Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

[zsasz 369]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Just to let you dimwits know if you have t figured it out yet, if the polls are close that means Trump is winning. But don’t worry, the democrats cheat game is strong in all the right places. 

This clown...already setting up the excuses "It WaSZ StOlEn!!!  ThErEs No Way He ShoUlD Have Lost!!!"

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

Reminds me of when libtards were sky screaming when Trump said he was spied on by Obama’s DOJ.  He was right. 

[TrailGuy 554]

44 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

And this comes after Trump made a joke about Harris giving blowjobs, which is sure to endear him further to women. 

I’m sure this sort of stuff will please some of the folks here who spend a lot of time engaged in similar rhetoric. But it’s only going to weaken Trump and Vance further in the polls. 

They cheer trump calling Kamala a whoar, and they also cheer that Trump is a rapist on his third wife, 25 years younger, cheated on all of them, flew on Epstein's plane, talked about walking in on nude teens, having sex with kids including his own daughter, sex with pron stars, grab em by the p.

Not a winning strategy.

[zsasz 369]

6 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

They cheer trump calling Kamala a whoar, and they also cheer that Trump is a rapist on his third wife, 25 years younger, cheated on all of them, flew on Epstein's plane, talked about walking in on nude teens, having sex with kids including his own daughter, sex with pron stars, grab em by the p.

Not a winning strategy.

Cucks fall in line behind the man they feel to be superior.  

[TBayXXXVII 2,545]

15 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Yeah I don’t really know and don’t really see the point you are making. I’m sure someone somewhere has said this if you say so. 

It is very unusual for your former VP to not support you, former President’s from your party, like 3/4 of your previous staff, etc. wouldn’t you say?

Trump never wanted Pence in the first place, the GOP kinda forced Pence on him.  I don't think the two ever liked each other at all... just like Biden and Harris.  I'm pretty confident both hated each other too.  She literally called him a racist on national tv in hopes to be elected instead of him... and smear him.  She did it on purpose.  Do you do that to someone you like?  Would you forgive someone who did that to you on purpose?  The answer to both of those questions, are "No".

Trump wasn't a lifelong politician, he doesn't have a pool of people that are government savvy like the rest of the cesspool that resides in DC.  The majority of his staff was people that he chose, from a pool of people who were put forward to him by members of the Republican party.  I wouldn't expect many of those people to like Trump because I'm guessing that Trump wasn't kowtowing to the rest of his party like Biden and Harris do.  Me, I think I'd rather have a president who is willing to put the people of the country first and the people of his party in the background.  Apparently you want the government to take precedent over the public.  Well, hey, there are countries like Russia and China where that happens.  Why not just go live there Comrade? 

[squistion 2,201]

52 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Trump never wanted Pence in the first place, the GOP kinda forced Pence on him.  I don't think the two ever liked each other at all... just like Biden and Harris.  I'm pretty confident both hated each other too.  She literally called him a racist on national tv in hopes to be elected instead of him... and smear him.  She did it on purpose.  Do you do that to someone you like?  Would you forgive someone who did that to you on purpose?  The answer to both of those questions, are "No".

Trump wasn't a lifelong politician, he doesn't have a pool of people that are government savvy like the rest of the cesspool that resides in DC.  The majority of his staff was people that he chose, from a pool of people who were put forward to him by members of the Republican party.  I wouldn't expect many of those people to like Trump because I'm guessing that Trump wasn't kowtowing to the rest of his party like Biden and Harris do.  Me, I think I'd rather have a president who is willing to put the people of the country first and the people of his party in the background.  Apparently you want the government to take precedent over the public.  Well, hey, there are countries like Russia and China where that happens.  Why not just go live there Comrade? 

 No she didn't "literally" call him a racist. And if Biden thought that she had, he never would have chosen here as VP IMO.

[Mike Honcho 5,281]

1 hour ago, zsasz said:

Nice. Power back to the people.  The greatest period in American history  was when we had a healthy progressive tax rate.  

