Hunter Biden indicted on nine tax charges, adding to gun charges in special counsel probe

[RLLD 4,191]

Department Of Justice Acknowledges Hunter Biden Laptop Content Is Legitimate For First Time

Quote

In a Tuesday court filing from DOJ prosecutors, which came in response to Biden’s request to have his federal firearm charges dismissed, investigators acknowledge the legitimacy of data found on Biden’s laptop prior to the 2020 election. The court filings described how IRS and FBI investigators had obtained a search warrant for tax violations on Biden, leading them to “various” backup data accounts.

 

Are we to believe then.....that they did not know until just recently.....or are we to believe that they knew right away?     Translated.......are they inept or corrupt?

 

[seafoam1 2,909]

12 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Department Of Justice Acknowledges Hunter Biden Laptop Content Is Legitimate For First Time

 

Are we to believe then.....that they did not know until just recently.....or are we to believe that they knew right away?     Translated.......are they inept or corrupt?

 

They were too busy helping get the word out that the riots of 2020 were very important mostly peaceful quality protesting events with no threats to the public or private sectors to pay attention to such low level tax and firearm thingies and words on a little computer. It had to wait in the name of justice needing to be doled out for the unfortunate death of a serial criminal. 

[RLLD 4,191]

29 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

They were too busy helping get the word out that the riots of 2020 were very important mostly peaceful quality protesting events with no threats to the public or private sectors to pay attention to such low level tax and firearm thingies and words on a little computer. It had to wait in the name of justice needing to be doled out for the unfortunate death of a serial criminal. 

They were too busy working to protect Joe Biden, instead of the people of the nation.

[Horseman 2,438]

And so it follows that yes, the election was stolen.

The fruit loops here will still say it's not his laptop.   

[Hardcore troubadour 15,212]

So is Anthony Blinken, who orchestrated the whole “russian plant” hoax, who was then rewarded with SOS going to be held accountable? He won’t be for his piss poor performance at his job. No one in this Admin is.  

[thegeneral 3,099]

How’s the impeachment coming fellas? They got this important inquiry started then took vacay for a month. Been back to work for a couple weeks now.

Updates?!?

[Strike 5,374]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

How’s the impeachment coming fellas? They got this important inquiry started then took vacay for a month. Been back to work for a couple weeks now.

Updates?!?

 

Hopefully they're being very strategic and will file the impeachment charges just in time for the election.

[thegeneral 3,099]

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

 

Hopefully they're being very strategic and will file the impeachment charges just in time for the election.

Nice to see you acknowledge it’s all a farce

[jonmx 2,425]

51 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Nice to see you acknowledge it’s all a farce

You are such a retard.  

[thegeneral 3,099]

6 minutes ago, jonmx said:

You are such a retard.  

You are just upset your vacations have  been taken away by George Soros. Sorry man!

[jonmx 2,425]

35 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

You are just upset your vacations have  been taken away by George Soros. Sorry man!

No, I just hate dumb bootlickers who cuck up to their masters and give away their freedoms because they lack a spine and brains to know they can take care of themselves.  

That is poetry how perfectly it describes today's leftist cult members.  .  

[thegeneral 3,099]

3 minutes ago, jonmx said:

No, I just hate dumb bootlickers who cuck up to their masters and give away their freedoms because they lack a spine and brains to know they can take care of themselves.  

That is poetry how perfectly it describes today leftists.  

This is like a tinhat Mad Lib

[jonmx 2,425]

6 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

This is like a tinhat Mad Lib

No, unfortunately it is just stupidity on your part.   All the media has to do is to mention any of the trigger words like Trump, white supremists or conspiracy theory and you go to your knees and start eating some authoritarian hairy-ass booty.   

[thegeneral 3,099]

10 minutes ago, jonmx said:

No, unfortunately it is just stupidity on your part.   All the media has to do is to mention any of the trigger words like Trump, white supremists or conspiracy theory and you go to your knees and start eating some authoritarian hairy-ass booty.   

Such an odd world you live in. Might I suggest Bigfoot or Loch Ness as a healthier obsession. Maybe the Chupacabra?

[jonmx 2,425]

1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

Such an odd world you live in. Might I suggest Bigfoot or Loch Ness as a healthier obsession. Maybe the Chupacabra?

 No, I perfer to live in reality.  We have an army of over 4 million highly paid bureaucrats many of whom have expanded their powers and are absing rights of citizens with zero checks to their power.  Only a complete bootlicking dufuss would equate facts to Bigfoot.   So go fuk yourself. 

[RLLD 4,191]

7 hours ago, thegeneral said:

How’s the impeachment coming fellas? They got this important inquiry started then took vacay for a month. Been back to work for a couple weeks now.

Updates?!?

Haven't heard much.  Not expecting much.  The only correlation to the Biden criminal family is an organized crime family.  As when the mafia was running a similar scheme. Even then, when they had all the criminality documented, they still needed to flip at least one member, it is not clear to me just who they could flip here. And given the lavish protections afforded that family from the DOJ, we might have to wait for a new President to make something happen.

[Raven Fan 362]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

Haven't heard much.  Not expecting much.  The only correlation to the Biden criminal family is an organized crime family.  As when the mafia was running a similar scheme. Even then, when they had all the criminality documented, they still needed to flip at least one member, it is not clear to me just who they could flip here. And given the lavish protections afforded that family from the DOJ, we might have to wait for a new President to make something happen.

And yet you're 100% convinced that Biden took money to sell out the US (or some other criminal activity), yet the morons in the House can't even pin anything on Hunter let alone Joe.

This should teach you a lesson about jumping to conclusions with no evidence boyo.  But it won't.

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

37 minutes ago, Raven Fan said:

And yet you're 100% convinced that Biden took money to sell out the US (or some other criminal activity), yet the morons in the House can't even pin anything on Hunter let alone Joe.

This should teach you a lesson about jumping to conclusions with no evidence boyo.  But it won't.

Outside of the bank records, wire transfers, bank transactions, shell LLC’s, texts, emails, WhatsApp messages, tax fraud indictments,  Biden brand, 10% for the big guy, foreign business meetings, FARA violations, no products or services exchanged, whistleblowers, recorded phone calls between Biden & Poroshenko, video of Biden bragging firing the prosecutor, hunters statement he gave dad half his income, They have nothing boyo.

[Raven Fan 362]

11 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Outside of the bank records, wire transfers, bank transactions, shell LLC’s, texts, emails, WhatsApp messages, tax fraud indictments,  Biden brand, 10% for the big guy, foreign business meetings, FARA violations, no products or services exchanged, whistleblowers, recorded phone calls between Biden & Poroshenko, video of Biden bragging firing the prosecutor, hunters statement he gave dad half his income, They have nothing boyo.

Since you moron cultist have all the answers, how come your moron House Rs have been completely unable to actually prove anything boyo?

You could list out the same exact crap for your orange master, but of course that's different, because you're cultist.

Actually prove Biden sold out the US for money and we libs will be jumping up and down to boot his ass.  We're not cultist like you mongrels.  But until then you've got exactly ZIPPY boyo.

Love this for you. 

[RLLD 4,191]

55 minutes ago, Raven Fan said:

And yet you're 100% convinced that Biden took money to sell out the US (or some other criminal activity), yet the morons in the House can't even pin anything on Hunter let alone Joe.

This should teach you a lesson about jumping to conclusions with no evidence boyo.  But it won't.

Of course.   When the evidence is brought forward, you have to have the ability to see it for what it is.  The world is not an episode of Perry Mason, they will have to work to prove the crminality.

Or....would you prefer that criminals are never held to account, and when it appears malfeasance is transpiring, we instead pretend its not?

[Raven Fan 362]

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Of course.   When the evidence is brought forward, you have to have the ability to see it for what it is.  The world is not an episode of Perry Mason, they will have to work to prove the crminality.

Or....would you prefer that criminals are never held to account, and when it appears malfeasance is transpiring, we instead pretend its not?

YOU have declared Biden guilty without seeing a shred of actual evidence.

You sir are a giant hypocrite. 

[RLLD 4,191]

1 minute ago, Raven Fan said:

YOU have declared Biden guilty without seeing a shred of actual evidence.

You sir are a giant hypocrite. 

Of course.  There are plenty of people I feel are likely guilty before the outcome of a trial.  But what "I" think matters little.  What matters is what those pursuing the illegality think.  

For example.  I might think you have committed a crime.  Well, if there is no evidence to suggest then no one should investigate you.....no investigation should transpire without some evidence.  But if in the course of that investigation there is exculpatory evidence, or perhaps it becomes apparent that someone lied about you, they should then stop, correct?

It would be against our values to investigate people unless we think they are guilty, and it is clear based on what has been presented, which is not all of it as well, that these people are likely criminals..... so yeah, I will feel that way until either proven otherwise, or they are found to not be criminal.

This is how our system works 

[thegeneral 3,099]

23 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Outside of the bank records, wire transfers, bank transactions, shell LLC’s, texts, emails, WhatsApp messages, tax fraud indictments,  Biden brand, 10% for the big guy, foreign business meetings, FARA violations, no products or services exchanged, whistleblowers, recorded phone calls between Biden & Poroshenko, video of Biden bragging firing the prosecutor, hunters statement he gave dad half his income, They have nothing boyo.

 

2 hours ago, RLLD said:

Haven't heard much.  Not expecting much.  The only correlation to the Biden criminal family is an organized crime family.  As when the mafia was running a similar scheme. Even then, when they had all the criminality documented, they still needed to flip at least one member, it is not clear to me just who they could flip here. And given the lavish protections afforded that family from the DOJ, we might have to wait for a new President to make something happen.

You two should talk. There are recorded phone calls, videos, and the like. This seems pretty cut and dry. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,212]

1 hour ago, Raven Fan said:

And yet you're 100% convinced that Biden took money to sell out the US (or some other criminal activity), yet the morons in the House can't even pin anything on Hunter let alone Joe.

This should teach you a lesson about jumping to conclusions with no evidence boyo.  But it won't.

Huh? Hunter already plead guilty to crimes. Yeah it was a sweetheart deal, but it got blown up due to the whistleblowers that came forward to congress. Now he’s facing felonies. It was on the news. 

[RLLD 4,191]

Just now, thegeneral said:

 

You two should talk. There are recorded phone calls, videos, and the like. This seems pretty cut and dry. 

To be clear.  There is enough evidence on hand to investigate.  No criminality has yet been proven.  That being said, given that what we see with regard to the Biden's has been observed elsewhere, notably with organized crime.....there is likely some level of malfeasance present.

NOW....to repeat myself, and be perfectly clear (well, to make some effort to stave off the strawman and misuse of my words)..... there is not yet any proof that Biden implemented policy-related actions for the money he was provided.

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,212]

10 minutes ago, Raven Fan said:

YOU have declared Biden guilty without seeing a shred of actual evidence.

You sir are a giant hypocrite. 

doesn’t know the difference between evidence and proof. Continues to flap gums. 

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

54 minutes ago, Raven Fan said:

Since you moron cultist have all the answers, how come your moron House Rs have been completely unable to actually prove anything boyo?

You could list out the same exact crap for your orange master, but of course that's different, because you're cultist.

Actually prove Biden sold out the US for money and we libs will be jumping up and down to boot his ass.  We're not cultist like you mongrels.  But until then you've got exactly ZIPPY boyo.

Love this for you. 

I mean it’s clearly a common occurrence that foreign adversaries give out 10s of millions of dollars for no exchanged goods or service to the crackhead son of a Vice President. Totally legit boyo. 

[thegeneral 3,099]

44 minutes ago, RLLD said:

To be clear.  There is enough evidence on hand to investigate.  No criminality has yet been proven.  That being said, given that what we see with regard to the Biden's has been observed elsewhere, notably with organized crime.....there is likely some level of malfeasance present.

NOW....to repeat myself, and be perfectly clear (well, to make some effort to stave off the strawman and misuse of my words)..... there is not yet any proof that Biden implemented policy-related actions for the money he was provided.

 

@Dizkneelande has recordings of Biden and Ukrainian officials. 

[RLLD 4,191]

9 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

@Dizkneelande has recordings of Biden and Ukrainian officials. 

I have heard that refrain over and over, until they produce them I am not really interested.

I think we have enough whistleblower stuff, bank records and content from the laptop to at least support the investigation.....to an extent....

If it arises.....that they determine a whistleblower was unreliable.....or someone paid some company to setup Biden with false records or ANY other political chicanery, or anything exculpatory is found....and they keep investigating.....I WILL have a problem with that. 

[jerryskids 6,699]

1 hour ago, Raven Fan said:

YOU have declared Biden guilty without seeing a shred of actual evidence.

You sir are a giant hypocrite. 

Seems like once again I need to educate you on the difference between evidence and proof.

There is plenty of evidence.  The question is whether or not it rises to the level of proof.  HTH

[thegeneral 3,099]

Just now, jerryskids said:

Seems like once again I need to educate you on the difference between evidence and proof.

There is plenty of evidence.  The question is whether or not it rises to the level of proof.  HTH

This phone call between Biden and Poroshenko from 2020 that is often referred to as proof of illegal activity.

What would you say to those claims?

[Raven Fan 362]

1 hour ago, Dizkneelande said:

I mean it’s clearly a common occurrence that foreign adversaries give out 10s of millions of dollars for no exchanged goods or service to the crackhead son of a Vice President. Totally legit boyo. 

Is that when all the "mysterious" bank transfers took place boyo?

Or where they AFTER Biden was VP?

Dummy

[Raven Fan 362]

10 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Seems like once again I need to educate you on the difference between evidence and proof.

There is plenty of evidence.  The question is whether or not it rises to the level of proof.  HTH

There is zero "evidence" boyo.

"the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid."

Having bank transfers or talking with people in business IS NOT EVIDENCE.  Not until you can actually link it to wrongdoings.

Then it becomes evidence.

Trump and his stooge kids had the exact same kind of "evidence" for their business dealing with foreign government...well, they were actually bribed by being forced to stay in Trump's tacky motels to get face time with the orange moron.

So actually not the same at all boyo. 

[seafoam1 2,909]

5 minutes ago, Raven Fan said:

There is zero "evidence" boyo.

"the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid."

Having bank transfers or talking with people in business IS NOT EVIDENCE.  Not until you can actually link it to wrongdoings.

Then it becomes evidence.

Trump and his stooge kids had the exact same kind of "evidence" for their business dealing with foreign government...well, they were actually bribed by being forced to stay in Trump's tacky motels to get face time with the orange moron.

So actually not the same at all boyo. 

Why does this version of pimpledoosh keep saying boyo like he's pretending to be in some fictional ghey mob movie set back in the 19050s?

[jerryskids 6,699]

Just now, thegeneral said:

This phone call between Biden and Poroshenko from 2020 that is often referred to as proof of illegal activity.

What would you say to those claims?

It's certainly evidence.  Whether it is proof is for the "courts" to decide.

I think the implications from the prosecution side are clear:  Shokin was investigating Burisma, Biden said he had to go, and he held up the $1B until it happened.  In the call Biden said regarding Shokin's replacement, "“It’s going to be critical for him to work quickly to repair the damage that Shokin did."

I would assert an Occam's Razor claim to what Biden thought "critical" to repair.  What do you think it meant?

[jerryskids 6,699]

8 minutes ago, Raven Fan said:

There is zero "evidence" boyo.

"the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid."

Having bank transfers or talking with people in business IS NOT EVIDENCE.  Not until you can actually link it to wrongdoings.

Then it becomes evidence.

Trump and his stooge kids had the exact same kind of "evidence" for their business dealing with foreign government...well, they were actually bribed by being forced to stay in Trump's tacky motels to get face time with the orange moron.

So actually not the same at all boyo. 

Hush child, I'm having an adult discussion with @thegeneralabout evidence.  Maybe you can learn something.  Boyo.

[Dizkneelande 1,093]

1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

@Dizkneelande has recordings of Biden and Ukrainian officials. 

Suck it

https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-media-social-media-joe-biden-russia-292da15771d83932249b32873774f8ae

[Raven Fan 362]

3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Hush child, I'm having an adult discussion with @thegeneralabout evidence.  Maybe you can learn something.  Boyo.

Sorry you're not man enough to engage in a conversation.

I have "evidence" of this according to you...

LOL

Owned you bigly boyo.

[thegeneral 3,099]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

It's certainly evidence.  Whether it is proof is for the "courts" to decide.

I think the implications from the prosecution side are clear:  Shokin was investigating Burisma, Biden said he had to go, and he held up the $1B until it happened.  In the call Biden said regarding Shokin's replacement, "“It’s going to be critical for him to work quickly to repair the damage that Shokin did."

I would assert an Occam's Razor claim to what Biden thought "critical" to repair.  What do you think it meant?

I think this is a good summary

 

[thegeneral 3,099]

9 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Suck it

https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-media-social-media-joe-biden-russia-292da15771d83932249b32873774f8ae

Did you read this article?