Not like it used to be

[seafoam1 2,799]

1 hour ago, BunnysBastatrds said:

 Not even close man. Look harder. 

I'm spot on.

[listen2me 23 1,825]

8 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

League Champion is rather amusing in his fervent political posting, but seachode is just a painfully unfunny and unoriginal waste of bandwidth. 

It is amazing and hilarious that grown men can't just ignore a poster.  Or hell even put him on ignore.  Instead get in slap fights with posters they deem a waste of time.  

Pathetic yet hilarious to me. Some of you have no self control.  

This thread is full of funny.  Gutter complaining about political BS yet partakes in political slap fights on the daily all day.  One of the biggest participants in political slap fighting.  

[WatsonRules 46]

5 hours ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

A way to "improve" the forum is to create thread topics that actually invest in this community. 

I appreciate that @BunnysBastatrds started a Chain Restaurant Draft and supported that. He organized it, recruited for it and executed on his promise to do it. I can respect the effort. I've started 75 thread topics since I've gotten here in the GC. People can agree or disagree with my viewpoints, but none of my threads are cheap. I make it a point to support my own threads. And I can handle myself just fine if someone wants to come at me. Also it should be clear that I'm not any "alias" of any kind. No one posts like I do, no one. 

Instead of complaining what other people aren't giving you, go do something about it. 

Do you want to see change? Then set an example. Show people what good thread topics that enrich this community look like. And I'm not telling anyone here to do anything that I'm not doing right now, on my own, already. 

And your previous thread likely got deleted because inside of it with some replies, it involved some people holding timschochet's feet to the fire for his routine gaslighting BS. Of course he was going to get squistion or Sho Nuff to use one of their aliases or one of his own to Report Button you. 

Speaking up means zero unless you also choose to step up.  And I can say that here. Even though I'm new, I've earned that here. I'm not just saying it, I'm also doing it. 

This is the part where you try to gaslight everyone by saying how little you care, and then you'll ignore the part where if that was true, why are you even complaining in the first place? 

Gaslighting? On the Geek Bored?

 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

6 hours ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

A way to "improve" the forum is to create thread topics that actually invest in this community. 

I appreciate that @BunnysBastatrds started a Chain Restaurant Draft and supported that. He organized it, recruited for it and executed on his promise to do it. I can respect the effort. I've started 75 thread topics since I've gotten here in the GC. People can agree or disagree with my viewpoints, but none of my threads are cheap. I make it a point to support my own threads. And I can handle myself just fine if someone wants to come at me. Also it should be clear that I'm not any "alias" of any kind. No one posts like I do, no one. 

Instead of complaining what other people aren't giving you, go do something about it. 

Do you want to see change? Then set an example. Show people what good thread topics that enrich this community look like. And I'm not telling anyone here to do anything that I'm not doing right now, on my own, already. 

And your previous thread likely got deleted because inside of it with some replies, it involved some people holding timschochet's feet to the fire for his routine gaslighting BS. Of course he was going to get squistion or Sho Nuff to use one of their aliases or one of his own to Report Button you. 

Speaking up means zero unless you also choose to step up.  And I can say that here. Even though I'm new, I've earned that here. I'm not just saying it, I'm also doing it. 

This is the part where you try to gaslight everyone by saying how little you care, and then you'll ignore the part where if that was true, why are you even complaining in the first place? 

If we're being honest here, your posting is bad for several reasons, the least of which is the content.  But primarily you're bad because your posts are WAY too long.  Very very few people here bother to even read your posts.  They are usually copy and paste articles with horrific formatting and mix of fonts, then you throw a bunch of youtube videos in there that nobody watches.  You'd be better served to just post your own thoughts in a concise manner.

also, people these days overuse the term gaslighting these days

 

[RogerDodger 797]

19 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

If we're being honest here, your posting is bad for several reasons, the least of which is the content.  But primarily you're bad because your posts are WAY too long.  Very very few people here bother to even read your posts.  They are usually copy and paste articles with horrific formatting and mix of fonts, then you throw a bunch of youtube videos in there that nobody watches.  You'd be better served to just post your own thoughts in a concise manner.

also, people these days overuse the term gaslighting these days

 

His posts are bad because you have reading problems. 

[WatsonRules 46]

49 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

If we're being honest here, your posting is bad for several reasons, the least of which is the content.  But primarily you're bad because your posts are WAY too long.  Very very few people here bother to even read your posts.  They are usually copy and paste articles with horrific formatting and mix of fonts, then you throw a bunch of youtube videos in there that nobody watches.  You'd be better served to just post your own thoughts in a concise manner.

also, people these days overuse the term gaslighting these days

 

Gaslighting: to manipulate someone using psychological methods into questioning their own sanity or powers of reasoning.

I think some of the denizens of the Geek Bored don't even understand the term. Sort of like how they don't understand the terms cancel culture or First Amendment.

