END WOKENESS

[League Champion 1,896]

21 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

Pride parades are seemingly big on dildos nudity and pretending to rail eachother.  Totally for children.  

They are perverts, why does the left accept it as normal? Not only that, they celebrate it. 

[League Champion 1,896]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

these parades have become outrageous expressions of themselves that they no longer need to hide.

So that makes it ok??? 

Honey, get the Kids, we're going to the parade! 

[avoiding injuries 1,512]

1 minute ago, League Champion said:

So that makes it ok??? 

Honey, get the Kids, we're going to the parade! 

Going off that logic, the Penn State professor who got caught focking a dog last week and asked authorities to kill him, was just expressing himself and soon won’t have to hide it. 
Sick. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

6 minutes ago, League Champion said:

So that makes it ok??? 

Honey, get the Kids, we're going to the parade! 

It's ok for them to have their own parades.  Many of them are not appropriate for kids.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

4 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Going off that logic, the Penn State professor who got caught focking a dog last week and asked authorities to kill him, was just expressing himself and soon won’t have to hide it. 
Sick. 

There is a difference between two consenting adult men in a relationship and a man focking a dog.  Come on.

[League Champion 1,896]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

There is a difference between two consenting adult men in a relationship and a man focking a dog.  Come on.

Maybe the Dog initiated it. 

[listen2me 23 1,831]

Just now, League Champion said:

Maybe the Dog initiated it. 

Maybe the guy identifies as a canine?

Gutter will roll his eyes.   But never know in 10 20 years.  Maybe this guy will one day be liberated from the evil society that shamed him.  

There will be a next step.  There is always a next step.  Not saying that is it.  But there will be a next step.   

[GutterBoy 2,898]

Just now, listen2me 23 said:

Maybe the guy identifies as a canine?

Gutter will roll his eyes.   But never know in 10 20 years.  Maybe this guy will one day be liberated from the evil society that shamed him.  

There will be a next step.  There is always a next step.  Not saying that is it.  But there will be a next step.   

We've heard this argument for decades over the gay marriage debate, if we allow the gays to get married then people will marry their dogs.  It's dumb, and just an excuse to keep oppressing people.  You cant hold to ridiculous hypotheticals as a way to halt progress.

[listen2me 23 1,831]

8 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

We've heard this argument for decades over the gay marriage debate, if we allow the gays to get married then people will marry their dogs.  It's dumb, and just an excuse to keep oppressing people.  You cant hold to ridiculous hypotheticals as a way to halt progress.

It may have been too soon?  Im not halting progress.  I don't care what adults do.  I was too young to remember those discussions.   Maybe people were too early and skipped a step.  A step of the trannys and trying to stop kids hormones.  

1990

Guy: well if we let the gays marry each other next step is marrying your dog!

Someone: don't be ridiculous 

Guy: ok ok.  Well next step may be blocking kids hormones in thr name of letting them choose their gender!

Someone: now you are being really ridiculous!

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

So, because gays were oppressed or closeted at one time, we have to understand why trannies are waving their cacks in front of kids.  Thanks Gutterboy!  I get it now!  

[League Champion 1,896]

17 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So, because gays were oppressed or closeted at one time, we have to understand why trannies are waving their cacks in front of kids.  Thanks Gutterboy!  I get it now!  

Unbelievable isn't it 

[Hawkeye21 2,382]

1 hour ago, League Champion said:

As many as it takes 

Sooo...  A bunch of threads about Trumps is TDS.  A bunch of threats about Biden is perfectly fine.  Even more threads about trans people is patriotic.  Makes perfect sense.  I love the reasoning here.

[League Champion 1,896]

3 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Sooo...  A bunch of threads about Trumps is TDS.  A bunch of threats about Biden is perfectly fine.  Even more threads about trans people is patriotic.  Makes perfect sense.  I love the reasoning here.

It'll come to you one day Son 

[Hawkeye21 2,382]

1 minute ago, League Champion said:

It'll come to you one day Son 

I've already gotten it.  This place has always been the far right version of FBG.  Both extremely biased and neither think they are wrong.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

6 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Sooo...  A bunch of threads about Trumps is TDS.  A bunch of threats about Biden is perfectly fine.  Even more threads about trans people is patriotic.  Makes perfect sense.  I love the reasoning here.

Dude is a bot

[avoiding injuries 1,512]

2 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

There is a difference between two consenting adult men in a relationship and a man focking a dog.  Come on.

Yeah, about 3 years. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

All Rich dik virtue signaling. The only neighborhoods you see pride flags and Ukraine flags are in rich liberal ones. 

[League Champion 1,896]

9 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

There is a difference between two consenting adult men in a relationship and a man focking a dog.  Come on.

What if the dog was really hot? 

[League Champion 1,896]

 

[jerryskids 6,576]

3 hours ago, League Champion said:

 

Awesome, I think something like this is necessary to attack this plague.  Gutter and others will say it's not a plague, then I will point out that a group of gay people think it is serious enough to start this movement.   

[GutterBoy 2,898]

24 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Awesome, I think something like this is necessary to attack this plague.  Gutter and others will say it's not a plague, then I will point out that a group of gay people think it is serious enough to start this movement.   

Um yeah, it's not a bunch of gay people,  it's an alt right maga qanon group

https://www.advocate.com/news/gays-against-groomers-exposed

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

43 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Um yeah, it's not a bunch of gay people,  it's an alt right maga qanon group

https://www.advocate.com/news/gays-against-groomers-exposed

So they aren’t gay? 

[jerryskids 6,576]

44 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Um yeah, it's not a bunch of gay people,  it's an alt right maga qanon group

https://www.advocate.com/news/gays-against-groomers-exposed

Gays can't be conservative?

Also, the Advocate?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

25 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Gays can't be conservative?

Also, the Advocate?

It's not a group of gays, it's one woman, who might be gay, I don't know, but she pushes alt right anti LGBTQ propaganda and you idiots eat it up.

[Voltaire 5,203]

 

24 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

It's not a group of gays, it's one woman, who might be gay, I don't know, but she pushes alt right anti LGBTQ propaganda and you idiots eat it up.

Don't you read your own link you gullible mindless retard? My God, you're stupid.

It says two people responsible are both are gay, are both as is advertised in the name they chose for their organization. Of course, they bury that info at bottom of the article because they don't want people to realize that their whole article is a hit piece.

Oh my goodness, a politically active lesbian and gay man got together and created a group called Gays against Groomers. What is your sick perverted-brained point?

[edjr 6,578]

49 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Gays can't be conservative?

 

Wide stance?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

15 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

 

Don't you read your own link you gullible mindless retard? My God, you're stupid.

It says two people responsible are both are gay, are both as is advertised in the name they chose for their organization. Of course, they bury that info at bottom of the article because they don't want people to realize that their whole article is a hit piece.

Oh my goodness, a politically active lesbian and gay man got together and created a group called Gays against Groomers. What is your sick perverted-brained point?

Sorry to crush another one of your sources of information 

[Voltaire 5,203]

9 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Sorry to crush another one of your sources of information 

I'm not the one who linked to a pointless Media Matters hit piece, that you didn't even read, and proves with 100% certainty that Gays Against Groomers really is gay group and that this gay group really is against groomers.

Sorry to crush another one of your sources of information.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

4 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

I'm not the one who linked to a pointless Media Matters hit piece, that you didn't even read, and proves with 100% certainty that Gays Against Groomers really is gay group and that this gay group really is against groomers.

Sorry to crush another one of your sources of information.

How about wikipedia?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gays_Against_Groomers?wprov=sfla1

I know, attack any source that you disagree with.  Right out of the playbook.

In both articles, it points out that the "group" was started by one person and she clearly spreads anti gay hatred.

[jerryskids 6,576]

9 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

How about wikipedia?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gays_Against_Groomers?wprov=sfla1

I know, attack any source that you disagree with.  Right out of the playbook.

In both articles, it points out that the "group" was started by one person and she clearly spreads anti gay hatred.

She is gay, according to your own sources.  From your Wiki link:

Quote

Media Matters for America reported her personal Instagram account branded herself as an outspoken right-wing lesbian and pushed anti-trans rhetoric.^[10]

Dave Rubin is gay and clearly opposes the trans grooming movement.

Do you find it implausible that left-wing outfits like Media Matters, The Advocate, and Wiki would slam such a group while burying that they are gay?

[Voltaire 5,203]

4 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

How about wikipedia?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gays_Against_Groomers?wprov=sfla1

I know, attack any source that you disagree with.  Right out of the playbook.

