Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 25, 2018 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1010921064120160258 "Sally Moyer a.k.a. Agent #5 is a registered Democrat. She rooted for Hillary to win & IM'd "f*ck Trump" when she didn't. As FBI's Nat'l Security Law Branch chief, Moyer told agents investigating Hillary which evidence from her devices they could use & which they couldn't" More lawlessness from the Premier Law Enforcement Agency in the world. Focking clown show. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 29, 2018 Rosenstein admits under oath he never actually read the FISA warrant application he signed to spy on Carter Page. Banana republic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 29, 2018 Why did Rosenstein redact the fact that Strzok and Contrereas were friends? Rosie looks pissed. I believe he is a useful idiot, put in charge of the DOJ while the crooks from the Obama admin continued to run behind his back in an attempt to hide and destroy evidence of their collusion. He is being hung out to dry by the bad seeds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 29, 2018 Dems look like whiny scared bitches in these meetings. They know they are . Expect weekly mass shootings as this heats up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 29, 2018 Dems look like whiny scared bitches in these meetings. They know they are ######. Expect weekly mass shootings as this heats up. You dont grasp reality well. First...RR did not admit to what you claim and Gohmert looked like an idiot. As did Jordan later. As always....Rosenstein was the most competent person speaking and your little GOP buddies flailed away trying to trip him up and only made themselves look bad (oh, and RR is not a Democrat anyway). And your false flag BS again should we what an outright trolling ass you are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,658 Posted June 29, 2018 http://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/392745-clapper-declares-it-is-time-for-mueller-to-wrap-up-the-russia-probe-soon Clapper now wanting Mueller probe to finish up. Methinks he's waving the white flag wanting to call a cease fire now that his gun is empty. NO DEAL I saw a few minutes today. It is ironic beyond all belief the Trey Gowdy of all people is suddenly now all pissed off and saying will shut the hell down wrap at the hell up! Meanwhile, this investigation has yielded jail time sentences admissions indictments Etc. My name is Treys turn on Benghazi? He kept it alive for 2 and 1/2 years resulting in literally nothing. Nothing. Compared to what we have today. And literally nothing absolutely. Even without comparison. He had nothing. Two and a half years for a worthless Benghazi investigation that got nowhere. But suddenly he's all about the efficiency.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,658 Posted June 29, 2018 I think my favorite part was when some blue hard Senator was talking about subpoenaing telephone calls. Rosenstein didn't miss a Beat. Just very matter-of-factly drop this bomb in the middle of this guy ranting and spitting. You can't subpoena a phone call. The senator was absolutely gobsmacked. You look like you've been hit by a bus. Finally recovers enough to spit out I I I was just reading that that I suggest you don't senator. The whole meeting room just starts laughing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,813 Posted June 29, 2018 I saw a few minutes today. It is ironic beyond all belief the Trey Gowdy of all people is suddenly now all pissed off and saying will shut the hell down wrap at the hell up! Meanwhile, this investigation has yielded jail time sentences admissions indictments Etc. My name is Treys turn on Benghazi? He kept it alive for 2 and 1/2 years resulting in literally nothing. Nothing. Compared to what we have today. And literally nothing absolutely. Even without comparison. He had nothing. Two and a half years for a worthless Benghazi investigation that got nowhere. But suddenly he's all about the efficiency.. Benghazi is where we learned about Hillary and her illegal private sever. The rest is history. Benghazi was huge. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 29, 2018 I think my favorite part was when some blue hard Senator was talking about subpoenaing telephone calls. Rosenstein didn't miss a Beat. Just very matter-of-factly drop this bomb in the middle of this guy ranting and spitting. You can't subpoena a phone call. The senator was absolutely gobsmacked. You look like you've been hit by a bus. Finally recovers enough to spit out I I I was just reading that that I suggest you don't senator. The whole meeting room just starts laughing. That was Rocks second buddy Jordan. He constantly shows his clear ignorance in these things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 29, 2018 You dont grasp reality well. First...RR did not admit to what you claim and Gohmert looked like an idiot. As did Jordan later. As always....Rosenstein was the most competent person speaking and your little GOP buddies flailed away trying to trip him up and only made themselves look bad (oh, and RR is not a Democrat anyway). And your false flag BS again should we what an outright trolling ass you are. Watch it again then. At the very end RR says he signed the renewal that was attested to by a sworn member of FBI i.e. he authorized it because it had been previously authorized and someone else attested to it i.e. HE DIDN'T READ IT. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 29, 2018 And wiff Benghazi resulted in no conviction because the people in charge were the same people that let her off in the email investigation. The I.G. stated there appeared to be a predetermined outcome at the onset of the email investigation. Gowdy is playing his part and you fell for his earlier distancing from Trump act. Question remains......is Rosenstein playing a part or CYA. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 29, 2018 Why did Rosenstein redact the fact that Strzok and Contrereas were friends? Rosie looks pissed. I believe he is a useful idiot, put in charge of the DOJ while the crooks from the Obama admin continued to run behind his back in an attempt to hide and destroy evidence of their collusion. He is being hung out to dry by the bad seeds. DEMs trying desperately to let RR waste JJ's time with some BS. BOOM. Peter Strzok was in communication with Fusion GPS (Glenn Simpson) who was being paid by Hillary/DNC/Obama through Perkins Coie. That's a wrap folks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LOD01 192 Posted June 29, 2018 You dont grasp reality well. First...RR did not admit to what you claim and Gohmert looked like an idiot. As did Jordan later. As always....Rosenstein was the most competent person speaking and your little GOP buddies flailed away trying to trip him up and only made themselves look bad (oh, and RR is not a Democrat anyway). And your false flag BS again should we what an outright trolling ass you are. says the guy claiming he only votes Indy or R. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 29, 2018 https://youtu.be/oob6vZzFlj0 At the very end Rod Rosenstein acknowledges there was bias. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,475 Posted June 29, 2018 I would really like to have an assessment of the performance of the FBI and DOJ that comes from an outside and independent entity. These congressional sideshows are little more than posturing and hyperbole; which should be left to the media arm of each party such as CNN and FOX. Just the facts would be great. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted June 29, 2018 Poor Sho/Wiff. The jig is up. It's over. But they can't let go. At least that Saints guy ran away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 29, 2018 says the guy claiming he only votes Indy or R. That is again not what I claimed...seriously, you have that much trouble reading? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted June 29, 2018 That is again not what I claimed...seriously, you have that much trouble reading? Liar Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 29, 2018 Two recent hearings...2 guys seemingly look more and more competent and the GOP on these committees look worse and worse. Rosenstein just embarrassed Jordan (not that any of you will admit it) and Gohmert got quite unhinged and Goodlatte had to try and settle him down. Strzok...of course the right is leaking snippets...meanwhile, he wanted an open hearing, he has requested his full transcript be released. Why refuse? Because you can't run with the snippets and its easier to spin your narrative if you don't see all what he said. Pathetic as always. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted June 29, 2018 Two recent hearings...2 guys seemingly look more and more competent and the GOP on these committees look worse and worse. Rosenstein just embarrassed Jordan (not that any of you will admit it) and Gohmert got quite unhinged and Goodlatte had to try and settle him down. Strzok...of course the right is leaking snippets...meanwhile, he wanted an open hearing, he has requested his full transcript be released. Why refuse? Because you can't run with the snippets and its easier to spin your narrative if you don't see all what he said. Pathetic as always. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted June 29, 2018 Two recent hearings...2 guys seemingly look more and more competent and the GOP on these committees look worse and worse. Rosenstein just embarrassed Jordan (not that any of you will admit it) and Gohmert got quite unhinged and Goodlatte had to try and settle him down. Strzok...of course the right is leaking snippets...meanwhile, he wanted an open hearing, he has requested his full transcript be released. Why refuse? Because you can't run with the snippets and its easier to spin your narrative if you don't see all what he said. Pathetic as always. Are you actually defending Strzok? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,813 Posted June 29, 2018 Are you actually defending Strzok? I think he is. Wow. He has sunk to a new low. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 29, 2018 https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1012773045021396992.html Another sentencing delay requested by Mueller and Flynn. If this was an actual confession with evidence of guilt there wouldn't be any delays. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 460 Posted June 29, 2018 And wiff Benghazi resulted in no conviction because the people in charge were the same people that let her off in the email investigation. The I.G. stated there appeared to be a predetermined outcome at the onset of the email investigation. Gowdy is playing his part and you fell for his earlier distancing from Trump act. Question remains......is Rosenstein playing a part or CYA. I think he's playing a part. It's the only way I can reconcile his facial muscles struggling to suppress bursts of laughter which resulted in occasional beaming smiles and strained smirks. And a guy like that only does that for one reason: he knows a whole lot more than he's revealing, and what he knows is definitive. I think he's in Trump's pocket. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 460 Posted June 29, 2018 Two recent hearings...2 guys seemingly look more and more competent and the GOP on these committees look worse and worse. Rosenstein just embarrassed Jordan (not that any of you will admit it) and Gohmert got quite unhinged and Goodlatte had to try and settle him down. Strzok...of course the right is leaking snippets...meanwhile, he wanted an open hearing, he has requested his full transcript be released. Why refuse? Because you can't run with the snippets and its easier to spin your narrative if you don't see all what he said. Pathetic as always. You're falling for the show. I believe it is necessary to have Trump's allies in Congress look frustrated and not compliant. The best way to do that is NOT allow them access to everything going on. They get to play the role, and they don't even have to act - much. That, I believe, is what is going on here. I think this investigation is cutting deep, and doing big things - but it isn't landing anyone you think it is. In fact, I think it's getting to your sacred cows, and they're going to be served up with a nice red whine. Normally, when I catch a fish, one need not hook the fish past the gills. I think everyone is going to have trouble pulling that hook out of your sphincter. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 29, 2018 I think he's playing a part. It's the only way I can reconcile his facial muscles struggling to suppress bursts of laughter which resulted in occasional beaming smiles and strained smirks. And a guy like that only does that for one reason: he knows a whole lot more than he's revealing, and what he knows is definitive. I think he's in Trump's pocket. Great point. I've struggled with Rosenstein and Mueller. Both have deep history with the Clintons. Both are also over a barrel with past ties to the wholesale corruption. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 29, 2018 You're falling for the show. I believe it is necessary to have Trump's allies in Congress look frustrated and not compliant. The best way to do that is NOT allow them access to everything going on. They get to play the role, and they don't even have to act - much. That, I believe, is what is going on here. I think this investigation is cutting deep, and doing big things - but it isn't landing anyone you think it is. In fact, I think it's getting to your sacred cows, and they're going to be served up with a nice red whine. Normally, when I catch a fish, one need not hook the fish past the gills. I think everyone is going to have trouble pulling that hook out of your sphincter. You just keep thinking that...its compleyely illogical...so Im sure you actually believe it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 30, 2018 I would really like to have an assessment of the performance of the FBI and DOJ that comes from an outside and independent entity. These congressional sideshows are little more than posturing and hyperbole; which should be left to the media arm of each party such as CNN and FOX. Just the facts would be great. Inspector General Michael Horowitz is who you are looking for. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 30, 2018 https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1012773045021396992.html Another sentencing delay requested by Mueller and Flynn. If this was an actual confession with evidence of guilt there wouldn't be any delays. Federal judge getting fed up with Mueller stalling: However, later, in a minute-order, Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered the parties to explain by noon Monday July 2nd, the reason why the Court should depart from the normal practice of getting all the sentencing issues/dates done at the same time. https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/flynn-hearing-june-29-1.jpg?w=640&h=281 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,813 Posted June 30, 2018 Federal judge getting fed up with Mueller stalling: https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/flynn-hearing-june-29-1.jpg?w=640&h=281 Fockin circus. You're doing a hell of a job Muelly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 460 Posted June 30, 2018 You just keep thinking that...its compleyely illogical...so Im sure you actually believe it.No, it's completely logical. You also have a logical basis for thinking what you're thinking. There are just many more holes in reconciling your beliefs with the current reality than I have, to do the same, IMO. The problem with you, Sho, is that you cannot acknowledge that someone of an opposing view could arrive there logically. That's rooted in leftist's lack of understanding of conservatives, while the converse is not true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 30, 2018 No, it's completely logical. You also have a logical basis for thinking what you're thinking. There are just many more holes in reconciling your beliefs with the current reality than I have, to do the same, IMO. The problem with you, Sho, is that you cannot acknowledge that someone of an opposing view could arrive there logically. That's rooted in leftist's lack of understanding of conservatives, while the converse is not true. So wrong and so full of yourself with this analysis. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,498 Posted June 30, 2018 So wrong and so full of yourself with this analysis. You always say Wrong, False, Lie, etc. but never back it up. When you are challenged you say you already posted proof but never provide a link. You should change your name to No Value Added! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted June 30, 2018 So wrong and so full of yourself with this analysis.sho has flown over the cuckoos nest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 30, 2018 You always say Wrong, False, Lie, etc. but never back it up. When you are challenged you say you already posted proof but never provide a link. You should change your name to No Value Added! I say it when it is false...and I did back up my claims with you...again, I say that because its a fact. What did he post to back up his assertions? Nothing. And you talking about value is always funny. Your value appears to be regurgitate foxnews bullshit and nothing else. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,498 Posted June 30, 2018 I say it when it is false...and I did back up my claims with you...again, I say that because its a fact. What did he post to back up his assertions? Nothing. And you talking about value is always funny. Your value appears to be regurgitate foxnews bullshit and nothing else. Thanks for proving my point, at least I provide a link! If you feel they are facts a link should be easy. You said it was a fact that you were in better shape than I was and you dont have a clue who I am. You dont know what a fact is. You are a complete hack! Id love to chat but my plane is boarding. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 460 Posted June 30, 2018 So wrong and so full of yourself with this analysis.That's all you can say. From my side, I believe that the best example of arrogance is the side that feels so superior about their own positions that anyone who DOESN'T arrive at the same ones is <insert all the pejoratives that leftists throw at Conservatives>. I understand where you're coming from, and you're so arrogant that you do not accord someone like me the latitude to consider that what I am saying is not irrational. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 30, 2018 Thanks for proving my point, at least I provide a link! If you feel they are facts a link should be easy. You said it was a fact that you were in better shape than I was and you dont have a clue who I am. You dont know what a fact is. You are a complete hack! Id love to chat but my plane is boarding. You again talking about links given your years of plagiarism is hilarious. And your point is bogus...also, youve been asked over and over to provide links to back up your claims about board socialists and your list of lies...so you are once again full of . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted June 30, 2018 That's all you can say. From my side, I believe that the best example of arrogance is the side that feels so superior about their own positions that anyone who DOESN'T arrive at the same ones is <insert all the pejoratives that leftists throw at Conservatives>. I understand where you're coming from, and you're so arrogant that you do not accord someone like me the latitude to consider that what I am saying is not irrational. And your example is funny given this board throws out far more pejoratives about liberals than the other way around.I think what your saying is illogical based on what we know...you seem to want to hold onto it because otherwise the whole narrative is screwed and youd have to admit that I am right. And I know we cant have that on this bored. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites