Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 6, 2017 Just your run of the mill highly classified NSA document providing evidence of Russia's government interfering with our election. Actually interfering or attempting to? They as well as the U.S. attempt it all the time. From what I read it was a spear phishing hack targeting individuals in the election process. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 6, 2017 "My boy Obama" My god you troll even when someone tries to have a legitimate discussion of facts. I don't give a flying fock what would have happened with Hillary in office. Trump is in office. Right now. And there are details that said Russia disavowed our previous administration and meddled in our elections. What is Trump willing to do in order to stop that from happening again? There's another US election next year. Considering the already low turnouts during mid-terms, I'd sure hope we have the abilities in place to make sure another country doesn't reshape Congress The only defense for Trump is but Hillary...but Obama... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,012 Posted June 6, 2017 The only defense for Trump is but Hillary...but Obama... Well, Russian interference was discovered on Obamas watch, and he handled it. Sorry what actually happened bothers you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,173 Posted June 6, 2017 I'd say this Russia scandal will derail Trump's term but it's pretty obvious he had no intention of actually leading in the first place. Guy has been in office for less than 6 months and he's already whining about how hard it is between golf outings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 6, 2017 https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/four-top-law-firms-turned-requests-represent-trump-122423972.html 4 Top Law firms refuse to take on Trump as a client. The guy won’t pay and he won’t listen 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 6, 2017 https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/four-top-law-firms-turned-requests-represent-trump-122423972.html 4 Top Law firms refuse to take on Trump as a client. That is funny Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,012 Posted June 6, 2017 Should use Jay Sekulow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted June 6, 2017 https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/four-top-law-firms-turned-requests-represent-trump-122423972.html 4 Top Law firms refuse to take on Trump as a client. I found a paragraph to be quite interesting in that article that I would love to find out more information about: "Others mentioned potential conflicts with clients of their firms, such as financial institutions that have already received subpoenas relating to potential money-laundering issues that are part of the investigation." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 6, 2017 I found a paragraph to be quite interesting in that article that I would love to find out more information about: The DNC hack won't be what brings down some in this admin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,390 Posted June 6, 2017 Anything yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,390 Posted June 6, 2017 https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/four-top-law-firms-turned-requests-represent-trump-122423972.html 4 Top Law firms refuse to take on Trump as a client. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,851 Posted June 6, 2017 Anything yet? Nope but don't worry the Democrats are on the case. I'm sure they will drag this out for years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paulinstl 296 Posted June 6, 2017 Nope but don't worry the Democrats are on the case. I'm sure they will drag this out for years. Like Whitewater, I'm sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted June 6, 2017 Like Whitewater, I'm sure.hopefully key witnesses dont have someone stage thier suicide again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 6, 2017 Nope but don't worry the Democrats are on the case. I'm sure they will drag this out for years.So both the House and Senate Committees are democrats? The FBI?Assistant AG? Special Counsel? All big fat libs right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted June 6, 2017 Qatari Foreign Minister told CNN the FBI has confirmed a Russian hack and the planting of fake news to their state news agency. "Whatever has been thrown as an accusation is all based on misinformation and we think that the entire crisis being based on misinformation," the foreign minister told CNN's Becky Anderson. "Because it was started based on fabricated news, being wedged and being inserted in our national news agency which was hacked and proved by the FBI." Sheikh Saif Bin Ahmed Al-Thani, director of the Qatari Government Communications Office, confirmed that Qatar's Ministry of Interior is working with the FBI and the United Kingdom's National Crime Agency on the ongoing hacking investigation of the Qatar News Agency. Newsflash: The Democrats can errantly blame Russia for losing the election, and Russia could still be involved in a bunch of shady sh!t that not only helped Trump gain favorability, but is causing a whole lot of global instability. Of course, this will be met by die in the wool Trump supporters that believe any criticism of that country and their actions is fake news. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,012 Posted June 6, 2017 Was it the Russians that signed Nafta and wanted to sign the tpp? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted June 6, 2017 Was it the Russians that signed Nafta and wanted to sign the tpp? You tell us. You were a Democrat back then Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,012 Posted June 6, 2017 You tell us. You were a Democrat back then Wrong again. I voted for Bob Dole. Good man Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paulinstl 296 Posted June 6, 2017 hopefully key witnesses dont have someone stage thier suicide again. Vince Foster again? Holy sh1t. Don't you want to know the depth of Russia's interference in our election? Are you really that far right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted June 6, 2017 Vince Foster again? Holy sh1t. Don't you want to know the depth of Russia's interference in our election? Are you really that far right? yes and id also like to know if seth rich leaked the dnc emails and who killed him. Both very important to this russia investigation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paulinstl 296 Posted June 7, 2017 yes and id also like to know if seth rich leaked the dnc emails and who killed him. Both very important to this russia investigation. See what you can find on those missing workers for Ivanka. Maximum rolleyes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted June 7, 2017 See what you can find on those missing workers for Ivanka. Maximum rolleyes.what does that have to do with so called russian interference? