Sound of Freedom

[RogerDodger 797]

6 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Crazy huh?

LEAVE THE KIDS ALONE!

No kids were harmed, taken to tranny shows, given hormones or castrated during the making of this movie.   The movie is rated PG-13

Thanks for your concern.  

[seafoam1 2,904]

1 minute ago, RogerDodger said:

No kids were harmed, taken to tranny shows, given hormones or castrated during the making of this movie.   The movie is rated PG-13

Thanks for your concern.  

I'm convinced.guttermutt is weepaw level damaged. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

17 minutes ago, TK0001 said:

I could produce another twenty or so hit pieces on the movie, but hopefully you see the point.

They're all critical of the movie and the people behind the movie, sure.  I wouldn't call them "hit pieces", but whatever.  All movies have critics.

If you think this is a coordinated effort to get people not to watch the movie, then OK.

I'll ask, why is the media coordinating to supress people from watching the movie?

[RogerDodger 797]

33 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

 

I was looking for it and it wasn't there.  The only thing close to being political in the movie is that they refer to the kids as God's children (twice).  And the girl has a Saint Timothy charm necklace, coincidentally, as our hero is named Tim.  I suppose that could come across as conservative. 

That's it.  

Other than that the plot is about an agent of Homeland Security who gets tired of just busting the Pedos here in the US, by electronic surveillance, and decides to actually go rescue the kid that the pedo was uploading content on.  When he catches the kid while being smuggled across the border, he learns that he has a sister that was abducted at the same time. So our hero goes down to Columbia to rescue a bunch more kids.

We can argue whether the real-life Tim Ballard, founder of Operation Underground Railroad, ever did something like the character with the same name in the movie did making it “based on a true story” or not.  But, that’s a red herring @GutterBoygrasped onto.  The point of the film is a feel good hero movie that decent people in the world should be taking drastic actions to help these kids. 

And I like Bill Camp, he's got a supporting actor roll that fits him perfectly.  

[GutterBoy 2,898]

21 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

College students are kids now? No, they aren’t. So moving along after another expected failure everyone saw coming, you can Stfu about caring about the well being of children. Fraud. 

Nice try but you said you wished that my kids get raped.  At the time I only had 1 in college.  You're trash.

[RogerDodger 797]

7 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

They're all critical of the movie and the people behind the movie, sure.  I wouldn't call them "hit pieces", but whatever.  All movies have critics.

If you think this is a coordinated effort to get people not to watch the movie, then OK.

I'll ask, why is the media coordinating to supress people from watching the movie?

BonusBoy wouldn't call an article with the title "Sound Of Freedom’ Is a Superhero Movie for Dads With Brainworms" a hit piece.  

Stuff like this is why nobody takes you seriously.  

[TK0001 99]

3 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

They're all critical of the movie and the people behind the movie, sure.  I wouldn't call them "hit pieces", but whatever.  All movies have critics.

If you think this is a coordinated effort to get people not to watch the movie, then OK.

I'll ask, why is the media coordinating to supress people from watching the movie?

You wouldn't call an article with title "‘Sound Of Freedom’ Is a Superhero Movie for Dads With Brainworms" a hit piece?

Come on, man. I feel a lot of selective blindness here.

Why are they coordinating to suppress people from watching the movie? Why do you think? Maybe because "they" would rather the public be kept in the dark about what's really happening? And the most fashionable and efficient way to do that these days is to slap a "QAnon" label on it and write endless articles about how it's all wackadoo conspiracy theories and you're crazy to believe it. Then they work overtime to cancel anyone involved. It's the exact same playbook they used during COVID. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

2 minutes ago, TK0001 said:

You wouldn't call an article with title "‘Sound Of Freedom’ Is a Superhero Movie for Dads With Brainworms" a hit piece?

Come on, man. I feel a lot of selective blindness here.

Why are they coordinating to suppress people from watching the movie? Why do you think? Maybe because "they" would rather the public be kept in the dark about what's really happening? And the most fashionable and efficient way to do that these days is to slap a "QAnon" label on it and write endless articles about how it's all wackadoo conspiracy theories and you're crazy to believe it. Then they work overtime to cancel anyone involved. It's the exact same playbook they used during COVID. 

So basically you think the media supports child trafficking?

[TK0001 99]

9 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Nice try but you said you wished that my kids get raped.  At the time I only had 1 in college.  You're trash.

Damn. Starting to think HT is not a real nice person...

[RogerDodger 797]

8 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

I'll ask, why is the media coordinating to supress people from watching the movie?

Same reason they were suddenly anti-border wall when Trump made it a priority to campaign on.  I mean lot more border wall was built under Obama than Trump ever proposed.

You would think that stopping child sex trafficking would be bi-partisan.  Guess not.  

[TK0001 99]

Just now, GutterBoy said:

So basically you think the media supports child trafficking?

I believe the MSM supports whatever agenda it's told to support. You do remember 2019-2022, don't you?

[League Champion 1,909]

4 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

So basically you think the media supports child trafficking?

The Democrats are mixed up in a big old Epstein, who done it. The President himself is a kid toucher We can go on forever. 

Of course there's a hush campaign. 

STUPID!! 

 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

9 minutes ago, TK0001 said:

I believe the MSM supports whatever agenda it's told to support. You do remember 2019-2022, don't you?

Barely, but yeah.

You controls the MSM?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

5 minutes ago, League Champion said:

The Democrats are mixed up in a big old Epstein, who done it. The President himself is a kid toucher We can go on forever. 

Of course there's a hush campaign. 

STUPID!! 

 

 

11 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

Same reason they were suddenly anti-border wall when Trump made it a priority to campaign on.  I mean lot more border wall was built under Obama than Trump ever proposed.

You would think that stopping child sex trafficking would be bi-partisan.  Guess not.  

Be quiet, the adults are talking.

[TK0001 99]

Just now, GutterBoy said:

Barely, but yeah.

You controls the MSM?

No, I don't.

Do you believe all media companies are completely independent and arrive at their own biased conclusions without the input from outside influential sources?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

Just now, TK0001 said:

No, I don't.

Do you believe all media companies are completely independent and arrive at their own biased conclusions without the input from outside influential sources?

Meant "who" :damn you:

No they're not all independent, they all have biases.

I just don't believe there is a secret group of pedos that are trying to suppress child trafficking movies.

[League Champion 1,909]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

Meant "who" :damn you:

TRIGGERED

[BuckSwope 654]

1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

Let's also dismiss people that wish rape on kids.  if you wish rape on a kid, you obviously don't give a sh1t about kids.

Probably can also dismiss people who openly admit they don't care about the child trafficking south of the border as well.  

[seafoam1 2,904]

5 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Probably can also dismiss people who openly admit they don't care about the child trafficking south of the border as well.  

In past our border I think you mean. 

[TK0001 99]

1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

No they're not all independent, they all have biases.

I just don't believe there is a secret group of pedos that are trying to suppress child trafficking movies.

If they're not independent, then they must be affiliated with something. What would that something be? 

Do you think they partner together, or is there a group above them that drives the narrative (Russiagate, lockdowns, mandates, etc)?

[TK0001 99]

Gotta run, hope to pick this back up tomorrow some time. 

Much love, Gut. You know you my boy. Civilized debate is where it's at.

[RogerDodger 797]

Musk revealed the influence our government had on social media.  You're naïve if you think stuff like that is limited to just the social arm of media. 

And before tiny brain says it, no that doesn't necessarily mean there is a big pedo ring inside our government.  It's because the right has latched onto child trafficking as a core issue.  Just like the border wall the left has to be anti everything right.  

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

3 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

They're all critical of the movie and the people behind the movie, sure.  I wouldn't call them "hit pieces", but whatever.  All movies have critics.

If you think this is a coordinated effort to get people not to watch the movie, then OK.

I'll ask, why is the media coordinating to supress people from watching the movie?

 

 

Gutterboy, you mentioned you were a parent in a few threads months ago.  

Given that you are being intentionally obtuse in this thread, I genuinely feel sorry for your children. You sold them out to "Defend The Tribe" 

They've become your own personal "Isaac" so you can come heel and bend the knee to your partisanship. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,211]

Gutterboy thinks it’s ok to castrate a young boy. His betters told him it was. He followed.  Real Tim too. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

1 hour ago, TK0001 said:

Gotta run, hope to pick this back up tomorrow some time. 

Much love, Gut. You know you my boy. Civilized debate is where it's at.

Same here bro.  Civilized debate around here is hard to come by with all these ass holes.

[Sagging Scrot 44]

33 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Gutterboy thinks it’s ok to castrate a young boy. His betters told him it was. He followed.  Real Tim too. 

What a sick fock.  No wonder he's trying to stop people from watching this movie.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

@TK0001

 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

@TK0001

 

[TimHauck 2,713]

12 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

He's already on record that he streams content illegally.  Alleged richest guy here, steals media.

 

12 hours ago, BuckSwope said:

A cause SO important he can't spare a few bucks to help the people out by buying a ticket to their movie? 

 

 

I’m surprised he hasn’t shared his study from the last time this came up that claims people that watch pirated content actually spend the most money on it or some sh1t

[TimHauck 2,713]

On 7/25/2023 at 5:45 PM, Hawkeye21 said:

I thought these were some interesting questions.