In both articles, it points out that the "group" was started by one person and she clearly spreads anti gay hatred.

She's a lesbian. Your first link says the board contains herself, her lesbian fiancé, and a gay man named Leatherwood (at least these three members). Then your second says GaG has regional leaders naming the ones in Arizona and SE Florida indicating that it is indeed a national organization.  

They also have a spinoff for transgenders against groomers, not surprising as we've discussed trannies who come out in opposition to grooming and don't want to be linked in with the groomers.

Neither link quotes them as saying anything disturbing by the way. They do use the word "groomer" a lot, presumably directed at groomers but possibly also at people like you who support grooming.

[Voltaire 5,203]

If anyone want to know what they believe, in their own words, I found their website. https://www.gaysagainstgroomers.com/

 

Gays Against Groomers is a 501(c)4 organization of gay people who oppose the recent trend of indoctrinating, sexualizing and medicalizing children under the guise of “LGBTQIA+”

Our community that once preached love and acceptance of others has been hijacked by radical activists who are now pushing extreme concepts onto society, specifically targeting children in recent years.

 

The overwhelming majority of gay people are against what the community has transformed into, and we do not accept the political movement pushing their agenda in our name.

 

Gays Against Groomers directly opposes the sexualization and indoctrination of children. This includes drag queen story hours, drag shows involving children, the transitioning and medicalization of minors, and gender theory being taught in the classroom.

 

The activists, backed by school boards, government, woke media, and corporations, have been speaking on our behalf for too long. When fighting for equality, our goal was to successfully integrate ourselves into society, but now these radicals aim to restructure it entirely in order to accommodate a fringe minority, as well as seek to indoctrinate children into their ideology. 

 

We’re saying NO.  

 

There are millions of gays within the community that want nothing to do with this Alphabet religion and join the fight with parents and concerned people everywhere to protect children. We also aim to return sanity and reclaim the community we once called our own. 

 

The gay community is not a monolith. Those pushing this agenda do not represent or speak for us all, nor do we want to be associated with them in any way. What we are witnessing is mass scale child abuse being perpetrated on an entire generation, and we will no longer sit by and watch it happen.

 

It is going to take those of us from within the community to finally put an end to this insanity, and that's exactly what we're going to do.

[Voltaire 5,203]

1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

It's not a group of gays, it's one woman, who might be gay, I don't know, but she pushes alt right anti LGBTQ propaganda and you idiots eat it up.

https://www.gaysagainstgroomers.com/about

I count 21 regional directors from around the country. Also, the woman is absolutely a lesbian, which anyone who read the links that you provided, would surely know.

Don't you find it incredible how stupid beyond stupid some people are? I do.

[dogcows 1,030]

48 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

If anyone want to know what they believe, in their own words, I found their website. https://www.gaysagainstgroomers.com/

Wait, the group’s own website paints them in the most positive light possible? You don’t say!

Try digging a bit.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230226020700/https://abc7ny.com/nyc-ny-councilmember-vandalism-erik-boettcher-drag-queen-story-hour/12591944/

https://web.archive.org/web/20230207220034/https://www.advocate.com/news/2022/11/23/gays-against-groomers-founder-blames-gender-affirming-care-club-q-massacre

Here’s the company Jaimee Michell worked for when she started the group:

https://www.mediamatters.org/qanon-conspiracy-theory/grifter-gays-how-conspiracy-theorists-and-right-wing-operatives-created

Quote

In May 2022, Michell started a new job at X Strategies, a right-wing social media communications firm that promises its conservative clientele the ability to “create, shift, and control narratives.” The firm, co-founded and led by Bruesewitz, was previously implicated in a scheme involving paying online influencers as young as 14 years old to run ads for Trump insiders, including the campaign’s “Election Defense Fund.” 
 

Using 14-year old kids to promote your agenda? Leave the kids alone…

They have been roundly condemned by almost everybody for their hateful rhetoric, and harassment of people. Disgusting behavior. But of course they seem nice on their own website. Duh.

[Voltaire 5,203]

7 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Wait, the group’s own website paints them in the most positive light possible? You don’t say!

