Harrison Butker, geek club hero

[BeachGuy23 642]

7 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

 You can search my posts for reasons why trans ideology is concerning.  There’s no reason to type it out again, when you will simply respond with the leftist catchphrase, “its happening, but it’s rare”.

You think it's not rare?  Do you think trannies and drag queens are some kind of threat despite the fact that you admit they're not trying to "groom" anyone into their lifestyle.

To me the difference is that if people who think like Butker get into power they will absolutely try to legislate rules that impact the country that adhere to their conservative christian beliefs.  See the abortion debacle in this country for just a taste.  This is what to me is a real danger to our country, folks like Butker trying to turn back the clock and turning the country into something that more resembles the 1950's.

[Patented Phil 1,469]

24 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

LOL you're right, my bad.

Ok you said Obama created the environment we're in today.  You didn't really give any specific examples and I'm curious how you think Obama created the divide we have today.

Henry Louis Gates, Trayvon Martin, Big Mike (not his wife), BLM….  Obama was wrong factually and morally on just about every major racial controversy.  That’s why racial relations deteriorated so badly during his Presidency.  By the time he left office, race relations were worse than they were right after the LA riots.

[TimHauck 2,856]

6 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

That's not what people are worried about BOYO. My Kids don't need to know about your sexuality, beliefs or Pride Flags. You're there to teach my Kids math, not to teach your personal queer philosophy. 

What are they worried about?

[BeachGuy23 642]

1 minute ago, Patented Phil said:

Henry Louis Gates, Trayvon Martin, Big Mike (not his wife), BLM….  Obama was wrong factually and morally on every major racial controversy.  That’s why racial relations deteriorated so badly during his presidency by the time he left office race relations or worse than right after the LA riots.

Ok, thanks.

I don't really recall any of those having a big impact on me or our country.  And was BLM a thing during Obama's term?

As for HLG, this comment is what helped deteriorate race relations?  It seems extremely moderate to me.  Are people really that triggered because Obama said that minorities are disproportionally stopped?  Is that even in doubt?  You can say it's because of their past actions but it doesn't change the fact.  Did Obama say anything else that I'm missing?

On July 22, President Barack Obama said about the incident, "I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that. But I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home, and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately."

[Maximum Overkill 1,987]

Just now, TimHauck said:

What are they worried about?

Nobody is worried BOYO. But why do Pedocrat teachers feel the need for 9 year olds to know they're sexuality? Keep your sexuality out of the classroom, it doesn't belong there. 

How is that crazy? 

 

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Nobody is worried BOYO. But why do Pedocrat teachers feel the need for 9 year olds to know they're sexuality? Keep your sexuality out of the classroom, it doesn't belong there. 

How is that crazy? 

 

The amount of teachers that talk about sex to 9 year olds beyond what's been taught for years is miniscule.  These deviants should be identified and removed.

Why do you act like it's some huge issue in our country?  It's not.

Yet you cry like it's something that has a material impact on american life.  It does not.  You've  just got some weird fascination and fetish about all topics deviant sex.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,407]

So many weak men. It’s a big problem 

[TimHauck 2,856]

6 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Nobody is worried BOYO. But why do Pedocrat teachers feel the need for 9 year olds to know they're sexuality? Keep your sexuality out of the classroom, it doesn't belong there. 

How is that crazy? 

 

That’s not crazy.  I’d agree to keep it out of schools.  But if they want to have tranny dance shows at restaurants that people can choose to go to or not, have at it.

Good to know you’re not worried about the made up problem of “tranny terrorism” though

[jonmx 2,429]

7 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

The amount of teachers that talk about sex to 9 year olds beyond what's been taught for years is miniscule.  These deviants should be identified and removed.

Why do you act like it's some huge issue in our country?  It's not.

Yet you cry like it's something that has a material impact on american life.  It does not.  You've  just got some weird fascination and fetish about all topics deviant sex.

It is literally part of the ciriculum in many leftist states.  States like California and New Jersey have strong laws which protect gender propaganda at all levels of education, including kindergarten and makes it illegal for the schools to allow parents to opt out.  

[Patented Phil 1,469]

20 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Ok, thanks.

I don't really recall any of those having a big impact on me or our country.  And was BLM a thing during Obama's term?

As for HLG, this comment is what helped deteriorate race relations?  It seems extremely moderate to me.  Are people really that triggered because Obama said that minorities are disproportionally stopped?  Is that even in doubt?  You can say it's because of their past actions but it doesn't change the fact.  Did Obama say anything else that I'm missing?

On July 22, President Barack Obama said about the incident, "I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that. But I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home, and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately."

No.  It’s everything else he said and implied, which was complete bullshitt.  Obama cast the cop as the bad guy, when he was just trying to do his job - a job that was aggravated by an angry black man with a chip on his shoulder.

