WHO HERE STILL SUPPORTS A VIOLENT LIBERAL INSURRECTION? 🌈🦄

[Maximum Overkill 1,998]

 

 

[IndyColtsFan 325]

At least they didn't poop on the floor, adding lack of potty training to their lack of intelligence, common sense and restraint.

[Maximum Overkill 1,998]

3 minutes ago, IndyColtsFan said:

At least they didn't poop on the floor, adding lack of potty training to their lack of intelligence, common sense and restraint.

Or have ANAL BUTTTSEX on the House Floor 

[IndyColtsFan 325]

1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Or have ANAL BUTTTSEX on the House Floor 

Isn't this a bit redundant?

What other kind of buttsex is there besides anal?

That's like saying bagina pussysex.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,111]

Where is the outrage?  Where are our resident liberals when you need them?

[IndyColtsFan 325]

11 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Where is the outrage?  Where are our resident liberals when you need them?

The only outrage will be from far righties who are outraged that there isn't more outrage over a nothingburger.

[thegeneral 3,218]

23 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Or have ANAL BUTTTSEX on the House Floor 

We know who would be watching those vids

[jerryskids 6,800]

7 minutes ago, IndyColtsFan said:

The only outrage will be from far righties who are outraged that there isn't more outrage over a nothingburger.

'Sup Rusty?! Did your Pimpadeaux alias get banned, or are you just in shock from the realization of 4 more Trump years?

 

[Maximum Overkill 1,998]

16 minutes ago, IndyColtsFan said:

The only outrage will be from far righties who are outraged that there isn't more outrage over a nothingburger.

Outrage because Liberals staged an Insurrection? Like the 6th? 

[Voltaire 5,317]

2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

'Sup Rusty?! Did your Pimpadeaux alias get banned, or are you just in shock from the realization of 4 more Trump years?

 

 Fock.

It's a tough time for the left, they're in total meltdown. He probably said something stupid and had this happen to him.

[Voltaire 5,317]

6 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Outrage because our President can't finish a sentence??? 

BUT TRUMP, BUT TRUMP ...... wait for it.  

Not true.

Look! Look! Did you see that?

He can. He did. He looked great. He finished all his sentences. Lemming Democrats should be relieved that Biden is cognitively together, leave him alone, rally behind him, and move on.

[TimHauck 2,879]

No, I would not say pulling posters off a wall is an “insurrection,” but a destruction of property charge or something seems fair.

Surely there should be video of the perpetrators?

[Maximum Overkill 1,998]

The real insurrection is what Pedocrats are doing to kids. Why do Pedocrats LOVE sexualizing Children?

 

 

 

[Maximum Overkill 1,998]

 

 

 

[Baker Boy 1,699]

7 hours ago, TimHauck said:

No, I would not say pulling posters off a wall is an “insurrection,” but a destruction of property charge or something seems fair.

Surely there should be video of the perpetrators?

They were not posters they were pictures of hostages held in Gaza.

[TimHauck 2,879]

2 hours ago, Baker Boy said:

They were not posters they were pictures of hostages held in Gaza.

Oh sorry didn’t realize that was much different than a poster.  Does that qualify it as an insurrection?

[jerryskids 6,800]

3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Oh sorry didn’t realize that was much different than a poster.  Does that qualify it as an insurrection?

Does walking around the Capitol taking selfies qualify as an insurrection?

[TimHauck 2,879]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Does walking around the Capitol taking selfies qualify as an insurrection?

If someone did nothing but that, no I would not call that an insurrection

[IndyColtsFan 325]

On 7/5/2024 at 7:48 PM, jerryskids said:

'Sup Rusty?! Did your Pimpadeaux alias get banned, or are you just in shock from the realization of 4 more Trump years?

 

Nope.

Don't celebrate the Trump thing too early, though. 

Lot of time between now and November.

 

 

[IndyColtsFan 325]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Does walking around the Capitol taking selfies qualify as an insurrection?

No, but assaulting police to gain entry into The Capitol with the intent of stopping a part of the election process and killing the vice president and speaker of the House gets you in the insurrection discussion.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,111]

Just now, IndyColtsFan said:

No, but assaulting police to gain entry into The Capitol with the intent of stopping a part of the election process and killing the vice president and speaker of the House gets you in the insurrection discussion.

Okay, cool. Let us know when that happens.  so we can consider 1/6  a selfie fest.  Thanks for confirming. 

[TimHauck 2,879]

10 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Okay, cool. Let us know when that happens.  so we can consider 1/6  a selfie fest.  Thanks for confirming. 

The “killing the vice president and speaker of the house” part is speculation, but you acknowledge that the first part happened, correct?

In the case of the OP we don’t even know if anyone broke in.  Could’ve been another member of Congress, maybe even an inside job like that psycho pastor that probably burned his own bibles.

[seafoam1 3,035]

7 hours ago, TimHauck said:

The “killing the vice president and speaker of the house” part is speculation, but you acknowledge that the first part happened, correct?

In the case of the OP we don’t even know if anyone broke in.  Could’ve been another member of Congress, maybe even an inside job like that psycho pastor that probably burned his own bibles.

Keep making excuses libtard. You sound more and more lile biden every day. 

[IndyColtsFan 325]

37 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Okay, cool. Let us know when that happens.  so we can consider 1/6  a selfie fest.  Thanks for confirming. 

Very Antifa of you to deny otherwise.

 

[weepaws 3,197]

3 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

Keep making excuses libtard. Yoi sound more and more lile biden every day. 

You, Like.  HTH.  Stop with the alcohol when posting.  Amen. 

God bless. 

[jerryskids 6,800]

13 hours ago, IndyColtsFan said:

Nope.

Don't celebrate the Trump thing too early, though. 

Lot of time between now and November.

 

 

Oh, I know.  The gaslighting has already begun:  "It was just an episode!  He was tired, he had only rested for 6 days!  Look how good he looked in the carefully edited and curated Snuffalupagus interview!"

Once they decide they are sticking with Biden, the gaslighting will be at 11.  

Quote

You didn't hear it
You didn't see it
You won't say nothing to no-one
Never in your life
You never heard it
Oh, how absurd it all seems
Without any proof
You didn't hear it
You didn't see it
You never heard it, not a word of it
You won't say nothing to no-one
Never tell a soul
What you know is the Truth

 

[jerryskids 6,800]

14 hours ago, IndyColtsFan said:

No, but assaulting police to gain entry into The Capitol with the intent of stopping a part of the election process and killing the vice president and speaker of the House gets you in the insurrection discussion.

People who assaulted police should be prosecuted; I'm confident you are consistent with that belief for other, mostly peaceful protests.   

The people who got in were like "holy ish, we actually got in!"  Then for the most part they walked around, took selfies, then left.  Did they attempt to hold the Capitol, using their flag poles and fire extinguishers that they brought to take over the US?

Those who vandalized, like our Hamas terrorist loving, hostage hating comrade above, should also be prosecuted.  I'm confident you are consistent with that belief for other, mostly peaceful protests.  Like all of those pro-terrorist protesters who vandalize statues, take over college buildings, etc.  Wait, none of those were charged.

Anyway, you Lefties have turned the word "insurrection" into meaning "a protest that got out of hand.  But it was the other side, the bad guys, so that's OK!"

[TimHauck 2,879]

23 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

People who assaulted police should be prosecuted; I'm confident you are consistent with that belief for other, mostly peaceful protests.   

The people who got in were like "holy ish, we actually got in!"  Then for the most part they walked around, took selfies, then left.  Did they attempt to hold the Capitol, using their flag poles and fire extinguishers that they brought to take over the US?

Those who vandalized, like our Hamas terrorist loving, hostage hating comrade above, should also be prosecuted.  I'm confident you are consistent with that belief for other, mostly peaceful protests.  Like all of those pro-terrorist protesters who vandalize statues, take over college buildings, etc.  Wait, none of those were charged.

Anyway, you Lefties have turned the word "insurrection" into meaning "a protest that got out of hand.  But it was the other side, the bad guys, so that's OK!"

I said I supported the prosecution (just not for insurrection) of those who caused the damage in the picture from the OP.  Yet you still quoted me to bring up the whataboutism of people taking selfies on 1/6.  Was anyone charged with insurrection that did nothing but take selfies then leave?

[jerryskids 6,800]

7 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

The post of mine that you quoted said I supported the prosecution (just not for insurrection) of those who caused the damage in the picture from the OP.  Yet you still brought up the whataboutism of people taking selfies on 1/6.  Was anyone charged with insurrection that did nothing but take selfies then leave?

I feel like we are entering semanticville with you again...

All I said to you was:

Quote

Does walking around the Capitol taking selfies qualify as an insurrection?

which is not what you just said.

Carry on.   

[BeachGuy23 642]

6 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I feel like we are entering semanticville with you again...

All I said to you was:

which is not what you just said.

Carry on.   

Why ask that question?

Do you think that’s the only thing/most of what happened Jan 6th?   And if not why bring it up?

[TimHauck 2,879]

26 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I feel like we are entering semanticville with you again...

All I said to you was:

which is not what you just said.

Carry on.   

And I answered no to your question, if that’s all they did.  They should probably be charged with trespassing though.

I just thought it was odd that you replied to Rusty saying “those who vandalized should be prosecuted” and that you were confident he would agree, considering:

1) He also answered no to your question

2) I had previously said the vandals from the OP should be prosecuted, yet it was a post of mine (sorry, initially thought it was the same one but it was a different one) that apparently inspired you to ask if taking selfies on 1/6 was insurrection

[lickin_starfish 1,938]

If the police hold the doors open for someone to enter, is it still trespassing?

[TimHauck 2,879]

No Pro-Palestinian protesters were charged!!

 

oh, wait 

https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia/news/6-pe

 

[BeachGuy23 642]

15 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

If the police hold the doors open for someone to enter, is it still trespassing?

If a rabid horde of animals break through windows and doors so cops open the doors to avoid tons of people getting hurt, is that not trespassing?

LMFAO at cultist and the peaceful selfiefest…

SMH

[jerryskids 6,800]

17 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

No Pro-Palestinian protesters were charged!!

 

oh, wait 

https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia/news/6-pe

 

The page cannot be found.

But I'm confident you found some that did something so egregious that there was no choice but to charge them.

It's the same!

[TimHauck 2,879]

41 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

The page cannot be found.

But I'm confident you found some that did something so egregious that there was no choice but to charge them.

It's the same!

Sorry here is full link (https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia/news/6-people-arrested-pro-palestinian-protest-center-city-on-fourth-of-july/)

One person assaulted an officer but a lot of the other allegations don’t sound much different from other “out of hand protests.”

Also, it does look like some people are being prosecuted at Columbia as well.  But part of the reason some of the folks had charges dropped is due to lack of evidence: https://apnews.com/article/columbia-university-protest-israel-gaza-palestine-48f05df1a9aef73ff2c23355f5e6cc9d

 

To confirm, you would not call the images in the tweet from the OP an insurrection, correct?

[TimHauck 2,879]

Hopefully Rep Schneider releases the video footage

[jerryskids 6,800]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Sorry here is full link (https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia/news/6-people-arrested-pro-palestinian-protest-center-city-on-fourth-of-july/)

One person assaulted an officer but a lot of the other allegations don’t sound much different from other “out of hand protests.”

Also, it does look like some people are being prosecuted at Columbia as well.  But part of the reason some of the folks had charges dropped is due to lack of evidence: https://apnews.com/article/columbia-university-protest-israel-gaza-palestine-48f05df1a9aef73ff2c23355f5e6cc9d

 

To confirm, you would not call the images in the tweet from the OP an insurrection, correct?

No, I don't think the OP is an insurrection.  But I don't think 1/6 was an insurrection, that was my point, and I believe the point of the title of this thread.

Quote

What is the difference between seditious conspiracy and insurrection?