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paulinstl 296 Posted June 7, 2017 what does that have to do with so called russian interference? What does Vince Foster have to with it? My God. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paulinstl 296 Posted June 7, 2017 You really think the DNC killed Rich? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,012 Posted June 7, 2017 You really think the DNC killed Rich? How come MDC throws your name around so much? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paulinstl 296 Posted June 7, 2017 I guess because we were both very early members here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,012 Posted June 7, 2017 I guess because we were both very early members here. Yeah, he says you look up ip addresses. Why would he say that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,851 Posted June 7, 2017 So both the House and Senate Committees are democrats? The FBI? Assistant AG? Special Counsel? All big fat libs right? Yes the house and senate committees have democrats serving on them. You don't actually believe politicians appoint people to the AG office, FBI etc... without knowing their political preference? Do you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,851 Posted June 7, 2017 You really think the DNC killed Rich? I believe that organization had the most to gain from his death. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 7, 2017 Yes the house and senate committees have democrats serving on them. You don't actually believe politicians appoint people to the AG office, FBI etc... without knowing their political preference? Do you? Trump nominated Rosenstein. The Dems don't control the whole committees that are bringing this investigation. Any other bogus accusations? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 474 Posted June 7, 2017 DNI Coats will have an interesting testimony tomorrow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted June 7, 2017 You really think the DNC killed Rich?i do think there's a chance he was the wiki leaks source. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 7, 2017 DNI Coats will have an interesting testimony tomorrow Be interesting if someone asks him to confirm this... https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/top-intelligence-official-told-associates-trump-asked-him-if-he-could-intervene-with-comey-to-get-fbi-to-back-off-flynn/2017/06/06/cc879f14-4ace-11e7-9669-250d0b15f83b_story.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,912 Posted June 7, 2017 Be interesting if someone asks him to confirm this... https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/top-intelligence-official-told-associates-trump-asked-him-if-he-could-intervene-with-comey-to-get-fbi-to-back-off-flynn/2017/06/06/cc879f14-4ace-11e7-9669-250d0b15f83b_story.html Ha so stupid. He didnt obstruct, and Comey wont testify he did. And i guaran fockin tee you...that you will be in here Thursday just spouting how.."Well trump did it..but comey couldnt say that or he would be in trouble"....guranteed. This is why these things are pointless...it caters to a small whiny smarmy segment of people who arent going to like anything thats said anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 7, 2017 Ha so stupid. He didnt obstruct, and Comey wont testify he did. And i guaran fockin tee you...that you will be in here Thursday just spouting how.."Well trump did it..but comey couldnt say that or he would be in trouble"....guranteed. This is why these things are pointless...it caters to a small whiny smarmy segment of people who arent going to like anything thats said anyway. If asked if Trump asked him to stop...he willlikely answer.He won't opine as to what that means. He isn't going to step on Mueller's investigation. But he can confirm things that have been reported as true or not. Things that, at this point, have been just reports and not confirmed under oath. I'm positive no matter what is said...you all will claim it's nothing. Like all the subpoenas and recusals and firings have all just been nothing. If Coats confirms that article...and Comey confirms what is claimed Trump did asking him to halt...would you consider that obstruction? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,851 Posted June 7, 2017 Trump nominated Rosenstein. The Dems don't control the whole committees that are bringing this investigation. Any other bogus accusations? I answered your question and once again proved you wrong. Not sure what else you want? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,912 Posted June 7, 2017 If asked if Trump asked him to stop...he willlikely answer. He won't opine as to what that means. He isn't going to step on Mueller's investigation. But he can confirm things that have been reported as true or not. Things that, at this point, have been just reports and not confirmed under oath. I'm positive no matter what is said...you all will claim it's nothing. Like all the subpoenas and recusals and firings have all just been nothing. If Coats confirms that article...and Comey confirms what is claimed Trump did asking him to halt...would you consider that obstruction? I think it's sort of depends on the reasoning. If it's because there is truly nothing and it's complete Witch Hunt and he suggested for the good of the country or whatever to not waste time with this I think that's different than asking them to stop because he doesn't want to get busted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,173 Posted June 7, 2017 I guess because we were both very early members here. So was HT / RP. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 7, 2017 I answered your question and once again proved you wrong. Not sure what else you want? Proved me wrong? Because a few Dems are on the committee? Mueller was appointed by Trumps Deputy AG. FBI are not Dems... Are you really that stupid? I mean...I'm quite positive you are...just interesting if you'd admit it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