[TimHauck 2,856]

2 minutes ago, jonmx said:

It is literally part of the ciriculum in many leftist states.  States like California and New Jersey have strong laws which protect gender propaganda at all levels of education, including kindergarten and makes it illegal for the schools to allow parents to opt out.  

Link to it being part of the curriculum for 9 year olds?

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

No.  It’s everything else he said and implied, which was complete bullshitt, and set the cop u as the bad guy when he was just trying to do his job - a job that was aggravated by an angry black man with a chip on his shoulder.

You mean the guy trying to get into his own home?  Who was arrested even after providing proof to the officer that it was his house?

Wouldn't you be angry in that situation?

[Maximum Overkill 1,987]

13 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

 I’d agree to keep it out of schools.

Then why the hell are you arguing with me over it? We agree

Leave your sexuality at home, especially when teaching children. 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

2 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

You mean the guy trying to get into his own home?  Who was arrested even after providing proof to the officer that it was his house?

Wouldn't you be angry in that situation?

Read the case boyo.  Gates was the one in the wrong, as was Obama.  The fact you and most Liberals in this country are still unaware of this is evidence of the damage Obama did.

[BeachGuy23 642]

3 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

Read the case boyo.  Gates was the one in the wrong, as was Obama.  The fact you and most Liberals in this country are still unaware of this is evidence of the damage Obama did.

Was he trying to get into his house?

Did he show the cops proof that it was his house.

Yes or no?

[TimHauck 2,856]

7 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Then why the hell are you arguing with me over it? We agree

Leave your sexuality at home, especially when teaching children. 

I’m not.  But again, glad you don’t think there is a problem with “tranny terrorism”

[Maximum Overkill 1,987]

5 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

You mean the guy trying to get into his own home?  Who was arrested even after providing proof to the officer that it was his house?

Wouldn't you be angry in that situation?

Is that like when Pelosi's husband and his ghey lover had a lover's quarrel? Where one queer was chasing the other Pedocrat queer with a hammer. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, Maximum Overkill said:

Is that like when Pelosi's husband and his ghey lover had a lover's quarrel? Where one queer was chasing the other Pedocrat queer with a hammer. 

That's a perfect comparison of how cultist live in a world of alternative facts.  And simply believe what their alt right masters force feed them.

Thanks boyo.

[Maximum Overkill 1,987]

Just now, TimHauck said:

glad you don’t think there is a problem with “tranny terrorism”

Only when there's a problem  

Keep worrying about what a kicker says 

[Cdub100 3,903]

Finally read his speech. It's a weird flex the left is pulling to sh1t all over moms.

[TimHauck 2,856]

2 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

Finally read his speech. It's a weird flex the left is pulling to sh1t all over moms.

Being proud of being a mom isn’t the issue. It’s the emphasis on being a “homemaker.” You can be a mom without needing to be a homemaker (AKA stay at home mom)

[Maximum Overkill 1,987]

5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

It’s the emphasis on being a “homemaker.” You can be a mom without needing to be a homemaker (AKA stay at home mom)

That's not for you to decide BOYO. 

Some Women want to be homemakers. And why have someone else raise your kids if you don't need to? Most kids are on their own and neglected all summer because Mommy is at her "career". 

You're not a Man if you can't support your ENTIRE family. That's not wrong, that's fact. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

4 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

That's not for you to decide BOYO. 

Some Women want to be homemakers. And why have someone else raise your kids if you don't need to? Most kids are on their own and neglected all summer because Mommy is at her "career". 

You're not a Man if you can't support your ENTIRE family. That's not wrong, that's fact. 

Let's see, 25% of moms are SAHMs, so 75% of dads aren't men.

Interesting concept boyo.

https://qz.com/the-number-of-stay-at-home-mothers-rose-dramatically-in-1850440544

[TimHauck 2,856]

7 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

That's not for you to decide BOYO. 

Some Women want to be homemakers. And why have someone else raise your kids if you don't need to? Most kids are on their own and neglected all summer because Mommy is at her "career". 

You're not a Man if you can't support your ENTIRE family. That's not wrong, that's fact. 

I’m not deciding it.  But it sounds like you and Harrison Butker are

[jerryskids 6,790]

I believe that young children at drag events (shows, story hours) has a grooming effect.

We can debate the extent to which that is the intention (although the intention is at minimum to normalize the behavior), but if you don't think all of the bright clothes, makeup, hair, lights, and bombastic behavior can have an impression on young children, you know zero about young children.

And before someone goes down the red herring about whether or not you can turn a kid gay, not all drag queens are gay.  For many it is a lifestyle in and of itself.