Try digging a bit.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230226020700/https://abc7ny.com/nyc-ny-councilmember-vandalism-erik-boettcher-drag-queen-story-hour/12591944/

https://web.archive.org/web/20230207220034/https://www.advocate.com/news/2022/11/23/gays-against-groomers-founder-blames-gender-affirming-care-club-q-massacre

Here’s the company Jaimee Michell worked for when she started the group:

https://www.mediamatters.org/qanon-conspiracy-theory/grifter-gays-how-conspiracy-theorists-and-right-wing-operatives-created

Using 14-year old kids to promote your agenda? Leave the kids alone…

They have been roundly condemned by almost everybody for their hateful rhetoric, and harassment of people. Disgusting behavior. But of course they seem nice on their own website. Duh.

They are presented in a positive light on their own website while being roundly condemned by detractors on the left. This is no surprise.

Anyway, if you want to know what a group says, you have to listen to them in their own words, while their detractors perspective is important for balance/interpretation.

The first link is a protest this group against drag queen story hour where the protestors (not her, the NY branch) got arrested for going into the politician's apartment building lobby. For the record, when leftoid fanatics protested at Jenny Dirtcan's and Ted Wheeler's homes, I found it juicily hilarious and well deserved. But then, months later, when they did so at Justice Kavanaugh's home, not so much.  So my thinking had to kind of evolve since I realize the double-standard of laughing at home protests against mayors I despise but then being pissed/afraid when it happens to justices I like. You know, I have to be consistent. Consequently, I would not support taking a protest to a NYC Councilmember's home. 

 

The second is their spin of what she said in a Tucker Carlson appearance that is linked here: https://cdn.jwplayer.com/previews/lLM1PWVL So you can compare what was said and what was allegedly said. She says that not all gays are in favor of kiddie porn or sexualizing kids, only the activists. She says "being anti- child sexualization and multination is not anti-gay or LGBTQ but what IS anti-LGBTQ and anti-gay is saying all gays support this." She goes on to say that when the groomers and pedos associate with and lump themselves in with the greater gay community, it is not just insulting but also dangerous. When people conflate the gay community with pedos and groomers things like the Colorado shooting happen. 

This goes with what the drag queen we discussed in the other thread was saying about warning parents to keep their kids away from their events and these events should be adults only. The LGBTQ community is not a monolith. There are voices of sanity inside the gay, trans, and drag queen communities that are against presenting adult content to kids, against sexualizing children, and against sex change surgery. And frankly, that's quite refreshing.

Then the third link is just a character assassination smear which Media Matters does, and not very well. Oh no, some gays are conservative and don't support everything the activists want to do to kids. Free thinking is terrible! Get with the program!

 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

7 hours ago, jerryskids said:

She is gay, according to your own sources.  From your Wiki link:

Dave Rubin is gay and clearly opposes the trans grooming movement.

Do you find it implausible that left-wing outfits like Media Matters, The Advocate, and Wiki would slam such a group while burying that they are gay?

All the reporting is she is gay, so we must assume she is, even though it's odd that a self hating gay would do this.

My point still stands, this is not a grass roots organization formed by a bunch of gays standing up to "grooming", that's all a lie, it was one chick who is grifting and has a history of anti gay, pro maga, pro qanon, pro oppression behavior.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

6 hours ago, Voltaire said:

https://www.gaysagainstgroomers.com/about

I count 21 regional directors from around the country. Also, the woman is absolutely a lesbian, which anyone who read the links that you provided, would surely know.

Don't you find it incredible how stupid beyond stupid some people are? I do.

You can't count.

Also the link you provided says they have millions of members, but then it also says they have over 90.

Yes, people are stupid, I agree.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

5 hours ago, Voltaire said:

 

 She says that not all gays are in favor of kiddie porn or sexualizing kids, only the activists.

When people conflate the gay community with pedos and groomers things like the Colorado shooting happen. 

The irony here is hilarious.

The number of gays that are in favor of kiddie porn are very small, but what she is doing is saying that it's large, thus pushing violence against gays.

We all know that the biggest threat to children is not the gay community, it's heterosexual adult white males in positions of power (cops, teachers, church leaders) and close family members.  These are the people abusing our kids, not some random dude wearing dresses.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,959]

Gutterboy thinks 13 year olds should be able to have sex change operations.  

[GutterBoy 2,898]

1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Gutterboy thinks 13 year olds should be able to have sex change operations.  

No I don't.  Would you focking grow up and stop acting like a complete ass hole for once in your life.