[seafoam1 2,799]

1 minute ago, WatsonRules said:

Gaslighting: to manipulate someone using psychological methods into questioning their own sanity or powers of reasoning.

I think some of the denizens of the Geek Bored don't even understand the term. Sort of like how they don't understand the terms cancel culture or First Amendment.

watsonpimpledoosh.com 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

My biggest forum issue: the multiple threads on one topic, started by the usual attention wh0res who think they're making up with volume for what they sorely lack in entertainment value. 

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

5 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

If we're being honest here, your posting is bad for several reasons, the least of which is the content.  But primarily you're bad because your posts are WAY too long.  Very very few people here bother to even read your posts.  They are usually copy and paste articles with horrific formatting and mix of fonts, then you throw a bunch of youtube videos in there that nobody watches.  You'd be better served to just post your own thoughts in a concise manner.

also, people these days overuse the term gaslighting these days

 

 

 

I created a thread in late July that's essentially designed for people to complain about my posts and/or thread topics. Call it a functional "grease trap" of sorts. You are welcome to take your complaints there. 

But I'll also address it here. If my thread topics and/or posts are not for you, then there is plenty of other material on the forum you can read and participate in elsewhere. No one is stopping you. 

The kind of world I want to live in includes people who disagree with me. I'm OK if you disagree with me. No problem there. On any issue. But I draw the line on your entitlement in believing you have some say in how I choose to post. For example, I don't tell Wade Garrett he can't post the way he does. I'll just archive it in public in the hopes that the site owner will see it, finally get tired of him, then decides to permanently ban him forever. But I can't control that. 

But the same point remains in place - If there are people who want to see a certain kind of posting style or format or topic choice, then nothing is stopping them from setting an example in their own behavior and for them to create the kind of thread topics in the Geek Club that they would like to see regularly. 

Again, I'm doing that myself now. I'm posting in a way and manner that I would enjoy if others chose to participate that way. But I can't control if they do or don't. Though actually taking some kind of action here, on my part, IMHO, is 1000 times more effective than what I see you and the OP doing here, which is endless complaining about what everyone else is not giving you. Give it to yourself. 

“I’d always end up broken down on the highway. When I stood there trying to flag someone down, nobody stopped. But when I pushed my own car, other drivers would get out and push with me. If you want help, help yourself – people like to see that.” — Chris Rock

[WatsonRules 46]

Just now, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

 

I created a thread in late July that's essentially designed for people to complain about my posts and/or thread topics. Call it a functional "grease trap" of sorts. You are welcome to take your complaints there. 

But I'll also address it here. If my thread topics and/or posts are not for you, then there is plenty of other material on the forum you can read and participate in elsewhere. No one is stopping you. 

The kind of world I want to live in includes people who disagree with me. I'm OK if you disagree with me. No problem there. On any issue. But I draw the line on your entitlement in believing you have some say in how I choose to post. For example, I don't tell Wade Garrett he can't post the way he does. I'll just archive it in public in the hopes that the site owner will see it, finally get tired of him, then decides to permanently ban him forever. But I can't control that. 

But the same point remains in place - If there are people who want to see a certain kind of posting style or format or topic choice, then nothing is stopping them from setting an example in their own behavior and for them to create the kind of thread topics in the Geek Club that they would like to see regularly. 

Again, I'm doing that myself now. I'm posting in a way and manner that I would enjoy if others chose to participate that way. But I can't control if they do or don't. Though actually taking some kind of action here, on my part, IMHO, is 1000 times more effective than what I see you and the OP doing here, which is endless complaining about what everyone else is not giving you. Give it to yourself. 

“I’d always end up broken down on the highway. When I stood there trying to flag someone down, nobody stopped. But when I pushed my own car, other drivers would get out and push with me. If you want help, help yourself – people like to see that.” — Chris Rock

Endlessly complaining? I have less than 100 posts, man!

 

[MDC 7,124]

The biggest difference today is there are at least 3 right wing losers who spam the forearm with repetitive threads and sissy slapfighting 24/7/365. 

[RLLD 4,143]

20 hours ago, WatsonRules said:

Not from FBG. Permabanned here years ago, came back a few months ago to check things out.

 

It still sucks, only worse.

Drobs? 

[WatsonRules 46]

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Drobs? 

Is my posting style like drobeski's?

[seafoam1 2,799]

4 minutes ago, WatsonRules said:

Is my posting style like drobeski's?

pimpledoosh.

[RLLD 4,143]

5 minutes ago, WatsonRules said:

Is my posting style like drobeski's?

  

[Strike 5,185]

24 minutes ago, WatsonRules said:

Is my posting style like drobeski's?

If you were Drob you would be winning threads but that hasn't happened.

[WatsonRules 46]

Just now, Strike said:

If you were Drob you would be winning threads but that hasn't happened.

It never really happened with drobs, either.

Sorry.