San Francisco Mega Super Storm - doomsday

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,587]

1 hour ago, Fnord said:

I have actually recently read the opposite of this. You got some links to back up your statements?

which statement? maybe you can send a link and I will read it

 

 

[taco breath 424]

1 hour ago, Bert said:

Like it did 300 million years ago and Arizona was covered with water.  What is your point?

Climate change, due to a rise in global temperature from co2 output, is increasing the intensity and frequency of weather related natural disasters.

Got it charlie?

[JustinCharge 2,397]

53 minutes ago, taco breath said:

Climate change, due to a rise in global temperature from co2 output, is increasing the intensity and frequency of weather related natural disasters.

Got it charlie?

we used to joke about this as kids.  we used to say that eventually the climate crazies would seriously argue that whichever way the weather changed, hotter, colder, wetter, drier, they would actually try to blame it on human activity as a guilt trip, so they could never be wrong.  its hilarious you are actually doing it AND you think no-one saw that coming in advance when in fact you are probably the last one to come up with that thinking.

[Gladiators 2,035]

It should be called a Shitstorm

[Djgb13 2,339]

Cali geeks y’all good? I haven’t read the thread but hoping y’all are ok 

[Hardcore troubadour 16,062]

1 hour ago, taco breath said:

Climate change, due to a rise in global temperature from co2 output, is increasing the intensity and frequency of weather related natural disasters.

Got it charlie?

This is so so stupid I thought Tim wrote it

[taco breath 424]

28 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

This is so so stupid I thought Tim wrote it

lots of science backing up that theory but I suppose science is wrong too.  I guess that makes you correct.

Idiot

[Hardcore troubadour 16,062]

38 minutes ago, taco breath said:

lots of science backing up that theory but I suppose science is wrong too.  I guess that makes you correct.

Idiot

Lots of science and common sense debunking it. Sometimes science is wrong. Especially the science you follow. You know, the science with 87 genders and men that can get pregnant.  Pardon me for not following.  

[taco breath 424]

2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Lots of science and common sense debunking it. Sometimes science is wrong. Especially the science you follow. You know, the science with 87 genders and men that can get pregnant.  Pardon me for not following.  

Link?

Idiot.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,587]

4 hours ago, taco breath said:

Climate change, due to a rise in global temperature from co2 output, is increasing the intensity and frequency of weather related natural disasters.

Got it charlie?

plant life thrives between 900-1200 PPM co2, plant more plants, oh wait we have, the planet is greener than it has been in recorded history

throw trillions at it, plants and sea plants are the best solution to carbon output that has ever existed

graphine and carbon capture is better than anything you alarmists cry about

 

[taco breath 424]

Just now, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

plant life thrives between 900-1200 PPM co2, plant more plants, oh wait we have, the planet is greener than it has been in recorded history.

Tell that to the Amazon. 

Link?

Idiot.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,587]

1 hour ago, taco breath said:

Tell that to the Amazon. 

Link?

Idiot.

You have the number to Amazon?

[taco breath 424]

4 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

You have the number to Amazon?

You bore me, fool.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,587]

2 hours ago, taco breath said:

You bore me, fool.

Yep like every libtard you have zero sense of humor 

[Shooter McGavin 618]

Exxon predicted their actions would cause climate change in the 70s, but they had to get their bonuses, so now they deny it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/12/climate/exxon-mobil-global-warming-climate-change.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

[Fnord 2,657]

3 hours ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Exxon predicted their actions would cause climate change in the 70s, but they had to get their bonuses, so now they deny it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/12/climate/exxon-mobil-global-warming-climate-change.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur

Money Quote (emphasis mine):

In the new study, Geoffrey Supran and Naomi Oreskes of Harvard, and Stefan Rahmstorf of the Potsdam Institute, carried out a quantitative analysis of global warming projections made or recorded by Exxon scientists between 1977 and 2003.

Those records, which include internal memos and peer-reviewed papers published with outside academic researchers, make up the largest public collection of global warming projections recorded by a single company, the authors said.

Overall, Exxon’s global warming projections closely tracked subsequent temperature increases of around 0.2 degrees Celsius of global warming per decade, the study found.

The company’s scientists, in fact, excluded the possibility that human-caused global warming was not occurring, the researchers found.

Exxon’s scientists also correctly rejected the possibility of a coming ice age, even as the company continued to refer to it in its public communications; accurately predicted when human-caused global warming would be first detected; and estimated how much carbon dioxide could be added to the atmosphere before warming hit a dangerous threshold, the study found. Some of the Exxon studies predicted an even sharper rise in temperatures than what the planet has experienced.

“We now have airtight, unimpeachable evidence that ExxonMobil accurately predicted global warming years before it turned around and publicly attacked climate science and scientists,” said Dr. Supran. “Our findings show that ExxonMobil’s public denial of climate science contradicted its own scientists’ data.”