It's amusing to me that the MAGA crowd doesn't realize the Great America they miss had top rates over 50%

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

Word is the Harris/ Walz interview went great. She came off presidential and on point. Real Tim, Squish and the rest of the cucks agree. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

2 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

It's amusing to me that the MAGA crowd doesn't realize the Great America they miss had top rates over 50%

Hilarious. Delusional cucks think anyone was actually paying that rate.  That’s how they got so rich! 

[MDC 7,427]

6 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

It's amusing to me that the MAGA crowd doesn't realize the Great America they miss had top rates over 50%

Union membership rate of around 30% in the 1960s vs. 10% today. But Trump hates organized labor so MAGAs ignore that.

[thegeneral 3,214]

1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Trump never wanted Pence in the first place, the GOP kinda forced Pence on him.  I don't think the two ever liked each other at all... just like Biden and Harris.  I'm pretty confident both hated each other too.  She literally called him a racist on national tv in hopes to be elected instead of him... and smear him.  She did it on purpose.  Do you do that to someone you like?  Would you forgive someone who did that to you on purpose?  The answer to both of those questions, are "No".

Trump wasn't a lifelong politician, he doesn't have a pool of people that are government savvy like the rest of the cesspool that resides in DC.  The majority of his staff was people that he chose, from a pool of people who were put forward to him by members of the Republican party.  I wouldn't expect many of those people to like Trump because I'm guessing that Trump wasn't kowtowing to the rest of his party like Biden and Harris do.  Me, I think I'd rather have a president who is willing to put the people of the country first and the people of his party in the background.  Apparently you want the government to take precedent over the public.  Well, hey, there are countries like Russia and China where that happens.  Why not just go live there Comrade? 

This is a long way to say…yes it is unusual for so many people in his own party including many who worked with and for him to not support him.

[purdygood 352]

Just now, thegeneral said:

This is a long way to say…yes it is unusual for so many people in his own party including many who worked with and for him to not support him.

Everyone who has ever actually worked with Trump in real life hates him.  Those of us who didn't ever need to meet him to know he was a Ahole never voted for him to begin with.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

There would still be a 30 pct union participation rate if the jobs hadn’t been sent overseas. But never mind that. Trump! P.S. All the construction projects Trump ran in NY and NJ were built by union labor.  Ut why would a guy that has never been in a union know that? Lol. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

Just now, purdygood said:

Everyone who has ever actually worked with Trump in real life hates him.  Those of us who didn't ever need to meet him to know he was a Ahole never voted for him to begin with.

Yeah. Yet somehow they kept on building his buildings for decades.  People like doing work and not getting paid.  

[purdygood 352]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yeah. Yet somehow they kept on building his buildings for decades.  People like doing work and not getting paid.  

Con Men gonna Con.  PT Barnum, "there is a sucker born every minute".   Jay Z "On to the next one".

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

6 minutes ago, purdygood said:

Con Men gonna Con.  PT Barnum, "there is a sucker born every minute".   Jay Z "On to the next one".

Yup. The west side of Manhattan that had all those buildings with his name on them for years got built for free. Those suckers just kept on working and not getting paid. I thank them. 

[MDC 7,427]

Trump’s record on labor is so great that the NEA, SEIU, AFSCME, UFCW, AFL-CIO, UAW, United Steelworkers, American Federation of Teachers, and every other major labor union has endorsed Biden and now Harris.

What do they know though?  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

I remember when all those unions endorsed republicans until Trump came along.  

[squistion 2,201]

48 minutes ago, purdygood said:

Con Men gonna Con.  PT Barnum, "there is a sucker born every minute".   Jay Z "On to the next one".

Plus it wasn't the same people he kept coning for decades. You think anybody would work for him twice after he refused to pay them unless they accept 10 cents on the dollar for the work they had performed?

[MDC 7,427]

I remember when Trump campaigned as a populist working class champion. Turns out he’s just a another anti-labor country club Republican.  

I haven’t been this shocked since the end of the Sixth Sense.  

[purdygood 352]

50 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yup. The west side of Manhattan that had all those buildings with his name on them for years got built for free. Those suckers just kept on working and not getting paid. I thank them. 