 

He’s watched thousands of hours of child porn?  Gross.  Weird the GC doesn’t care about that but they will accuse schoolteachers of being pedos…

[TK0001 99]

12 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

@TK0001

 

What am I looking at here? I don't know this Jim Stewartson, but "anti-disinfo" and "activist" and the Ukranian flag in his handle give me a pretty good idea of his character right off the bat. I love when people pronounce themselves as fighters of "disinformation", as if only they know what real truth is.

Last we left off, you were saying you don't believe there's a secret society controlling the media. On that I disagree. I think it's quite clear the media is doing the bidding of the people who control it, who wish to control the narrative. That video that circulated a few years back proves it to be fact. All the local news stations owned by Sinclair, all producing the same segment in which the talking heads recited the same script.

[RogerDodger 797]

12 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

@TK0001

 

You found some nut jobs on twitter.  Nice work.

[League Champion 1,909]

3 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

You found some nut jobs on twitter.  Nice work.

Snowflakes gonna Snowflake

[GutterBoy 2,898]

8 minutes ago, TK0001 said:

What am I looking at here? I don't know this Jim Stewartson, but "anti-disinfo" and "activist" and the Ukranian flag in his handle give me a pretty good idea of his character right off the bat. I love when people pronounce themselves as fighters of "disinformation", as if only they know what real truth is.

Last we left off, you were saying you don't believe there's a secret society controlling the media. On that I disagree. I think it's quite clear the media is doing the bidding of the people who control it, who wish to control the narrative. That video that circulated a few years back proves it to be fact. All the local news stations owned by Sinclair, all producing the same segment in which the talking heads recited the same script.

I was providing those tweets as a different opinion that you might find interesting.  If you're going to dismiss it based on a flag, well ok, but I believe you were just saying how we shouldn't automatically dismiss people because they are Qanon.

Secret society controlling the media?  We'll have to agree to disagree here.  The Sinclair video?  That is one media conglomerate operating many local affiliates.  They're all owned by the same company, so they all push the same narrative.  It's not the illuminati controling hundreds of individual entities.  Make sense?

[TimHauck 2,713]

Imagine the awareness it would bring to the cause if Tim Ballard were arrested on child porn charges.  Do you agree righties?

[League Champion 1,909]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Imagine the awareness it would bring to the cause if Tim Ballard were arrested on child porn charges.  Do you agree righties?

I'm all for killing all of them regardless of party affiliation. You won't hear that from many Libs because it's obviously a major problem in the Lib community. 

[TimHauck 2,713]

7 minutes ago, League Champion said:

I'm all for killing all of them regardless of party affiliation. You won't hear that from many Libs because it's obviously a major problem in the Lib community. 

And yet there hasn’t been a single comment in 2+ days from righties addressing Ballard’s admission to watching thousands of hours of illegal child sexual assault material.    Several commented shortly after saying that all pedos are liberals though.  Is Ballard a liberal?

[League Champion 1,909]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

yet there hasn’t been a single comment in 2+ days from righties addressing Ballard’s admission to watching thousands of hours of illegal child sexual assault material

He's a piece of shizz and deserves to die IMO. I can't speak for everyone but I can't be more blunt than that. 

[RogerDodger 797]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

And yet there hasn’t been a single comment in 2+ days from righties addressing Ballard’s admission to watching thousands of hours of illegal child sexual assault material.    Several commented shortly after saying that all pedos are liberals though.  Is Ballard a liberal?

 

2 minutes ago, League Champion said:

He's a piece of shizz and deserves to die IMO. I can't speak for everyone but I can't be more blunt than that. 

That's actually addressed in the movie.  The movie character Tim Ballard has to watch all the video evidence as part of his job with Homeland Security.  You know, the evidence to identify all the children and pedos and the crimes the pedos committed.  It causes some real internal struggles for him as he has a family with a bunch of children and it affects his home life and psyche.  

I'd prefer we find out that the real life Tim Ballard is a genuine guy that has been trying to help these kids, like the movie.  To find out he's a pedo problem on top of the existing sex trafficking would be much worse, the exact opposite of "awesome".  But that's just me.  

 

[TK0001 99]

10 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

I was providing those tweets as a different opinion that you might find interesting.  If you're going to dismiss it based on a flag, well ok, but I believe you were just saying how we shouldn't automatically dismiss people because they are Qanon.

I never said anything about "dismissing people because they are Qanon". I don't know who is or who isn't, and I don't care. I asked why do we dismiss certain allegations simply because they are associated with Qanon. All this rushing to categorize things is an effort to throw them out with the bathwater. If the harvesting of child blood is actually happening and we're just slapping a Qanon label on it to turn our backs to it, that's a horrible thing. I think that's dangerous, and it's also a very common tactic. Ross Perot said "you people" and was summarily shuffled off into oblivion because he was immediately connected to the KKK because of it.

"They" are clearly trying very hard to slap a Qanon label on this movie in order to dismiss it. I think that's telling, revealing it to be an actual threat.