 

Is sedition the same thing as insurrection? While they clearly overlap, “sedition” centers more on plotting and incitement, whereas “insurrection” is generally understood to mean the actual violent acts of an uprising aimed at overthrowing the government.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/25/us/what-is-seditious-conspiracy-insurrection-treason.html#:~:text=Is sedition the same thing,aimed at overthrowing the government.

Digging more into seditious conspiracy, from the US Code:

Quote

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/238

For the bolded, a small number of people appear to have plotted to delay the certification -- they should and are being investigated.  Same for those who assaulted police.  The majority of folks in there though just followed the mob mentality, much like most of the mobsters during the Summer of Love were following the lead of Antifa at scores of events.

I have tried to make the case here in the past that the virtual lack of enforcement during the Summer of Love taught everyone that such behavior is not only acceptable, but socially desired.  The response inevitably was "but... but... this was an INSURRECTION$#@!"

It wasn't an insurrection.  Nobody tried to take over the United States with flag poles and fake guillotines.  

[TimHauck 2,879]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

No, I don't think the OP is an insurrection.  But I don't think 1/6 was an insurrection, that was my point, and I believe the point of the title of this thread.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/25/us/what-is-seditious-conspiracy-insurrection-treason.html#:~:text=Is sedition the same thing,aimed at overthrowing the government.

Digging more into seditious conspiracy, from the US Code:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/238

For the bolded, a small number of people appear to have plotted to delay the certification -- they should and are being investigated.  Same for those who assaulted police.  The majority of folks in there though just followed the mob mentality, much like most of the mobsters during the Summer of Love were following the lead of Antifa at scores of events.

I have tried to make the case here in the past that the virtual lack of enforcement during the Summer of Love taught everyone that such behavior is not only acceptable, but socially desired.  The response inevitably was "but... but... this was an INSURRECTION$#@!"

It wasn't an insurrection.  Nobody tried to take over the United States with flag poles and fake guillotines.  

Oh ok, so you’ve moved the goalposts from

”it wasn’t insurrection if someone just took selfies on 1/6”

to

”1/6 was mostly just people taking selfies so there was no insurrection.”

I see you didn’t include the US code for insurrection:

2383. Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

 

Once people (more than a “small number”) started breaking down barriers, assaulting police officers which you acknowledge, and doing things like breaking windows or climbing through broken windows in order to get in, I don’t see the problem with calling that an insurrection.  To compare pulling some papers off a wall (especially since Rep Schneider says nothing about folks breaking into the building) to 1/6 is something I’d expect from Tranny Overkill, but not you.

The difference between 1/6 and the “summer of love” to me was the fact that 1/6 occurred at the nation’s capital and of course was specifically planned around protesting the transfer of the President.  Yes there was some damage to government buildings during the summer of love, but for one they weren’t really protesting “the government,” and I’d bet that much of the damage done wasn’t done by people that were protesting at all but rather criminals just capitalizing on an opportunity to steal and cause destruction.

[Maximum Overkill 1,998]

8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Oh ok, so you’ve moved the goalposts from

”it wasn’t insurrection if someone just took selfies on 1/6”

to

”1/6 was mostly just people taking selfies so there was no insurrection.”

I see you didn’t include the US code for insurrection:

2383. Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

 

Once people (more than a “small number”) started breaking down barriers, assaulting police officers which you acknowledge, and doing things like breaking windows or climbing through broken windows in order to get in, I don’t see the problem with calling that an insurrection.  To compare pulling some papers off a wall (especially since Rep Schneider says nothing about folks breaking into the building) to 1/6 is something I’d expect from Tranny Overkill, but not you.

The difference between 1/6 and the “summer of love” to me was the fact that 1/6 occurred at the nation’s capital and of course was specifically planned around protesting the transfer of the President.  Yes there was some damage to government buildings during the summer of love, but for one they weren’t really protesting “the government,” and I’d bet that much of the damage done wasn’t done by people that were protesting at all but rather criminals just capitalizing on an opportunity to steal and cause destruction.

Anyone remember when Liberals took over a street in Portland, then took over the police station? Hypocrites