You realize he didn't "build them" he just offered up his "brand" for the most part, then didn't pay the actual builders who did the renovation work. He didn't just create buildings out of nowhere. There was already buildings there. Was there a lot of open land on Manhattan back then that he generously built skyscrapers on because he is a genius?

[Hawkeye21 2,399]

Is it even possible to have an election where the losing candidate doesn't blame the loss on cheating?  We live in an era now where everyone puts the blame on someone else.  There is no more accountability.  That use to be a conservative trait but it's fading away fast.

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

3 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Just to let you dimwits know if you have t figured it out yet, if the polls are close that means Trump is winning. But don’t worry, the democrats cheat game is strong in all the right places. 

Whether Trump wins or loses- you will still be a nothing happening dipshit

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

9 minutes ago, purdygood said:

You realize he didn't "build them" he just offered up his "brand" for the most part, then didn't pay the actual builders who did the renovation work. He didn't just create buildings out of nowhere. There was already buildings there. Was there a lot of open land on Manhattan back then that he generously built skyscrapers on because he is a genius?

Yeah, as usual your statement has a kernel of truth in it but the rest is misinformation.  It’s what you people do. 

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

2 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Trump never wanted Pence in the first place, the GOP kinda forced Pence on him.  I don't think the two ever liked each other at all... just like Biden and Harris.  I'm pretty confident both hated each other too.  She literally called him a racist on national tv in hopes to be elected instead of him... and smear him.  She did it on purpose.  Do you do that to someone you like?  Would you forgive someone who did that to you on purpose?  The answer to both of those questions, are "No".

Trump wasn't a lifelong politician, he doesn't have a pool of people that are government savvy like the rest of the cesspool that resides in DC.  The majority of his staff was people that he chose, from a pool of people who were put forward to him by members of the Republican party.  I wouldn't expect many of those people to like Trump because I'm guessing that Trump wasn't kowtowing to the rest of his party like Biden and Harris do.  Me, I think I'd rather have a president who is willing to put the people of the country first and the people of his party in the background.  Apparently you want the government to take precedent over the public.  Well, hey, there are countries like Russia and China where that happens.  Why not just go live there Comrade? 

1.) Pence is a large reason why Trump won the first time around.

2.) Trump brought new trash into the DC cesspool. He didn't drain the swamp, he extended it.

3.) Trump puts himself first. Then, Now, Forever.

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

42 minutes ago, MDC said:

Trump’s record on labor is so great that the NEA, SEIU, AFSCME, UFCW, AFL-CIO, UAW, United Steelworkers, American Federation of Teachers, and every other major labor union has endorsed Biden and now Harris.

What do they know though?  

HT hates unions. He was told to hate them and they are wrecking the country according to his masters. 

[purdygood 352]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yeah, as usual your statement has a kernel of truth in it but the rest is misinformation.  It’s what you people do. 

A kernel of Truth or the actual Truth?  Let me consult Truth Social because that's been a HUGE success.

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

14 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Is it even possible to have an election where the losing candidate doesn't blame the loss on cheating?  We live in an era now where everyone puts the blame on someone else.  There is no more accountability.  That use to be a conservative trait but it's fading away fast.

It certainly seems to be going that way. It will be interesting to see what happens if/when Kamala loses. Will she accept the results and move on or will she declare it was stolen? 

I think we all know what path Trump will take if/when he loses

[Hawkeye21 2,399]

Just now, Sean Mooney said:

It certainly seems to be going that way. It will be interesting to see what happens if/when Kamala loses. Will she accept the results and move on or will she declare it was stolen? 

I think we all know what path Trump will take if/when he loses

I think she will accept it.  I'm not sure about the rest of the party though.

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

Just now, Hawkeye21 said:

I think she will accept it.  I'm not sure about the rest of the party though.

I would hope if the person at the head accepts it that trickles down.....but I could see that latter part not being the case. 

 

Could get potentially ugly considering there is a strong chance the Democrats lose control of everything

[thegeneral 3,214]

12 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

It certainly seems to be going that way. It will be interesting to see what happens if/when Kamala loses. Will she accept the results and move on or will she declare it was stolen? 

I think we all know what path Trump will take if/when he loses

No one is pulling Trump’s act in 2020. 

[The Real timschochet 6,764]

9 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

It certainly seems to be going that way. It will be interesting to see what happens if/when Kamala loses. Will she accept the results and move on or will she declare it was stolen? 

I think we all know what path Trump will take if/when he loses

It’s not even a question. Hillary called Trump to congratulate him the very same night. Al Gore conceded the moment the Supreme Court ruled. Neither of them thought the result was a just one and they said so afterwards but they both conceded. The only guy in American history who refused to concede, who tried to falsify the results, who tried to have his Vice President dispute the outcome, and who encouraged a violent mob to storm the Capitol and disrupt the transfer of power, was Donald Trump. Nobody else in either party has done this. 
(In some state elections certain candidates like Stacy Abrams refused to concede but only for a few days, and they certainly never tried to fix the outcome or encourage violence. There is no “whataboutism” here. There is only Trump.) 

[MDC 7,427]

9 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

It certainly seems to be going that way. It will be interesting to see what happens if/when Kamala loses. Will she accept the results and move on or will she declare it was stolen? 

I think we all know what path Trump will take if/when he loses

It’s not just if he loses. Trump will cry fraud before and after the election even if he wins. Meanwhile Trump and dozens of his supporters in swing states face actual election fraud charges. You can’t make this up.

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

It’s not even a question. Hillary called Trump to congratulate him the very same night. Al Gore conceded the moment the Supreme Court ruled. Neither of them thought the result was a just one and they said so afterwards but they both conceded. The only guy in American history who refused to concede, who tried to falsify the results, who tried to have his Vice President dispute the outcome, and who encouraged a violent mob to storm the Capitol and disrupt the transfer of power, was Donald Trump. Nobody else in either party has done this. 
(In some state elections certain candidates like Stacy Abrams refused to concede but only for a few days, and they certainly never tried to fix the outcome or encourage violence. There is no “whataboutism” here. There is only Trump.) 

Don't forget- they were just taking pictures according to MAGA weirdos

[zsasz 369]

3 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Trump never wanted Pence in the first place, the GOP kinda forced Pence on him.  I don't think the two ever liked each other at all... just like Biden and Harris.  I'm pretty confident both hated each other too.  She literally called him a racist on national tv in hopes to be elected instead of him... and smear him.  She did it on purpose.  Do you do that to someone you like?  Would you forgive someone who did that to you on purpose?  The answer to both of those questions, are "No".

Trump wasn't a lifelong politician, he doesn't have a pool of people that are government savvy like the rest of the cesspool that resides in DC.  The majority of his staff was people that he chose, from a pool of people who were put forward to him by members of the Republican party.  I wouldn't expect many of those people to like Trump because I'm guessing that Trump wasn't kowtowing to the rest of his party like Biden and Harris do.  Me, I think I'd rather have a president who is willing to put the people of the country first and the people of his party in the background.  Apparently you want the government to take precedent over the public.  Well, hey, there are countries like Russia and China where that happens.  Why not just go live there Comrade? 

LMAO!...the Alpha of Alphas getting bullied by Mitch McConell and Liz Cheney.  

[zsasz 369]

40 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Is it even possible to have an election where the losing candidate doesn't blame the loss on cheating?  We live in an era now where everyone puts the blame on someone else.  There is no more accountability.  That use to be a conservative trait but it's fading away fast.

Not for the RNC...Republicans running for local Dogcatchers are crying that their elections are fixed.  

 

[zsasz 369]

1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yup. The west side of Manhattan that had all those buildings with his name on them for years got built for free. Those suckers just kept on working and not getting paid. I thank them. 

Bro.....no matter how much you simp for Trump......he ain't going to sleep with you. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

Just now, zsasz said:

Bro.....no matter how much you simp for Trump......he ain't going to sleep with you. 

Anyone know who this puzzy is? Or used to be? 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,433]

I’ve only been a dues paying member in six unions. So far. 

[Beaker15 241]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Anyone know who this puzzy is? Or used to be? 

Some low testosterone beta cuck