How the fock do Tee Higgens and Drake London get...

[seafoam1 2,805]

...0.00 points each? 

It's mind boggling.

[polecatt 474]

Joe Burrow apparently got paid and decided to take the week off

[IGotWorms 4,057]

Desmond Ridder is not great.

Not sure what the issue was with the bengals  

[seafoam1 2,805]

3 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

...0.00 points each? 

It's mind boggling.

London got 1 target

Higgins got 8 with no catches 

Holy hell. 

[polecatt 474]

1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

London got 1 target

Higgins got 8 with no catches 

Holy hell. 

I don't see Ridder throwing it down the field to the outside very much

[Gepetto 1,291]

23 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Desmond Ridder is not great.

Not sure what the issue was with the bengals  

Rain and Browns Defense I guess. Maybe the dawg pound affected him mentally, just kidding. I like Burrow. He should bounce back.

[seafoam1 2,805]

17 minutes ago, polecatt said:

I don't see Ridder throwing it down the field to the outside very much

Must be a change of coaching approach. He peppered London last year in his 4 games or so. Crazy. And I sat Zay Flowers for him. Oh well. 

But Higgins? 0 for 8? I wish I saw the game. 

[WhiteWonder 2,681]

35 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

...0.00 points each? 

It's mind boggling.

London plays in a poor passing offense shouldn’t be a complete shock there 

[polecatt 474]

16 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Must be a change of coaching approach. He peppered London last year in his 4 games or so. Crazy. And I sat Zay Flowers for him. Oh well. 

But Higgins? 0 for 8? I wish I saw the game. 

Ridder targeted Mack Hollins more. From what I saw, it was on inside routes.

He also targeted the RBs and Kyle Pitts. Drake on the outside, just once.

I don't know that's just a coincidence, but worth noting

[Nomad99 700]

49 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

...0.00 points each? 

It's mind boggling.

Same boat + Sky Moore.......and Akers with 1pt so far.

[seafoam1 2,805]

1 hour ago, WhiteWonder said:

London plays in a poor passing offense shouldn’t be a complete shock there 

Last year in his rookie year he had 72 receptions. Oh my God, it's not shocking a number one receiver in year two has zero receptions on 1 target!!

[seafoam1 2,805]

56 minutes ago, Nomad99 said:

Same boat + Sky Moore.......and Akers with 1pt so far.

I played Skyy Moore in another league. 

[Nomad99 700]

43 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

I played Skyy Moore in another league. 

Zay Flowers & Sutton on my bench.

[WhiteWonder 2,681]

1 hour ago, seafoam1 said:

Last year in his rookie year he had 72 receptions. Oh my God, it's not shocking a number one receiver in year two has zero receptions on 1 target!!

I didn’t say it was expected but Desmond Ridder is the QB on a team that drafted Bijan and still deploys Allgeier. Run heavy scheme. 

London is someone you should have been anticipating to be boom/bust. 
 

hth

[Ray_T 740]

5 hours ago, WhiteWonder said:

London plays in a poor passing offense shouldn’t be a complete shock there 

I avoided him for this reason.

but I still would have expected better than THIS.

all I can say is I am very glad I dont have him on any of my fantasy teams

[weepaws 3,157]

Didn’t target London at all.  Saw no upside  this season from last.   

[Ray_T 740]

3 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Didn’t target London at all.  Saw no upside  this season from last.   

no the conditions that hinder his production (the guy throwing him the ball)  has not changed.   he hasnt improved and he hasnt been replaced.

until one of those things happens, London will remain in purgatory despite his high talent level.

[weepaws 3,157]

Pitts I think  has more upside with the Qb they have at the helm.  

[LaChup 229]

I agree. Pitts would be a much better than the QB they have right now. They don't call him "Arm" Pitts for nothing.

[JagFan 149]

I watched the Atlanta game (it was the only game on here) and they didn’t need to throw much at all.  The running, and short passing game was working very well.