wiffleball 4,642 Posted February 10 At least 20 years too late. https://assurance-portal.newsroomlabs.com/article-intro/17623546/?ep=portal&lang=en Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,315 Posted February 10 Did he ever find the killer? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 988 Posted February 10 27 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: Did he ever find the killer? Every time he looks in the mirror, so yes. He would probably say that and add "IF I did it" and then he'd smirk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MLCKAA 395 Posted February 10 No one lives forever, as he knows all too well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,482 Posted February 10 He will join Ruth Ginsburg and George Bush in the lake of fire soon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,220 Posted February 10 When he dies will the media show white people celebrating and black people upset, like they did after the verdict was read but reversed? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,035 Posted February 10 I nominate Fred Goldman to cut it out of him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted February 10 OJ was found innocent in a court of law just like Kyle Rittenhouse. It is obvious people only respect our judiciary system when it brings the verdict they want. celebrating the fact that somebody has cancer has a lot of bad karma with it. Good luck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joneo 529 Posted February 11 10 hours ago, Baker Boy said: OJ was found innocent in a court of law just like Kyle Rittenhouse. It is obvious people only respect our judiciary system when it brings the verdict they want. celebrating the fact that somebody has cancer has a lot of bad karma with it. Good luck. Poor comparison. Shows lack of knowledge and comprehension about the cases. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,560 Posted February 11 I hear that wandering around the woods in Chernobyl eating raw rabbits does wonders for cancer survivors. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted February 11 14 hours ago, joneo said: Poor comparison. Shows lack of knowledge and comprehension about the cases. Innocent until proven guilty, both were proven innocent, both were attacked by the public as being guilty. The difference is that they were attacked by different political sides for different reasons. Americans are no longer innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the American public. This is what Nancy Pelosi the speaker of the house had to say about it. No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence." Nancy Pelosi Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joneo 529 Posted February 11 58 minutes ago, Baker Boy said: Innocent until proven guilty, both were proven innocent, both were attacked by the public as being guilty. The difference is that they were attacked by different political sides for different reasons. Americans are no longer innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the American public. This is what Nancy Pelosi the speaker of the house had to say about it. No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence." Nancy Pelosi The MSM does suck concerning this. They opinionize their reporting with spin and outright lies. However, political motives were only involved in the Rittenhouse case. The left clearly attacked him and the 2nd Amendment on a daily basis. OJ was not based on political leanings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,035 Posted February 11 2 hours ago, Baker Boy said: Innocent until proven guilty, both were proven innocent, both were attacked by the public as being guilty. The difference is that they were attacked by different political sides for different reasons. Americans are no longer innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the American public. This is what Nancy Pelosi the speaker of the house had to say about it. No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence." Nancy Pelosi Being Not Guilty does not mean proven innocent. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