[nobody 2,667]

3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I believe that young children at drag events (shows, story hours) has a grooming effect.

We can debate the extent to which that is the intention (although the intention is at minimum to normalize the behavior), but if you don't think all of the bright clothes, makeup, hair, lights, and bombastic behavior can have an impression on young children, you know zero about young children.

And before someone goes down the red herring about whether or not you can turn a kid gay, not all drag queens are gay.  For many it is a lifestyle in and of itself.

Preach.  Kids don't need to be exposed to those behaviors.  I doubt as many people would care if they just kept kids out of it.

[Sean Mooney 1,983]

3 hours ago, Patented Phil said:

How’s today’s vibrant, progressive society working out?  You like what you see?  Everyone at each other’s throats?

Diversity is our strength!

I think that's a function of people pushing back because they want people to live they way they want them to and not the other way around always

[Maximum Overkill 1,987]

18 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I believe that young children at drag events (shows, story hours) has a grooming effect.

We can debate the extent to which that is the intention (although the intention is at minimum to normalize the behavior), but if you don't think all of the bright clothes, makeup, hair, lights, and bombastic behavior can have an impression on young children, you know zero about young children.

And before someone goes down the red herring about whether or not you can turn a kid gay, not all drag queens are gay.  For many it is a lifestyle in and of itself.

Tim supports exposing Kids to perverted Trannys dancing around kids  half naked. 

Not grooming in his views apparently. 

[jerryskids 6,790]

1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Tim supports exposing Kids to perverted Trannys dancing around kids  half naked. 

Not grooming in his views apparently. 

I'm waiting for @Sean Mooneyto come tell me it doesn't happen often and I hate trans people.   

[Maximum Overkill 1,987]

Just now, jerryskids said:

I'm waiting for @Sean Mooneyto come tell me it doesn't happen often and I hate trans people.   

Just wait, it's coming 

[GutterBoy 2,899]

While I agree that young kids shouldn't be at adult themed drag events, I still have a problem with the govt regulating it.

We already have laws that protect children against indecency.  If we want the govt to regulate certain behaviors it sets a bad precedent.  Should be make it illegal for kids to attend certain churches, gun shows, protests?

[Maximum Overkill 1,987]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

I’m not deciding it.  But it sounds like you and Harrison Butker are

He ain't all wrong 

[TimHauck 2,856]

1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

He ain't all wrong 

Ok hypocrite

[Maximum Overkill 1,987]

4 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

young kids shouldn't be at adult themed drag events, I still have a problem with the govt regulating it.

WTF?? Let's just let Pedos run wild! Why would you have ANY problem with it? There's no reason why a half naked Tranny should be reading to kids, NONE! 

You're sick GUTTERBOY.

[GutterBoy 2,899]

1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

WTF?? Let's just let Pedos run wild! Why would you have ANY problem with it? There's no reason why a half naked Tranny should be reading to kids, NONE! 

You're sick GUTTERBOY.

I agree.  Same with a half naked priest reading the Bible to a kid

[Maximum Overkill 1,987]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

That’s not crazy.  I’d agree to keep it out of schools.  But if they want to have tranny dance shows at restaurants that people can choose to go to or not, have at it.

Good to know you’re not worried about the made up problem of “tranny terrorism” though

Insane 

 

[Maximum Overkill 1,987]

2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

I agree.  Same with a half naked priest reading the Bible to a kid

Yes, and I wouldn't let my Kids anywhere near a Priest. A perv is a perv is a perv. 

Why do you support Trannies reading to little Kids? And why do Trannies want to be around kids so bad? 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,407]

52 minutes ago, nobody said:

Preach.  Kids don't need to be exposed to those behaviors.  I doubt as many people would care if they just kept kids out of it.

Nobody did care when they did. Rupaul has been around for a while with television shows and endorsements. No one called for  any boycotts of those products. Mic drop. 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

2 hours ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Was he trying to get into his house?

Did he show the cops proof that it was his house.

Yes or no?

Yes.  He was also having trouble getting in and jimmying the doorknob, which created the appearance of someone breaking in.  Someone actually reported that to the cops which is why they were called.  Instead of explaining this to the cop nicely, Gates was a dik and played the victim race card.  All this nuance was lost because people (Obama included) simply went with the Liberal narrative and didn’t look at the actual facts.  Cops bad, black people victims.  Obama reinforced that and it led to disastrous results with blacks, police, and race relations in general.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,407]

The cop made a mistake by issuing him a disorderly conduct summons. You can’t be disorderly in your own home. He should have arrested him for obstruction of governmental administration or whatever like crime they have up there and taken him to the station house. Play with me and I’ll show you the penal law.  A sharp cop has more tricks than Houdini.  Gates is a bich and should have been slapped across his face like a rude child.