks? Yeah I'm sure it was Republicans doing it. Come on. If Trump's team promised to ease sanctions on Russia in exchange for the election assist, will that meet your threshold for impeachment and/or treason? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,410 Posted May 31, 2017 Current Score.... Trump / Russian Collusion = 0 DNC Criminality = Over 1 Billion Sold Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 31, 2017 Yeah I just meant there needs to be some substance to it. Not that he just condoned it or look the other way or something. He would need to have had an active role. Proof of leaks? Yeah I'm sure it was Republicans doing it. Come on. He may not have had an active roll...other than using Russian propaganda in some of his speeches (that may have been due to him just being dumb). But he would have people to do that. If he even ok'd such a thing he would be complicit. In addition, this investigation likely goes beyond just the DNC hack...there is going to be a big part with financial ties of people to some bad hombresin Russia. I think there is a possibility that some around him leaked things. He isn't the most likable guy out there you know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites