Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
wiffleball

OJ has Cancer

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Did he ever find the killer? 😬

Every time he looks in the mirror, so yes. He would probably say that and add "IF I did it" and then he'd smirk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one lives forever, as he knows all too well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OJ was found innocent in a court of law just like Kyle Rittenhouse. It is obvious people only respect our judiciary system when it brings the verdict they want.

celebrating the fact that somebody has cancer has a lot of bad karma with it. Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Baker Boy said:

OJ was found innocent in a court of law just like Kyle Rittenhouse. It is obvious people only respect our judiciary system when it brings the verdict they want.

celebrating the fact that somebody has cancer has a lot of bad karma with it. Good luck.

Poor comparison.  Shows lack of knowledge and comprehension about the cases. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hear that wandering around the woods in Chernobyl eating raw rabbits does wonders for cancer survivors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, joneo said:

Poor comparison.  Shows lack of knowledge and comprehension about the cases. 

Innocent until proven guilty, both were proven innocent, both were attacked by the public as being guilty. The difference is that they were attacked by different political sides for different reasons.

Americans are no longer innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the American public. This is what Nancy Pelosi the speaker of the house had to say about it.
 

No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence." Nancy Pelosi 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

Innocent until proven guilty, both were proven innocent, both were attacked by the public as being guilty. The difference is that they were attacked by different political sides for different reasons.

Americans are no longer innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the American public. This is what Nancy Pelosi the speaker of the house had to say about it.
 

No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence." Nancy Pelosi 

 

The MSM does suck concerning this. They opinionize their reporting with spin and outright lies. However, political motives were only involved in the Rittenhouse case. The left clearly attacked him and the 2nd Amendment on a daily basis. OJ was not based on political leanings. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Baker Boy said:

Innocent until proven guilty, both were proven innocent, both were attacked by the public as being guilty. The difference is that they were attacked by different political sides for different reasons.

Americans are no longer innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the American public. This is what Nancy Pelosi the speaker of the house had to say about it.
 

No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence." Nancy Pelosi 

 

Being Not Guilty does not mean proven innocent.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×